<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; National and World News</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/national-and-world-news</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'National and World News'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>LONDON AWARE 08</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/28/london-aware-08/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/28/london-aware-08/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pem Charnley</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/28/london-aware-08/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/01/london.jpg" title="london.jpg"><img src="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/01/london.jpg" alt="london.jpg" align="left" /></a>Citizens across the UK will have the chance to expand their knowledge of all things green with a London expedition due to run in May.</p>
<p>Entitled LONDON AWARE 08, the exhibition gives people a chance to meet and talk with the exhibitors.</p>
<p>And as the website tells us:</p>
<p><em>LONDON AWARE 08 will be a meeting point for everyone - businesses, charities and experts, as well as people who are taking their first steps into a greener world.</em></p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>The event looks interesting, refreshing and very much down-to-earth. As it should be with no barriers between those in the know and those who aren&#8217;t. An ideal opportunity to spread the word. As quoted above, the organisers are keen to get those new to greener living involved.</p>
<p>Clicking on the <a href="http://www.ukaware.com/visitors.php?sub=2">visitor link</a> over at the website, we are promised that information, advice and inspiration will be provided to allow us all to achieve a more sustainable way of life.</p>
<p>Companies from across the board will be in attendance to promote their sustainable products.</p>
<p>There will also be a series of lectures on climate change.</p>
<p>The event has been organised by UK AWARE - a group of people eager to make a difference. As they so realistically put it:</p>
<p><em>We realise that to really fight climate change we need to make the right choices also the easiest ones.</em></p>
<p>Further events are also planned for Manchester and Edinburgh.</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ukaware.com/about.php">UK AWARE</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ukaware.com/index.php?sub=1">LONDON AWARE 08</a></p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong></p>
<p>Image courtesy of <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/ru_boff/2126740570/">Flickr</a></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]Citizens across the UK will have the chance to expand their knowledge of all things green with a London expedition due to run in May.

Entitled LONDON AWARE 08, the exhibition gives people a chance to meet and talk with the exhibitors.

And as the website tells us:

LONDON AWARE 08 will be a meeting point for everyone - businesses, charities and experts, as well as people who are taking their first steps into a greener world.



[1] http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/01/london.jpg]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/28/london-aware-08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Just Three Sustainable Homes Built in UK!</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/28/just-three-sustainable-homes-bult-in-uk/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/28/just-three-sustainable-homes-bult-in-uk/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pem Charnley</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Building]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ecoscraps]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/28/just-three-sustainable-homes-bult-in-uk/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoscraps.com/files/2008/01/gordon.jpg" title="gordon.jpg"><img src="http://ecoscraps.com/files/2008/01/gordon.jpg" alt="gordon.jpg" align="left" /></a>It&#8217;s long been a concern of mine - a concern that has been growing in recent months.How exactly do you get the public on board, get them to make green choices? Gordon Brown dreams of 100,000 sustainable homes being built.</p>
<p>Only 99,997 to go then.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/only-three-sustainable-homes-built-in-uk-so-far-774647.html">Only three sustainable homes built in UK so far</a>.</p>
<p>Image courtesy of <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/opendemocracy/631051000/">Flickr</a>.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]It's long been a concern of mine - a concern that has been growing in recent months.How exactly do you get the public on board, get them to make green choices? Gordon Brown dreams of 100,000 sustainable homes being built.

Only 99,997 to go then.

Only three sustainable homes built in UK so far [2].

Image courtesy of Flickr [3].

[1] http://ecoscraps.com/files/2008/01/gordon.jpg
[2] http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/only-three-sustainable-homes-built-in-uk-so-far-774647.html
[3] http://flickr.com/photos/opendemocracy/631051000/]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/01/28/just-three-sustainable-homes-bult-in-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>75 Flood Warnings in UK: More Rain Forecast as Climate Changes</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/16/75-flood-warnings-in-uk-more-rain-forecast/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/16/75-flood-warnings-in-uk-more-rain-forecast/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pem Charnley</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/16/75-flood-warnings-in-uk-more-rain-forecast/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/01/ukflooding.jpg" title="ukflooding.jpg"><img src="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/01/ukflooding.jpg" alt="ukflooding.jpg" align="left" /></a>The UK&#8217;s Environment Agency has issued flood warnings. The alert follows days of heavy rainfall.</p>
<p>The Agency has a special webpage <a href="http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/subjects/flood/floodwarning/?lang=_e">dedicated to flooding</a>, updated every 15 minutes, and as I type this, the page states the following:</p>
<p>1 severe flood warning</p>
<p>74 flood warnings</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>One warning issued covers the area that includes the town of Tewkesbury. This particular town made the headlines during last year&#8217;s summer due to appalling flooding. Indeed, there are residents still living in caravans due to the summer&#8217;s extensive damage and yet now these same people must prepare for another potential disaster hitting their neighbourhood.</p>
<p>Rivers and settlements very often go hand in hand. Tewkesbury is positioned so that it sits where the River Severn and the River Avon converge.</p>
<p>One resident, Julie Irwin, is quoted in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/2008/jan/16/pollution?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=environment">The Guardian</a> as saying: &#8220;Anxiety levels here are very high, more so because we&#8217;ve seen very little action from the council to clear the drains or the brooks&#8230;. I just feel we are sitting ducks.&#8221;</p>
<p>She added that many houses in the town were inches away from inundation.</p>
<p><a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUKL1531360820080116?rpc=401&amp;">Reuters</a> have run the story and one paragraph sums the situation up in a distressingly simple sentence:</p>
<p><em>Tewkesbury in Gloucestershire found itself at risk once again as the river Avon overflowed its banks following five days of rain.</em></p>
<p>Gloucestershire isn&#8217;t so far away from where I type this. It&#8217;s been impossible not to notice the weather. Wind and rain have lashed and howled at my windows day and night with let-ups few and far between.</p>
<p>In a chillingly matter-of-fact summary of the summer flooding, the Environment Agency have drafted <a href="http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/subjects/flood/1867303/">a report</a> that begins:</p>
<p><em>In June and July 2007, there were several periods of extreme rainfall which gave rise to widespread flooding in England and parts of Wales. We experienced the wettest May to July since 1766 when reliable records began to be collected. Approximately 49,000 households and nearly 7,000 businesses were flooded. Major infrastructure such as transport links, schools, power and water supplies were disrupted. </em></p>
<p><em>Flooding was caused by drains, river channels and flood defences being overwhelmed by the extreme flows of water.  This often happened very quickly and in these circumstances it is difficult to predict where flooding will occur.</em></p>
<p>I now fear a summary of our winter&#8217;s weather will read all too similarly.</p>
<p>So this is what they mean by climate chaos, is it? The UK often jests itself about its weather. A rather damp collection of islands that is all too frequently mildly overcast. We positively enjoy moaning about the weather. But now the joke&#8217;s over.</p>
<p>In the meantime, the <a href="http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/subjects/flood/1217883/1218121/1218151/?version=1&amp;lang=_e">Environment Agency</a> have a page telling people what to do should there be the risk of a flood. I hope these tips prove useful whatever country you live in:</p>
<ul>
<li>Identify a safe place where you, your family and your pets can keep away from the floodwater.</li>
<li>Gather essential items together. These include warm clothes, blankets, regular medication, a torch, food supplies, a mobile phone and a battery operated or wind-up radio.</li>
<li>Turn off gas, electricity and water supplies at the mains.</li>
<li>Move electrical items and valuables to a first floor or higher position.</li>
<li>Floods can kill. NEVER attempt to walk or drive through any depth of floodwater.</li>
<li>WAIT for the emergency services. Follow their instructions. If an evacuation order is issued you MUST comply.</li>
</ul>
<p>A further page on the Agency&#8217;s website <a href="http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/subjects/flood/1217883/1218166/1218172/?version=1&amp;lang=_e">discusses climate change.</a> It states quite clearly that the UK&#8217;s weather is changing. Heavier rain, more intense storms, these two weather patterns are becoming increasingly more regular.</p>
<p>The problem facing us here in the UK is that there is no &#8220;flood season.&#8221; Regardless of the time of year, flooding can occur.</p>
<p>And with reference to the storms, these can have environmental impacts offshore also. The Guardian article referenced earlier highlighted another environmental threat. The 6,000 tonne freighter, the Ice Prince, has sunk. The ship became another victim of the storms after its cargo of timber shifted. The vessel&#8217;s crew had to be rescued. The report continues:</p>
<p><em>The Ice Prince&#8217;s fuel tanks are full of 313 tonnes of intermediate fuel oil. IFO is a blend of heavy and lighter oils which can spread thinly over a wide area. There is also diesel on board.</em></p>
<p>With this borne in mind, the RSPB remain on standby should the hull break up. The thought that in the coming days the news will fill with shots of seabirds covered in oil is frightening and of course potentially very upsetting.</p>
<p><strong>Sources:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/weather/2008/jan/16/pollution?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=environment">Flood Report</a> - The Guardian</p>
<p><a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUKL1531360820080116?rpc=401&amp;">Flood Report</a> - Reuters</p>
<p><a href="http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/?lang=_e">Environment Agency</a></p>
<p>Image obtained from <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/eabod/903491580/">Flickr </a></p>
<p><strong>Useful Resources:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/yourenv/639312/?version=1&amp;lang=_e">Climate Change</a> - a page including useful links on the Environment Agency&#8217;s website.</p>
<p>Gavin Hudson wrote a moving account of his <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2007/12/19/the-dark-side-of-crude-firsthand-accounts-of-koreas-oil-spill-cleanup/">cleaning up an oil spill</a> in South Korea.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]The UK's Environment Agency has issued flood warnings. The alert follows days of heavy rainfall.

