<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; navajo-nation</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/navajo-nation</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'navajo-nation'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Navajo Fight Against New Uranium Mines Explained, on The Lindberg Report</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/30/navajo-fight-against-new-uranium-mines-explained-on-the-lindberg-report/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/30/navajo-fight-against-new-uranium-mines-explained-on-the-lindberg-report/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Lindberg Report]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/30/navajo-fight-against-new-uranium-mines-explained-on-the-lindberg-report/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/insituleach.jpg" title="insituleach.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/insituleach.jpg" alt="insituleach.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>As I stated in an earlier <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/19/navajos-say-no-to-new-uranium-mines-on-tribal-lands/">article</a>, the Navajo Nation is challenging the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in a Federal appeals court, over proposed in <em>situ leach</em> uranium mining on tribal lands.  It&#8217;s the first time in history that the NRC will be challenged in court for its approval of a source materials license for an in <em>situ leach</em> uranium mine.</p>
<p>The Navajo communities of Crownpoint and Church Rock are represented by the New Mexico Environmental Law Center (NMELC), Eastern Navajo Dine against Uranium Mining (ENDAUM) and Southwest Research and Information Center (SRIC).   They are demanding that a New Mexico mining company, Hydro Resources, Inc., stay off tribal lands.</p>
<p>Eric Jantz, a lawyer with the NMELC, spent some time with me, explaining the lawsuit and that organization&#8217;s role in other uranium related issues.  I asked him for a briefing on the litigation.</p>
<p><div class="flash-media"><object width="290" height="24" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="movie" value="http://planetsave.com/wp-content/resources/player.swf" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="flashvars" value="soundFile=http%3A%2F%2Fplanetsave.com%2Ffiles%2F2008%2F04%2Feric-jantz-final.mp3" /><!--[if !IE]> --><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://planetsave.com/wp-content/resources/player.swf" width="290" height="24"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="flashvars" value="soundFile=http%3A%2F%2Fplanetsave.com%2Ffiles%2F2008%2F04%2Feric-jantz-final.mp3" /><!-- <![endif]--><a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer">Get Adobe Flash Player</a> to play this audio or <a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/eric-jantz-final.mp3">download the audio file</a> instead.<!--[if !IE]> --></object><!-- <![endif]--></object></div></p>
<p>Image:  <a href="http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf27.html">World Nuclear Association</a></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]

As I stated in an earlier article [2], the Navajo Nation is challenging the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in a Federal appeals court, over proposed in situ leach uranium mining on tribal lands.  It's the first time in history that the NRC will be challenged in court for its approval of a source materials license for an in situ leach uranium mine.

The Navajo communities of Crownpoint and Church Rock are represented by the New Mexico Environmental Law Center (NMELC), Eastern Navajo Dine against Uranium Mining (ENDAUM) and Southwest Research and Information Center (SRIC).   They are demanding that a New Mexico mining company, Hydro Resources, Inc., stay off tribal lands.

Eric Jantz, a lawyer with the NMELC, spent some time with me, explaining the lawsuit and that organization's role in other uranium related issues.  I asked him for a briefing on the litigation.

eric-jantz-final.mp3 [3]

Image:  World Nuclear Association [4]

