<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; petroleum</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/petroleum</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'petroleum'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Petroleum Gets a Free Pass While Biofuels Are Torn Apart (Opinion)</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/04/petroleum-gets-a-free-pass-while-biofuels-are-torn-apart-opinion/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/09/04/petroleum-gets-a-free-pass-while-biofuels-are-torn-apart-opinion/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/09/04/petroleum-gets-a-free-pass-while-biofuels-are-torn-apart-opinion/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>In what he describes as misplaced behavior, Nikola Davidson, program director for the Northwest Biofuels Association, has raised a good point in a <a href="http://www.seattleweekly.com/2008-09-03/news/harassing-gas/1" target="_blank">Seattle Weekly article</a> — why is it that biofuels are becoming the ire of green activists while petroleum appears to be getting a free pass?</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-877" style="vertical-align: text-top" src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/09/shell_propel.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="284" /></p>
<p>The issue stems from activist and Green Party candidate for Washington governor <a href="http://www.wagreens.us/home/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=887&#38;Itemid=53" target="_blank">Duff Badgley&#8217;s</a> attempts to drive customers away from a <a href="http://www.propelfuels.com/" target="_blank">new biofuel station in northwest Seattle</a>. Allegedly Badgley and his group, <a href="http://www.oneearth.name/" target="_blank">One Earth</a>, have been harassing customers by taking pictures of their license plates and passing out leaflets that proclaim biofuels as a &#8220;scourge on humankind.&#8221;</p>
<p>Biofuels certainly have a <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/08/20/biodiesel-alliance-requests-input-on-future-sustainability/" target="_blank">hard row to hoe in terms of reaching sustainability</a>, and the <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/" target="_blank">activists have some valid concerns</a>, but a &#8220;scourge on humanity&#8221;? Really? It&#8217;s almost laughable.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/09/04/petroleum-gets-a-free-pass-while-biofuels-are-torn-apart-opinion/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/09/04/petroleum-gets-a-free-pass-while-biofuels-are-torn-apart-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Scrapping Fossil Fuel Subsidies Can Decrease Emissions</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/31/scrapping-fossil-fuel-subsidies-can-decrease-emissions/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/31/scrapping-fossil-fuel-subsidies-can-decrease-emissions/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/31/scrapping-fossil-fuel-subsidies-can-decrease-emissions/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/2420537629-ef51c2cdb8.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px" height="269" alt="2420537629_ef51c2cdb8" src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/2420537629-ef51c2cdb8-thumb.jpg" width="202" align="left" border="0" /></a> Normally, when you think of an energy subsidy, specifically a fuel subsidy, it&#8217;s all good news. With the ever increasing price of fuel, and the world&#8217;s economy going to hell in a handbasket, any help we can get is a good thing.</p>
<p>But a new report from the UN Environment Program (UNEP) has turned that idea on its head, and for good measure. Because once you get right down to it, would you rather the government put their moneys in to helping out sustainable and renewable energies, or propping up the old ones?</p>
<p>Subsequently, the UNEP has recommended that fossil fuel subsidies should be scrapped, and that in doing so could not only decrease the amount of greenhouse gases, but also give a &#8220;not insignificant boost to the global economy.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/31/scrapping-fossil-fuel-subsidies-can-decrease-emissions/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/31/scrapping-fossil-fuel-subsidies-can-decrease-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>A Perilous Walk in a Plastic World</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2008/08/24/a-perilous-walk-in-a-plastic-world/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2008/08/24/a-perilous-walk-in-a-plastic-world/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Justin Van Kleeck</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2008/08/24/a-perilous-walk-in-a-plastic-world/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2008/08/800px-plastic_recycle.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3329" style="float: right" src="http://sustainablog.org/files/2008/08/800px-plastic_recycle-300x212.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="212" /></a>Out once again for my daily constitutional and communion&#8211;another long morning walk&#8211;I blow slowly down this country road like the breeze in the Lynyrd Skynyrd song, like so many other wisps of Earth’s breath from time immemorial, like a ghost haunting some sacred ground.</p>
