<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; law</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/law</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'law'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>New Zealand Environment Court Says No to Huge Wind Farm</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/newz.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/newz.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3915" /></a><br />
<strong>What would have been the Southern Hemisphere&#8217;s largest wind farm, a $2 billion NZD ($1.4 billion USD) and 630 MW wind farm in New Zealand, is not happening because New Zealand&#8217;s Environment Court says that it would ruin the surrounding landscape.</strong></p>
<p>This project would have powered <strong>over a million homes</strong> and made a huge dent in New Zealand&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions. It is not happening now because of a group of NIMBY activists and the Environment Court&#8217;s ruling.</p>
<p>This is a huge blow, in itself, to <strong>renewable and wind energy proponents</strong>, but it also brings concerns for future wind energy projects.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Show Your Support for Water Recycling in SF</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/21/show-your-support-for-water-recycling-in-sf/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/21/show-your-support-for-water-recycling-in-sf/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhonda Winter</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[localization]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/21/show-your-support-for-water-recycling-in-sf/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: left"><strong>If you are going to be anywhere near San Francisco City Hall this afternoon, please consider going to the fourth floor to voice your support for <a title="greywater" href="http://greywateraction.org/greywater-recycling" target="_self">greywater</a> recycling. </strong>There will be a meeting at the <a title="Building Inspection" href="http://www.sfdbi.org/" target="_self">Building Inspection</a> Commission today to vote on a SF city amendment which is attempting to make it more complicated for city residents to recycle and <a title="conserve their own water" href="http://greywateraction.org/content/water-justice" target="_self">conserve our own water</a>.</h3>
<h3 style="text-align: center"><strong>Time:  Wed, Oct 21, pm @ 2pm</strong></h3>
<h3 style="text-align: center"><strong>Where: SF City Hall, Room 416</strong></h3>
<h5 style="text-align: center"><a rel="attachment wp-att-1657" href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/21/show-your-support-for-water-recycling-in-sf/greywaterbarrel/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1657" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2009/10/greywaterbarrel.jpg" alt="greywater barrel" width="500" height="375" /></a><strong><a title="rain barrel" href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/19/conserving-water-rainbarrel-love/" target="_self">Rain barrels</a> made from recycled food grade containers for water conservation.</strong></h5>
<p style="text-align: center">
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/21/show-your-support-for-water-recycling-in-sf/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/21/show-your-support-for-water-recycling-in-sf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Yellowstone Grizzlies Back on Endangered Species List</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/09/23/yellowstone-grizzlies-back-on-endangered-species-list/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/09/23/yellowstone-grizzlies-back-on-endangered-species-list/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Hohler</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Endangered Species]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental &amp; Climate Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/09/23/yellowstone-grizzlies-back-on-endangered-species-list/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/09/grizzly.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4995" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/09/grizzly.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p>In 2007 federal protections were dropped for the protection of Yellowstone grizzlies. Ever since then, the Greater Yellowstone Coalition have been fighting to give protection back to the bears. They argued that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) failed to address the loss of essential food sources for the bears, whitebark pine seeds and cutthroat trout.</p>
<p>On Monday, September 21 they finally achieved what they were fighting for when Judge Donald Molloy ruled that inadequate regulatory mechanisms were put in place to manage the bears. The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and six other groups, represented by Earthjustice, have a similar case pending in Idaho.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/09/23/yellowstone-grizzlies-back-on-endangered-species-list/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/09/23/yellowstone-grizzlies-back-on-endangered-species-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Interior Sued to Obtain Oil Royalty Revenue Information</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/10/interior-sued-to-obtain-oil-royalty-revenue-information/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/10/interior-sued-to-obtain-oil-royalty-revenue-information/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/10/interior-sued-to-obtain-oil-royalty-revenue-information/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3239" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/10/interior-sued-to-obtain-oil-royalty-revenue-information/salazar/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3239" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/06/salazar.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p><strong>Is the </strong><a href="http://www.doi.gov/" target="_blank"><strong>U.S. Interior Department</strong></a><strong> wrongly withholding information that will reveal whether taxpayers are being ripped off in a controversial oil and gas royalty program? </strong><a href="http://www.peer.org/" target="_blank"><strong>Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility</strong></a><strong> (PEER) seem to think so, according to a lawsuit they filed today. Interior claims that disclosure of bidding and contracting information about its </strong><a href="http://www.mrm.mms.gov/RIKweb/default.htm" target="_blank"><strong>Royalty-In-Kind</strong></a><strong> (RIK) sales would reveal oil company trade secrets.</strong></p>
