<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; mccain energy policy</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/mccain-energy-policy</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'mccain energy policy'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Nuclear Power is NOT the Solution to Our Global Warming Woes</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/22/nuclear-power-is-not-the-solution-to-our-global-warming-woes/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/22/nuclear-power-is-not-the-solution-to-our-global-warming-woes/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Low Impact Living</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/22/nuclear-power-is-not-the-solution-to-our-global-warming-woes/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="float: right" src="http://www.lowimpactliving.com/images/blog-images/nuclear_plant_sm.jpg" alt="nuclear plant" width="171" height="253" />[<em>Editor's note: The following is a guest-post from Low Impact Living</em>]<br />
As our presidential campaign season draws towards a close and the attacks / counter-attacks reach a fever pitch, it&#8217;s almost impossible to separate fact from fiction. So many contradictory proposals, so many disparate numbers &#8212; I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if someone says the sky is bright pink before we&#8217;re through.</p>
<p>The debate about energy policy is a case in point: the proposals so far have ranged from sound (invest in multiple forms of renewable energy) to questionable (clean coal, 45 new nuclear power plants) to the insultingly cynical and foolish (<a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/drill-baby-drill-republicans-try-out-stupid-new-catchphrase/">Drill Baby Drill</a>!).</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/22/nuclear-power-is-not-the-solution-to-our-global-warming-woes/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/22/nuclear-power-is-not-the-solution-to-our-global-warming-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why Drill, Baby, Drill Will Never be an Energy Solution and is NOT an Energy Policy</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/why-drill-baby-drill-will-never-be-an-energy-solution-and-is-not-an-energy-policy/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/why-drill-baby-drill-will-never-be-an-energy-solution-and-is-not-an-energy-policy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/why-drill-baby-drill-will-never-be-an-energy-solution-and-is-not-an-energy-policy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/oilrig.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1326" style="margin-left: 2px;margin-right: 2px;float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/oilrig.jpg" alt="Texas oil rig" width="282" height="181" /></a>I&#8217;m sure at tonight&#8217;s presidential debate, we will hear more of John McCain&#8217;s energy policy.  I&#8217;ve recently read some enlightening information in <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1438211953/ecochildsplay-20">The Bush League of Nations: The Coalition of the Unwilling, the Bullied, and the Bribed</a></em> by James A. Swanson that proves &#8220;<a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/drill-baby-drill-republicans-try-out-stupid-new-catchphrase/" target="_blank">Drill, baby, drill</a>&#8221; is not an energy policy, and it will never make us energy independent. US oil production peaked in 1970 at more than 11 million barrels a day, ironically just three years before the oil crisis.  Consider these statistics from Swanson&#8217;s book:</p>
<ul>
<li>By the end of 2005, US crude oil production had dropped to 4.86 million barrels per day, which is <em>less than 45%</em> of America&#8217;s peak production in 1970.</li>
<li>By 2005, America was producing less oil than it did in 1950.</li>
<li>The 1970 record oil production represented<em> more than 40%</em> of total world production, but it was still not enough to meet America&#8217;s appetite for oil-almost 15 million barrels per day in 1970.</li>
<li>By the end of 2005, U.S. oil consumption had increased to about 21 million barrels per day, while U.S. production, as noted above, had dropped to 5 million barrels.  American now has to import <em>more than 75% </em>of the oil it consumes.</li>
<li>By way of comparison, at the time of the 1973 oil crisis, during which Americans endured closed gas stations and gas lines blocks long, the United States imported l<em>ess than one-third</em> of its oil.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/why-drill-baby-drill-will-never-be-an-energy-solution-and-is-not-an-energy-policy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/why-drill-baby-drill-will-never-be-an-energy-solution-and-is-not-an-energy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 119 queries in 0.392 seconds. -->