<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; livestock</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/livestock</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'livestock'</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Environmental Protest Round-Up 19 September</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/19/environmental-protest-round-up-19-september/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/19/environmental-protest-round-up-19-september/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kay Sexton</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Spectrum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/19/environmental-protest-round-up-19-september/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3606" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/09/sheep.jpg" alt="new zealand sheep" width="500" height="359" /></p>
<p>Thursday this week seems to have been a key day for environmental protest.</p>
<h3>Chinese pollution protest</h3>
<p>In Fujian Province, eastern China, villagers blockaded a road to protest against high levels of lead in the blood of their children. Local residents are convinced that the children’s excessive lead levels are the result of pollution from the  Huaqiang Battery Factory. Authorities have ordered China&#8217;s environmental protection bureau to increase oversight of the plant. The protest comes in the wake of several <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/most-chinese-say-pollution-is-a-big-problem-and-should-be-made-a-top-priority/" target="_blank">similar protests </a>against industrial plants that have succeeded in getting polluting factories closed down.</p>
<h3>Manure message</h3>
<p>And in the UK, journalist and television presenter <a href="http://gas2.org/2009/09/10/jay-lenos-new-show-will-put-guests-in-an-electric-car/" target="_blank">Jeremy Clarkson</a> found his own bit of global warming, on his doorstep! Seven members of group Climate Rush visited his home and left steaming piles of horse manure on his drive, along with a message reading ‘This is what you&#8217;re landing us in’. The protestors, all women, chose Clarkson because he has a sceptical attitude to climate change. Clarkson is the presenter of Top Gear, a car programme, and has recently driven to the Arctic. In the past he has made inflammatory remarks about the effects of climate change, describing walkers who demand access to land as ‘urban communists’ and cyclists as ‘Lycra Nazis’.</p>
<h3>New Zealand animal foods protest</h3>
<p>And finally on the same day, 17 September, a New Zealand protest against <a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/07/31/how-to-guide-for-local-sustainable-safe-foods/" target="_blank">palm kernel imports </a>ended inconclusively.  The company, Fonterra, is a dairy supplies specialist and also a cooperative with over 11,000 dairy farming members in New Zealand.  Greenpeace claims there is both local and international concern about the nature of the palm oil industry globally and protestors chained themselves to the cranes of the ship delivering the imports.  <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/27/kenyan-maize-crisis-leads-to-food-aid-proposals/" target="_blank">Feed imports for livestock</a> are an increasing contentious issue – Greenpeace says that corn and grain farmers in New Zealand have supported their action because their own products have been outpriced by cheap imported livestock foods and that endangered species are being further threatened by land clearance fuelled by the palm oil export industry. 14 protesters, charged with unlawful boarding of a ship, will be appearing in court next week.<br />
New Zealand sheep courtesy of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flissphil/" target="_blank">PhillipC </a>at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/" target="_blank">Flickr</a> under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">creative commons licence</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/19/environmental-protest-round-up-19-september/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Wildlife Authorities Kill Pair of Wolves in Oregon</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/07/wildlife-authorities-kill-pair-of-wolves-in-oregon/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/07/wildlife-authorities-kill-pair-of-wolves-in-oregon/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhishja Larson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/07/wildlife-authorities-kill-pair-of-wolves-in-oregon/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3897" href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/07/wildlife-authorities-kill-pair-of-wolves-in-oregon/wolf-portrait/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3897" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/09/wolf-portrait.jpg" alt="Wolf image for wolf pair killed in Oregon article" width="500" height="332" /></a></p>
<h3>One of only three wolf pairs in Oregon was killed by U.S.D.A. Wildlife Services with approval from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.</h3>
<p>The <a href="http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2009/wolves-09-07-2009.html" target="_blank">Center for Biological Diversity announced today</a> that Oregon&#8217;s wolf recovery program suffered a serious setback when a pair of wolves residing in the Eagle Cap Wilderness in eastern Oregon were killed over the weekend by wildlife authorities.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/07/wildlife-authorities-kill-pair-of-wolves-in-oregon/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/07/wildlife-authorities-kill-pair-of-wolves-in-oregon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Efficient Animal Farming an &#8220;Illusion&#8221; - Reform Advised</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/01/efficient-animal-farming-an-illusion-reform-advised/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/01/efficient-animal-farming-an-illusion-reform-advised/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Ricciardi</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/01/efficient-animal-farming-an-illusion-reform-advised/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/08/tmp_hog_confinement_barn_interior.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3495" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/08/tmp_hog_confinement_barn_interior-500x356.jpg" alt="hog confinement barn (piggery) interior" width="500" height="356" /></a></p>

