<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; perennial grasses</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/perennial-grasses</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'perennial grasses'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Ethanol Made From Grasses Reduces Greenhouse Gases</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/12/03/ethanol-made-from-grasses-reduces-greenhouse-gases/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/12/03/ethanol-made-from-grasses-reduces-greenhouse-gases/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Cellulosic ethanol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food vs. fuel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/12/03/ethanol-made-from-grasses-reduces-greenhouse-gases/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>If non-food <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/02/worlds-first-commercially-viable-cellulosic-ethanol-plant-online-2009/">cellulosic ethanol</a> — &#8220;<a href="http://gas2.org/2008/08/07/cellulosic-ethanol-primer-i-like-the-name-celluline/comment-page-2/" target="_blank">celluline</a>&#8221; — is the future of sustainable biofuels, what are the best non-food crops to use to make it?</h3>
<h4>In a new study, researchers have shown that growing perennial grasses to make celluline rather than using corn stover or sugar cane is better for the environment because it increases soil health and stores much more carbon in the soil, thereby reducing greenhouse gases.</h4>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1348 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/12/harvest.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="266" /></p>

<p>Current first generation ethanol is produced by fermenting the starch in corn kernels. This has become a controversial source of biofuel due to <a href="http://gas2.org/category/biofuels/food-vs-fuel/" target="_blank">food vs. fuel</a> concerns and the relatively low <a href="http://www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/RENEW/Biomass/docs/FORUM/EthanolEnergyBalance.pdf" target="_blank">energy gain</a> from the whole process.</p>
<p>But celluline represents a true departure from these concerns in that significantly more liquid fuel energy can be harvested from <a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/10/biofuels/biofuels-interactive" target="_blank">non-food portions of the plant</a> — the stems and leaves. Celluline is still in the research and development stage, but many people have hung their hats on it as the holy grail that will replace corn ethanol and bypass concerns over <a href="http://gas2.org/category/biofuels/food-vs-fuel/" target="_blank">food vs. fuel</a> and <a href="http://www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/RENEW/Biomass/docs/FORUM/EthanolEnergyBalance.pdf" target="_blank">energy gains</a> (PDF).</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/12/03/ethanol-made-from-grasses-reduces-greenhouse-gases/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/12/03/ethanol-made-from-grasses-reduces-greenhouse-gases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 95 queries in 0.500 seconds. -->