<p>With my every organ of sensory input wide open and on full alert, it is pretty much impossible for my eyes to miss the decidedly unnatural clutter of colorlessness that, like the natural things surrounding and hiding it (as if with embarrassment, perhaps), glistens with early morning dew in the roadside ditch: a plastic bag.</p>
<p>And within and scattered around that bag, like a litter of critters not completely born quite yet, a plastic soda bottle, a few empty plastic food wrappers, a Styrofoam cup with plastic lid and straw, a plastic spork….</p>
<p>Did some mad biochemist create and sow seeds of plastic that have finally sprouted? Pondering this, my eyes sort of glaze over as my mind’s eye starts to ramble off and my body rambles on via autopilot. And I hear in my mind’s ear, drowning out the birdsong and the breeze, a voice intoning ominously that America (and so by default the world) is addicted to oil.</p>
<p>And suddenly, as the country road loses its hard, firm reality, a vast plain of <em>plastic</em> stretches out before me…like <em>terra firma</em> comprised of solidified oil instead of soil, rocks, and stones. And like Dante stepping on the faces of the submerged dead in Hell, I tread upon countless plastic items that go along with daily human existence. Not just plastic soda bottles and sporks. Not just plastic bags and Saran Wrap.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/08/24/a-perilous-walk-in-a-plastic-world/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2008/08/24/a-perilous-walk-in-a-plastic-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Biodiesel Alliance Requests Your Input on the Future of Biofuel Sustainability</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/08/20/biodiesel-alliance-requests-input-on-future-sustainability/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/08/20/biodiesel-alliance-requests-input-on-future-sustainability/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food vs. fuel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/08/20/biodiesel-alliance-requests-input-on-future-sustainability/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-830" style="vertical-align: text-top" src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/08/sba-logo.png" alt="" width="255" height="247" />The <a href="http://www.sustainablebiodieselalliance.com/" target="_blank">Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance</a> (SBA) is a non-profit organization created to promote cradle-to-grave biodiesel practices for verifying that all points in the production and distribution chain are sustainable.</p>
<p>And now they <a href="http://www.sustainablebiodieselalliance.com/cgi/yabb2/YaBB.pl?action=login" target="_blank">want your input on what those sustainable practices and standards should be</a> — they&#8217;ve released the first draft of their &#8220;<a href="http://www.sustainablebiodieselalliance.com/BPSDRAFT.pdf" target="_blank">Principles and Baseline Practices for Sustainability</a>&#8221; (PDF) to the public under a 45-day comment and review period.</p>
<p>So, if you&#8217;ve ever questioned the <a href="http://gas2.org/category/biofuels/food-vs-fuel/" target="_blank">wisdom of growing our own fuel</a>, or you&#8217;ve wondered how biofuels can be considered sustainable at all given other <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/" target="_blank">seemingly cleaner options like solar, wind and geothermal</a>, now&#8217;s your time to speak up.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/08/20/biodiesel-alliance-requests-input-on-future-sustainability/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/08/20/biodiesel-alliance-requests-input-on-future-sustainability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Obama Campaign Seeks to Make Oil Prices Irrelevant</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/28/obama-campaign-seeks-to-make-oil-prices-irrelevant/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/28/obama-campaign-seeks-to-make-oil-prices-irrelevant/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/28/obama-campaign-seeks-to-make-oil-prices-irrelevant/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-738" style="vertical-align: top" src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/07/obama.jpg" alt="Obama" width="500" height="332" /></p>
<p>Watching the news is a dangerous enterprise for those of us trying to maintain a clear picture of this election season&#8217;s most important issues. Despite all the chatter, it seems relatively obvious that our most fundamental problem is American energy policy, or more specifically: oil prices and our dependence on cheap energy.</p>
<p>If you buy that premise, which I&#8217;m prepared to debate elsewhere, then this election should really only be decided by one evaluation criterion: <strong>which candidate has a better plan to reduce our oil consumption, replace it with viable alternatives, and spur innovation and commercial development of new technologies (and a new green-collar economy)?</strong></p>