<h3>The efficiency of current animal farming practices is an &#8220;illusion&#8221;, according to a report released last Summer by the <a href="www.pewtrusts.org/" target="_blank">Pew Charitable Trusts</a> (May 30, 2008).</h3>
<h4>This &#8220;illusion&#8221; is made possible by &#8220;cheap grain, cheap water and prison-like confinement systems.&#8221;  Underpinning this status is the drive for the lowest possible labor costs&#8211;meaning automated feeding, watering, and waste disposal is the norm&#8211;which undermines and impoverishes traditional, family and small farm operations (farms which are typically bought out by corporate farming conglomerates, who then receive  the lion&#8217;s share of subsidies; about half a trillion since 2001).</h4>
<p>What some call &#8220;industrial&#8221; farming and others &#8211;like the <a href="www.ucsusa.org/" target="_blank">Union of Concerned Scientists</a>&#8211;more descriptively refer to as  &#8220;confined&#8221; farming, results in massive over-crowding of livestock where unsafe/unhealthy conditions prevail for both the  animals, and the workers. These conditions make the spread of disease easier, and lead to over use of antibiotics (which are also often used to keep young calves sickly, and their meat more tender). *</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/01/efficient-animal-farming-an-illusion-reform-advised/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/01/efficient-animal-farming-an-illusion-reform-advised/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Report Shows that Climate Change &#8220;Literally Affects People in Their Backyards&#8221;</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental &amp; Climate Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/sprinkler.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4566" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/06/sprinkler.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>

<p><strong>It&#8217;s in the papers and on TV. It spreads across the Internet (including this very post), and it is finding its way into the classroom. Global climate change is nothing new. And it certainly isn&#8217;t going away. Not yet, anyway.</strong></p>
<p>A report, “<a href="http://www.globalchange.gov/publications/reports/scientific-assessments/us-impacts" target="_blank">Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States</a>,” was put out on June 16, 2009. The report compiles years of scientific research and takes into account new data not available during the preparation of previous assessments. It was produced by a consortium of experts from 13 U.S. government science agencies and from several major universities and research institutes.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>How to Green Your Cows&#8217; Gas</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/07/how-to-green-your-cows-gas/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/07/how-to-green-your-cows-gas/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Levitan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/07/how-to-green-your-cows-gas/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/05/cows.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3097" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/05/cows.jpg" alt="Reductions of cow-produced methane could play a big role in mitigating climate change." width="500" height="433" /></a>A recent study by Canadian researchers published in the <em>Journal of Animal Science</em> indicate that by fine-tuning the balance of starch, sugar, cellulose, ash, fat and other elements of cattle feed, <a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/23/scientists-discover-new-global-warming-threat-methane-time-bomb-under-arctic-seabed/" target="_self">methane</a> production by the cows can be reduced by as much as 25 percent. If such a move could be implemented on a broad scale, it could be an immensely important piece of the emission reduction puzzle. <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/29/80-percent-of-amazon-deforestation-stems-from-cattle-ranching-2/" target="_self">Cattle</a> farming accounts for as much as 18 percent of the total greenhouse gases emitted worldwide, according to a <a href="http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000448/index.html" target="_blank">2006 report</a> by the Food and Agriculture Organization.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/07/how-to-green-your-cows-gas/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/07/how-to-green-your-cows-gas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Texas Town Enforces Chicken Ban, Assaults Sustainable Living</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/03/11/texas-town-enforces-chicken-ban-assaults-sustainable-living/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/03/11/texas-town-enforces-chicken-ban-assaults-sustainable-living/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Chappell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[food policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/03/11/texas-town-enforces-chicken-ban-assaults-sustainable-living/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1698" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/03/chicken-reduced-300x231.jpg" alt="Run little chicken, run away from Lancaster, Texas." width="300" height="231" /></p>