The Agency has a special webpage dedicated to flooding [2], updated every 15 minutes, and as I type this, the page states the following:

1 severe flood warning

74 flood warnings



[1] http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/01/ukflooding.jpg
[2] http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/subjects/flood/floodwarning/?lang=_e]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/16/75-flood-warnings-in-uk-more-rain-forecast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Dead Swans: Avian Flu Strain the Cause</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/11/dead-swans-fatal-avian-flu-strain-the-cause/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/11/dead-swans-fatal-avian-flu-strain-the-cause/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pem Charnley</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/11/dead-swans-fatal-avian-flu-strain-the-cause/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/01/swans1.jpg" title="swans1.jpg"><img width="303" src="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/01/swans1.jpg" alt="swans1.jpg" height="195" /></a>In the adjoining English county - a mere 40 miles or so from where I type this, I learn that three swans have been found dead.</p>
<p>The cause of death? Avian flu. (The H5N1 strain)</p>
<p>The dead birds were found at Abbotsbury swannery in Dorset which is a colony of mute swans. The swannery dates back to the 11th century and was established by Benedicitine monks.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Staff discovered the deaths during a routine check and are now being administered Tamiflu tablets as a precaution.</p>
<p>Whether it is more of a shock when it happens to such beautiful creatures is of course debatable, yet certainly it seems to have upset the people I have spoken to more than usual.</p>
<p>And as a report in The Guardian states:</p>
<p><em>The outbreak comes less than a month after restrictions on poultry movement were lifted in Norfolk and Suffolk that had been imposed after an outbreak of H5N1 on a free range turkey farm in November.</em></p>
<p>This is not good timing at all.</p>
<p>It is thought that wild birds are the source of the infection.</p>
<p>But certainly, as far as this writer is concerned, avian influenza still seems a rather mysterious area. It pops up in the news far too often, yet still I am ignorant as to the facts. So here goes.</p>
<p><strong>Recent UK History</strong></p>
<p>Again referring to the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2238899,00.html?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=environment">Guardian piece</a> it states that in 2005 a parrot died of the disease. Fortunately the bird was in quarantine at the time which allowed the UK to maintain its disease-free status.</p>
<p>In April, 2006, 35,000 chickens had to be slaughtered at a farm in the south of England after an outbreak of the disease was discovered.</p>
<p>12 months ago, 159,000 turkeys had to be culled - again in the south of England - after it was found that some of the birds had died suspiciously. It appears the H5N1 strain was to blame.</p>
<p>Two months ago, yet again in the same part of the country, 5,000 birds were destroyed at a poultry farm during another outbreak.</p>
<p><strong>What is Avian Flu?</strong></p>
<p>The disease came to light in Italy around 100 years ago. It can affect a variety of both domesticated and wild birds.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/avianflu/biofacts/avflu.html">This site</a> explains:</p>
<p><em>Infection can range from asymptomatic to severe, depending on the virulence of the virus and the susceptibility of the avian host. Avian influenza in domestic chickens and turkeys is classified according to disease severity, with two recognized forms: highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), also known as fowl plague, and low-pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI).</em></p>
<p><em>Avian influenza viruses that cause HPAI are highly virulent and mortality rates in infected flocks often approach 100%. While LPAI viruses are generally of lower virulence, LPAI in flocks should be controlled because LPAI viruses can serve as progenitors to HPAI viruses.</em></p>
<p><strong>Sources:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/birdflu/story/0,,2239304,00.html">The Guardian</a> incl. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/birdflu/story/0,,1591620,00.html">Q and A</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/avianflu/biofacts/avflu.html">Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy</a></p>
<p>Picture obtained <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/tamburix/357111598/">here</a>.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
 [1]In the adjoining English county - a mere 40 miles or so from where I type this, I learn that three swans have been found dead.
The cause of death? Avian flu. (The H5N1 strain)

The dead birds were found at Abbotsbury swannery in Dorset which is a colony of mute swans. The swannery dates back to the 11th century and was established by Benedicitine monks.



[1] http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/01/swans1.jpg]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/11/dead-swans-fatal-avian-flu-strain-the-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Khosla Ventures and BIOeCON form KiOR Inc.</title>
    <link>http://bioecon.greenoptions.com/2007/11/01/khosla-ventures-and-bioecon-form-kior-inc/</link>
    <comments>http://bioecon.greenoptions.com/2007/11/01/khosla-ventures-and-bioecon-form-kior-inc/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BIOeCON</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioecon.greenoptions.com/2007/11/01/khosla-ventures-and-bioecon-form-kior-inc/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Silicon Valley, Menlo Park, CA, USA, and Hoevelaken, The Netherlands — November 1, 2007—  Khosla Ventures and BIOeCON announce today the formation of their joint venture KiOR Inc. Khosla Ventures, will provide the Series A funding, whereas BIOeCON will bring its knowledge and intellectual property for the ‘Biomass Catalytic Cracking Process’ (BCC). KiOR Inc. will focus on the further development and commercialization of the BCC technology as well as prepare for raising significantly more capital in the next two to three years.   


BCC technology converts lignocellulosic biomass, found in grass, wood, and various agricultural and forestry wastes, into a bio-oil product that can be further upgraded to transportation fuels.  The conversion of cellulosic biomass to bio-oil represents a significant commercial opportunity that also offers important benefits, including using post-harvesting waste rather than competing with food crops; promoting environmental sustainability; reducing reliance on fossil fuels such as crude oil; and enabling economic development and job creation in rural areas.  


  “The key technical problem in the conversion of cellulosic biomass into usable fuels is how to open up the inaccessible solid fibrous 'woody' material, so that it can be effectively transformed. Most of the existing processes to unlock the woody structures are quite costly and intensive of energy or chemicals,” says Paul O’Connor, founder and president of BIOeCON.  “BIOeCON has developed a simple non-energy intensive way to make the woody biomass accessible to catalysts and convert to a bio-oil product with significantly improved product properties compared to other thermal-chemical processes.   


Doug Cameron, Khosla Ventures’ Chief Scientific Advisor: “BIOeCON has a strong R&#38;D network and solid scientific fundamentals. We have done a thorough evaluation of the technology and research programs and believe this can be a breakthrough technology.”  


 “Securing funding from a strategic and visionary venture capital company like Khosla Ventures is a major step forward”, says Rob van der Meij, CEO of KiOR Inc.” Khosla’s experience and expertise in technology startups is unmatched in the industry and we are looking forward to the acceleration that Khosla Ventures no doubt will bring.”  


KiOR’s concept and approach is unique and has the potential to become a large scale, widely applied technology, that can improve energy availability and sustainability to both the developed and developing world. The BCC technology unlocks the energy of vast amounts of biomass waste and converts it into a high valued energy product. This will not only reduce net carbon dioxide emission, but can also improve the energy independence of many countries.   


About BIOeCON
BIOeCON was founded in 2006 by Paul O’Connor with the aim to develop new, large scale technology to convert biomass, particularly the recalcitrant polymeric biomass residue, in a more efficient and cost-effective way to valuable molecules which can be utilized by the chemical and energy industry. BIOeCON is a privately funded company, which operates through an international network of top-scientists and institutions to bring together know-how, expertise and experience from heterogeneous catalysis, biomass processing, process development and technology commercialization. BIOeCON is based in Hoevelaken, the Netherlands. www.bio-e-con.com [1]   



About Khosla Ventures
Khosla Ventures offers venture assistance, strategic advice and capital to entrepreneurs. The firm helps entrepreneurs extend the potential of the Internet to new markets such as mobile and supports breakthrough scientific work such as bio refineries. Vinod Khosla founded the firm in 2004 and was joined in 2006 by two partners. The partners have been involved in founding or growing billion dollar businesses such as Sun Microsystems, Juniper Networks and AOL. Vinod has been labeled the #1 VC multiple times by Forbes and Fortune recently labeled him as one of the nation’s most influential ethanol advocates, noting “there are venture capitalists, and then there’s Vinod Khosla.” The firm’s capital comes entirely from its own partners and a portion of all profits are donated to charitable causes, with an emphasis on micro-finance, education, the environment and affordable housing. Khosla Ventures is based in Menlo Park, California, USA. www.khoslaventures.com [2] 



[1] http://www.bio-e-con.com/
[2] http://www.khoslaventures.com/]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://bioecon.greenoptions.com/2007/11/01/khosla-ventures-and-bioecon-form-kior-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Singapore Lands Largest Solar Production Complex</title>
    <link>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/31/singapore-lands-largest-solar-production-complex/</link>
    <comments>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/31/singapore-lands-largest-solar-production-complex/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Developing Nations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Landscaping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National and World News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Physics and Engineering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[REC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science and Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleantechnica]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[norway]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[singapore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar+energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar+manufacturing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar+power]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/31/singapore-lands-largest-solar-production-complex/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/29/Hand_with_solar.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="180" align="right" />Renewable energy is big, big, big: Josh just wrote about the world's largest wind farm possibly <a href="/2007/10/29/world_s_largest_wind_farm_growing_up_in_south_dakota">going up in South Dakota</a> (yahoo!), California could see the <a href="/2007/07/09/california_to_get_planet_s_largest_solar_power_plant">world's largest</a> solar power plant, and now Singapore is in the foray with landing the largest solar manufacturing facility the world's ever seen. 
</p>
<p>
A Norwegian company called Renewable Energy Corporation (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=OSL%3AREC">REC</a>) will build the complex, which will be completed in different stages to incorporate wafer, cell, and module production. REC already operates the world's current largest solar plant in Norway, which produces about 650 megawatts of energy annually. 
</p>
<p>
A solar manufacturing plant would be the first of its kind in Southeast Asia, and REC looked at 200 locations before settling on Singapore. A combination of tax incentives, grants, and a skilled workforce were some of the reasons REC liked it. Likewise, Singapore officials are thrilled about playing center stage in the world's rush to clean technology. Ko Kheng Hwa of the Economic Development Board explained:</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ Renewable energy is big, big, big: Josh just wrote about the world's largest wind farm possibly going up in South Dakota [1] (yahoo!), California could see the world's largest [2] solar power plant, and now Singapore is in the foray with landing the largest solar manufacturing facility the world's ever seen.

A Norwegian company called Renewable Energy Corporation (REC [3]) will build the complex, which will be completed in different stages to incorporate wafer, cell, and module production. REC already operates the world's current largest solar plant in Norway, which produces about 650 megawatts of energy annually.

A solar manufacturing plant would be the first of its kind in Southeast Asia, and REC looked at 200 locations before settling on Singapore. A combination of tax incentives, grants, and a skilled workforce were some of the reasons REC liked it. Likewise, Singapore officials are thrilled about playing center stage in the world's rush to clean technology. Ko Kheng Hwa of the Economic Development Board explained:
 	The project will be a 'queen bee' to attract a hive of solar activities to Singapore — big companies and young start-ups engaged in research and development, manufacturing and innovation, as well as the supplier ecosystem… This investment will be a tremendous boost to our national drive to develop the solar industry.
Once completed in 2010, the capacity of all the products the plant produces will generate up to 1.5 gigawatts (GW) of energy each year — that's compared to the total global industry output of 2 GW in 2006. That large of an impact, combined with the 3,000 expected jobs, shines a new light on an emerging area of the world hungry for innovative and clean technology.

Accelerating Innovation [4]
All Headline News [5]
Manufacturing.net [6]

[1] http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/30/worlds-largest-wind-farm-growing-up-in-south-dakota/
[2] http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/07/09/california-to-get-planet’s-largest-solar-power-plant/
[3] http://finance.google.com/finance?q=OSL%3AREC
[4] http://innovate.typepad.com/innovation/2007/10/worlds-largest-.html
[5] http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7008974962
[6] http://www.manufacturing.net/Singapore-Largest-Solar-Complex.aspx]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/31/singapore-lands-largest-solar-production-complex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Bushfire or the Wildfire</title>
    <link>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/29/the-bushfire-or-the-wildfire/</link>
    <comments>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/29/the-bushfire-or-the-wildfire/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/29/the-bushfire-or-the-wildfire/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/1342/1714071235_535f7cb8a6.jpg" alt="" width="287" height="192" align="right" />It might surprise many of you American readers to know that, down here in Australia, we don’t actually have wildfires. It's a surprising fact isn't it? From what I'm able to cobble together, Australia has <em>never</em> had a wildfire.
</p>
<p>
Granted, our bushfire seasons are horrific!
</p>
<p>
OK, so yeah, I'm just having a bit of fun with the different words and descriptions, but I have a point. Not an etymological point, but a point nonetheless. 
</p>
<h3><strong>A Brief Australian History Lesson</strong></h3>
<p>
The Californian fires have once again brought to light the sheer flammability of our surroundings. I live in Victoria, an Australian state with a very high bushfire rate. Australia has the dubious honor of being the home to what may have been the worst bush/wildfires in the world.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
It might surprise many of you American readers to know that, down here in Australia, we don’t actually have wildfires. It's a surprising fact isn't it? From what I'm able to cobble together, Australia has never had a wildfire.