<p>The Royalty-In-Kind Program is responsible for managing Minerals Revenue Management&#8217;s (MRM) commercial oil and gas sales activity. The RIK Program is currently selling over 800,000 MM-Btu of natural gas per day and over 150,000 barrels of crude oil per day.</p>
<p>Simply put, Interior acts as an oil broker, selling this oil and gas in order to obtain its shares. Royalty payments on oil and gas from offshore tracts and public lands are one of the federal government&#8217;s greatest sources of non-tax revenues, making over $4 billion in 2007. RIK allows companies to pay federal royalties in the form of oil or natural gas rather than cash.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.peer.org/docs/doi/09_9_6_ig_report_on_sex_and_drugs_in_rik.pdf" target="_blank">An investigation last September</a> found that Interior employees (19 RIK marketers and other RIK employees - approximately 1/3 of the entire RIK staff) were engaging in sex and drug parties with oil officials, and 8 of the 19 employees received gifts exceeding the allowable limit.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/10/interior-sued-to-obtain-oil-royalty-revenue-information/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/10/interior-sued-to-obtain-oil-royalty-revenue-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ontario Updates its 136 Year Old Mining Law to Limit Exploration Rights</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/03/ontario-updates-its-136-year-old-mining-law-to-limit-exploration-rights/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/03/ontario-updates-its-136-year-old-mining-law-to-limit-exploration-rights/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amiel Blajchman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/03/ontario-updates-its-136-year-old-mining-law-to-limit-exploration-rights/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/01/2527670737_b7d4f21e50.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2195" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/01/2527670737_b7d4f21e50.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></h4>
<h4>After 136 years, the Ontario government is planning on <a title="Ontario Mining law" href="http://www.mndm.gov.on.ca/news/NRView.asp?NRNUM=72&#38;NRYear=2009&#38;NRLAN=EN&#38;NRID=5423" target="_blank">revising</a> its 136 year old mining law to reflect modern circumstances (including prohibiting exploration on private land in Southern Ontario). Drafted in the 1873 when the exploitation of natural resources was seen as the key to economic success, mining was treated as an activity that superseded anything else. Based on a &#8220;free entry&#8221; system, a mining company could explore and stake land anywhere in the province, including personal property, <a href="http://www.thestar.com/article/431290">aboriginal lands</a>, and some zones of ecological sensitivity.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/03/ontario-updates-its-136-year-old-mining-law-to-limit-exploration-rights/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/03/ontario-updates-its-136-year-old-mining-law-to-limit-exploration-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Canada to Protect 15 Million Acres of British Columbia Forest</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/06/canada-to-protect-15-million-acres-of-british-columbia-forest/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/06/canada-to-protect-15-million-acres-of-british-columbia-forest/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gavin Hudson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/06/canada-to-protect-15-million-acres-of-british-columbia-forest/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/04/british-columbia-great-bear-rainforest.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2766" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/04/british-columbia-great-bear-rainforest.jpg" alt="British Columbia great bear rainforest" width="500" height="329" /></a>The Canadian government has made good on a promise to protect 15.8 million acres of unique British Columbia rainforest&#8211;an area more than twice the size of the entire country of Belgium.</h3>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/06/canada-to-protect-15-million-acres-of-british-columbia-forest/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/06/canada-to-protect-15-million-acres-of-british-columbia-forest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bills Could Reorganize Farming and Criminalize Organic Farming</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/bills-could-reorganizing-farming-and-criminalize-gardening-organic-farming/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/bills-could-reorganizing-farming-and-criminalize-gardening-organic-farming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Megan Prusynski</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video &amp; Media]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/bills-could-reorganizing-farming-and-criminalize-gardening-organic-farming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center">This post contains additional media. <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/bills-could-reorganizing-farming-and-criminalize-gardening-organic-farming/">Click here to view the full post</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>In two vague bills introduced both in the House and Senate of the US Congress, a vast reorganization of America&#8217;s agriculture system aimed at tracking and regulating foods for public safety could endanger organic farms and gardens.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left"></p>