<p>A quick survey of both candidate&#8217;s websites makes it fairly obvious (see the official stance of <a title="Obama Campaign Website" href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/" target="_blank">Obama </a>and <a title="McCain Campaign Website" href="http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm" target="_blank">McCain</a>). I&#8217;ll be comparing each candidate&#8217;s plan in more detail later on, but for now I&#8217;ve republished some of the main points from Obama&#8217;s campaign website, in order to highlight how he intends on dealing with <a title="More impacts of soaring oil prices." href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/25/wind-powered-tall-ships-are-once-again-important-as-oil-prices-hurt-trade/" target="_blank">oil prices</a> and our dependence on them.</p>
<p>To assist in this evaluation, here are three important criteria. If we&#8217;re serious about transitioning away from petroleum as our primary transportation fuel, we&#8217;re going to have to hit it from multiple angles. It doesn&#8217;t seem totally unreasonable to estimate that each of these could account for 1/3 of our total fuel usage:</p>
<ul>
<li>Decrease consumption and improve efficiency (#8 &#38; 9).</li>
<li>Develop and rapidly commercialize alternative fuels and <a title="How to develop plug-in electric car infrastructure..." href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/24/how-to-build-an-electric-car-charging-infrastructure-smart-grids-fast-charging-and-universal-access/">infrastructure</a> (#1, 4, 5, 6, 7).</li>
<li>Develop and rapidly implement new technology (#1, 2, 3).</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key elements of <a title="Obama Campaign Website" href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/" target="_blank">Obama&#8217;s plan</a>:</h3>
<h3><strong>1. Invest $150 Billion over 10 Years in Clean Energy with a focus on technology developed in the US:</strong></h3>
<p>This includes <a title="Switchgrass could offset 30% of US petroleum" href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/14/switchgrass-could-displace-30-of-us-petroleum-usage-with-94-ghg-reduction/" target="_blank">next generation biofuels</a> and fuel infrastructure, commercialization of <a title="Gas 2.0" href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/24/how-to-build-an-electric-car-charging-infrastructure-smart-grids-fast-charging-and-universal-access/" target="_blank">plug-in hybrids</a>, development of commercial-scale renewable energy, low-emissions coal plants, and beginning the transition to a new digital electricity grid.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/28/obama-campaign-seeks-to-make-oil-prices-irrelevant/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/28/obama-campaign-seeks-to-make-oil-prices-irrelevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Edible Activism: Changing the World Through What We Eat</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Megan Prusynski</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health and the Environment]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/07/picking_broccoli.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2736" src="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/07/picking_broccoli.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>For as often as we do eat, it seems as if most of us don&#8217;t think too much about what we&#8217;re putting into our bodies. With food production so far removed from our every day lives, it&#8217;s easy to ignore where our food comes from and what it&#8217;s impact may be. But what we put on our plates has a larger footprint than what we drive. According to the <a title="FAO" href="http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0612sp1.htm">Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Livestock production is one of the major causes of the world&#8217;s most pressing environmental problems, including global warming, land degradation, air and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity. Using a methodology that considers the entire commodity chain, it estimates that livestock are responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, a bigger share than that of transport.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The things we choose to eat can obviously have an enormous impact on the planet and everything on it, including ourselves. Naturally then, our diet choices can say a lot about our ethics and beliefs. They can even be a political statement and a form of activism. I think that every choice we make has the potential to change the world, and certainly what I choose to eat has an impact.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Samsung to Invest $1.63 Billion in Indonesian Biodiesel Project</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-718" style="vertical-align: top" src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/07/palm_oil.jpg" alt="Oil Palm Plantation" width="500" height="262" /></p>