<p>The small city of Lancaster, Texas has had a law on its books banning all chickens within the city limits, but for years it had gone unnoticed and unenforced, until recently.  That changed when a local resident found out that the previously unknown law would now be enforced citing anyone who kept chickens within the city limits.</p>
<p>Local food writer and sustainable living proponent Marye Audet, has kept a flock of 19 chickens on her 2 1/4 acre rural homestead for the last five years in a rural area of town, unaware that she was breaking the law by doing so.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify">&#8220;This is not about us living in a subdivision of $400,000.00 homes and being the Beverly Hillbillies.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/03/11/texas-town-enforces-chicken-ban-assaults-sustainable-living/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/03/11/texas-town-enforces-chicken-ban-assaults-sustainable-living/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Save My Chickens: Take Action Against NAIS</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Cate Nelson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Farmers Market Fare]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[local food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2009/02/junior.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1614" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/02/junior-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="282" height="211" /></a> I’m sitting in my backyard, surrounded by chickens and children.  A couple of dogs periodically pester both species of livestock. <em>(Yes, I did just call my child flock “livestock.”) </em>I’m waiting on the first egg of the day, a pink speckled one from my oldest Americana hen.</p>
<p>This backyard chicken experiment is new to my family, only a 6-month-old endeavor.  We wanted our children to know where food comes from.  We wanted to know that the eggs we ate were from happy chickens.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium">But as the number of small chicken “farmers” pop up in <a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/07/cluckin-about-urban-chickens/">cities</a>, <a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/26/urban-agriculturalist-backyard-chickens/comment-page-1/">suburbs</a>, and rural areas alike, <strong>our collective grand experiment may be in peril.</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cluckin&#8217; About Urban Chickens</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/07/cluckin-about-urban-chickens/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/07/cluckin-about-urban-chickens/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Becky Striepe</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[localization]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/07/cluckin-about-urban-chickens/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4><b>The urban chicken movement is growing as more and more folks try to move away from factory farmed food and towards self-sufficiency.</b></h4>
<p><a href='http://ecolocalizer.com/files/2009/01/urban-chicken-coop.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2009/01/urban-chicken-coop.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1097" /></a><br />
[<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en">Creative Commons</a> photo by <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/22748341@N00/1362082866/in/set-72157601498853104/">Linda N.</a>]</p>
<p><b>Why Chickens?</b><br />
Chickens are pretty low-maintenance. Once you have your coop set up, you just have to make sure they&#8217;re fed, watered, and get to run around outside.  Most people who raise their own chickens do so for the eggs, not the meat.  Instead of buying eggs from a factory farm or from hundreds of miles away, urban chicken owners benefit from a cheap, local, reliable source of protein.  Chicken poop is also a great fertilizer for your garden!</p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/07/cluckin-about-urban-chickens/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/07/cluckin-about-urban-chickens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Life Cycle: Greening the Other White Meat</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/04/life-cycle-greening-the-other-white-meat/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/04/life-cycle-greening-the-other-white-meat/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Simran Sethi</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Food &amp; Drink]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/04/life-cycle-greening-the-other-white-meat/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sarahsmarsh.wordpress.com/"><em>Sarah Smarsh and </em></a><em><a href="http://www.journalism.ku.edu/faculty/people/sethi.shtml">Simran Sethi</a> are writing a series on the impacts of everyday things. They will be posting previews on Green Options before launching the posts on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/simran-sethi">Huffington Post</a> Here’s a peek at pork.</em><br />
<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/beeldenzeggenmeer/405092064/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3453" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2008/09/pig-200x300.png" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>It’s lunchtime, baby. Panda Garden. Porky goodness. Mooshu style.</p>
<p>The “other white meat” in your takeout container falls behind beef and chicken in American consumption, but we do pig out on pig—on average, each of us <a href="http://www.thepigsite.com/articles/7/markets-and-economics/1344/factors-affecting-us-pork-consumption">consumes 51 pounds of Wilbur annually</a>. That translates to big impact on our water and air.</p>
