<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Pascua Lama</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/pascua-lama</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Pascua Lama'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Argentina&#8217;s President Vetoes Law to Protect Glaciers</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/02/argentinas-law-to-protect-glaciers-vetoed/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/02/argentinas-law-to-protect-glaciers-vetoed/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amiel Blajchman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/02/argentinas-law-to-protect-glaciers-vetoed/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/12/441967_48cbfa5dcc.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-1744" style="margin-left: 2px;margin-right: 2px;float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/12/441967_48cbfa5dcc-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="319" height="238" /></a></p>
<p>On November 11th, Argentinian President Cristina Fernández <a href="http://www.tierramerica.info/nota.php?lang=eng&#38;idnews=2922" target="_blank">vetoed</a> a previously passed bill aimed at protecting Argentina&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaciers" target="_blank">glaciers</a>.</p>
<p>The bill, entitled <em>The Law of Minimum Budgets for the Protection of Glaciers and Periglacial Environment</em>, had been passed overwhelmingly despite concerns from governors of affected provinces and Argentina&#8217;s Secretariat of Mines that the bill&#8217;s provisions would prevent mining development.</p>
<p><strong>The glacier protection bill would have:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Established basic standards to preserve glaciers as strategic reserves of hydric resources and water supplies; and</li>
<li>Prohibited activities that would prevent the glaciers from acting as water supplies.</li>
</ol>
<p>Some of the <a href="http://www.mountainpartnership.org/common/newsletter/last.html" target="_blank">activities</a> that would have been severely curtailed in glacial environments would have been mining (<a href="http://www.google.ca/url?sa=U&#38;start=1&#38;q=http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/country/2000/9502000.pdf&#38;ei=H541SdrlEJSk8QTunLH8Bw&#38;usg=AFQjCNHL7cttlkGR2TFBGBH1WLosd_4ddQ" target="_blank">including</a> gold, copper, aluminum, iron and steel, and others), oil and gas exploration and exploitation, general construction activities, and the release of any substances that would have a detrimental effect on glaciers.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/02/argentinas-law-to-protect-glaciers-vetoed/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/02/argentinas-law-to-protect-glaciers-vetoed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 91 queries in 0.306 seconds. -->