Granted, our bushfire seasons are horrific!


OK, so yeah, I'm just having a bit of fun with the different words and descriptions, but I have a point. Not an etymological point, but a point nonetheless. 

A Brief Australian History Lesson

The Californian fires have once again brought to light the sheer flammability of our surroundings. I live in Victoria, an Australian state with a very high bushfire rate. Australia has the dubious honor of being the home to what may have been the worst bush/wildfires in the world. 


Dubbed the Black Friday Fires [1], they occurred on the 13th of January, 1939, in Victoria. Almost 20,000 km² (4,942,000 acres, 2000 ha) were destroyed, a total of 71 people lost their lives, several towns were entirely destroyed, and a total of 1,300 buildings were destroyed. 


A Royal Commission  	— a major government public inquiry into an issue in commonwealth countries  	— determined that three quarters of the state of Victoria was directly or indirectly affected. The Commission noted that &#34;it appeared the whole State was alight on Friday, 13 January, 1939.&#34;


1967 saw Tasmania – the only state with a higher likelihood to burn this year than Victoria  	— suffer a series of fires that later became known as the Black Tuesday bushfires [2]. Over 60 people died, and thousands more were affected. So widespread were the fires that they even encroached upon the capital of Hobart. 


And last in my tour of the named fires are the Ash Wednesday Fires [3]. February 16, 1983, saw Victoria and our westerly neighboring state South Australia (original, aren't we!) suffer from fires that took the lives of 75 Australians, and razed more than 2000 homes. The summer bushfires of 1982/1983 razed approximately 5,200 km² (1,284,000 acres).

El Niño


I'm not sure if many of you are aware, but I copped a thorough beating on Digg [4] (the social news site) for my most recent story [5], looking at the links between global warming and the Californian fires. Apparently I was doing everything from politicizing the fires, to simply providing incorrect information, aka, sensationalizing the fires. I especially like the idea that an Australian is politicizing the American fires. 


Nothing could be further from the truth. The simple fact is that a combination of global warming, and increased El Niño and La Niña events are causing havoc worldwide. 


And being an Australian, I'm somewhat of an expert in this. Not to diminish the horror and tragedy of the Californian fires, but in terms of sheer magnitude and relative damage done, Australia has been copping it these past few years. 


Just last year, we experienced what are being described as &#34;…some of the worst bushfires in living memory,&#34; according to our premier [6] John Brumby. 


Wanna know the kicker? Here's what he added next: &#34;This summer could be worse, with the risk spreading across the state to the fringes of Melbourne.&#34;


Melbourne is to Victoria what San Francisco is to California: both a city of its own and a collection of what Americans would call 'neighborhoods' (thanks to Dave for helping me with that analogy). So what Brumby is saying is that the fires will likely begin to encroach upon urban centers. 


For me personally, that likelihood is pretty high, considering that I only need to drive for 5 minutes before I reach areas ripe for fires. 

Global Warming is not a Myth


What, as Donna Moss from The West Wing would say, &#34;really grips my ass&#34; is that people seem to want to be oblivious to what is going on. They hear the words 'global warming' and immediately start looking for the ballot box. They seem to misunderstand the implications. Whether global warming is caused by us or not, is not the issue. It simply is happening! 


What we are trying to tell you is that the earth is warming, and with it various conditions are changing. As I mentioned, for California  	— and other areas across the world  	— the rain/dry equilibrium causes an increase in growth, which then dries out and becomes fuel for massive fires. 


There are no questions asked. That is what is happening!

The Little Boy and Girl


El Niño and La Niña are pretty much to blame for a lot of what is happening. Australia has been at the mercy of El Niño conditions, providing us with droughts that are ruining lives across the entire country. But only are farmers being threatened with bankruptcy, but everything is drying out: we're turning in to a giant tinder box. 


To ignore the effects  	— like so many did for the better part of my lifetime  	— of El Niño and La Niña is stupidity in itself. And people are realizing that now, after the scientific community finally decided there was overwhelming evidence against them (no, I'm not bitter!). So why is it people are not willing to learn from their isolationist/buried-head syndromes, and see what is actually happening in the world. 


No, I was not politicizing the tragedy of the Californian fires. And, no, I do not believe that an Australian life is worth more than an American life. But relatively, Australia has always been affected worse by fires than America has. In sheer terms of relative size and population density, it is a natural occurrence, and one that takes Australian lives with it. 


Do I sound scared? I damned sure as hell do! I'm living cycling distance from suburbs that could very well ignite in a few weeks or months. I want people to know that what I'm reporting on, I have a stake in! Global warming is an issue that I'm seeing directly affect those around me. I have friends and family in fire brigades that will be out battling fires across the state, and in one case, across the country. 


Whether you want to believe that we've had anything to do with global warming is up to you. I honestly couldn't care less! But the world is getting warmer, and thus creating higher chances for melting polar caps, weird ocean changes and drought. When I say that global warming was the cause behind the severity of the Californian fires, I mean it. Yes, fires have been happening for a while, and would have popped up again, but not to the levels of which they are now!


I'll halt my rant here. Be thinking of us Aussies as we enter our fifth season: the Bushfire season. 



The Age - Fire season is approaching. Be ready [7]


More from GO, ie, Josh's Digg Beating


California Fires and Climate Change: A Match Made in Hell [8] 


Photo Credit - Tim A. Williams [9] 



[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Friday_(1939)
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_Tasmanian_fires
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ash_Wednesday_fires
[4] http://digg.com/environment/California_Fires_and_Climate_Change_A_Match_Made_in_Hell
[5] http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/25/california_fires_and_climate_change_a_match_made_in_hell
[6] http://www.theage.com.au/news/editorial/fire-season-is-approaching-be-ready/2007/10/26/1192941332584.html
[7] http://www.theage.com.au/news/editorial/fire-season-is-approaching-be-ready/2007/10/26/1192941332584.html
[8] http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/25/california_fires_and_climate_change_a_match_made_in_hell
[9] http://www.flickr.com/photos/bundabergtim/1714071235/]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/29/the-bushfire-or-the-wildfire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Minneapolis Mayor First to Use Plug-In Hybrid as Official Car</title>
    <link>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/29/minneapolis-mayor-first-to-use-plug-in-hybrid-as-official-car/</link>
    <comments>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/29/minneapolis-mayor-first-to-use-plug-in-hybrid-as-official-car/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Automobiles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Landscaping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National and World News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Prius]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[RT+Rybak]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science and Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleantechnica]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[phev]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plug-in hybrid]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/29/minneapolis-mayor-first-to-use-plug-in-hybrid-as-official-car/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/29/Rybak_and_PHEV.jpg" alt="" width="280" height="229" align="right" /><a href="http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/mayor/"></a>
</p>
<p>
Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak may be the first mayor in the nation to drive a plug-in hybrid vehicle as his official city car. 
</p>
<p>
Since he was first elected in 2002, Mayor Rybak's official car has been a Toyota Prius. But the dramatically superior gas mileage of a plug-in hybrid vehicle prompted him to make the switch: he had his hybrid converted to a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle, from which he expects to get about 70 miles per gallon (mpg) compared to his average 40 mpg with the Prius.
</p>
<p>
A plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) is like a regular hybrid with a cord. That is, its battery can be recharged by plugging it into a regular 120-volt outlet.
</p>
<p>
Typical of many PHEVs, Mayor Rybak's car can travel about 30 miles solely on battery power if the speeds are 30 mph or less. If he drives further or needs to go faster, the car automatically switches over to using the gas engine. But for local city driving — when speeds are low and distances are shorter — he could go days without using any gasoline to power the engine.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ 

Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak may be the first mayor in the nation to drive a plug-in hybrid vehicle as his official city car.

Since he was first elected in 2002, Mayor Rybak's official car has been a Toyota Prius. But the dramatically superior gas mileage of a plug-in hybrid vehicle prompted him to make the switch: he had his hybrid converted to a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle, from which he expects to get about 70 miles per gallon (mpg) compared to his average 40 mpg with the Prius.

A plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) is like a regular hybrid with a cord. That is, its battery can be recharged by plugging it into a regular 120-volt outlet.

Typical of many PHEVs, Mayor Rybak's car can travel about 30 miles solely on battery power if the speeds are 30 mph or less. If he drives further or needs to go faster, the car automatically switches over to using the gas engine. But for local city driving — when speeds are low and distances are shorter — he could go days without using any gasoline to power the engine.

Although most of Minnesota's electricity comes from coal power, powering a vehicle with the electric grid is still cleaner [1] than gasoline. But the Mayor and other city officials want to make it even cleaner: Minneapolis has applied for a state grant to install solar panels on some city buildings so that future plug-in cars could charge up using solar power instead of fossil fuels. Rybak told the Minnesota Daily [2]:
 	It became clear to me that the two big things we had to do were convert to plug-in hybrids and find a way to have them use electricity from non-coal sources 	… I become very frustrated with people saying we need to do years of research on all these issues. Research is great, but the technology is there right now.
Last year, Minnesota became the first state in the nation to pass legislation promoting plug-in hybrids. The law instructs the state to buy plug-in hybrids on a preferred basis when they become available and encourages Minnesota State University - Mankato [3] to develop flex-fuel plug-in hybrid vehicles (plug-ins that can run on an ethanol blend).

Minneapolis has about 100 government vehicles that are either hybrids or use E-85 fuel (an 85 percent ethanol, 15 percent gasoline blend). Leadership from the city and supportive government policies could make plug-in hybrids a more common occurrence on Twin Cities roads. 