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/insituleach.jpg
[2] http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/19/navajos-say-no-to-new-uranium-mines-on-tribal-lands/
[3] http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/eric-jantz-final.mp3
[4] http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf27.html]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/30/navajo-fight-against-new-uranium-mines-explained-on-the-lindberg-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/eric-jantz-final.mp3" length="8910054" type="audio/mpeg" />
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Navajos On Warpath Over Uranium Mining On Tribal Lands</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/19/navajos-say-no-to-new-uranium-mines-on-tribal-lands/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/19/navajos-say-no-to-new-uranium-mines-on-tribal-lands/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/19/navajos-say-no-to-new-uranium-mines-on-tribal-lands/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/uranium-mine.jpg" title="uranium-mine.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/uranium-mine.jpg" alt="uranium-mine.jpg" /></a><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/uranium-mine.jpg" title="uranium-mine.jpg"> </a></p>
<p>For all the minorities in this country who have raised pluperfect hell about their past or current situations, the American Indian has been the quietist, and I wonder why.</p>
<p>Before you write me nasty emails, I&#8217;m not minimizing the concerns of minorities in this country: they have their issues and the right to use their voices, and that&#8217;s good.</p>
<p>But think for a moment about the original settlers of this land, the American Indian.</p>
<p>They did just fine for centuries, sustaining their cultures with the fruits of the land, picking fights and having wars, just like we all do.</p>
<p>Then, came the white man (no emails please, because that&#8217;s what happened), who invaded the natives&#8217; birthright, confiscated their tribal lands, transferred them to reservations and literally forgot about them.  Many of those Native Americans to this very day are without electricity and running water, in some cases, living in dirt poor conditions, and they languish without raising their voices.</p>
<p>How incredibly sad.</p>
<p><!--more-->To add insult to this incomprehensible indignity, mining companies in search of uranium <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/24/uranium-woes-on-indian-nation-lands-an-interview-with-marilyn-berlin-snell/">invaded their tribal homes</a>, gouged out huge amounts of topsoil, taking what uranium they could profitably retrieve and leaving open sores bleeding toxic radiation into the soil, air and water.</p>
<p>Their legacy?  Still-born babies, children with birth defects, cancer for hundreds, maybe even thousands,  livestock mutations and God only knows what else.  Maybe to the nuclear industry and our federal government, these people are considered &#8220;collateral damage.&#8221;</p>
<p>The government that put these noble people onto these lands, quickly approved the mining claims and encouraged uranium miners to take what they can, and in many cases paid only lip service to the clean-up process.</p>
<p>Now, with the price of uranium soaring, those uranium people are at it again, boring test holes on federal lands, in our &#8220;protected&#8221; forests, and on Indian nation lands.</p>
<p>For the first time in the history of this country, the Navajo communities of <a href="http://www.city-data.com/city/Crownpoint-New-Mexico.html">Crownpoint</a> and <a href="http://www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO9.html">Church Rock</a>, New Mexico are saying NO to the feds and uranium miners.</p>
<p>In an unprecedented move, the <a href="http://www.nrc.gov/">Nuclear Regulatory Commission</a> (NRC) will be challenged in Federal appeals court for its approval of a source materials license for an <em><a href="http://world-nuclear.org/info/inf27.html">in situ</a></em> leach uranium mine on Navajo tribal lands.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.nmenvirolaw.org/">New Mexico Environmental Law Center</a> (NMELC), will present oral arguments on May 12 to a panel of Federal judges in Denver, asking that the NRC decision to allow mining be set aside.</p>
<p>Eric Jantz, an attorney for the NMELC, said in a news release:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;The importance of our hearing on May 12 cannot be overstated.  &#8220;We are talking about the land, water, air and health of two whole communities. There are people on this land grazing their cattle and hauling their daily drinking water.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The company in question, <a href="http://serc.carleton.edu/resources/2507.html">Hydro Resources</a>, is proposing mining operations in four areas in the Church Rock-Crownpoint region.  The NRC approved the license in 2006, but the New Mexico Environmental Law Center filed a lawsuit in 2007, asking that the license application be overturned.</p>
<p>In it&#8217;s release, the NMELC states the NRC has violated the National Environmental Policy Act, the Atomic Energy Act, and it&#8217;s own regulations.</p>
<p>The NMELC&#8217;s clients are appealing the following points:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Hydro Resources failed to prove that it will protect groundwater from contamination by uranium and other toxic heavy metals.</em><em> The company failed to ensure that the health of residents near the mines would be protected from damaging radioactive air emissions. </em></p>
<p><em>Hydro Resources&#8217; proposed financial bond for the site is inadequate to ensure that the site(s) would be cleaned up in the event that the company is unable to undertake reclamation of the land and/or water impacted by the mining.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Three cheers for the Navajo Nation, for standing up to our big-brother government.</p>
<p>My <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/20/opinion-yucca-mountain-failure-a-windfall-for-nuclear-utilities/">stand</a> on nuclear energy is <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/14/is-utah-to-become-a-uranium-dumping-ground-for-the-world/">well-stated</a>, en toto: it&#8217;s a dirty, dangerous, toxic, life-threatening industry and until miners are held responsible for the mess they make, there should be no new mining of nuclear materials in America.</p>
<p>Photo:  LA Times</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]  [2]

For all the minorities in this country who have raised pluperfect hell about their past or current situations, the American Indian has been the quietist, and I wonder why.