<p>According to an <a title="Jakarta Post article on Samsung palm oil investment " href="http://old.thejakartapost.com/detailbusiness.asp?fileid=20080722.L02&#38;irec=1" target="_blank">article in the Jakarta Post</a>, an official from the <a title="Wikipedia entry for Politics of Indonesia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Indonesia" target="_blank">Indonesian government</a> has spilled the beans on Samsung&#8217;s plans to invest up to $1.63 billion dollars in what&#8217;s sure to be a controversial acquisition of land for growing oil palms and construction of a <a title="Biodiesel Mythbuster" href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/" target="_blank">biodiesel</a> plant in Indonesia.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>2018: The Year of Petroleum Independence?</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/07/18/2018-the-year-of-petroleum-independence/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/07/18/2018-the-year-of-petroleum-independence/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Cefali</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/07/18/2018-the-year-of-petroleum-independence/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Former Vice-President Al Gore says we cannot wait until 2050 to curtail our carbon emissions.  In Washington this week Gore made his case for eliminating petroleum from the United States economy by the year 2018.  Is his goal too ambitious?</strong></h3>
<p style="text-align: center"><span style="text-decoration: underline;color: #0000ee"><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2008/07/392250455_356a652c74_b1.jpg"></a><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2008/07/al-gore.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-709" src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/07/al-gore.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></span></p>
<p><em>Editor&#8217;s Note: This is Anthony&#8217;s first post as a contributor to Gas 2.0. Anthony works on sugar-based biofuels at the Raines Lab of Petroleum Alternatives, University of Wisconsin-Madison</em>.</p>
<p>I have a lot of admiration for Al Gore.  I was in the 7th grade when he lost his bid for the presidency, and even then I could feel that something awful was upon us.  Fast forward eight years and we find ourselves in a world where Al Gore is running a campaign to help mankind in a much more focused manner.  Instead of defecting to the private sector, Gore remains a public servant dedicated to the environment.  Recently, he called for the United States to lead the way to stop global warming, and now he is calling for the United States to be off of carbon based fuels by the year 2018.</p>
<h3><span> Gore&#8217;s </span>battle cry could not have come at a better time.
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/18/2018-the-year-of-petroleum-independence/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/07/18/2018-the-year-of-petroleum-independence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Opinion: Biofuels, Food Prices and Global Warming Roundup</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food vs. fuel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>The current rate at which biofuels are falling out of favor is largely founded on biased ideologies, which have been shaped by widespread political and corporate agenda-pushing from all sides of the fence.<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-700" style="vertical-align: text-top" src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/07/biofuel_food_mashup.jpg" alt="Biofuels food and climate change" width="500" height="183" /></h3>
<p>But first, a digression.</p>
<p><strong>Part 1: When an egg was just an egg<br />
</strong></p>
<p>I remember a time when an egg was just an egg. Nobody argued about that. It was a blissful time. Yet, for all its strengths, it was a fragile time held together by unsupported conclusions and limited knowledge.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bush Lifts Executive Ban on Offshore Drilling - Why it Matters and Why it Doesn&#8217;t</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/14/bush-lifts-executive-ban-on-offshore-drilling-why-it-matters-and-why-it-doesnt/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/14/bush-lifts-executive-ban-on-offshore-drilling-why-it-matters-and-why-it-doesnt/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/14/bush-lifts-executive-ban-on-offshore-drilling-why-it-matters-and-why-it-doesnt/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/07/117867215_e6546f9680.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-478" src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/07/117867215_e6546f9680.jpg" alt="" width="543" height="417" /></a>In a largely symbolic move, President George W. Bush ordered to lift the Executive Order banning the drilling of offshore oil wells in the U.S.. However, the move will have no effect on the current regulations on offshore drilling because there are two prohibitions on offshore drilling, one imposed by Congress and another by executive order signed by Bush the elder in 1990.</p>
<p>&#8220;Today, I&#8217;ve taken every step within my power to allow offshore exploration,&#8221; Bush told reporters today at the White House. &#8220;This means the only thing standing between the American people and these vast oil resources is action from the U.S. Congress.&#8221;</p>
