<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; los alamos</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/los-alamos</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'los alamos'</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Mini Nuclear Power Plants For Your Neighborhood In Five Years</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/09/mini-nuclear-power-plants-for-your-neighborhood-in-five-years/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/09/mini-nuclear-power-plants-for-your-neighborhood-in-five-years/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/09/mini-nuclear-power-plants-for-your-neighborhood-in-five-years/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/11/nucleartoy.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1467" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/11/nucleartoy.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="336" /></a></p>
<p>Scientists at the US government laboratory which developed the first atomic bomb say <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/08/mini-nuclear-plants-power_n_142412.html">nuclear power plants </a>smaller than a garden shed and able to power about 20,000 homes will be available within the next five years. The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/08/mini-nuclear-plants-power_n_142412.html">miniature reactors</a> will be factory-sealed, absent of any weapon-grade materials, and also have no moving parts.</p>
<p>Awesome. Call them <strong>Nükleer</strong> and we can sell them at <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/02/could_nuclear_p.php">Ikea</a>!
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/09/mini-nuclear-power-plants-for-your-neighborhood-in-five-years/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/09/mini-nuclear-power-plants-for-your-neighborhood-in-five-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Making Lemonade: &#8220;Green Freedom&#8221; to Make Gasoline from Carbon Emissions</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/20/making-lemonade-green-freedom-to-make-gasoline-from-carbon-emissions/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/20/making-lemonade-green-freedom-to-make-gasoline-from-carbon-emissions/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Carol Gulyas</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/20/making-lemonade-green-freedom-to-make-gasoline-from-carbon-emissions/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p> <img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/02/orangesky_ae29a93163jpg.jpeg" alt="orangesky_ae29a93163jpg.jpeg" align="left" height="379" width="254" /></p>
<p>Dr. Jeffrey Martin and William L. Kubic, Jr. have proposed a concept to synthesize gasoline from carbon dioxide emissions, and have dubbed their idea &#8220;Green Freedom.&#8221;  &#8220;The idea is simple,&#8221; (a sure bet that it&#8217;s anything but) says Kenneth Chang in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/science/19carb.html?_r=1&#38;scp=1&#38;sq=carbon+to+gasoline&#38;st=nyt&#38;oref=slogin"><em>New York Times</em>:</a></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Air would be blown over a liquid solution of potassium carbonate, which would absorb the carbon dioxide [which] would then be extracted and subjected to chemical reactions that would turn it into fuel: methanol, gasoline or jet fuel.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>The resulting gasoline would not emit carbon dioxide.  Developed at Los Alamos, the idea is based on sound physics, though so far it has not been proven at the factory level.  The problem with the concept is that it uses an enormous amount of energy &#8212; so much so that it can&#8217;t be produced economically except by a nuclear power plant. Oh, and thousands of them would need to be built in order to replace petroleum at current levels of use.  The scientists are estimating that the process could produce gasoline at a cost of $3.40 a gallon to the consumer.</p>
<p>If this sounds like a contorted process, it may be because the carbon emissions problem remains a hard nut to crack.  <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/23/affordable-electric-cars-coming-to-us-in-2009/">Electric cars</a> just move the energy use to the power plant, unless those cars are powered by solar-charged batteries.  Hydrogen fuel cells take large amounts of energy to create the hydrogen.  And biofuels take up valuable farmland or replace rainforests needed to offset carbon emissions. So you can&#8217;t blame a scientist for trying.   Martin and Kubic will present their idea today at the <a href="http://www.upcomingevents.ctc.com/2ndAnnualAltEnergyNOW_agenda.html">Alternative Energy Now</a> conference in Lake Buena Vista, Florida.</p>
<p><em>For another take on the &#8220;Green Freedom&#8221; project, see <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/02/15/another-blue-sky-energy-source/">Steve Verhey&#8217;s post on Gas 2.0</a>.</em></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/20/making-lemonade-green-freedom-to-make-gasoline-from-carbon-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 124 queries in 0.376 seconds. -->