<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; NuScale</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/nuscale</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'NuScale'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Answer to an Amory Lovins Disciple Who Believes in Conservation, Solar, Wind and Micropower</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/answer-to-an-amory-lovins-disciple-who-believes-in-conservation-solar-wind-and-micropower/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/answer-to-an-amory-lovins-disciple-who-believes-in-conservation-solar-wind-and-micropower/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/answer-to-an-amory-lovins-disciple-who-believes-in-conservation-solar-wind-and-micropower/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/09/drooping_flag.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/09/drooping_flag-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1058" /></a>In addition to my efforts on Green Options publications like CleanTechnica, I also publish a blog titled <a href="http://www.atomicinsights.com">Atomic Insights</a>. On that blog, I have recently been engaged in a conversation with a reader named Gordon, who is a believer in the energy supply systems that <a href="http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11999219">Amory Lovins</a> has been advocating for more than 35 years. I addressed this response to Gordon, but it is a more generally applicable response for anyone who wants to follow the non-nuclear &#8220;soft energy path&#8221;.</p>
<p>Gordon:</p>
<p>One thing you apparently do not understand about nuclear fission is that it can come in a variety of sizes. Not all plants are the extra large central station power plants that you are discussing.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/answer-to-an-amory-lovins-disciple-who-believes-in-conservation-solar-wind-and-micropower/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/answer-to-an-amory-lovins-disciple-who-believes-in-conservation-solar-wind-and-micropower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>NuScale Power and Hyperion Power Generation - Nuclear Power Systems That Are Not &#8220;Extra Large&#8221;</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/07/nuscale_power_module.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/07/nuscale_power_module.jpg" alt="NuScale Power Module" width="259" height="319" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-781" /></a>One of Al Gore&#8217;s frequently used sound bites to explain his skepticism about the potential for nuclear power to address energy and climate change challenges is that the plants come in only one size - &#8220;extra large&#8221;. The last time I heard him say those words was during an <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/17/eveningnews/main4270123.shtml">interview by Katie Couric</a> just a couple of weeks ago.</p>
<p>Web denizens, Navy submariners, former Army Nukes, and others have always recognized that the former Vice President&#8217;s comment does not provide a full picture of the possibilities. While it is certainly true that vendors like GE, Areva, Rosatom, Siemens, and Mitsubishi have chosen to limit their model line-up to the very largest plants, the technical fact is that nuclear reactors have always been available in multiple sizes ranging from petite to XXL. </p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 127 queries in 0.422 seconds. -->