<p>Due to the high variety of bacteria, worms and other <a href="http://www.hogwatchmanitoba.org/enviro.html">undesirables in pig flesh</a>, and because of the quick-spread disease potential of crowded pig farms, heavy doses of antibiotics are administered routinely. Those same drugs end up in your body via waste streaming into our water supply, and via that Mooshu pork to go. Other side dishes you might not have ordered include growth hormones to encourage meat-heavy livestock and vaccines injected to avoid profit-damaging disease.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/04/life-cycle-greening-the-other-white-meat/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/04/life-cycle-greening-the-other-white-meat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ethanol, Texas, and a Waiver Request</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/25/ethanol-texas-and-a-waiver-request/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/25/ethanol-texas-and-a-waiver-request/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Heidi Suydam</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/25/ethanol-texas-and-a-waiver-request/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/07/corn-and-field3.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-566" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/07/corn-and-field3.jpg" alt="corn and field" width="187" height="250" /></a>In an <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92881875">NPR News</a> interview on July 24th, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/contacts.htm#kriz">Margaret Kriz</a>, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/">National Journal</a> energy and environment correspondent, discussed ethanol, Texas, the EPA and the ensuing debate regarding <a href="http://www.ethanolrfa.org/policy/regulations/federal/standard/">Ethanol regulations</a>. Texas has reportedly applied for a waiver of the current ethanol standards. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Policy_Act_of_2005">Energy Policy Act</a> provides an option for a waiver only if the environment or economy would be severely harmed because of the Renewable Fuel Standards.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.governor.state.tx.us/">Texas governor, Rick Perry,</a> has applied for the waiver citing severe stress on prices, livestock and agriculture industry in the state. This has opened discussion and debate regarding the use of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel">ethanol</a> in our fuel. The <a href="http://www.beefusa.org/goverenewablefuelsandethanolproduction.aspx">livestock industry</a>, <a href="http://www.flex-news-food.com/pages/17286/Biofuel/Corn/USA/us-food-industry-calls-ethanol-mandate-waiver.html">food industry</a>, and <a href="http://www.gmabrands.com/news/docs/NewsRelease.cfm?docid=1730">Grocery Manufacturers Association</a> are opposed to the mandated increase in the use of ethanol. <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/texassouthwest/stories/072108dntexperry.76a61f69.html">Dallas Morning News</a> reports that Governor Perry has gained support from some environmental groups as well.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.epa.gov/">Environmental Protection Agency</a> will ultimately decide if Texas will be granted the requested waiver. It is expected that their decision will be made in early August. The spirited debates that have begun as a result of Governor Perry&#8217;s request will surely cause our political leaders to revisit the regulations currently in place.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/07/texas-long-horn.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-562" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/07/texas-long-horn.jpg" alt="Texas Long Horn" width="240" height="221" /></a>What are we learning from this? Fuel and food are closely related. We need fuel to operate the machines that harvest, process, package and distribute our food. When increasing our use of corn derived fuel such as ethanol we must also take all these other areas into consideration. In addition to the fact that corn is a vegetable we eat, it is also a primary livestock feed source.</p>
<p>Once again, there is a need for a balanced approach in the pursuit of energy alternatives in America. The debate surrounding the use of ethanol is far reaching and diverse, from cleaner burning fuel to world hunger. Ethanol production and consumption are hot topics not soon to be extinguished.</p>
<h3>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/04/30/biofuels-part-i-corn-ethanol-isnt-the-solution/">Biofuels Part 1: Corn Ethanol Isn&#8217;t the Solution</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/">Study: Your Car Can Run on 20% Ethanol</a></li>
<li><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/09/obama-and-ethanol-is-it-just-about-winning-votes/">Obama and Ethanol: Is It Just About Winning Votes?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/10/would-you-like-to-read-about-problems-with-meeting-ethanol-mandates-in-california/">Would You Like to Read about Meeting Ethanol Mandates in California?</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Photo Credit: Fields and Corn <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielsphotography/312655810/">Danielle Leininger via Flickr</a> Creative Commons Liscence; Texas Longhorn Steer <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dad_and_clint/421749161/">Charles &#38; Clint&#8217;s Photostream via Flickr</a> Creative Commons Liscence<br />
<a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/tree.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4567" src="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/tree.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="351" /></a><strong><em>Some Key Findings of the report are:</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>1. Global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced. Global temperature has increased over the past 50 years. This observed increase is due primarily to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases. (p. 13)</strong></p>