Before you write me nasty emails, I'm not minimizing the concerns of minorities in this country: they have their issues and the right to use their voices, and that's good.

But think for a moment about the original settlers of this land, the American Indian.

They did just fine for centuries, sustaining their cultures with the fruits of the land, picking fights and having wars, just like we all do.

Then, came the white man (no emails please, because that's what happened), who invaded the natives' birthright, confiscated their tribal lands, transferred them to reservations and literally forgot about them.  Many of those Native Americans to this very day are without electricity and running water, in some cases, living in dirt poor conditions, and they languish without raising their voices.

How incredibly sad.

To add insult to this incomprehensible indignity, mining companies in search of uranium invaded their tribal homes [3], gouged out huge amounts of topsoil, taking what uranium they could profitably retrieve and leaving open sores bleeding toxic radiation into the soil, air and water.

Their legacy?  Still-born babies, children with birth defects, cancer for hundreds, maybe even thousands,  livestock mutations and God only knows what else.  Maybe to the nuclear industry and our federal government, these people are considered "collateral damage."

The government that put these noble people onto these lands, quickly approved the mining claims and encouraged uranium miners to take what they can, and in many cases paid only lip service to the clean-up process.

Now, with the price of uranium soaring, those uranium people are at it again, boring test holes on federal lands, in our "protected" forests, and on Indian nation lands.

For the first time in the history of this country, the Navajo communities of Crownpoint [4] and Church Rock [5], New Mexico are saying NO to the feds and uranium miners.

In an unprecedented move, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission [6] (NRC) will be challenged in Federal appeals court for its approval of a source materials license for an in situ [7] leach uranium mine on Navajo tribal lands.

The New Mexico Environmental Law Center [8] (NMELC), will present oral arguments on May 12 to a panel of Federal judges in Denver, asking that the NRC decision to allow mining be set aside.

Eric Jantz, an attorney for the NMELC, said in a news release:
"The importance of our hearing on May 12 cannot be overstated.  "We are talking about the land, water, air and health of two whole communities. There are people on this land grazing their cattle and hauling their daily drinking water."
The company in question, Hydro Resources [9], is proposing mining operations in four areas in the Church Rock-Crownpoint region.  The NRC approved the license in 2006, but the New Mexico Environmental Law Center filed a lawsuit in 2007, asking that the license application be overturned.

In it's release, the NMELC states the NRC has violated the National Environmental Policy Act, the Atomic Energy Act, and it's own regulations.

The NMELC's clients are appealing the following points:
Hydro Resources failed to prove that it will protect groundwater from contamination by uranium and other toxic heavy metals. The company failed to ensure that the health of residents near the mines would be protected from damaging radioactive air emissions. 

Hydro Resources' proposed financial bond for the site is inadequate to ensure that the site(s) would be cleaned up in the event that the company is unable to undertake reclamation of the land and/or water impacted by the mining.
Three cheers for the Navajo Nation, for standing up to our big-brother government.

My stand [10] on nuclear energy is well-stated [11], en toto: it's a dirty, dangerous, toxic, life-threatening industry and until miners are held responsible for the mess they make, there should be no new mining of nuclear materials in America.

