<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; NiMH</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/nimh</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'NiMH'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>New Nickel-Lithium Battery Has &#8220;Ultrahigh&#8221; Energy Storage Capacity</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/10/06/new-nickel-lithium-battery-has-ultrahigh-energy-storage-capacity/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/10/06/new-nickel-lithium-battery-has-ultrahigh-energy-storage-capacity/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Batteries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/10/06/new-nickel-lithium-battery-has-ultrahigh-energy-storage-capacity/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Researchers have found a way to create a battery out of Nickel and Lithium that can store more than 3.5 times the energy of lithium-ion batteries and are much safer to boot.</h3>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3723 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/10/ni-li_battery_1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="373" /></p>

<p>Lithium-ion batteries are great and all—having heralded in a new age of portable electronics and allowed for the possibility of mass-market <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/23/affordable-electric-cars-coming-to-us-in-2009/">electric cars</a>—but they have a few major drawbacks. For instance, they have a propensity to<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeWq6rWzChw" target="_blank"> catch fire</a> and <a href="http://news.cnet.com/apple-sued-over-exploding-ipod-touch/" target="_blank">explode</a> and, although they have a much better energy storage capacity than say lead-acid or nickel metal hydride (NiMH) batteries, they still weigh too much to pack more than a couple hundred miles of range into a passenger car.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/10/06/new-nickel-lithium-battery-has-ultrahigh-energy-storage-capacity/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/10/06/new-nickel-lithium-battery-has-ultrahigh-energy-storage-capacity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Toyota and EDF Testing Plug-in Prius in UK</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/13/toyota-and-edf-testing-plug-in-prius-in-uk/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/09/13/toyota-and-edf-testing-plug-in-prius-in-uk/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dana Nuccitelli</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fuel economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plug-in hybrid EVs]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/09/13/toyota-and-edf-testing-plug-in-prius-in-uk/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>In an international effort, Japanese automaker Toyota and Électricité de France (EDF) are expanding their European plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) testing program to the United Kingdom.</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.treehugger.com/toyota-edf-plug-in-prius-01.jpg" alt="prius EDF" width="525" height="346" /><br />
The trial builds on the first European PHEV testing program <a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/09/edf-and-toyota-.html">launched by Toyota and EDF on French roads in September 2007</a>.  The UK partnership is designed to evaluate vehicle performance within an urban environment, vehicle infrastructure requirements, and driver behaviors and expectations.</p>
<p>Trials started on September 10th and will continue for more than one year. Toyota’s PHEV will make its on-the-road debut as part of EDF Energy’s company fleet and will be tested by employees under every-day driving conditions.  The modified plug-in Prius being tested will utilize nickel-metal hydride (NiMh) batteries, with an <a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/07/toyota-announce.html">all-electric range of approximately 8 miles</a> if the speed remains below 62 mph.  When Toyota begins producing the plug-in Prius (expected for fleets in 2009), it will utilize superior lithium-ion batteries.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/09/13/toyota-and-edf-testing-plug-in-prius-in-uk/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/09/13/toyota-and-edf-testing-plug-in-prius-in-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Who Might Win McCain&#8217;s Battery Competition? Part I: Firefly</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/who-might-win-mccains-battery-competition-part-i-firefly/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/who-might-win-mccains-battery-competition-part-i-firefly/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/who-might-win-mccains-battery-competition-part-i-firefly/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-665" style="vertical-align: top" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/07/firefly-mashup.jpg" alt="Firefly microcell foam next to classis lead plates" width="500" height="382" /><em></em></p>