<p>But actually, there are a few other things standing between the American people and &#8220;these vast oil resources,&#8221; the most significant being capitalism and global energy markets.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/14/bush-lifts-executive-ban-on-offshore-drilling-why-it-matters-and-why-it-doesnt/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/14/bush-lifts-executive-ban-on-offshore-drilling-why-it-matters-and-why-it-doesnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Soaring Fuel Prices Spur Aviation Industry to Explore Alternatives</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/11/soaring-fuel-prices-spur-aviation-industry-to-explore-alternatives/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/11/soaring-fuel-prices-spur-aviation-industry-to-explore-alternatives/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/11/soaring-fuel-prices-spur-aviation-industry-to-explore-alternatives/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Rolls Royce and British Airways Announce Joint Research Venture</h3>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/07/rollsjetenjine.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-657" src="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/07/rollsjetenjine.jpg" alt="rolls royce jet engine" width="510" height="303" /></a>The aviation industry is facing unprecedented growth in fuel costs and growing pressure to curb emission levels. As a result, research programs, joint ventures, and public-private partnerships have all been launched to come up with new forms of jet fuel. Rolls-Royce and British Airways are the most recent companies to announce a research partnership to study the feasibility of dramatically expanding the use of the alternative fuels.</p>
<p>Jet fuel (kerosene) now ranks as the third-highest petroleum product in demand and its growth rate outpaces that of GDP. <strong>Kerosene is the current fuel of choice for jet fuel because It is widely available and can tolerate a wide range of temperatures. </strong>The demand for kerosene on the global market has <a href="http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/economics/fuel_monitor/index.htm">caused its price to double in the last 12 months</a> alone. Growth in demand for kerosene is being driven, in part, by a growing culture of mobility and its transportation fuels byproducts in the rapidly growing economies of Asia, but also because of the added pressure of American military fuel consumption in the Iraq war. As global energy consumption is<a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/30/eia-predicts-energy-50-increase-in-world-energy-consumption-by-2030/"> predicted to grow 50 percent by 2050</a>, the aviation industry is wising-up to the notion that fuel prices are not coming down any time soon.
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/11/soaring-fuel-prices-spur-aviation-industry-to-explore-alternatives/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/11/soaring-fuel-prices-spur-aviation-industry-to-explore-alternatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Refined Refinery? ConocoPhillips in Billings, MT</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Courtney Carlisle</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/07/refinery.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-619" src="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/07/refinery.jpg" alt="ConocoPhillips in Billing, MT" width="144" height="192" /></a>Billings, MT plays host to three petroleum refineries, which fuel the local economy.  I was fortunate to receive an invitation from the American Petroleum Institute to come out as their guest and tour the ConocoPhillips refinery and meet a few of the local citizens to hear their thoughts on big oil.</p>
<p>Out of the three refineries located in Billings, one has a very unique story and position in the world of refining. The ConocoPhillips refinery is the first Energy Star certified refinery in the world (two years in a row). Not bad for an industry that is not highly regarded in public opinion given the current prices we are paying at the pump, but sustainability and environmental factors actually rank very high on the list of priorities for this tightly run operation.</p>
<p>Not only is ConocoPhillips the most energy efficient and least polluting out of the three, it was also the first to form a Citizen&#8217;s Advisory Council comprised of community members unafraid to speak up about their concerns with having a refinery located in town - the most prevalent, of course, being air quality control.</p>
<p>Stepping off of the plane (from LA granted), the air in Montana is crisp and clear, which is amazing given the fact that there are <em>three </em>refineries that are emitting sulfur and CO2 among other elements into the air. However, even walking around the Conoco plant, it was hard to smell any evidence of &#8220;refining&#8221; going on. The community members that I got to speak with (including Stella of local <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF-8&#38;oe=utf-8&#38;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#38;client=firefox-a&#38;um=1&#38;q=stella,&#38;near=Billings,+MT&#38;fb=1&#38;view=text&#38;latlng=261585401164547223">Stella&#8217;s Kitchen and Bakery fame</a>) excessively praised the efforts of the Conoco team for this reason and for the EPA air quality reports (which I&#8217;ll post on later) showing ConocoPhillips leading the pack in terms of lowest amounts of Sulfur Dioxide and other irritants.