<p style="text-align: left">The bills, S.425 and H.R.875, attempt to modernize food safety and regulate and standardize agriculture by creating an agency called the Food Safety Administration, but in the process they could <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epXNJNjYBvw&#38;feature=related">threaten organic farming</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/bills-could-reorganizing-farming-and-criminalize-gardening-organic-farming/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/bills-could-reorganizing-farming-and-criminalize-gardening-organic-farming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fisherman Faces Year in Jail for Harming Humpback Whale</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/03/humpbackwhale.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4243" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/03/humpbackwhale.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></h3>
<h3>Fishing nets often inadvertantly become entangled around whales, and while that is a crime under the Endangered Species Act, hardly anyone ever faces charges. But one unlucky fisherman has been caught in the act.</h3>
<p>Robert J. Eldridge Jr. faces up to a year in prison and a $100,000 fine if convicted of three felony charges.</p>

<p>The district attorney says he &#8220;did knowingly and unlawfully take a marine mammal, to wit, a humpback whale in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States by acts of pursuit, torment, and annoyance which had the potential to injure said marine mammal in the wild.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Not guilty: Greenpeace Activists Who Used Climate Change as a Legal Defence</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>The Guardian Environment Network</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Society]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Europe]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Six Greenpeace climate change activists have been cleared of causing £30,000 of criminal damage at a coal-fired power station in a verdict that is expected to embarrass the government and lead to more direct action protests against energy companies. <em>Article by John Vidal of the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment" target="_blank">Guardian</a>.</em><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/03/5-of-the-kingsnorth-6-who-in.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2429" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/03/5-of-the-kingsnorth-6-who-in.jpg" alt="5 of the \" width="430" height="240" /></a></h3>
<p>The jury of nine men and three women at Maidstone crown court cleared the six by a majority verdict. Five of the protesters had scaled a 200-metre chimney at Kingsnorth power station, Hoo, Kent, in October last year.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cancer Victim&#8217;s Widow Awarded $8 Mil. in Philip Morris Lawsuit</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/02/cigarettes.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4072" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/02/cigarettes.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></h3>
<h3>In a ruling that could impact thousands of similar cases, a Florida jury has ordered <a href="http://www.knowmore.org/wiki/index.php?title=Altria_Group%2C_Inc." target="_blank">Philip Morris</a>, the largest tobacco company in the US, to pay the family of a lung cancer victim $8 million in damages.</h3>

<p>Elaine Hess presented evidence to the jury showing that her husband Stuart had smoked three packs of cigarettes every day before dying of lung cancer at only 55. Philip Morris&#8217; attorney argued that Hess had the free will to quit at any time, but the jury didn&#8217;t buy it.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boston Teen Files Bill to Ban &#8216;Debarking&#8217; of Cats and Dogs</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/02/devocalization-teen-boston.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3933" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/02/devocalization-teen-boston.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="371" /></a></p>

<p><strong>Fifteen-year-old Bostonian Jordan Star has emerged as the <a title="devocalization" href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1149346" target="_blank">surprise driving force behind a bill to ban the cruel practice of &#8217;surgically silencing&#8217; cats and dogs by removing their vocal cords</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Star, a freshman at Needham High, decided to take action after coming across a dog that had been debarked and abandoned. “It was just horrible,” he said of the dog’s struggle to get his attention. “It was just like a hoarse, wheezy cough. In a shelter, all they are is a mutilated animal, which makes them harder to adopt.”</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Consumer Product Safety Information Act Could Ban Children From Libraries</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/01/10/new-consumer-product-safety-information-act-could-ban-children-from-libraries-2/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/01/10/new-consumer-product-safety-information-act-could-ban-children-from-libraries-2/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/01/10/new-consumer-product-safety-information-act-could-ban-children-from-libraries-2/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[
