<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; oilsands</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/oilsands</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'oilsands'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Alberta&#8217;s Oilsands: Now a Murderer</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/05/01/albertas-oilsands-natures-murderer/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/05/01/albertas-oilsands-natures-murderer/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/05/01/albertas-oilsands-natures-murderer/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ecoscraps.com/files/2008/05/duck_head.jpg" alt="A duck in water. (Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user Sujit Kumar.)" />If you haven&#8217;t yet read the <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/04/30/ducks-follo.html" title="Few survivors after 500 ducks take a dip in oilsands waste">heartbreaking news or seen the tragic images</a>, here&#8217;s another reason to oppose Canada&#8217;s oilsands development: On Monday, some 500 migrating ducks landed in a waste pond at a Syncrude site in Alberta &#8230; and only a handful survived long enough to be rescued and, with luck, restored to health.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/05/01/albertas-oilsands-natures-murderer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. Law Complicates Canadian Oilsands</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/green-earth.jpg" title="Green Earth"><img src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/green-earth.jpg" alt="Green Earth" align="left" /></a>When the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act last December, the bill included a passage that could effect Canada&#8217;s oilsands, and that has the Canadian government nervous.</p>
<p>The law prohibits federal procurement of fuels that produce more global warming emissions than conventional sources. Canada is concerned because the fuel taken from the oilsands is considered alternative fuel under the new energy act <em>and </em>it produces more global warming emissions than other sources. It complicates things because U.S. firms have major investments in the oilsands and the U.S. government currently gets a lot of fuel from there, so the U.S. essentially passed a law that could jeopardize this arrangement. In the province of Alberta, the oilsands represent the second largest oil reserve on the planet after  Saudi Arabia.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 73 queries in 0.443 seconds. -->