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The All-Electric (EV) CitiCar: Powered by the Sun</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/06/19/the-all-electric-ev-citicar-powered-by-the-sun/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/06/19/the-all-electric-ev-citicar-powered-by-the-sun/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Ivanko</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Do-it-yourself (DIY)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Solar power]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/06/19/the-all-electric-ev-citicar-powered-by-the-sun/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2008/06/zenncar.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-604" style="vertical-align: top" src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/06/zenncar.jpg" alt="Zenn Electric Car" width="500" height="213" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting the 4-door, family-sized EV sedan rumored to be in the pipeline from the Canadian-based ZENN Motor Company (they already make a great 2-door model that&#8217;s even affordable to us non-celebrity types, picture above).  I&#8217;d like to avoid going to the gas station at all when going to an Energy Fair or Green Festival.  While our VW Jetta TDI gets more than 40 mpg, these days the cost for diesel (and biodiesel when I can get it) is quite a bit more than gasoline, and rising faster than gas.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2008/06/ivanko-citicar.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-587" style="margin: 4px" src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/06/ivanko-citicar.jpeg" alt="" width="133" height="110" /></a>For now, we&#8217;re moving around locally in a funky-looking, all-electric CitiCar, made in 1974.  Our CitiCar is restored to roughly <a href="http://www.evalbum.com/869">original condition</a> (except for the wear and tear on the body itself) with the expert help of our neighbor who found two more after we found ours.  It&#8217;s hard to go anywhere without people cutting me off &#8212; not out of rage &#8212; but curiosity or with a smile on their face.  Sometimes getting a &#8220;head turner&#8221; doesn&#8217;t need to come at a huge price.
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/06/19/the-all-electric-ev-citicar-powered-by-the-sun/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/06/19/the-all-electric-ev-citicar-powered-by-the-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Price of Oil Has Department of Defense Looking to Save Fuel</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>$1 per barrel increase in the price of oil costs U.S. $130 million</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/06/refueling.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-342" src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/06/refueling.jpg" alt="Air Force jet refuels in mid-flight" width="500" height="300" /></a> Whenever I&#8217;m involved in a discussion about government waste and/or the politics of bureaucratic budgeting, I undoubtedly recount a story that usually leaves people nodding in agreement or shaking their head in disbelief. The story goes like this: A friend of mine we&#8217;ll call &#8220;Rob,&#8221; whom I used to work with during my summer breaks, was coming back to Massachusetts for an unexpected late-September visit. Rob had relocated to Pensacola, Florida where he was learning how to fly jets at the Naval Flight Training School. <strong>As Rob lifted the golf clubs out of the nose of the fighter jet he had just flown from Florida to Massachusetts for a one-day visit, he knew his trip was different</strong> - and he was a little uneasy about it.</p>
<p>You see, Rob&#8217;s day-long visit to play golf in Massachusetts was made possible by an officer (or officers) who rightly feared that ending up with a surplus of fuel at the end of that fiscal year would slash the budget for fuel in the next. Rob&#8217;s little visit was back in the early 1990s, but with today&#8217;s <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/14/opec-and-friends-want-oil-prices-to-behave-like-a-hot-air-balloon-not-a-bubble/">skyrocketing fuel prices</a>, and the added fuel demands of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the &#8220;largest single user of petroleum products in the world&#8221; is looking for ways to use less fuel - and more types of it.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>LS9&#8217;s Designer Biofuel, Renewable Petroleum</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/11/ls9s-designer-biofuel-renewable-petroleum/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/11/ls9s-designer-biofuel-renewable-petroleum/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Courtney Carlisle</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/11/ls9s-designer-biofuel-renewable-petroleum/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>The privately held, venture backed industrial biotechnology company, <a href="http://ls9.com/index.html">LS9</a>, maintains that the answer to our gas crisis is renewable petroleum technology that they have custom engineered, a Designer Biofuel. Researchers at the San Francisco-based company have been able to alter existing bacteria to yield new, diesel-producing strains.  They are also working on developing a bacteria strain that makes crude oil that canbe trucked and go through the refining process.</p>