<p><em>Editor&#8217;s note: This post is a lead-in story to the <a title="Gas 2.0 interview with Mil Ovan, SVP and Co-founder of Firefly Energy" href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/interview-with-mil-ovan-svp-and-co-founder-of-firefly-energy/" target="_blank">Gas 2.0 interview with Mil Ovan, Senior Vice President and Co-founder of Firefly Energy</a>. </em></p>
<p>Last week John McCain, the presumptive presidential nominee for the 2008 Republican ticket, <a title="Gas 2.0 post about McCain battery competition" href="http://gas2.org/2008/06/23/mccain-proposes-300-million-prize-to-developer-of-super-battery/" target="_blank">suggested that a $300 million government-sponsored competition</a> would be a good way to spur development of next generation battery technologies.</p>
<p>His comments <a title="Link to politicususa post" href="http://www.politicususa.com/en/Obama-Bounty" target="_blank">generated debate in the blogosphere</a> and around the United States. Meanwhile, Barack Obama, the presumptive presidential nominee for the Democratic ticket, <a title="Link to truck trend post" href="http://blogs.trucktrend.com/6261183/industry-news/obama-calls-mccains-300-million-battery-prize-a-gimmick/index.html" target="_blank">called McCain&#8217;s proposal a gimmick</a> suggesting that $300 million was not enough.</p>
<p>Regardless of my feelings about the proposed competition or the candidates themselves, it got me thinking about just who might win it if it were to become a reality. All that thinking led to this post, and, hopefully, to several others that will look at the most promising next generation battery technologies on the horizon.</p>
<p>This week I&#8217;ll start with <a title="Firefly Energy homepage" href="http://www.fireflyenergy.com/" target="_blank">Firefly Energy</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/who-might-win-mccains-battery-competition-part-i-firefly/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/who-might-win-mccains-battery-competition-part-i-firefly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Interview With Mil Ovan, SVP and Co-founder of Firefly Energy</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/interview-with-mil-ovan-svp-and-co-founder-of-firefly-energy/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/interview-with-mil-ovan-svp-and-co-founder-of-firefly-energy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/interview-with-mil-ovan-svp-and-co-founder-of-firefly-energy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-666" style="vertical-align: top" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/07/ff_logo.jpg" alt="Firefly Logo" width="240" height="173" /><em>Editor&#8217;s note: This interview is a companion piece to <a title="Gas 2.0 post about who might win McCain's battery competition" href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/who-might-win-mccains-battery-competition-part-i-firefly/" target="_blank">Part I of the Gas 2.0 series about who might win John McCain&#8217;s proposed $300 million dollar battery competition</a> if it were to become reality.</em></p>
<p>Last week John McCain, the presumptive presidential nominee for the 2008 Republican ticket, generated debate by <a title="Gas 2.0 post about McCain battery competition" href="http://gas2.org/2008/06/23/mccain-proposes-300-million-prize-to-developer-of-super-battery/" target="_blank">suggesting that a $300 million government- sponsored competition</a> would be a good way to spur development of next generation battery technologies.</p>
<p>His comments got me thinking about just who might win such a competition it if it were to become reality.</p>
<p><a title="Firefly Energy homepage" href="http://www.fireflyenergy.com/" target="_blank">Firefly Energy</a> is one of the companies that made it to my short list. Founded in 2003, they have been working on reinvigorating old-hat <a title="Wikipedia entry for lead-acid battery" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_acid_battery" target="_blank">lead-acid battery</a> technology in such a way that it would become brand new and cutting edge once again.</p>
<p>Firefly&#8217;s innovation is that they&#8217;ve taken the heavy lead plates you&#8217;d find in a classic lead-acid battery and replaced them with a light carbon-graphite microcell foam that&#8217;s been impregnated with lead.</p>
<p>I recently had a chance chat with Mil Ovan, Senior Vice President and Co-founder of Firefly, about the company, their take on McCain&#8217;s competition, Firefly&#8217;s battery technology, environmental worries about lead, the Oasis battery, electric vehicles and the company&#8217;s plans for the future.</p>
<h3>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/interview-with-mil-ovan-svp-and-co-founder-of-firefly-energy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/07/01/interview-with-mil-ovan-svp-and-co-founder-of-firefly-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 191 queries in 0.575 seconds. -->