Scott Borgerson of the Council on Foreign Relations, a former U.S. Coast Guard lieutenant commander, has just gone on record as saying that we could be facing a new cold war.

The analogy is both apt and humorously fitting, but is it in any way true? Instead of the historic face-off between the world’s two superpowers, we could be looking at something far different. Instead of just America and Russia, Arctic powers include Canada, Denmark and Norway, in addition to the original two.

Already tensions are rising, in a way that is eerily familiar. Russia is sending submarines and science ships north to investigate how far their continental shelf extends. They’ve planted a flag on the seabed underneath the North Pole, and for the first time since the Cold War, they’ve sent strategic bomber flights over the Arctic.

And yet a US official, who went on record under anonymity, believes that “There’s no ice cold war.”

Borgerson said in a telephone interview recently that “…planting a flag on the sea bottom and renewing strategic bomber flights is provocative,” and added that “I don’t think we’re [the United States] scrambling. We’re sleepwalking … I think the Russians are scrambling and I think the Norwegians and Canadians and Danes are keenly aware.”

Everyone’s scrambling for the best view. Russia isn’t the only one conducting scientific research. All of the Arctic powers are looking at just how far their continental shelves reach. Russia seems to have stepped on toes, and while they aren’t necessarily in direct conflict with the US as of yet, Norway and Denmark definitely have some issues with what Russia is claiming as hers.

Coastal nations, like the 5 involved, are generally happy with the 200 nautical miles that extend from their coastline as sovereign territory. But recent research coming out of the University of New Hampshire and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration suggests that the US shelf might extend an extra 100 nautical miles further than previously thought.

The U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea is what gives the sovereign rights to coastal nations. And many believe that the US should sign the treaty soon. In addition, if a country can meet a set of conditions – scientific, etc – then their coastal boundaries can extend.

“Of course we need to be at the table as ocean law develops,” the U.S. official said. “It’s not like ocean law is going to stop developing if we’re not in there. It’s just going to develop without us.”

What saddens me the most is that you can get your bottom dollar that this does not bode well for the environment. Ask yourself what’s causing the melting of the Arctic, and then look at what they hope to extract. The answer to both questions, is fossil fuel.

Photo Courtesy of arcticroute.com via Flickr

It is estimated by scientists that nearly 25% of the world's undiscovered gas and oil reserves may be in the Arctic. With warming seas making the idea of a Northwest Passage for shipping lanes a reality, the enticement of setting up rigs and scooping resources is causing countries to get out and make claims. Canada, Russia, Denmark, and the United States are all shouting "Mine! Mine!". Oil aside, fishing companies are also eager to start tapping into the region, which could spell disaster for stocks in the region.

So, what does this mean? Well, to put it simply, in the face of climate change and environmental collapse, there's always a buck to be made. Opening up the Arctic, a pristine environmental area relatively untouched to human exploitation, could destroy a great deal of life. As the article states, "Apart from the risk of oil spills, more vessels could carry alien organisms into the Northwest Passage, posing a risk to indigenous life forms."

Let's also not forget the native people who actually live in these Arctic areas and depend on the natural environment for survival. Groups like the Inuits and the Sami may be directly affected in ways that could prove disastrous for their way of life. It's a sad fact that world governments may see the dollar signs of a possible ice-free Arctic, before they see the advantages of preventing such a loss. Hit the excellent article for an in-depth report on this particular situation.

You probably find that you need to use some sort of "ice melt" to help with the job, but we all know that most of these products are not without environmental side effects. In fact, it's been quite obvious for some time that most existing solutions are not environmentally-friendly, but super eco-friendly solutions are still not available.

Of course, there are ways to be less damaging to the environment when deicing pavement. You might want to take a couple of Advil for this one, because it's going to get a little manual around here.

The first step is to stop the ice before it starts. Clear snow before ice has a chance to form. If you're dealing with ice from freezing rain, Treehugger recommends that you break up that ice with a flat hoe. However, that may not be entirely reasonable depending on the area that you are working with, and the amount of ice.

One of the more environmentally friendly compounds out there (or less toxic, at least) is CMA - calcium magnesium acetate. If you put it down before the snowfall, it will even help stop ice from forming. It's a great alternative to salt, however it becomes much less effective in temperatures lower than the mid-20s.

One final recommendation is use whatever product you choose sparingly. Put down just enough to help you break up the ice so that you can remove it more easily.

Rebecca says: I'm feeling for you all right now. We're expecting a temperature drop here in Miami this weekend. A high in the mid-60s is a push for us, but we've pledged not to complain after seeing what the rest of the country is up against. Stay warm and drink some fair-trade hot cocoa!

Resources:

Environmental Literary Council, Impacts of Deicing

ENN, Environmentally Friendlier Ways to De-Ice Pavement?

University of Nebraska, Winter Deicing Agents for the Homeowner

University of Maryland, Melting Ice Safely