<p><img src="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/06/technologydiagram.gif" alt="null" /></p>
<p>The hydrocarbon based biofuel mimics fuel properties of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, which allows it to run through existing pipeline infrastructure and run in any vehicle, setting it apart from other biofuel products. While LS9&#8217;s Designer Biofuel emits the same amount of greenhouse gas as regular crude oil and petroleum products in a combustible engine, the company purports that ultimately that they will have a much smaller impact since they don&#8217;t have to drill for the feedstock. Their product also produces twice the energy of regular petroleum products; so, it requires half of the amount of feedstock to yield the same amount of energy.</p>
<p> <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/06/title_about.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-508" src="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/06/title_about.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="139" /></a></p>
<p>Aside from the environmental questions of emissions, the company is also competing with the challenge of moving this laboratory production to full scale industrial production.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/11/ls9s-designer-biofuel-renewable-petroleum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bush Blames Congress for High Electricity, Food, And Gas Prices</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/04/anwr-eia.jpg" alt="ANWR, EIA, Graph, oil production" align="top" /></p>
<p><strong>This morning on NPR, President Bush tried to blame congress for the nation&#8217;s <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/10/us-will-export-440-billion-for-oil-in-2008/" title="US will export $440 Billion">high gas</a>, <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/14/perfect-storm-inflating-food-prices-worldwide/" title="Why food prices are so high...">food</a>, and electricity prices. Apparently, Congress has been thwarting the President&#8217;s attempts to fix the economy:</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve repeatedly submitted proposals to help address these problems,&#8221; the president said. &#8220;Yet time after time, Congress chose to block them.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>See How Much A Gallon of Corn Costs (Interactive Map)</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/04/16/see-how-much-a-gallon-of-corn-costs-interactive-map/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/04/16/see-how-much-a-gallon-of-corn-costs-interactive-map/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/04/16/see-how-much-a-gallon-of-corn-costs-interactive-map/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://e85prices.com/" title="ethanol, E85, gas prices"><img src="http://ecoscraps.com/files/2008/04/e85prices.jpg" alt="ethanol, E85, gas prices" align="top" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Currently, the average price for a gallon of E85 (85% ethanol, 15% gasoline) is $2.67. That&#8217;s amazing if you think about it, since a gallon of ethanol <a href="http://www.iowacorn.org/ethanol/ethanol_3a.html" title="3 gallons per bushel">requires </a>about <a href="http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/ageng/machine/ae945w.htm" title="Conversion Factors">16 lbs. of corn</a> to produce.</p>
<p>Take a look at this <a href="http://e85prices.com/" title="E85 Prices">interactive map</a> to see what E85 costs in your area.</p>
<p>Via: <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/16/bolt-on-kits-convert-cars-to-85-ethanol-part-of-green-auto-service-offered-by-aamco/" title="Gas 2.0">gas2.org</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/04/16/see-how-much-a-gallon-of-corn-costs-interactive-map/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Biodiesel Myth (Or Fact?) #23: Biodiesel is Raising Food Prices</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/04/11/biodiesel-myth-or-fact-23-biodiesel-is-raising-food-prices/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/04/11/biodiesel-myth-or-fact-23-biodiesel-is-raising-food-prices/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel Guide]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food vs. fuel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/04/11/biodiesel-myth-or-fact-23-biodiesel-is-raising-food-prices/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/04/soybeans.jpg" alt="soy, soybeans, field, agriculture, biodiesel, biofuel" align="top" /></p>