BIOconversion Blog [4]
Cal Cars [5]
City of Minneapolis [6]
Minnesota Daily [2]

Photo Source: City of Minneapolis [8]

[1] http://www.calcars.org/calcars-news/797.html
[2] http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2007/10/24/72164061
[3] http://www.mnsu.edu/
[4] http://bioconversion.blogspot.com/2006/06/minnesota-law-endorses-flexible-fuel.html
[5] http://www.calcars.org/calcars-news/797.html
[6] http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/mayor/news/20071011newsmayor_pug-in_hybrid.asp
[7] http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2007/10/24/72164061
[8] http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/mayor/]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/29/minneapolis-mayor-first-to-use-plug-in-hybrid-as-official-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Book Review: Fight Global Warming Now</title>
    <link>http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/10/25/book-review-fight-global-warming-now/</link>
    <comments>http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/10/25/book-review-fight-global-warming-now/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kelli Best-Oliver</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National and World News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Recreation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science and Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Weekend Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bill mckibben]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organizing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[step it up]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/10/25/book-review-fight-global-warming-now/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/110/fightglobalwarming.jpg" alt="" width="164" height="250" align="right" />On April 14, 2007, <a href="http://april.stepitup2007.org/index.php">Step it Up 2007</a> <a href="/2007/04/13/step_it_up_saturday_in_your_neighborhood">facilitated over 1400 different rallies in all 50 states</a> urging Congress to cut carbon emissions 80% by 2050.  It was the largest day of citizen actions on global warming in history, and it truly was citizen action.  Although Step It Up 2007 was the brainchild of Bill McKibben and several former Middlebury College students, the success of the event was contingent on grassroots efforts by everyday people concerned about the environment. 
</p>
<p>
In McKibben and the Step It Up Team's new book, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#38;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FFight-Global-Warming-Now-Community%2Fdp%2F0805087044&#38;tag=greeopti-20&#38;linkCode=ur2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=9325">Fight Global Warming Now: The Handbook for Taking Action in Your Community</a></em><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=greeopti-20&#38;l=ur2&#38;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> (Henry Holt, $13.00), the authors show how normal, everyday people, without any community organizing background, were able to create successful events to rally support for addressing climate change. Reflecting on the success of Step It Up allows the authors to repeat what worked--and discard what didn't. Their seven tips (make it credible, snappy, collaborative, meaningful, creative, wired and seductive) are a framework for understanding how community organizing works in the 21st century.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
On April 14, 2007, Step it Up 2007 [1] facilitated over 1400 different rallies in all 50 states [2] urging Congress to cut carbon emissions 80% by 2050.  It was the largest day of citizen actions on global warming in history, and it truly was citizen action.  Although Step It Up 2007 was the brainchild of Bill McKibben and several former Middlebury College students, the success of the event was contingent on grassroots efforts by everyday people concerned about the environment. 


In McKibben and the Step It Up Team's new book, Fight Global Warming Now: The Handbook for Taking Action in Your Community [3] (Henry Holt, $13.00), the authors show how normal, everyday people, without any community organizing background, were able to create successful events to rally support for addressing climate change. Reflecting on the success of Step It Up allows the authors to repeat what worked--and discard what didn't. Their seven tips (make it credible, snappy, collaborative, meaningful, creative, wired and seductive) are a framework for understanding how community organizing works in the 21st century.  


The book is a quick read written in simple, conversational tone that empowers the reader.  Really?  Is it that easy to organize a rally?  McKibben and group seem to think so, and highlight many anecdotes from the first Step It Up to show how novice activists can create powerful events.  These anecdotes also serve as a type of scrapbook of the first Step It Up 2007, illuminating the hundreds of events and thousands of individual experiences.   Just in case you might need some help with your own event, the authors clearly outline areas for concentration to establish credibility, drum up publicity, and finance your event.  There's also a resources page directing you to further reading on both climate change, activism, and other resources necessary for creating your own successful event.  From online networking to how to create aeriel art, from media attention to attracting politicians, someone who did it for April's Step It Up has advice for you. 


McKibben and team make it seem so simple.  How else can they get people to realize that we have everything we need to be activists?  We don't need to sit around and wait for Al Gore to organize a carbon-spewing concert.  We all have within us the ability to lead, to create, to organize.  They're just providing a little push.  If you've ever wanted to organize, but never thought you could, this is a must-read that will give you the tools you need to call yourself an activist and organizer. Step It Up is happening again on November 3rd.  It's never too late to get organized.  In fact, the theme for November's event is &#34;Who's A Leader [4]?&#34;


Fight Global Warming Now was released October 22nd. 



[1] http://april.stepitup2007.org/index.php
[2] http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/04/13/step_it_up_saturday_in_your_neighborhood
[3] http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#38;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FFight-Global-Warming-Now-Community%2Fdp%2F0805087044&#38;tag=greeopti-20&#38;linkCode=ur2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=9325
[4] http://stepitup2007.org/]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/10/25/book-review-fight-global-warming-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Kansas Kills Coal Plants</title>
    <link>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/22/kansas-kills-coal-plants/</link>
    <comments>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/22/kansas-kills-coal-plants/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CO2 regulation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Landscaping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National and World News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[climate+change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global+warming]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/22/kansas-kills-coal-plants/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/29/pollution.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="161" align="right" />For the first time ever, a U.S. regulatory agency denied a coal plant permit solely on the basis of its carbon dioxide emissions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a main contributor to global warming.
</p>
<p>
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) denied permits to two large, 700-megawatt plants proposed by Sunflower Electric Power. The plants would have cost about $3.6 billion and spewed 11 million tons of CO2 into the air each year. That’s almost the same amount of CO2 that the Northeastern states planned to have saved by 2020 with their cap-and-trade program. The attorneys general of those states had petitioned Kansas officials to deny the coal plants that would have effectively negated their efforts. 
</p>
<p>
Interestingly, while the KDHE staff recommended that the plants be permitted, state law also allows the KDHE secretary to deny a permit if there is an unregulated emission that threatens public health or the environment. And that's what happened here: Secretary Roderick L. Bremby disagreed with his staff because of the unregulated CO2 emissions that pose a threat to global warming. He wrote in his <a href="http://www.kdheks.gov/news/web_archives/2007/10182007a.htm">news release</a>: &#34;I believe it would be irresponsible to ignore emerging information about the contribution of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to climate change and the potential harm to our environment and health if we do nothing.&#34;
</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
For the first time ever, a U.S. regulatory agency denied a coal plant permit solely on the basis of its carbon dioxide emissions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a main contributor to global warming.


The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) denied permits to two large, 700-megawatt plants proposed by Sunflower Electric Power. The plants would have cost about $3.6 billion and spewed 11 million tons of CO2 into the air each year. That’s almost the same amount of CO2 that the Northeastern states planned to have saved by 2020 with their cap-and-trade program. The attorneys general of those states had petitioned Kansas officials to deny the coal plants that would have effectively negated their efforts. 


Interestingly, while the KDHE staff recommended that the plants be permitted, state law also allows the KDHE secretary to deny a permit if there is an unregulated emission that threatens public health or the environment. And that's what happened here: Secretary Roderick L. Bremby disagreed with his staff because of the unregulated CO2 emissions that pose a threat to global warming. He wrote in his news release [1]: &#34;I believe it would be irresponsible to ignore emerging information about the contribution of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to climate change and the potential harm to our environment and health if we do nothing.&#34;



Kansas also has a goal of getting 10 percent of its electricity at peak period from wind power. The electric cooperatives will meet that goal by the end of the year  	— two years ahead of the deadline.


A Sunflower Electric Power spokesman pointed out that the company could build natural gas plants that emit half the amount of CO2, but they also have a much higher fuel cost than coal. So once again we're back to the business problem of not having a price on CO2 emissions (such as through a cap-and-trade or carbon tax policy). Without a price on CO2, there is no &#34;common yardstick&#34; for determining whether the additional fuel cost of natural gas is offset by the less CO2 emitted. While the Kansas decision may set a precedent for other regulatory bodies around the country, the federal government also needs to spell out the CO2 rules for businesses and utilities.   


Kansas City Star [2] 
Kansas Department of Health and Environment [3]
New York Times [4] 
Washington Post [5] 



[1] http://www.kdheks.gov/news/web_archives/2007/10182007a.htm
[2] http://www.kansascity.com/679/story/322904.html
[3] http://www.kdheks.gov/news/web_archives/2007/10182007a.htm
[4] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/20/business/20plant.html?ref=science
[5] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/18/AR2007101802452.html]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/22/kansas-kills-coal-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Australian Apathy Descends</title>
    <link>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/australian-apathy-descends/</link>
    <comments>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/australian-apathy-descends/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/australian-apathy-descends/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/1342/swse_logo_long_copy.gif" alt="" width="370" height="95" align="right" />In a country that is all but the American whipping boy, it is no surprise that we find ourselves lagging behind. Alternate energy sources and use of water are all but non-existent except in a niche market. Australian’s seem to be impassive when it comes to global warming; sure, it’s bad and all, but don’t make me change my life to fix it. <br />
<br />
It doesn’t help when the government is described as a “follower”, as Richard Potter from Solar Charge suggests in a seminar at the Save Water Save Energy expo. <br />
<br />
This year is also an election year, with the Prime Minister John Howard only recently announcing the election for mid November. For much of the year there has already been a lot of noise concerning global warming and climate change, but not much action. It was the issue that everyone had to have a view on. <br />
<br />
The Green Party has managed to build up a larger profile this year as a result of these issues. The two major parties, Liberal and Labor, are lucky to receive a 10% rating from the Big Switch; an initiative to alert the layman voter to what the parties are doing for the environment. <br />
<br />
But the turn out at the expo is at least something to ease the mind. It’s a Friday, before the CBD goes on its lunch break, and it’s hard to not bump in to someone. People seem to want to make a change, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that many are over the age of 50. You could imagine many of them being grandparents wanting to make a change for their children and grandchildren, or simply wanting to make a difference.
</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
In a country that is all but the American whipping boy, it is no surprise that we find ourselves lagging behind. Alternate energy sources and use of water are all but non-existent except in a niche market. Australian’s seem to be impassive when it comes to global warming; sure, it’s bad and all, but don’t make me change my life to fix it. 

It doesn’t help when the government is described as a “follower”, as Richard Potter from Solar Charge suggests in a seminar at the Save Water Save Energy expo. 

This year is also an election year, with the Prime Minister John Howard only recently announcing the election for mid November. For much of the year there has already been a lot of noise concerning global warming and climate change, but not much action. It was the issue that everyone had to have a view on. 

The Green Party has managed to build up a larger profile this year as a result of these issues. The two major parties, Liberal and Labor, are lucky to receive a 10% rating from the Big Switch; an initiative to alert the layman voter to what the parties are doing for the environment. 

But the turn out at the expo is at least something to ease the mind. It’s a Friday, before the CBD goes on its lunch break, and it’s hard to not bump in to someone. People seem to want to make a change, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that many are over the age of 50. You could imagine many of them being grandparents wanting to make a change for their children and grandchildren, or simply wanting to make a difference.


I spoke to a representative from the Wilderness Society who was here to represent the move towards recycled paper. Though not sure about where we are in a global ranking in terms of deforestation, he did have figures for me for my home state of Victoria and my brothers state of Tasmania. 

“I don’t know what the percentage is, but I do know what figures are. In Victoria I think we log something like over 15,000 hectares of native forest every year. And in Tasmania, I think it is something 3 times that. So you’re looking at around about 45,000 hectares of native forest being logged every year in Tasmania.”

If you’ve read my stuff here at GO, then you’ll be well aware of the fact that I’m not necessarily the sunniest person when it comes to our environmental future. I live in a country that is in so many ways like the US in terms of political lackluster. We live and die off the political movement of a government that seems not to care about our environment. So much so that the living aspect of that is looking more and more unlikely every year that goes by. 

