<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; national defense</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/national-defense</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'national defense'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>US Army Releases First Annual Sustainability Report</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2008/11/17/us-army-releases-first-annual-sustainability-report/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2008/11/17/us-army-releases-first-annual-sustainability-report/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2008/11/17/us-army-releases-first-annual-sustainability-report/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2008/11/army.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3843" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2008/11/army.jpg" alt="US Army Soldier marching in formation" width="500" height="377" /></a>Is sustainability a national security issue? Politicians, policy makers and academics may be willing to argue sides of that question, but for the U.S. Army, the answer seems to be <a href="http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/04/19/global-warming-threatens-us-national-security/">&#8220;Yes, sir!&#8221;</a> Following up on earlier announcements of <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/07/army-wants-to-build-worlds-most-powerful-solar-array/">solar arrays</a> and <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/29/us-army-works-to-cut-its-carbon-bootprint-ba-da-bum/">emission reduction goals</a>, the <a href="http://www.army.mil/-newsreleases/2008/11/14/14229-army-2007-sustainability-report-released/">Army released its first annual sustainability report</a> on Friday. Covering the period of FY 2004-2007, the report notes a number of encouraging trends:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Sixteen Army installations with comprehensive Installation Sustainability Plans in place.</li>
<li>78% (301) of FY07 ArmyMilitary Construction projects designed to at least U.S. Green Building Council&#8217;s LEED® new construction certification standards.</li>
<li>100% (161) installations with an Environmental Management System (EMS) in place with 31% in conformance to ISO14001</li>
<li>8.4% reduction in facility energy useintensity (KBtu/gross square foot/per year, since FY03)</li>
</ul>
<p>Challenges still exist, of course. Among them:</p>
<ul>
<li>35% increase in Hazardous Waste (HW) generation as reported for CY03 to CY06 and an 8% increase in pounds HWgenerated per $1000 net Army cost of operations.</li>
<li>11% increase in absolute Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) releases as reported for CY03 to CY06, but a 13% decrease in pounds TRI released per $1000 net Army cost of operations.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/11/17/us-army-releases-first-annual-sustainability-report/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2008/11/17/us-army-releases-first-annual-sustainability-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 95 queries in 0.524 seconds. -->