<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; military spending</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/military-spending</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'military spending'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Obama Can End our Economic Dependency on War by Curtailing Global Arms Sales</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/07/obama-can-end-our-economic-dependency-on-war-by-curtailing-global-arms-sales/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/07/obama-can-end-our-economic-dependency-on-war-by-curtailing-global-arms-sales/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/07/obama-can-end-our-economic-dependency-on-war-by-curtailing-global-arms-sales/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/01/warandpeace.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2093" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/01/warandpeace.jpg" alt="US depends on global war sales to support the economy" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Obama was elected as the first anti-war president since Dwight D. Eisenhower promised to end the Korean Conflict.</strong> <a href="http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/24/the-worlds-top-10-military-spenders/" target="_blank">War is big money to the US, and this country is the world&#8217;s top military spender</a>!  Obama has given this country hope for change, but the biggest change we need is to stop war mongering. Since Pearl Harbor 67 years ago, the US has been on the nonstop warpath, whether covertly or overtly.</p>
<h3>War is bad for the environment, bad for society, bad for culture, bad for our health; however, it is good for the economy. As <a href="http://www.truthout.org/010109A" target="_blank">Deepak Chopra wisely said</a>, &#8220;Unless it can make as much money as war, peace doesn&#8217;t stand a chance.&#8221;</h3>
<p>Last year, the <a href="http://www.truthout.org/010709C" target="_blank">US overtook Russia as the leading arms supplier to the developing world</a>. <strong>The US made $24.8 billion in global arms agreements</strong> selling conventional weapons that included: tanks, self-propelled guns, artillery, armored personnel carriers, armored cars, major surface combatants, minor surface combatants, submarines, guided missile patrol boats, supersonic combat aircraft, subsonic combat aircraft, other aircraft, helicopters, surface to air missiles, surface to surface missiles, and anti-ship missiles.  The US dominated 41.5 percent of the global arms market, with Russia coming in second place with 17.3 percent. <strong>70.5 percent of these arms sales went to developing countries</strong>.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/07/obama-can-end-our-economic-dependency-on-war-by-curtailing-global-arms-sales/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/07/obama-can-end-our-economic-dependency-on-war-by-curtailing-global-arms-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The World&#8217;s Top 10 Military Spenders</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/24/the-worlds-top-10-military-spenders/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/24/the-worlds-top-10-military-spenders/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/24/the-worlds-top-10-military-spenders/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoscraps.com/files/2008/01/800px-us_army_m1a1_abrams_main_battle_tank.jpg" title="800px-us_army_m1a1_abrams_main_battle_tank.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/01/800px-us_army_m1a1_abrams_main_battle_tank.jpg" alt="800px-us_army_m1a1_abrams_main_battle_tank.jpg" align="left" height="193" width="299" /></a>1. United States (FY08 budget), $623 billion<br />
2. China (2004), $65 billion<br />
3. Russia, $50 billion<br />
4. France (2005), $45 billion<br />
5. United Kingdom, $42.8 billion<br />
6. Japan (2007), $41.75 billion<br />
7. Germany (2003), $35.1 billion<br />
8. Italy (2003), $28.2 billion<br />
9. South Korea (2003), $21.1 billion<br />
10. India (2005 est.), $19 billion</p>
<p>Image source: <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/53/US_Army_M1A1_Abrams_main_battle_tank.jpg/800px-US_Army_M1A1_Abrams_main_battle_tank.jpg">Wikimedia Commons</a></p>
<p>Data source: <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174884/Tomgram%3A%20%20Chalmers%20Johnson%2C%20How%20to%20Sink%20America">TomDispatch.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/53/US_Army_M1A1_Abrams_main_battle_tank.jpg/800px-US_Army_M1A1_Abrams_main_battle_tank.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/24/the-worlds-top-10-military-spenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 123 queries in 0.379 seconds. -->