Those who have turned up today, and will continue to arrive over the weekend, are definitely looking for something to do to make their lives a little greener. They want to find alternatives for their hot water, electricity usage and their use of water. 

Do I think that anyone here is going to be able to make the big change that we need? No. My pessimism simply doesn’t allow for it. And while I’m well aware of the joy that we find in being able to do “our small part”, I think big, and I want to make big change. So I’m hard to please. Let me make one thing clear though. I see myself making change across the world through science, advocacy and being a loudspeaker for the race against global warming. I want to see people making these movements at home. 


Save Water Save Energy Expo [1] 



[1] http://savewatersaveenergyexpo.com.au/]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/australian-apathy-descends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Save Water Save Energy Expo 2007 – Melbourne</title>
    <link>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/save-water-save-energy-expo-2007-%e2%80%93-melbourne/</link>
    <comments>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/save-water-save-energy-expo-2007-%e2%80%93-melbourne/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/save-water-save-energy-expo-2007-%e2%80%93-melbourne/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/1342/swse_logo_long_copy.gif" alt="" width="370" height="95" align="right" />As the only Australian member of the GO writing team, it came as a surprise to find my hometown of Melbourne was hosting a green expo. Situated at the Melbourne Exhibition Center, the Save Water Save Energy Expo gave me my first chance to get out of the house for GO. <br />
<br />
This article will from hereon out be a journal entry, letting you walk around the exhibition floor. <br />
<br />
I’ve just arrived, and made my way to the end of the floor where Mick Harris of The Light takes the 11:30 spot. The array of lightware on the table in front of me suggests that he just might have something to do with lighting. <br />
<br />
The Australian Government recently announced that incandescent lights will be banned in Australia. Now despite the frustration I feel that the government felt the need to regulate such a thing, there will obviously be a need to swap to something else.<br />
<br />
Mick begins his talk discussing the differences between compact fluro’s and your standard lightbulb. One of the obstacle's between a mass move toward more energy efficient lightbulbs are the small things, like color and brightness. Mick seems to know everything there is to know about lighting, something that Australian’s are going to need as time passes by and the ban towards normal light bulbs is emplaced. <br />
<br /></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
As the only Australian member of the GO writing team, it came as a surprise to find my hometown of Melbourne was hosting a green expo. Situated at the Melbourne Exhibition Center, the Save Water Save Energy Expo gave me my first chance to get out of the house for GO. 

This article will from hereon out be a journal entry, letting you walk around the exhibition floor. 

I’ve just arrived, and made my way to the end of the floor where Mick Harris of The Light takes the 11:30 spot. The array of lightware on the table in front of me suggests that he just might have something to do with lighting. 

The Australian Government recently announced that incandescent lights will be banned in Australia. Now despite the frustration I feel that the government felt the need to regulate such a thing, there will obviously be a need to swap to something else.

Mick begins his talk discussing the differences between compact fluro’s and your standard lightbulb. One of the obstacle's between a mass move toward more energy efficient lightbulbs are the small things, like color and brightness. Mick seems to know everything there is to know about lighting, something that Australian’s are going to need as time passes by and the ban towards normal light bulbs is emplaced. 

Pulling a volunteer out of the 70 or so audience, Mick addresses one of the issues that people are definitely going to encounter; dimmable compact fluro’s [1]. However, as much as they might be the better option, where to find them is a mystery to all and sundry. After 15 minutes, I feel like I’ve taken just about as much lighting as I can for one moment. I’m heading off to trundle the room. 

I spent the next half an hour trundling around the exhibition floor, visiting numerous booths. It is very hard to turn your head without looking at another way to save water, energy, carbon emissions. Even the seemingly personal experience of the toilet was invaded by a notice about urinal blocks helping save us water. 

Possibly the greatest booth that I’ve seen so far, and am likely to see, was the booth for Quench Solutions. Their slogan, “Guilt Free Showers in a Drought”. For a country like Australia, in the midst of one of its worst droughts in recent recorded history, showers are one of those luxuries that people are very unwilling to give up. Brian Gaye spoke to me quickly, and explained the system to me. Click here to hear  [2]him sell a good long shower...


12:30 roles around back at the seminar stage and I find myself waiting for Stephen Pepper and Richard Potter speaking on Hot Water &#38; Power from the sun. 

Richard Potter speaks first from Solar Charge who has been doing business here in Victoria for 35 years. Back in 1998 it had taken them 18 months to convince an energy supplier to allow for solar power to be used in the grid. A North facing, unshaded roof though seems to be a requirement, which doesn’t bode well for any houses without, as Potter suggests that there is really very little one can do to usurp that problem. 

Any house that does manage to get a solar system set up on their roof will get first access to the energy generated through the solar. After your usage, the excess will run off in to the energy grid, and “literally” reverse your meter usage. “During the day your exporting power, at night your using power. It’s an in/out system.”

Most people still end up being a net consumer to the power company, but some manage to get to 100% self reliant over the period of a year. Potter’s main call is that everyone who goes to the expo should go home and swap their lights over to compact fluorescent. With a 25 year warranty, and a 40 or 50 year lifespan, a member of the audience was surprised that this isn’t a loss-loss initiative. Though, Potter does note that “you need an environmental bent” if you want to be really behind this. 

Steven Pepper, from InSolar steps up next, to discuss solar hot water. The sun will provide 75% of your hot water in Melbourne each year. But in the winter, there is obviously not going to be a rush for luke-warm showers. In winter, InSolar have three options to boost up the heat; wood-fire, electric and natural gas. 

There is a veritable multitude of solar water systems that can be installed, from rooftop systems through to a heat pump. Stephen is reaching the end of his half hour, and speaking faster and faster, forcing my fingers to catch up (if only he had a pause button). 

One of the devices that caught my eye are gravity fed systems that allow your wood or gas fire – both very energy efficient for keeping the house warm during winter – can also boost the heat levels in your water system during the colder months where the sun is bored with its life. 

I departed at this stage, as everything else was just a repeat of what we had already heard. It was a good morning out, and somewhat gratifying to see others in my country showing this interest. However, in my other article, you’ll see what I really think. 


Save Water Save Energy Expo [3] 



[1] http://flickr.com/photos/joshshill/1629995704/
[2] http://joshshill.com/SESWExpo2007.mp3
[3] http://savewatersaveenergyexpo.com.au/]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/save-water-save-energy-expo-2007-%e2%80%93-melbourne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://joshshill.com/SESWExpo2007.mp3" length="1532264" type="audio/mpeg" />
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>We are doing it, and so can you with our &#8220;Contract Farming Program&#8221;!</title>
    <link>http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/2007/10/08/we-are-doing-it-and-so-can-you-with-our-contract-farming-program/</link>
    <comments>http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/2007/10/08/we-are-doing-it-and-so-can-you-with-our-contract-farming-program/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PBTJOE</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/2007/10/08/we-are-doing-it-and-so-can-you-with-our-contract-farming-program/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
&#160;
</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
&#160;

  

	
		
			Get Involved 
		
	


	
		
			
			
			Buying, Selling &#38; Investing in Jatropha Trees 
			
			1) Purchase Trees for Investment 
			
			2) Sell trees for Commissions as an Affiliate
		
	


&#160;


Whether you desire to buy trees to help the environment for personal reasons, for investment purposes or you simply refer others to buy trees through our Affiliate Program,  PanAm BioFuels has made the process so simple that everyone can find a way to participate in it. 

1) Purchase Trees for Investment

Jatropha trees can be bought directly from Pan-Am Biofuels for only $4 each in lots ranging from 250 trees for $1000 to 25,000 trees for $100,000.  Though delivery is possible for larger volumes, we will believe most people will take advantage of our Contract Farming Program where we will actually plant your trees on our plantations.  


With our Contract Farming Program we do all the work from planting to harvest to sale of the oil.  The only fee for all of this is a 10% fee from profits.  Then 90% of the profits are passed on to you, the tree owner.  All you have to do is purchase your trees in lots for only $4/each. [1] 


If you have priced trees at your local nursery you will see most prices range from $10 to $25. So now you may be thinking... 


&#34;How can you produce, plant and sell these trees at only $4 each?&#34; 


There are several reasons, including, but not limited to, 


	Because the cost of living as well as labor is much cheaper in Central America where our nurseries are located. 
	The efficiencies and economies of scale we enjoy by the huge volume of trees our nursery outputs allow us to save a tremendous amount of money passing the savings on to you. 
	Our nursery is in close proximity to our Jatropha Tree plantation in Costa Rica where our Contract Farming Program is being implemented so there are minimal transportation expenses. 


&#34;So how much money do I stand to earn by buying your Jatropha Trees? What is the return on my investment?&#34;  


Your trees can potentially bring  as much as 45% PER YEAR calculated  from your original investment once the trees start producing within 3-4 years.   Jatropha trees start bearing seeds the second year and reach maximum production at about 4 years.  You can review the full details and Financial Projections [2] once you register and login. 


Pan-Am Biofuels has truly created a unique situation and opportunity for the average person to take advantage of. 


Now you can participate in an industry that has produced the wealthiest individuals and corporations in the world. The only difference is, instead of drilling for oil and destroying the environment, you will be growing oil and restoring the environment by owning oil producing Jatrpha Trees [3] 

2) Sell trees for Commissions as an Affiliate 

We will pay you to refer customers! Pan-Am Biofuels has created a lucrative opportunity for webmasters,  business owners and individuals alike. By becoming an Affiliate you can help promote our Jatropha tree project, earn commissions and at the same time you'll be doing your part to better our environment.  Learn more about how our Affiliate Program works.  [4]



&#160;


&#160;



[1] http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=45&#38;Itemid=75
[2] http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=49&#38;Itemid=84
[3] http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=45&#38;Itemid=75
[4] http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=52&#38;Itemid=94]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/2007/10/08/we-are-doing-it-and-so-can-you-with-our-contract-farming-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Indonesia Hopeful for Tree Planting Record</title>
    <link>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/05/indonesia-hopeful-for-tree-planting-record/</link>
    <comments>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/05/indonesia-hopeful-for-tree-planting-record/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/05/indonesia-hopeful-for-tree-planting-record/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/1342/16_1-acquedotto.jpg" alt="" width="295" height="200" align="right" />In my continuing series on &#34;Stories that don’t make you want to cry&#34;, I have found once again the universe lining up to help me. This time though, it's more than just a step in the right direction, it’s a step away from the brink. <br />
<br />
According to Greenpeace, Indonesia had the fastest pace of deforestation in the world between 2000 and 2005, with an area of forest equivalent to 300 soccer pitches disappearing each hour. <br />
<br />
But they’re looking to turn things around and, in all reality, on their heads!<br />
<br />
Ahead of the U.N. climate change summit being held in their native Bali this December, the Indonesian people – from the lowest to the highest in status, including the President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono – will<a href="http://www.enn.com/ecosystems/article/23611"> be planting a total of 79 million trees</a> in one day!<br />
<br />
</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
In my continuing series on &#34;Stories that don’t make you want to cry&#34;, I have found once again the universe lining up to help me. This time though, it's more than just a step in the right direction, it’s a step away from the brink. 