Photo:  LA Times

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/uranium-mine.jpg
[2] http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/uranium-mine.jpg
[3] http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/24/uranium-woes-on-indian-nation-lands-an-interview-with-marilyn-berlin-snell/
[4] http://www.city-data.com/city/Crownpoint-New-Mexico.html
[5] http://www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO9.html
[6] http://www.nrc.gov/
[7] http://world-nuclear.org/info/inf27.html
[8] http://www.nmenvirolaw.org/
[9] http://serc.carleton.edu/resources/2507.html
[10] http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/20/opinion-yucca-mountain-failure-a-windfall-for-nuclear-utilities/
[11] http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/14/is-utah-to-become-a-uranium-dumping-ground-for-the-world/]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/19/navajos-say-no-to-new-uranium-mines-on-tribal-lands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Group Sues EPA for Inaction on Coal Permit</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/19/navajo-group-sues-epa-for-stalling-on-air-permit/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/19/navajo-group-sues-epa-for-stalling-on-air-permit/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[administration and bureaucracy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/19/navajo-group-sues-epa-for-stalling-on-air-permit/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Giuliani Firm to Do Legal Bidding <a title="navajo_wolfgang_staudt_compressed.jpg" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/navajo_wolfgang_staudt_compressed.jpg"><img src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/navajo_wolfgang_staudt_compressed.jpg" alt="navajo-nation, coal-fired powered plant, coal, epa, air-permit, clean-air, climate-change, greenhouse-gasses, global-warming" /></a></h3>
<p><strong>A Navajo Nation enterprise has filed a lawsuit against the US Environmental Protection Agency Tuesday for dragging its feet on an air permit for a proposed coal-fired power plant. </strong>Dine Power Authority of the Navajo Nation and Houston-based Sithe Global Power have partnered to build the $3 billion, 1500 megawatt Desert Rock plant. The group filed for a <a href="http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/desertrock/">permit</a> back in 2004 and is still awaiting a final decision. &#8220;Time is money,&#8221; said Steven Begay, the general manager of DPA.  Begay added, &#8220;Sithe is spending money, and we&#8217;re spending money. The longer we wait, the more money we spend &#8230; and we don&#8217;t want to do that. We want to move forward.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sithe has alredy invested about $20 million in the project and the lawsuit claims the tribe is losing $5 million per month in tax revenue for each month the permit is delayed. The investor group announced in January that they would be suing the agency, and that they would be represented by <a href="http://energylegalblog.com/">friend of &#8216;big energy,&#8217;</a> <a href="http://www.bracewellgiuliani.com/">Giuliani and Bracewell</a>. Apparently Rudy Giuliani will find ways to assert his political will, even if he can&#8217;t be President. <!--more--></p>
<p>The air permit would set limits for emissions covered under the federal <a href="http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/">Clean Air Act</a>, such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, particulates and lead emissions. Both federal officials and Desert Rock developers have said the draft permit contains some of the strictest controls ever set for a coal-fired power plant in the United States.</p>
<p>But not everyone is as excited about what would be the third coal-fired power plant in the Four-Corners region.  <a href="http://riogrande.sierraclub.org/campaigns/desert_rock_power_plant/desertrock_power_plant.htm">Environmental groups</a>, and <a href="http://www.dinecare.org/">Navajo environmentalists</a> argue that<a title="four-corners-desert-rock-ma.jpg" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/four-corners-desert-rock-ma.jpg"><img src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/four-corners-desert-rock-ma.jpg" alt="four-corners-desert-rock-ma.jpg" /></a> Desert Rock would be unhealthy for local residents and the environment. This, like most other power plant sitings, is an issue of environmental health and justice. The New Mexico Environment Department and others have criticized the draft permit for not including enforceable conditions to address adverse visibility and for not analyzing mercury or carbon dioxide emissions. Others have complained that a better understanding of existing air quality conditions in the Four Corners region is needed before acceptable standards can be set for Desert Rock.</p>
<p>As awareness about global climate change has deepened in the US, <a href="http://sustainablog.org/2007/12/19/coal-plants-cancelled-in-wyoming/">the pace of permitting new coal-fired power plants has fallen-off considerably</a>. Big coal is mounting a big pushback to fend off coal&#8217;s image as a dirty fuel and win favor in the court of public opinion. <strong>Until the feds either pass meaningful climate legislation, or the EPA takes a firm stance on regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant (as they were instructed by the Supreme Court), there is not much for EPA policymakers to hang their hats on.</strong></p>
<p>My belief is that there are some very wise people at the EPA who are blocking a decision on this permit until there has been a clearer signal from the administration, or a precedent-setting case brought to the Supreme Court. At least, that is my hope.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/9da87f5b460fa1b49ce132a3af7964ab.htm">Gallup Independent</a></p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/9da87f5b460fa1b49ce132a3af7964ab.htm">CNN/Money</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.desert-rock-blog.com/blog">Desert Rock Blog</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/desertrock/">Desert Rock Clean Air Proposed Permit </a></p>
<p>Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/wolfgangstaudt/">Wolfgang Staudt </a></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[Giuliani Firm to Do Legal Bidding  [1]
A Navajo Nation enterprise has filed a lawsuit against the US Environmental Protection Agency Tuesday for dragging its feet on an air permit for a proposed coal-fired power plant. Dine Power Authority of the Navajo Nation and Houston-based Sithe Global Power have partnered to build the $3 billion, 1500 megawatt Desert Rock plant. The group filed for a permit [2] back in 2004 and is still awaiting a final decision. "Time is money," said Steven Begay, the general manager of DPA.  Begay added, "Sithe is spending money, and we're spending money. The longer we wait, the more money we spend ... and we don't want to do that. We want to move forward."