<p><strong>2. Climate changes are underway in the United States and are projected to grow. Climate-related changes are already observed in the United States and its coastal waters. These include increases in heavy downpours, rising temperature and sea level, rapidly retreating glaciers, thawing permafrost, lengthening growing seasons, lengthening ice-free seasons in the ocean and on lakes and rivers, earlier snowmelt, and alterations in river flows. These changes are projected to grow. (p. 27)</strong></p>
<p><strong>3. Widespread climate-related impacts are occurring now and are expected to increase. Climate changes are already affecting water, energy, transportation, agriculture, ecosystems, and health. These impacts are different from region to region and will grow under projected climate change. (p. 41-106, 107-152)</strong></p>
<p><strong>4. Climate change will stress water resources. Water is an issue in every region, but the nature of the potential impacts varies. Drought, related to reduced precipitation, increased evaporation, and increased water loss from plants, is an important issue in many regions, especially in the West. Floods and water quality problems are likely to be amplified by climate change in most regions. Declines in mountain snowpack are important in the West and Alaska where snowpack provides vital natural water storage. (p. 41, 129, 135, 139)</strong></p>
<p><strong>5. Crop and livestock production will be increasingly challenged. Agriculture is considered one of the sectors most adaptable to changes in climate. However, increased heat, pests, water stress, diseases, and weather extremes will pose adaptation challenges for crop and livestock production. (p. 71)</strong></p>
<p><strong>6. Coastal areas are at increasing risk from sea-level rise and storm surge. Sea-level rise and storm surge place many U.S. coastal areas at increasing risk of erosion and flooding, especially along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, Pacific Islands, and parts of Alaska. Energy and transportation infrastructure and other property in coastal areas are very likely to be adversely affected. (p. 111, 139, 145, 149)</strong></p>
<p><strong>7. Threats to human health will increase. Health impacts of climate change are related to heat stress, waterborne diseases, poor air quality, extreme weather events, and diseases transmitted by insects and rodents. Robust public health infrastructure can reduce the potential for negative impacts. (p. 89)</strong></p>
<p><strong>8. Climate change will interact with many social and environmental stresses. Climate change will combine with pollution, population growth, overuse of resources, urbanization, and other social, economic, and environmental stresses to create larger impacts than from any of these factors alone. (p. 99)</strong></p>
<p><strong>9. Thresholds will be crossed, leading to large changes in climate and ecosystems. There are a variety of thresholds in the climate system and ecosystems. These thresholds determine, for example, the presence of sea ice and permafrost, and the survival of species, from fish to insect pests, with implications for society. With further climate change, the crossing of additional thresholds is expected. (p. 76, 82, 115, 137, 142)</strong></p>
<p><strong>10. Future climate change and its impacts depend on choices made today. The amount and rate of future climate change depend primarily on current and future human-caused emissions of heat-trapping gases and airborne particles. Responses involve reducing emissions to limit future warming, and adapting to the changes that are unavoidable. (p. 25, 29)</strong></p>
<p>Watch Video Coverage of the presentation of the report on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y88sgDM9HmA" target="_blank">youtube</a>.</p>
<p><em>Photo Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbum/175117349/">bbum</a></em><em> via flickr under Creative Commons License</em></p>
<p><em>Photo 2 Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/marzinians/3592548434/" target="_blank">Dimit®i</a> via flickr under Creative Commons License</em></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/25/ethanol-texas-and-a-waiver-request/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cow Poop: More Electric Power Potential than Wind and Solar?</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/25/cow-poop-more-electric-power-potential-than-wind-and-solar/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/25/cow-poop-more-electric-power-potential-than-wind-and-solar/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EcoLocalizer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/25/cow-poop-more-electric-power-potential-than-wind-and-solar/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/files/2008/07/cow-poop.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-498" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2008/07/cow-poop.jpg" alt="MosheA at Wikimedia Commons under a GNU Free Documentation license.)" width="200" height="126" /></a>Converting the U.S.&#8217;s ample and renewable volumes of cow manure into biogas could provide as much as 3 percent of the nation&#8217;s electricity needs, say two researchers at the University of Texas at Austin.</p>
<p>In a new study published in the online journal <em>Environmental Research Letters</em>, <span class="lrg" style="font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif">Amanda Cuéllar and Michael Webber conclude that harnessing the full potential of cow poop power could not only help generate as much &#8212; or more &#8212; electricity as wind and solar power do today, but could greatly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/25/cow-poop-more-electric-power-potential-than-wind-and-solar/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/25/cow-poop-more-electric-power-potential-than-wind-and-solar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sheep and Cow Farting Vaccine to Reduce Climate Changing Methane Emissions</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/06/09/sheep-and-cow-farting-vaccine-to-reduce-climate-changing-methane-emissions/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/06/09/sheep-and-cow-farting-vaccine-to-reduce-climate-changing-methane-emissions/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fun / Offbeat]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/06/09/sheep-and-cow-farting-vaccine-to-reduce-climate-changing-methane-emissions/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoscraps.com/files/2008/06/344638102_0745e9ff32.