<h3> Increased world demand for grains and vegetable oils due to population growth (esp. in China and India), the weak dollar, agricultural production problems around the world, and $100/barrel oil are some of the driving factors accounting for increasing food prices.</h3>
<p>After covering <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/" title="Biodiesel Mythbuster 2.0: 22 Biodiesel Myths Dispelled">22 of the most popular myths about biodiesel</a>, I realized I&#8217;d only given lip service to a major issue: increasing food prices. In <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/" title="Biodiesel Mythbuster 2.0: 22 Biodiesel Myths Dispelled">Myth #2</a>, I mentioned that the goal of <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/" title="Biodiesel Mythbuster">biodiesel </a>production is to move away from food-based feedstocks.</p>
<p>But until that happens, the question remains: <strong>if I use <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/" title="Biodiesel Mythbuster">biodiesel </a>made from soybeans right now, am I contributing to the larger problem of increasing commodity prices and starving poor people?</strong>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/11/biodiesel-myth-or-fact-23-biodiesel-is-raising-food-prices/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/04/11/biodiesel-myth-or-fact-23-biodiesel-is-raising-food-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Biodiesel Mythbuster 2.0: Twenty-Two Biodiesel Myths Dispelled</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel Guide]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/04/biomercedes.jpg" alt="mercedes, biodiesel, biofuel, ethanol, alternative fuel, diesel, biopower" align="top" /></p>
<h4> Most of us are at least vaguely familiar with biodiesel, but <strong>how much do we really know?</strong></h4>
<h4>While biodiesel is easily the most popular alternative fuel available, it&#8217;s commonly misunderstood or misrepresented by inaccurate information. Since the most frequent question I get is, &#8220;So what exactly <em>is</em> biodiesel, <em>anyway?</em>&#8220;, I decided to write a tome covering all the basics—<strong>a one stop shop for all your biodiesel- related questions.</strong></h4>
<p>It&#8217;s been exactly one year since I published <a title="GreenOptions Archives" href="http://claytonbodiecornell.greenoptions.com/2007/04/05/green-myth-busting-biodiesel/">the first Biodiesel Mythbuster</a> on <a title="GreenOptions" href="http://greenoptions.com">GreenOptions.com</a>, and its popularity made a sequel inevitable. By way of a short introduction, here&#8217;s what I wrote last year:
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>2015: 30% of US Corn Harvest Will Be Gasoline</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/04/09/2015-30-of-us-corn-harvest-will-be-gasoline/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/04/09/2015-30-of-us-corn-harvest-will-be-gasoline/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food vs. fuel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/04/09/2015-30-of-us-corn-harvest-will-be-gasoline/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4><img src="http://gas2.org/files/2008/04/cornharvest.jpg" alt="corn, farm, harvest, ethanol" align="left" />As <a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/04/report-us-ethan.html#more" title="GreenCarCongress">Green Car Congress reported</a> earlier this week, ethanol production is up 37% for the first quarter of 2008.</h4>
<p>Ethanol plants in the US are now pumping out approximately <strong>21.4 million gallons</strong> of corn-based ethanol every day, which has already amounted to <strong>1.9 billion gallons</strong> for the year.</p>
<p>The upshot of all this production is progress toward the ethanol quotas required by the <a href="http://gas2.org/2007/12/20/popular-mechanics-ethanol-bill-bad-news/" title="Gas 2.0">new Renewable Fuels Standard</a>, which mandates 15 billion gallons of ethanol be produced from corn in the US by 2015.</p>
<p><strong>But check this out:</strong> the <a href="http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/conference/blog/2008/04/02/farm-broadcasters-hear-from-rfa-on-planting-intentions/" title="RFA">Renewable Fuels Association estimates</a> that in 2015 it will take 1/3 of the total US corn harvest to meet those quotas. The estimation is based on producing 3 gallons of ethanol from one bushel of corn, and a total corn harvest of 15 billion bushels.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/09/2015-30-of-us-corn-harvest-will-be-gasoline/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/04/09/2015-30-of-us-corn-harvest-will-be-gasoline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 534 queries in 2.214 seconds. -->