Sithe has alredy invested about $20 million in the project and the lawsuit claims the tribe is losing $5 million per month in tax revenue for each month the permit is delayed. The investor group announced in January that they would be suing the agency, and that they would be represented by friend of 'big energy,' [3] Giuliani and Bracewell [4]. Apparently Rudy Giuliani will find ways to assert his political will, even if he can't be President. 

The air permit would set limits for emissions covered under the federal Clean Air Act [5], such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, particulates and lead emissions. Both federal officials and Desert Rock developers have said the draft permit contains some of the strictest controls ever set for a coal-fired power plant in the United States.

But not everyone is as excited about what would be the third coal-fired power plant in the Four-Corners region.  Environmental groups [6], and Navajo environmentalists [7] argue that [8] Desert Rock would be unhealthy for local residents and the environment. This, like most other power plant sitings, is an issue of environmental health and justice. The New Mexico Environment Department and others have criticized the draft permit for not including enforceable conditions to address adverse visibility and for not analyzing mercury or carbon dioxide emissions. Others have complained that a better understanding of existing air quality conditions in the Four Corners region is needed before acceptable standards can be set for Desert Rock.

As awareness about global climate change has deepened in the US, the pace of permitting new coal-fired power plants has fallen-off considerably [9]. Big coal is mounting a big pushback to fend off coal's image as a dirty fuel and win favor in the court of public opinion. Until the feds either pass meaningful climate legislation, or the EPA takes a firm stance on regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant (as they were instructed by the Supreme Court), there is not much for EPA policymakers to hang their hats on.

My belief is that there are some very wise people at the EPA who are blocking a decision on this permit until there has been a clearer signal from the administration, or a precedent-setting case brought to the Supreme Court. At least, that is my hope.

Gallup Independent [10]

CNN/Money [11]

Desert Rock Blog [12]

Desert Rock Clean Air Proposed Permit  [13]

Photo: Wolfgang Staudt  [14]

[1] http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/navajo_wolfgang_staudt_compressed.jpg
[2] http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/desertrock/
[3] http://energylegalblog.com/
[4] http://www.bracewellgiuliani.com/
[5] http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/
[6] http://riogrande.sierraclub.org/campaigns/desert_rock_power_plant/desertrock_power_plant.htm
[7] http://www.dinecare.org/
[8] http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/four-corners-desert-rock-ma.jpg
[9] http://sustainablog.org/2007/12/19/coal-plants-cancelled-in-wyoming/
[10] http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/9da87f5b460fa1b49ce132a3af7964ab.htm
[11] http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/9da87f5b460fa1b49ce132a3af7964ab.htm
[12] http://www.desert-rock-blog.com/blog
[13] http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/desertrock/
[14] http://www.flickr.com/people/wolfgangstaudt/]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/19/navajo-group-sues-epa-for-stalling-on-air-permit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 82 queries in 0.424 seconds. -->