According to Greenpeace, Indonesia had the fastest pace of deforestation in the world between 2000 and 2005, with an area of forest equivalent to 300 soccer pitches disappearing each hour. 

But they’re looking to turn things around and, in all reality, on their heads!

Ahead of the U.N. climate change summit being held in their native Bali this December, the Indonesian people – from the lowest to the highest in status, including the President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono – will be planting a total of 79 million trees [1] in one day!


Scheduled for November 28th, the tree planting will be part of a global initiative launched at U.N. climate change talks in Nairobi last year. The Plant for the Planet: Billion Tree Campaign [2] has so far planted 346,469,727 trees, with a total pledge of 1,130,983,692 trees. 79 million is definitely going to help matters!

&#34;Everybody, residents and officials from the lowest unit of the government to the president, will take part in this movement,&#34; said Ahmad Fauzi Masud, spokesman for the Indonesian forestry ministry. &#34;It will be a national record and, possibly, a world record.&#34;

Indonesia is listed as Southeast Asia’s biggest economy – not surprising when you’re home to Bali – but sadly, they are also one of the world’s three biggest greenhouse gas emitters, along with the U.S., China and Brazil. This comes as a result of its massive deforestation, in conjunction with peatland degradation and forest fires, according to a recent report sponsored by the World Bank and Britain's development arm.

Additionally, environmental groups are worried that the continued and rapid growth of palm oil plantations throughout Indonesia are damaging the countries rainforests. Despite the fact that many of these plantations are out to fuel (haha, get it, “fuel”?) new plans for biofuels, the damage to the rainforests may be a greater threat. 

Participants from 189 countries will be gathering in Bali this December to discuss a new deal to fight global warming. With the Kyoto Protocol running out in 2012, and in the wake of earlier talks between envoys from participating countries, the talks will hopefully bring about a new goal that countries like the U.S.,, Australia, China and India will all be able to agree too. 


ENN - Indonesia to Plant 79 Million Trees in One Day [3]


Plant for the Planet: Billion Tree Campaign [2] 


Photo © UNEP 



[1] http://www.enn.com/ecosystems/article/23611
[2] http://www.unep.org/billiontreecampaign/
[3] http://www.enn.com/ecosystems/article/23611
[4] http://www.unep.org/billiontreecampaign/]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/05/indonesia-hopeful-for-tree-planting-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>China to Follow US&#8217; Environmental Lead?</title>
    <link>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/04/china-to-follow-us-environmental-lead/</link>
    <comments>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/04/china-to-follow-us-environmental-lead/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/04/china-to-follow-us-environmental-lead/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/1342/ALeqM5iziZgOqsTUk1O35aQ97hpa_5_PZQ.jpg" alt="" width="277" height="211" align="right" />When you look at our planet today and search for two of the biggest influencers in the world, China and the US spring to the top of most people's lists. No doubt there are other countries that people would argue for, but the simple fact is that America is the current dominant force and China is the rising economic force. As such, one of them is going to have to make a move to spur genuine international action on climate change. 
</p>
<p>
David Hawkins, a climate expert of the environmental group the <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/">National Resources Defense Council</a>, believes that China is only going to make a move once America does. 
</p>
<p>
&#34;My impression is that the national government  	— top level ministry officials  	— in China regard the threats of global warming to their country with a much higher level of seriousness than their counterparts do here in the United States,&#34; he said. 
</p>
<p>
The theory is that because China sees environmental problems as current and major problems that need to be dealt with now, they will be more likely to follow in America's footsteps when they make a move. Sadly, he doesn't think that they're alone in waiting for US leadership.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
When you look at our planet today and search for two of the biggest influencers in the world, China and the US spring to the top of most people's lists. No doubt there are other countries that people would argue for, but the simple fact is that America is the current dominant force and China is the rising economic force. As such, one of them is going to have to make a move to spur genuine international action on climate change. 


David Hawkins, a climate expert of the environmental group the National Resources Defense Council [1], believes that China is only going to make a move once America does. 


&#34;My impression is that the national government  	— top level ministry officials  	— in China regard the threats of global warming to their country with a much higher level of seriousness than their counterparts do here in the United States,&#34; he said. 


The theory is that because China sees environmental problems as current and major problems that need to be dealt with now, they will be more likely to follow in America's footsteps when they make a move. Sadly, he doesn't think that they're alone in waiting for US leadership. 


US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spoke this past week at a special UN conference on climate change in New York, indicating that the US may be willing to move soon. This after George Bush  	— at his own climate change conference last week  	— lamely announced that voluntary measures to tackle global warming was a possible idea for the future. 


&#34;It is striking that the administration at the moment in the international conversation seems to be pretty isolated,&#34; said John Ashton, Britain's climate envoy, in response to Bush's ideas. &#34;I think that the argument that we can do this through voluntary approaches is now pretty much discredited internationally.&#34;


So when Condoleezza Rice spoke, her words brought a little more hope to some of us. &#34;Ultimately, we must develop and bring to market new energy technologies that transcend the current system of fossil fuels, carbon emissions and economic activity. Put simply, the world needs a technological revolution.&#34;


This is a type of message we like to hear, especially considering how important new technologies  	— especially when partnered with renewable energies such as solar and wind  	— will be to our future. 


Hawkins also believes that technological advance is going to be the draw card for China to get in on the game. 


&#34;The biggest carrot is to have the U.S. to take a leadership role,&#34; he said. &#34;Then countries like China are going to say, 'What does the United States know that we don't know?' and agree to their own cuts,&#34; said Hawkins.


So hopefully, when America gets tough on emissions both by regulation and through development of new technology, China will step in to the arena as well. And as the most polluted country in the world, there can only be one way to go: up!


For a related article, check out Maria's US, China Partner on Efficiency – Can It Make a Difference? [2]


ENN -  Expert says China would follow U.S. lead on climate [3]



[1] http://www.nrdc.org/
[2] http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/wednesday_us_china_partner_on_efficiency_can_it_make_a_difference
[3] http://www.enn.com/climate/article/23570]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/04/china-to-follow-us-environmental-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US, China Partner on Efficiency – Can It Make a Difference?</title>
    <link>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/03/us-china-partner-on-efficiency-%e2%80%93-can-it-make-a-difference/</link>
    <comments>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/03/us-china-partner-on-efficiency-%e2%80%93-can-it-make-a-difference/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clinton+Global+Initiative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Developing Nations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Eco-Entrepreneurs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Building]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[JUUCCCE]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Landscaping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National and World News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science and Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Socially Responsible Investing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cfl]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleantechnica]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/03/us-china-partner-on-efficiency-%e2%80%93-can-it-make-a-difference/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/4/juccce.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="252" align="right" />Former President Bill Clinton’s Global Initiative has been all over the news lately, working with nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and big business to move the ball forward with clean energy solutions to global warming. Whatever you think of the guy, it's hard to deny that his partnerships are impressive and the results could be revolutionary.
</p>
<p>
Besides the <a href="/2007/09/30/utilities_announce_major_efficiency_initiative">agreement by utilities</a> to invest in energy efficiency, and besides Florida Power &#38; Light’s major new <a href="/2007/10/02/_florida_s_solar_power_shines_bright">commitment to solar energy</a>, the Clinton Global Initiative is also partnering with the Joint U.S.-China Cooperation on Clean Energy (<a href="http://www.juccce.com/en/index.html">JUUCCCE</a>) on efficiency efforts in China. 
</p>
<p>
The China Lighting Conversion program will distribute 10 million free energy-efficient compact fluorescent light bulbs (<a href="/guide/low_energy_light_bulbs_whats_the_deal">CFLs</a>) to customers. CFLs use one-third the energy of traditional bulbs, but are still cost-prohibitive to many Chinese. According to JUUCCCE, the CFLs would save about 3.7 million tons of CO2 over 4 ½ years  	— enough to avoid having to build one typical U.S.-size coal plant. While I tell myself it's encouraging to see the start of another clean energy commitment in China, I'm still disheartened by the multiple coal plants they're building each week. But change has to start somewhere.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ Former President Bill Clinton’s Global Initiative has been all over the news lately, working with nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and big business to move the ball forward with clean energy solutions to global warming. Whatever you think of the guy, it's hard to deny that his partnerships are impressive and the results could be revolutionary.

Besides the agreement by utilities [1] to invest in energy efficiency, and besides Florida Power &#38; Light’s major new commitment to solar energy [2], the Clinton Global Initiative is also partnering with the Joint U.S.-China Cooperation on Clean Energy (JUUCCCE [3]) on efficiency efforts in China.

The China Lighting Conversion program will distribute 10 million free energy-efficient compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs [4]) to customers. CFLs use one-third the energy of traditional bulbs, but are still cost-prohibitive to many Chinese. According to JUUCCCE, the CFLs would save about 3.7 million tons of CO2 over 4 ½ years  	— enough to avoid having to build one typical U.S.-size coal plant. While I tell myself it's encouraging to see the start of another clean energy commitment in China, I'm still disheartened by the multiple coal plants they're building each week. But change has to start somewhere.

The other JUUCCCE program is the Energy Efficient Urban Design Tools for Mayors. This is an interactive, multimedia curriculum to train hundreds of Chinese mayors on technology and best practices that can make their cities more energy efficient. Mayors will learn about green building programs, for example, and will connect with vendors, service providers and financial advisors to help them implement what they learn. The key with this program will be rigorous follow-up and support to ensure that the information learned isn't forgotten or lost in the bureaucracy one the mayor returns to the city.

The first phase will begin with the CFL program in April 2008, with the training for mayors to start in October of next year.