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-668" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/06/344638102_0745e9ff32.jpg" alt="sheep" width="500" height="332" /></a>Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, <a href="http://www.epa.gov/methane/" target="_blank">20 times more powerful than carbon dioxide</a> at trapping heat. New Zealand scientists have developed a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2076607/Sheep-flatulence-inoculation-developed.html" target="_blank">vaccine to cut down on livestock flatulence</a>, which should help farmers avoid a proposed &#8220;flatulence tax&#8221; on the methane their livestock produces.  New Zealand cows and sheep are responsible for about half of the country&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>Via:  <a href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/06/06/now-heres-a-breakthrough-sheep-fart-vaccine-developed-in-nz/" target="_blank">It&#8217;s Getting Hot in Here</a></p>
<p>For a more <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/06/anti-fart-shots-for-a-cleaner-environment/#more-2571">in depth post on the anti-farting vaccine, please visit Planetsave</a>.<br />
<a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/tree.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4567" src="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/tree.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="351" /></a><strong><em>Some Key Findings of the report are:</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>1. Global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced. Global temperature has increased over the past 50 years. This observed increase is due primarily to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases. (p. 13)</strong></p>
<p><strong>2. Climate changes are underway in the United States and are projected to grow. Climate-related changes are already observed in the United States and its coastal waters. These include increases in heavy downpours, rising temperature and sea level, rapidly retreating glaciers, thawing permafrost, lengthening growing seasons, lengthening ice-free seasons in the ocean and on lakes and rivers, earlier snowmelt, and alterations in river flows. These changes are projected to grow. (p. 27)</strong></p>
<p><strong>3. Widespread climate-related impacts are occurring now and are expected to increase. Climate changes are already affecting water, energy, transportation, agriculture, ecosystems, and health. These impacts are different from region to region and will grow under projected climate change. (p. 41-106, 107-152)</strong></p>
<p><strong>4. Climate change will stress water resources. Water is an issue in every region, but the nature of the potential impacts varies. Drought, related to reduced precipitation, increased evaporation, and increased water loss from plants, is an important issue in many regions, especially in the West. Floods and water quality problems are likely to be amplified by climate change in most regions. Declines in mountain snowpack are important in the West and Alaska where snowpack provides vital natural water storage. (p. 41, 129, 135, 139)</strong></p>
<p><strong>5. Crop and livestock production will be increasingly challenged. Agriculture is considered one of the sectors most adaptable to changes in climate. However, increased heat, pests, water stress, diseases, and weather extremes will pose adaptation challenges for crop and livestock production. (p. 71)</strong></p>
<p><strong>6. Coastal areas are at increasing risk from sea-level rise and storm surge. Sea-level rise and storm surge place many U.S. coastal areas at increasing risk of erosion and flooding, especially along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, Pacific Islands, and parts of Alaska. Energy and transportation infrastructure and other property in coastal areas are very likely to be adversely affected. (p. 111, 139, 145, 149)</strong></p>
<p><strong>7. Threats to human health will increase. Health impacts of climate change are related to heat stress, waterborne diseases, poor air quality, extreme weather events, and diseases transmitted by insects and rodents. Robust public health infrastructure can reduce the potential for negative impacts. (p. 89)</strong></p>
<p><strong>8. Climate change will interact with many social and environmental stresses. Climate change will combine with pollution, population growth, overuse of resources, urbanization, and other social, economic, and environmental stresses to create larger impacts than from any of these factors alone. (p. 99)</strong></p>
<p><strong>9. Thresholds will be crossed, leading to large changes in climate and ecosystems. There are a variety of thresholds in the climate system and ecosystems. These thresholds determine, for example, the presence of sea ice and permafrost, and the survival of species, from fish to insect pests, with implications for society. With further climate change, the crossing of additional thresholds is expected. (p. 76, 82, 115, 137, 142)</strong></p>
<p><strong>10. Future climate change and its impacts depend on choices made today. The amount and rate of future climate change depend primarily on current and future human-caused emissions of heat-trapping gases and airborne particles. Responses involve reducing emissions to limit future warming, and adapting to the changes that are unavoidable. (p. 25, 29)</strong></p>
<p>Watch Video Coverage of the presentation of the report on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y88sgDM9HmA" target="_blank">youtube</a>.</p>