<h3><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/files/2009/01/childrens-books.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2548" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2009/01/childrens-books.jpg" alt="Unless tested, children\'s books may be banned from libraries under CPSIA" width="293" height="194" /></a></h3>
<h3>From gently used clothing to handmade toys, we&#8217;ve raised our concerns about how the <a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/12/08/alert-new-consumer-product-safety-rules-will-make-handmade-natural-toys-illegal/" target="_blank">new Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) will negatively affect green families</a> and businesses.</h3>
<p>This law designed to protect our children is so poorly written, it will actually benefit big business and harm resale shops and natural toymakers.  As <a href="http://www.redding.com/news/2009/jan/06/law-threatens-viability-of-clothing-makers/" target="_blank">Stephen Lamar, executive vice president of the American Apparel and Footwear Association explained to the Redding Record Searchlight</a>, &#8220;<strong>The law introduces an extraordinarily large number of testing requirements for products for which everyone knows there&#8217;s no lead.</strong>&#8220;  <a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/12/29/cpsia-update-exemptions-for-natural-materials-proposed/" target="_blank">An exemption has been proposed for clothing and toys made from natural materials such as wood and wool</a>, but what about library books? <strong>Yes, LIBRARY BOOKS!</strong></p>
<h3>Taking effect on February 10, 2009, the CPSIA will require all products for children under 12 be tested for lead, including books.  That means in order for a library to admit children under 12, they must test all of their children&#8217;s books or ban children from the library.</h3>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/01/10/new-consumer-product-safety-information-act-could-ban-children-from-libraries-2/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/01/10/new-consumer-product-safety-information-act-could-ban-children-from-libraries-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>China to Ban High Pollution Cars from Capital</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/01/01/china-to-ban-high-pollution-cars-from-capital/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/01/01/china-to-ban-high-pollution-cars-from-capital/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gavin Hudson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Transportation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Asia]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/01/01/china-to-ban-high-pollution-cars-from-capital/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Starting New Year&#8217;s Day, Beijing will ban high-emission vehicles from the city.</h3>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/01/beijing-traffic.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2178" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/01/beijing-traffic.jpg" alt="Beijing traffic" width="500" height="332" /></a>Beijing will ban some 353,800 vehicles with high emissions from anywhere within the <a href="http://www.bjcpc.com.cn/Info/en/e_news_detail.asp?id=39" target="_blank">fifth ring road</a>, which circles the city center at a radius of 10-15 km. One in ten cars and trucks in Beijing will be subject to the ban. But, say city officials, those vehicles account for 50 percent of the city&#8217;s notoriously bad auto pollution.</p>
<p>The vehicles on the banned list are those that do not meet the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_emission_standards" target="_blank">Euro I emissions standards</a> set in Europe in the early 90&#8217;s. According to Ren Lihong of the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, these cars are a big part of Beijing&#8217;s pollution problem.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/01/01/china-to-ban-high-pollution-cars-from-capital/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/01/01/china-to-ban-high-pollution-cars-from-capital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>California Expected to Pass Most Radical Global Warming Plan in US, Possibly the World</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/11/california-expected-to-pass-most-radical-global-warming-plan-in-us-possibly-the-world/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/11/california-expected-to-pass-most-radical-global-warming-plan-in-us-possibly-the-world/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/11/california-expected-to-pass-most-radical-global-warming-plan-in-us-possibly-the-world/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/12/california-global-warming-michael-dunn.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1833" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/12/california-global-warming-michael-dunn.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p><strong>The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is today expected to adopt the most <a title="AB 32 scoping plan" href="http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/psp.pdf" target="_blank">radical global warming plan</a> in the U.S., and possibly the world. If passed, it will force individuals, as well as the state&#8217;s utilities, refineries and large factories to fundamentally change the way they do business, and slash greenhouse gas emissions.</strong></p>