Joint U.S.-China Cooperation on Clean Energy [5]

[1] http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/09/30/utilities_announce_major_efficiency_initiative
[2] http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/_florida_s_solar_power_shines_bright
[3] http://www.juccce.com/en/index.html
[4] http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/guide/low_energy_light_bulbs_whats_the_deal
[5] http://www.prweb.com/releases/JUCCCE/ClintonGlobalInitiative/prweb557372.htm]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/03/us-china-partner-on-efficiency-%e2%80%93-can-it-make-a-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Environmental &#8220;New Deal&#8221;: Will France Lead the Way?</title>
    <link>http://heidistrebel.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/the-environmental-new-deal-will-france-lead-the-way/</link>
    <comments>http://heidistrebel.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/the-environmental-new-deal-will-france-lead-the-way/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Heidi Strebel</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://heidistrebel.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/the-environmental-new-deal-will-france-lead-the-way/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/858/france_map_globe.jpeg" alt="" width="253" height="250" align="right" />The first phase in the French government's environmental &#34;New Deal&#34; is complete. Jean-Louis Borloo, the minister of ecology and sustainable development, hosted a conference in Paris last Thursday to present the results of that initial phase and to launch the second phase. In his press release, Borloo employed rousing terms to describe a momentous turning point in French society. 
</p>
<blockquote>
	After a time of inquiry, now is the time for action, and France will be present at the forefront of the fight for human rights in the 21st century. The environmental new deal is an unprecedented democratic process. The role of the State is essentially to facilitate collective action. Its mission is to foster synergy between common and sometimes competing causes. After several weeks of debate one thing is clear: dialogue works and solutions exist.
</blockquote>
<p>
Stirring indeed. But what makes this program so exceptional? The multilateral nature of the first phase, and the democratic or collective nature of the second, according to Borloo, adding that France can lead the way for the rest of the world by fashioning a sustainable society. &#34;As both producers and consumers we will be subject to major changes, but those changes represent an opportunity for our economy, our health and our children.&#34; Sustainable living and economic growth are not incompatible. &#34;By protecting the environment we prepare our companies for the economic competition of the future, we improve our quality of life, and we prevent illnesses caused by pollution.&#34;</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
The first phase in the French government's environmental &#34;New Deal&#34; is complete. Jean-Louis Borloo, the minister of ecology and sustainable development, hosted a conference in Paris last Thursday to present the results of that initial phase and to launch the second phase. In his press release, Borloo employed rousing terms to describe a momentous turning point in French society. 


	After a time of inquiry, now is the time for action, and France will be present at the forefront of the fight for human rights in the 21st century. The environmental new deal is an unprecedented democratic process. The role of the State is essentially to facilitate collective action. Its mission is to foster synergy between common and sometimes competing causes. After several weeks of debate one thing is clear: dialogue works and solutions exist.


Stirring indeed. But what makes this program so exceptional? The multilateral nature of the first phase, and the democratic or collective nature of the second, according to Borloo, adding that France can lead the way for the rest of the world by fashioning a sustainable society. &#34;As both producers and consumers we will be subject to major changes, but those changes represent an opportunity for our economy, our health and our children.&#34; Sustainable living and economic growth are not incompatible. &#34;By protecting the environment we prepare our companies for the economic competition of the future, we improve our quality of life, and we prevent illnesses caused by pollution.&#34;


More grand statements. There is a sense of deja vu. And I cannot help but ask, as I have been asking repeatedly over the last few weeks, is there any substance behind the hype?


Within a week of taking office last Spring, French President Nicolas Sarkozy called a meeting on sustainable development and the environment.  The gathering marked the beginning of the larger program that constitutes the &#34;New Deal.&#34; In the first phase of the program, members from different sectors of society were assembled in six working groups that convened over the summer, with each group focusing on a different environmental issue. Representatives of NGOs, companies, unions, local councils and government bodies joined scientists and other specialized experts to confer on the status quo and to draft a plan of action. 


The novelty lies in the diversity of the participants. Individuals and interest groups who are normally at loggerheads with one another were brought to the same negotiating table. Each delegate was equal in status with the next, and could contribute fully to the proceedings. 


For example, working group number one was focused on climate change and energy needs. Jean Jouzel and Nicholas Stern were co-presidents of the group. Jouzel is an eminent French geochemist and climatologist who has carried out extensive research on climate change in Antarctica and Greenland; Stern is a prominent British economist and author of the renowned &#34;Stern Review,&#34; a report which presents the impact of climate change on the global economy. 


The NGO camp for group one consisted of delegates from international alliances such as Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), as well as envoys from national environmental groups. The employee camp was composed of representatives from different labor unions, including engineers, railway workers, technicians, and white-collar workers. The employer camp was comprised of leaders from various business associations, both general confederations and industry-specific alliances such as the Union of Chemical Manufacturers, and the Federation of Road Transportation. Finally, the state camp consisted of directors of government bodies such as the National Forestry Office and the Energy and Environment Agency. 


It is hardly surprising that the government website features interviews with delegates who are by and large satisfied with the process and the outcome of the working groups. They admit that the challenges were great, the stakes were high, and there was a considerable time constraint, but they also refer to lively debate, a genuine exchange, progress and consensus. Delegates' observations and remarks featured on an NGO website are much more subdued.


Bernard Cressens, program director at WWF France, participated in the workshops devoted to the subject of greening French agriculture. No one boycotted the meeting, Cressens says. A coalition of NGOs was even able to distribute a list of suggestions for use during one of the sessions. But as soon as the group began to focus on the details of a particular matter, someone, often a representative from the French Ministry of Agriculture, always raised an objection. &#34;So — reduce the use of pesticides, yes that's a good idea but it's impossible; increase the percentage of organic farming in France, yes but is there the market for it; defend domestic biodiversity yes, well maybe, but...&#34;


Olivier Louchard, a member of Climate Action Network, attended several workshops dedicated to questions of transportation and methods of reducing CO2 emissions. While he feels that the discussions were &#34;relatively constructive,&#34; and some promising proposals were made, he was troubled by the time constraints, calling them &#34;completely unrealistic.&#34; &#34;It's not possible to establish a national climate plan in only two months and certainly not one that can be implemented by the current government over the next five years.&#34; So Louchard wonders whether the government might not have its own plan of action, one that will be followed irrespective of what emerges from the working groups and the public debate.


Last week each working group drew up a report, outlining the conclusions of their discussions and providing suggestions for immediate, mid-term and long-term actions. The reports were presented at the conference on Thursday, and the second phase of the &#34;new deal&#34; was launched: the public debate. Anyone can participate in the debate, either by attending one of the regional meetings scheduled across the country from October 5 to 19, or by visiting the government website set up specifically for the occasion. The website is hosting a forum where the French people can leave comments on any of the reports, which are available in full and condensed versions. They can also take the opportunity to engage in a dialogue with one another.


Borloo concluded the conference by saying it has not yet been proven that another type of economic growth is possible. &#34;But if all parts of society work together, if each day every one of us makes the right choices, if at every moment and in every aspect of our lives we vote for sustainable alternatives, then it is my conviction,&#34; he said, &#34;that it is possible.&#34; Thus France can provide a model both in Europe and around the world, of a healthy growing and sustainable economy.


Yes, sounds great. And no, I'm not being sarcastic, or at least not regarding the general idea of the whole thing. The very fact that the working groups convened, engaged in dialogue and presented their reports, is an accomplishment in itself. The forum for public debate represents a unique opportunity for French citizens to participate and thereby hopefully become more engaged in the transformation toward sustainable living. 


But, Borloo and company have cried green, twice in one month. There was the promise of the first eco-friendly Rugby World Cup [1]. Then there was the promise of the ultra-cool green techno parade [2]. In both cases, the government ministry and the organizing committees vowed to take actions that were entirely within the realm of the possible. So, if a promise to install proper recycling facilities at a sports stadium or along the route of a music parade cannot be kept, how can the pledge to revolutionize an entire society be taken seriously?


Image source: UMBC edu  [3]


Environmental &#34;New Deal&#34; French Government Website [4]


Alliance for the Planet  [5]



[1] http://heidistrebel.greenoptions.com/2007/09/10/the_green_revolution_meets_the_2007_rugby_world_cup
[2] http://heidistrebel.greenoptions.com/2007/09/18/the_clubber_s_guide_to_eco_cool_the_paris_techno_parade_sets_the_beat
[3] http://www.umbc.edu/ges/student_projects/France_Bedford/france_home_globe
[4] http://www.legrenelle-environnement.fr/grenelle-environnement/
[5] http://legrenelle.lalliance.fr/]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://heidistrebel.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/the-environmental-new-deal-will-france-lead-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Florida&#8217;s Solar Power Shines Bright</title>
    <link>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/floridas-solar-power-shines-bright/</link>
    <comments>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/floridas-solar-power-shines-bright/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Florida+Power+and+Light]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Landscaping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National and World News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global+warming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar+power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar+thermal]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/floridas-solar-power-shines-bright/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/29/sun_over_water.jpg" alt="" width="252" height="171" align="right" />There's big news for solar power coming out of Florida. Florida Power &#38; Light (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&#38;q=FPL">FPL</a>) – one of the nation's largest utilities and the largest producer of wind power – announced at the Clinton Global Initiative conference that it will spend $1.5 billion to build solar thermal energy in Florida, California, and other states. In addition, the utility plans on investing nearly another billion dollars nationwide to cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, a big contributor to global warming.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_thermal_energy">Solar thermal power</a> makes electricity by converting solar energy to heat that drives a thermal power plant.
</p>
<p>
The utility's plan is to build at least 300 megawatts (MW) of solar thermal in Florida; that's enough electricity to power about 150,000 homes. It will also help the state reach its goal of cutting CO2 emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and get 20 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by that same year.
</p>
<p>
California will get a 200-MW plant that will cover 2 square miles with flat mirrors that track the sun.
</p>
<p>
FPL's CEO Lew Hay told <a href="http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/44543/story.htm">Reuters</a>: &#34;The thing we've got to make customers understand is that any fossil fuel has a hidden cost that society is paying every day, and that is the cost of carbon. We need to put a price on carbon, by doing so the illusion that coal-produced energy is low-cost will go away.&#34;</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
There's big news for solar power coming out of Florida. Florida Power &#38; Light (FPL [1]) – one of the nation's largest utilities and the largest producer of wind power – announced at the Clinton Global Initiative conference that it will spend $1.5 billion to build solar thermal energy in Florida, California, and other states. In addition, the utility plans on investing nearly another billion dollars nationwide to cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, a big contributor to global warming.


Solar thermal power [2] makes electricity by converting solar energy to heat that drives a thermal power plant.


The utility's plan is to build at least 300 megawatts (MW) of solar thermal in Florida; that's enough electricity to power about 150,000 homes. It will also help the state reach its goal of cutting CO2 emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and get 20 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by that same year.


California will get a 200-MW plant that will cover 2 square miles with flat mirrors that track the sun.


FPL's CEO Lew Hay told Reuters [3]: &#34;The thing we've got to make customers understand is that any fossil fuel has a hidden cost that society is paying every day, and that is the cost of carbon. We need to put a price on carbon, by doing so the illusion that coal-produced energy is low-cost will go away.&#34;


The project FPL has planned will start out as a 10MW pilot project and eventually grow to be the largest solar plant in Florida. But besides the solar investment, the company is also upgrading all 4.5 million electricity meters used by Florida customers. The replacements will be &#34;smart network&#34; meters that show a digital read-out of electricity consumption, and even give an hour-by-hour record of power use. This will allow customers and businesses to monitor their energy use more closely, and experiment with the most effective methods of efficiency. Other investments will go towards promoting these efforts.


As exciting as this news is, it's easy to feel down when you learn that FPL's solar plans for Florida only amount to about 1 percent of the state's power plant capacity. But clean energy supporters and FPL are still optimistic. Hay pointed out that relatively large commitments to clean energy, like FPLs, will really drive the cost of the technology down.


Already the largest wind power provider, FPL now has its sights on leading the solar market.