<p><em>Photo Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbum/175117349/">bbum</a></em><em> via flickr under Creative Commons License</em></p>
<p><em>Photo 2 Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/marzinians/3592548434/" target="_blank">Dimit®i</a> via flickr under Creative Commons License</em></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/06/09/sheep-and-cow-farting-vaccine-to-reduce-climate-changing-methane-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Anti-Fart Shots for a Cleaner Environment?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/06/anti-fart-shots-for-a-cleaner-environment/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/06/anti-fart-shots-for-a-cleaner-environment/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental &amp; Climate Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/06/anti-fart-shots-for-a-cleaner-environment/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/06/livestock.jpg" title="livestock.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/06/livestock.jpg" alt="livestock.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><u><strong>Aw, c&#8217;mon, pull my finger!</strong></u></p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably had that one pulled (pardon the pun) on you at least once in your life, and the old guy got a good laugh out of your response.  It&#8217;s ok, old guys do strange things, I know.</p>
<p>Well, this isn&#8217;t about old guys, but sheep, cattle, deer and goats, the premier emitters of methane gas in the world.  In this case, nature is &#8220;pulling the finger.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/06/anti-fart-shots-for-a-cleaner-environment/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/06/anti-fart-shots-for-a-cleaner-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Livestock&#8217;s Long Shadow by David Shaw</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/28/livestocks-long-shadow-by-david-shawla/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/28/livestocks-long-shadow-by-david-shawla/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Beth Bader</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/28/livestocks-long-shadow-by-david-shawla/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2008/03/wastewaterlagoon.jpg" title="Waste lagoon, USDA photo"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2008/03/wastewaterlagoon.jpg" alt="Waste lagoon, USDA photo" height="197" width="296" /></a></p>
<p><em>Editor’s note: David Shaw, a participant in the blog project by Professor Simran Sethi’s Media and the Environment course at the University of Kansas, examines the global impact of livestock production. This post was originally published to the course blog on Tuesday, March 15, 2008.</em></p>
<p>Recently, I discovered a report from 2006, entitled <a href="vitualcentre.org/en/library/key_pub/longshad/A0701E00.pdf">Livestock’s Long Shadow</a>, which is an assessment of global livestock’s impacts on the environment. The report was produced by the Livestock, Environment and Development (LEAD) Initiative. This is not an animal rights group, or a band of hippie vegans, but rather a sub-committee of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.</p>
<p>I’m well aware of many of the report’s findings, but there is much in the report that I never knew. It’s troubling that livestock is rarely addressed by leading environmentalists and environmental groups. Especially because, as the report states, “the livestock sector emerges as one of the most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems at every scale from local to global.”</p>
<p>Based on recent posts about the impact of food on the environment, I highly recommend at least skimming through the report. Here are a few highlights I’ve taken directly from the report’s executive summary:<br />
<em>(photo: USDA. Waste lagoon at a hog farm in North Carolina)</em></p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/28/livestocks-long-shadow-by-david-shawla/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/28/livestocks-long-shadow-by-david-shawla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Consider Cutting the Meat Out</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/20/consider-cutting-the-meat-out/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/20/consider-cutting-the-meat-out/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sharon Troy</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[vegetarian]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/20/consider-cutting-the-meat-out/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2008/03/mo327x89.gif" alt="meatout" align="left" />In an act of precognition, Mark Seall wrote <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/19/wildlife-should-we-eat-them/">a post today on EcoWorldly</a> raising a number of questions about vegetarianism. While it would be near impossible to address all of his questions in one post, I do want to get the conversation started. I call his post precognitive because it provides a perfect segue to promote an event happening tomorrow:  <a href="http://www.meatout.org/">The Great American Meatout</a>.</p>
<p>Every Spring, thousands of activists and educators get together at events all over the world to raise awareness of vegetarian diets. Despite the event&#8217;s name, it has in fact grown into an international phenomenon. You can <a href="http://www.meatout.org/events/mevents.htm">find a calendar of events here</a> to see what&#8217;s going on near you. This is certainly a great place to start in terms of resources, and I plan to address that further in my next post.</p>