<p>The plan will outline for the first time how people and businesses will be required to meet the state&#8217;s 2006 &#8216;Global Warming Solutions Act&#8217; and transform California into a global leader in the fight against climate change.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/11/california-expected-to-pass-most-radical-global-warming-plan-in-us-possibly-the-world/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/11/california-expected-to-pass-most-radical-global-warming-plan-in-us-possibly-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US Endangered Species Could Lose Vital Protection</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/11/grizzly-chascar.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1662" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/11/grizzly-chascar.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="344" /></a></p>

<p><strong>Endangered US animal and plant species are in danger of losing <a title="endangered" href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hXBV9U9SBb_hysHw0UpNdHvcmx4gD94ICH781" target="_blank">vital legal protection designed to prevent them from extinction</a>.</strong></p>
<p>The outgoing Bush administration is proposing to <strong><a title="esa" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/" target="_self">rush through legislation</a></strong> that will remove the right of government experts to ensure that dams, highways and other big infrastructure projects don&#8217;t pose an unacceptable threat to fragile plants and animals under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Crucially, the regulations must be approved by Friday if they are to come into effect before President-elect Obama&#8217;s swearing-in ceremony on January 20th.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US Supreme Court Sides With Navy In Whales Sonar Case</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/11/whale-tail.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1587" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/11/whale-tail.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="361" /></a></p>

<p><strong>In a landmark case, the US Supreme Court ruled yesterday that the <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUKTRE4AB51L20081112?pageNumber=1&#38;virtualBrandChannel=0">US Navy can carry out sonar </a>training exercises off the southern California coast, without safeguards designed to protect whales, dolphins and other marine mammals.</strong></p>
<p>The decision is a major setback for environmentalists, who had hoped the Court would uphold <strong>an <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/08/the-us-navy-doesnt-save-the-whales/">earlier injunction</a> by a federal judge requiring the navy to take precautions while undertaking submarine-hunting exercises</strong>. Environmental groups originally launched the lawsuit claiming that the <strong>use of sonar can injure or even kill a wide range of marine species</strong>, including sea-lions and <strong><a title="whales" href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/10/03/exxon-oil-and-gas-project-to-face-russian-legal-challenge-over-endangered-whales/" target="_self">endangered</a></strong> blue whales.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Oklahoma Senator Seeks Constitutional Right to Hunt</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/26/oklahoma-senator-seeks-constitutional-right-to-hunt/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/26/oklahoma-senator-seeks-constitutional-right-to-hunt/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Environmentalism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/26/oklahoma-senator-seeks-constitutional-right-to-hunt/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Democratic Oklahoma state senator Earl Garrison <a href="http://www.muskogeephoenix.com/local/local_story_300002637.html" target="_blank">has proposed a “Hunters Bill of Rights” that would guarantee the legality of hunting</a>. He fears a ban on hunting could could happen at some point due to pressure from animal rights groups and hopes to preemptively block any attempts with a constitutional amendment.<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/10/deer.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3153" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/10/deer.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="326" /></a></p>
<p>“Animals have to be harvested,” he said. “It’s important that you have management because if you don’t, you get overpopulation, and the animals get smaller and there’s too much inbreeding.”</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/26/oklahoma-senator-seeks-constitutional-right-to-hunt/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/26/oklahoma-senator-seeks-constitutional-right-to-hunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ecuador&#8217;s President Will Quit if New Pro-Nature Constitution Not Approved</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/25/ecuadors-president-will-quit-if-new-pro-nature-constitution-not-approved/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/25/ecuadors-president-will-quit-if-new-pro-nature-constitution-not-approved/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Levi Novey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/25/ecuadors-president-will-quit-if-new-pro-nature-constitution-not-approved/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/09/rafael-correa-president-of-ecuador.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1702" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/09/rafael-correa-president-of-ecuador.jpg" alt="Rafael Correa- President of Ecuador" width="286" height="228" /></a>On Sunday Ecuadorians will vote to accept or reject a new constitution for their country. The constitution would make major changes to how the government functions. Among the constitution&#8217;s 444 articles, highlights include giving the government more control over the mining, oil, transportation, telecommunication, and banking industries, allowing the president to run immediately for re-election after his or her first-term, bestowing nature with legal rights, and giving individual citizens the ability to fight for nature&#8217;s rights legally in courts.