Associated Press, via Orlando Sentinel [4] 
Reuters, via Planet Ark [5] 



[1] http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&#38;q=FPL
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_thermal_energy
[3] http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/44543/story.htm
[4] http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/state/orl-solar2707sep27,0,3097588.story
[5] http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/44543/story.htm]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/floridas-solar-power-shines-bright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ecuador to Leave Oil &#8212; And Revenue &#8212; In the Ground</title>
    <link>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/ecuador-to-leave-oil-and-revenue-in-the-ground/</link>
    <comments>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/ecuador-to-leave-oil-and-revenue-in-the-ground/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/ecuador-to-leave-oil-and-revenue-in-the-ground/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/1342/20050517_yasuni.jpg" alt="" width="294" height="199" align="right" />There is, at least in my humble and possibly pessimistic opinion, very little to be excited about in this day and age when it comes to reversing global warming. Lakes are dying, ice sheets are melting, and a number of leaders in the developed world are like the kids seven steps behind the rest of their friends. 
</p>
<p>
But then we get little nuggets of gold like this one, featuring the Ecuadorans who are now top on my list of &#34;World's Greatest People.&#34;
</p>
<p>
Ecuador has pledged <a href="http://www.enn.com/energy/article/23511">not to extract or explore the nearly one billion barrels of oil</a> hidden underneath its Yasuni National Park. Despite the fact that oil exports make up one third of the country's budget, Ecuador will become the first country to deliberately leave oil reserves untouched. 
</p>
<p>
However, Ecuador may not take quite the financial hit expected, because they could receive financial incentives in reward for this action. The fact that they are essentially removing the equivalent of 436 million tons of carbon dioxide from the planet is definitely worthy of such reward.  
</p>
<p>
Yasuni is home to two indigenous tribes that live in voluntary isolation in what is described as one of the world's most biodiverse locations on the planet.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
There is, at least in my humble and possibly pessimistic opinion, very little to be excited about in this day and age when it comes to reversing global warming. Lakes are dying, ice sheets are melting, and a number of leaders in the developed world are like the kids seven steps behind the rest of their friends. 


But then we get little nuggets of gold like this one, featuring the Ecuadorans who are now top on my list of &#34;World's Greatest People.&#34;


Ecuador has pledged not to extract or explore the nearly one billion barrels of oil [1] hidden underneath its Yasuni National Park. Despite the fact that oil exports make up one third of the country's budget, Ecuador will become the first country to deliberately leave oil reserves untouched. 


However, Ecuador may not take quite the financial hit expected, because they could receive financial incentives in reward for this action. The fact that they are essentially removing the equivalent of 436 million tons of carbon dioxide from the planet is definitely worthy of such reward.  


Yasuni is home to two indigenous tribes that live in voluntary isolation in what is described as one of the world's most biodiverse locations on the planet. 


The YasunÌ-ITT Initiative is only one part of a grander plan that the Ecuadoran government is working on. Its National Development Plan includes prioritizing the use of renewable energy sources, building efficient transport systems, promotion of eco-tourism and sustainable development for Ecuador's Amazonian region. 


Once again, compare all of this to the doings of the US, and you can see just how far behind we industrialized nations really are. 


Organized by George Bush earlier this year at the G8 summit, his two-day meeting of the 17 biggest emitters of climate-warming gases [2] only served to show how isolated Bush and his government really are. 


Bush  	— who at least got credit for realizing the seriousness of what is happening  	— only managed to further his single minded resolve to do absolutely nothing, the resolve that saw him  	— along with my beloved John Howard  	— decline to sign the Kyoto Protocol in 2001. 


He stressed a need to create new environmental technologies, and to implement voluntary measures to tackle global warming. But this last point has received much criticism, most notably from John Ashton, Britain's climate envoy. 


&#34;It is striking that the administration at the moment in the international conversation seems to be pretty isolated,&#34; he said. &#34;I think that the argument that we can do this through voluntary approaches is now pretty much discredited internationally.&#34;


It's ironic that at the same time that we see George Bush and his United States all but standing still on a conveyor belt, we see a small country like Ecuador sacrificing a possible third of its annual budget to help not only themselves, but the rest of the world as well. 


All I can say is this; ¡Buen Trabajo Sangriento Ecuador! (Bloody Good Job Ecuador!)


ENN - Gutsy Ecuador proposes to put a lid on oil. [3]


ENN -  Bush draws fire at climate talks [4]


Photo courtesy ASU 



[1] http://www.enn.com/energy/article/23511
[2] http://www.enn.com/climate/article/23509
[3] http://www.enn.com/energy/article/23511
[4] http://www.enn.com/climate/article/23509]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://joshuashill.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/ecuador-to-leave-oil-and-revenue-in-the-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Utilities Announce Major Efficiency Initiative</title>
    <link>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/01/utilities-announce-major-efficiency-initiative/</link>
    <comments>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/01/utilities-announce-major-efficiency-initiative/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Con+Edison]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Duke+Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Edison+International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Great+Plains+Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Landscaping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National and World News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PNM+Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pepco+Holdings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science and Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sierra+Pacific+Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Socially Responsible Investing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Xcel+Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleantechnica]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[climate+change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy+efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global+warming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/01/utilities-announce-major-efficiency-initiative/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/29/Meter.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="160" align="right" />Thanks to Erin over at <a href="http://www.reamp.org/newsroom">RE-AMP</a> for the heads-up on this great piece of news: Eight major utilities have agreed to implement energy efficiency measures in order to meet the growing demand for electricity. By emphasizing efficiency over coal, they will cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 30 million tons — the equivalent of taking almost 6 million cars off the road — and avoid the need to build 50 500-megawatt peaking power plants. 
</p>
<p>
The utilities involved have more than 20 million customers and cover 22 states: Con Edison (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:ED">ED</a>), Edison International (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=EIX&#38;hl=en">EIX</a>), Great Plains Energy (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGXP">GXP</a>), Duke Energy (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=DUK&#38;hl=en">DUK</a>), Pepco Holdings (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=POM&#38;hl=en">POM</a>), PNM Resources (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=PNM&#38;hl=en">PNM</a>), Sierra Pacific Resources (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=SRP&#38;hl=en">SRP</a>), and Xcel Energy (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=XEL&#38;hl=en">XEL</a>). Up until now, the only utilities that want to grow profits through energy efficiency investments have been in California. 
</p>
<p>
The move by these utilities comes at a time when demand is growing, concerns and lawsuits about emissions abound, and global warming is a hot political and business issue. 
</p>
<p>
Energy efficiency is the cheapest and fastest way to cut global warming emissions, and the utilities <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070927/clth040.html?.v=101">agree</a>: &#34;  	…we share a common belief that energy efficiency is the greatest untapped resource in addressing global climate change in the near-term.&#34; Here are the major elements of their plan:<br />
</p>
<ul>
	<li>Boost investments in energy efficiency projects to $1.5 billion per year in the next 10 years.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>Create a national institute for electric efficiency. The Energy Efficiency Institute will work on regulatory policy models, notably how utilities can make money when customers use less energy rather than more. It will be formed within the Edison Electric Institute, which represents the nation’s investor-owned utilities. </li>
</ul>
<p>
</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ Thanks to Erin over at RE-AMP [1] for the heads-up on this great piece of news: Eight major utilities have agreed to implement energy efficiency measures in order to meet the growing demand for electricity. By emphasizing efficiency over coal, they will cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 30 million tons — the equivalent of taking almost 6 million cars off the road — and avoid the need to build 50 500-megawatt peaking power plants.

The utilities involved have more than 20 million customers and cover 22 states: Con Edison (ED [2]), Edison International (EIX [3]), Great Plains Energy (GXP [4]), Duke Energy (DUK [5]), Pepco Holdings (POM [6]), PNM Resources (PNM [7]), Sierra Pacific Resources (SRP [8]), and Xcel Energy (XEL [9]). Up until now, the only utilities that want to grow profits through energy efficiency investments have been in California.

The move by these utilities comes at a time when demand is growing, concerns and lawsuits about emissions abound, and global warming is a hot political and business issue.

Energy efficiency is the cheapest and fastest way to cut global warming emissions, and the utilities agree [10]: "  	…we share a common belief that energy efficiency is the greatest untapped resource in addressing global climate change in the near-term." Here are the major elements of their plan:

	Boost investments in energy efficiency projects to $1.5 billion per year in the next 10 years.


	Create a national institute for electric efficiency. The Energy Efficiency Institute will work on regulatory policy models, notably how utilities can make money when customers use less energy rather than more. It will be formed within the Edison Electric Institute, which represents the nation’s investor-owned utilities.


Innovation and multi-party collaboration will be needed to craft policies that allow companies to profit from investing in efficiency. Utilities could profit from replacing inefficient air conditioners and light bulbs, for instance. Great Plains hopes to get legislation passed in Kansas and Missouri that would allow them to earn a higher return on efficiency investments than what would be made investing in traditional power plants. The utility could install smart electricity meters that tell customers when electricity prices are highest and even allows the utility to adjust the operations of appliances in customer homes. Michael Chesser, Chairman and CEO of Great Plains, said [11] that energy efficiency, "with the right incentives," could take care of all the growth in electricity demand between 2010 and 2017.

The business community was also interested by the announcement. The Dow Jones Wire [12] commented:
 	It's a sign of how quickly energy efficiency has taken center stage in the utility industry's growth plans. Even in states where rates are low, power companies increasingly see efficiency investments as an inexpensive way to satisfy growing electricity demand and boost revenue without provoking the public opposition that usually dogs proposals for new power plants and transmission lines.
The utilities are working in partnership with the Clinton Global Initiative, backed by former President Bill Clinton's foundation.

Cross posted on Maria Energia [13]

Kansas City Star [14]
Dow Jones Wire [12]
Yahoo Finance [16]

[1] http://www.reamp.org/newsroom
[2] http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:ED
[3] http://finance.google.com/finance?q=EIX&#38;hl=en
[4] http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGXP
[5] http://finance.google.com/finance?q=DUK&#38;hl=en
[6] http://finance.google.com/finance?q=POM&#38;hl=en
[7] http://finance.google.com/finance?q=PNM&#38;hl=en
[8] http://finance.google.com/finance?q=SRP&#38;hl=en
[9] http://finance.google.com/finance?q=XEL&#38;hl=en
[10] http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070927/clth040.html?.v=101
[11] http://news.morningstar.com/news/ViewNews.asp?article=/DJ/200709271257DOWJONESDJONLINE000567_univ.xml&#38;pgid=qtqnNews3
[12] http://news.morningstar.com/news/ViewNews.asp?article=/DJ/200709271257DOWJONESDJONLINE000567_univ.xml&#38;pgid=qtqnNews3
[13] http://mariaenergia.blogspot.com/
[14] http://www.kansascity.com/news/consumer_news/story/294207.html
[15] http://news.morningstar.com/news/ViewNews.asp?article=/DJ/200709271257DOWJONESDJONLINE000567_univ.xml&#38;pgid=qtqnNews3
[16] http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070927/clth040.html?.v=101]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/01/utilities-announce-major-efficiency-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 333 queries in 0.768 seconds. -->