<p>For today I want to look at Mark&#8217;s question, <strong>&#8220;Should we be eating animals in the first place?&#8221;</strong>  Here&#8217;s my take&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/20/consider-cutting-the-meat-out/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/20/consider-cutting-the-meat-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Blame the Cows</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/21/blame-the-cows/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/21/blame-the-cows/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[ecoscraps]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/21/blame-the-cows/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/21/blame-the-cows/jersey-cow-photo-by-man-vyi/" rel="attachment wp-att-172" title="Jersey cow (Photo by Man vyi)"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/01/jersey-cow.jpg" alt="Jersey cow (Photo by Man vyi)" align="left" /></a></p>
<p>The Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences has just received $590,000 to support research into <a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080121/D8UADK0G2.html">how diet affects a cow&#8217;s methane emissions.</a> Livestock are blamed for <a href="http://www.epa.gov/rlep/faq.html">28 percent of the world&#8217;s human-caused emissions of methane,</a> a much more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.</p>
<p><em>Photo courtesy of Man vyi at <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Jersey_cattle_in_Jersey.jpg%3Cbr%3E%3C/a%3E">Wikimedia Commons</a></em><br />
<a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/tree.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4567" src="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/tree.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="351" /></a><strong><em>Some Key Findings of the report are:</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>1. Global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced. Global temperature has increased over the past 50 years. This observed increase is due primarily to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases. (p. 13)</strong></p>
<p><strong>2. Climate changes are underway in the United States and are projected to grow. Climate-related changes are already observed in the United States and its coastal waters. These include increases in heavy downpours, rising temperature and sea level, rapidly retreating glaciers, thawing permafrost, lengthening growing seasons, lengthening ice-free seasons in the ocean and on lakes and rivers, earlier snowmelt, and alterations in river flows. These changes are projected to grow. (p. 27)</strong></p>
<p><strong>3. Widespread climate-related impacts are occurring now and are expected to increase. Climate changes are already affecting water, energy, transportation, agriculture, ecosystems, and health. These impacts are different from region to region and will grow under projected climate change. (p. 41-106, 107-152)</strong></p>
<p><strong>4. Climate change will stress water resources. Water is an issue in every region, but the nature of the potential impacts varies. Drought, related to reduced precipitation, increased evaporation, and increased water loss from plants, is an important issue in many regions, especially in the West. Floods and water quality problems are likely to be amplified by climate change in most regions. Declines in mountain snowpack are important in the West and Alaska where snowpack provides vital natural water storage. (p. 41, 129, 135, 139)</strong></p>
<p><strong>5. Crop and livestock production will be increasingly challenged. Agriculture is considered one of the sectors most adaptable to changes in climate. However, increased heat, pests, water stress, diseases, and weather extremes will pose adaptation challenges for crop and livestock production. (p. 71)</strong></p>
<p><strong>6. Coastal areas are at increasing risk from sea-level rise and storm surge. Sea-level rise and storm surge place many U.S. coastal areas at increasing risk of erosion and flooding, especially along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, Pacific Islands, and parts of Alaska. Energy and transportation infrastructure and other property in coastal areas are very likely to be adversely affected. (p. 111, 139, 145, 149)</strong></p>
<p><strong>7. Threats to human health will increase. Health impacts of climate change are related to heat stress, waterborne diseases, poor air quality, extreme weather events, and diseases transmitted by insects and rodents. Robust public health infrastructure can reduce the potential for negative impacts. (p. 89)</strong></p>
<p><strong>8. Climate change will interact with many social and environmental stresses. Climate change will combine with pollution, population growth, overuse of resources, urbanization, and other social, economic, and environmental stresses to create larger impacts than from any of these factors alone. (p. 99)</strong></p>
<p><strong>9. Thresholds will be crossed, leading to large changes in climate and ecosystems. There are a variety of thresholds in the climate system and ecosystems. These thresholds determine, for example, the presence of sea ice and permafrost, and the survival of species, from fish to insect pests, with implications for society. With further climate change, the crossing of additional thresholds is expected. (p. 76, 82, 115, 137, 142)</strong></p>
<p><strong>10. Future climate change and its impacts depend on choices made today. The amount and rate of future climate change depend primarily on current and future human-caused emissions of heat-trapping gases and airborne particles. Responses involve reducing emissions to limit future warming, and adapting to the changes that are unavoidable. (p. 25, 29)</strong></p>
<p>Watch Video Coverage of the presentation of the report on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y88sgDM9HmA" target="_blank">youtube</a>.</p>
<p><em>Photo Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbum/175117349/">bbum</a></em><em> via flickr under Creative Commons License</em></p>
<p><em>Photo 2 Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/marzinians/3592548434/" target="_blank">Dimit®i</a> via flickr under Creative Commons License</em></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/21/blame-the-cows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 561 queries in 1.522 seconds. -->