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/25/ecuadors-president-will-quit-if-new-pro-nature-constitution-not-approved/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/25/ecuadors-president-will-quit-if-new-pro-nature-constitution-not-approved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Five Flaws in the New U.S. &#8216;Country of Origin&#8217; Food Labeling</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/14/five-flaws-in-the-new-us-country-of-origin-food-labeling/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/14/five-flaws-in-the-new-us-country-of-origin-food-labeling/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/14/five-flaws-in-the-new-us-country-of-origin-food-labeling/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/09/meat-labels1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-984" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/09/meat-labels1.jpg" alt="The new labeling law falls short." width="300" height="328" /></a><strong>On September 30<sup>th</sup>, six years after Congress originally passed the law, the United States will implement a country of origin labeling program for supermarket foods. But due to industry pressure, some of the most important and potentially dangerous products are exempt from being labeled.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-16-imported-food_N.htm" target="_blank">Only 1.3% of imported food is inspected by the FDA</a>, and of that small fraction, many hazardous items are confiscated. The average American consumes an estimated <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-16-imported-food_N.htm" target="_blank">260 pounds of imported food every year</a>, which is roughly 13% of their diet. Food safety will always be a concern. Arming consumers with the knowledge of where their food comes from will not only help with everyday shopping, but also help in the case of a recall of a food from a specific region (like <a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/896487/the_fda_issues_jalapenos_recall.html" target="_blank">jalapeños</a> from Mexico). While the new law has <a href="http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/core_food_safety/006022.html" target="_blank">some benefits</a>, many recent examples of food contamination and safety concerns show that it won&#8217;t do enough.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/14/five-flaws-in-the-new-us-country-of-origin-food-labeling/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/14/five-flaws-in-the-new-us-country-of-origin-food-labeling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Neighborhood in Lima, Peru Takes on Noise Pollution by Passing 1 Dog Per Apartment Law</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/08/30/neighborhood-in-lima-peru-takes-on-noise-pollution-by-passing-1-dog-per-apartment-law/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/08/30/neighborhood-in-lima-peru-takes-on-noise-pollution-by-passing-1-dog-per-apartment-law/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Levi Novey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/08/30/neighborhood-in-lima-peru-takes-on-noise-pollution-by-passing-1-dog-per-apartment-law/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/08/peruvian-hairless.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1527" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/08/peruvian-hairless.jpg" alt="The Peruvian Hairless" width="266" height="350" /></a>When it comes to pollution, Lima has it all. The air is contaminated, the water, the sky, the streets. Pollution is everywhere.</p>
<p>I was quite surprised to read earlier today, that among all of the possibilities, a neighborhood in Lima has taken a stand on the issue of noisy, barking, scurrying, dogs. Who would have thought that noise pollution caused by dogs would get a group of Lima citizens up in arms?</p>
<p>Without a doubt, the level of noise pollution in Lima is tremendously high. When combining the cacaphony of sounds that arise from traffic, parties, animals, and so on, you will be hard pressed to find Lima residents who at some point have not been annoyed by the constant tapping of their ear drums. For this reason, I think there is merit in passing a law that attempts to limit noise pollution in Lima. Whether or not targeting the population of dogs as a method to control noise is the right way to do it&#8211; I&#8217;m not sure.
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/08/30/neighborhood-in-lima-peru-takes-on-noise-pollution-by-passing-1-dog-per-apartment-law/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/08/30/neighborhood-in-lima-peru-takes-on-noise-pollution-by-passing-1-dog-per-apartment-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 700 queries in 1.339 seconds. -->