<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; oilsands</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/oilsands</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'oilsands'</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Environmental Protest Round-Up 25 September 2009</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/25/environmental-protest-round-up-25-september-2009/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/25/environmental-protest-round-up-25-september-2009/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kay Sexton</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Spectrum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/25/environmental-protest-round-up-25-september-2009/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3622" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/09/view-over-peninsula-smaller.jpg" alt="Scottish highlands" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>Protests from the tiny and good-tempered to the large and tragic this week, starting with the small and apparently ineffectual.</p>
<h3>Ineffective Canadian protest</h3>
<p>On Wednesday <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/26/oil-giant-shell-on-trial-for-nigerian-environmentalist-saro-wiwas-execution/" target="_blank">Royal Dutch Shell </a>claimed that the oilsands mine that it operates at Muskeg River in northern Vancouver, Canada, was still running at full speed, despite the second day of environmental protest by Greenpeace activists who had arrived at the mine on Tuesday and prevented the operation of a super-sized dumper truck and a hydraulic mining shovel.  The protest is intended to show that the utilisation of Canada’s <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/06/developing-oil-from-canadian-tar-sands-could-kill-160-million-migratory-birds-by-2038/" target="_blank">oilsands</a> desposits is a contributor to worsening climate change.</p>
<h3>Fatal Peruvian protest</h3>
<p>In Peru, the government has acted on the financially troubled and environmentally challenged <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/05/environmental-protest-round-up-5-september-2009/" target="_blank">Doe Run Peru </a>smelter. Their response to the closure of the site has been to give the operators a 30-month extension on their previous environmental clean-up deadline.  Production was halted in June, when banks cut off finance to the operating company: U.S.-based Renco Group. Now Renco says that it expects to obtain new loans and restart production now that 30 months have been added to the October deadline. If the plant reopens, around 20,000 jobs could be saved, but La Oroya will remain one of the most polluted towns on the planet for some time to come as spokesman has said Renco requires three years to undertake the clean-up. In unrest at the plant this week, one policeman died and at least three others were injured as protesters demanded the government reopen the smelter.</p>
<h3>Polite Scottish Highlands protest</h3>
<p>In the Scottish Highlands, a village of 270 persons has managed to obtain a 283 signature petition against proposed quarrying at Muir of Ord. Ord is famous for its distillery which produces whisky and several local businesses have lodged protests on environmental grounds. The entire 140-member Conon Fishings Syndicate has demanded safeguards for salmon fishing, and the Glen Orrin fish farm fears it could be at risk from flooding and reduced water quality. A local fruit farm has said the quarrying will have a detrimental effect on its business and adversely impact local wildlife. These protestors say this adverse effect on local business would counteract potential economic gains from the quarry which will extract sand and gravel from a 22-acre site over a 15 year licence period. Local wildlife like otters, ospreys and red kites may also be affected as their habitats are damaged, especially round local rivers.</p>
<p>Highlands photograph author&#8217;s own</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/25/environmental-protest-round-up-25-september-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Alberta&#8217;s Oilsands: Now a Murderer</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/05/01/albertas-oilsands-natures-murderer/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/05/01/albertas-oilsands-natures-murderer/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Other Green Topics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/05/01/albertas-oilsands-natures-murderer/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/05/duck_head.jpg" alt="A duck in water. (Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user Sujit Kumar.)" />If you haven&#8217;t yet read the <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/04/30/ducks-follo.html" title="Few survivors after 500 ducks take a dip in oilsands waste">heartbreaking news or seen the tragic images</a>, here&#8217;s another reason to oppose Canada&#8217;s oilsands development: On Monday, some 500 migrating ducks landed in a waste pond at a Syncrude site in Alberta &#8230; and only a handful survived long enough to be rescued and, with luck, restored to health.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/05/01/albertas-oilsands-natures-murderer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. Law Complicates Canadian Oilsands</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/green-earth.jpg" title="Green Earth"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/03/green-earth.jpg" alt="Green Earth" align="left" /></a>When the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act last December, the bill included a passage that could effect Canada&#8217;s oilsands, and that has the Canadian government nervous.</p>
<p>The law prohibits federal procurement of fuels that produce more global warming emissions than conventional sources. Canada is concerned because the fuel taken from the oilsands is considered alternative fuel under the new energy act <em>and </em>it produces more global warming emissions than other sources. It complicates things because U.S. firms have major investments in the oilsands and the U.S. government currently gets a lot of fuel from there, so the U.S. essentially passed a law that could jeopardize this arrangement. In the province of Alberta, the oilsands represent the second largest oil reserve on the planet after  Saudi Arabia.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/20/us-law-complicates-canadian-oilsands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 152 queries in 0.426 seconds. -->