<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; policy</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/policy</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'policy'</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Recovery Act Incentivizes Portugal to Build $4 Billion Worth of New US Wind Power Projects</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/22/portugal-incentivized-to-roll-out-4-billion-worth-of-new-us-wind-power-projects/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/22/portugal-incentivized-to-roll-out-4-billion-worth-of-new-us-wind-power-projects/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/22/portugal-incentivized-to-roll-out-4-billion-worth-of-new-us-wind-power-projects/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/installer_wind.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4025" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/installer_wind.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="350" /></a><br />
Through its Texas subsidiary <span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #000000"> <a title="Green News" href="http://www.ecoseed.org/component/search/Horizon+Wind/?ordering=newest&#38;searchphrase=exact&#38;limit=20" target="_blank">Horizon Wind Energy</a></span></span>, the giant Portuguese company <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDP_Renov%C3%A1veis" target="_blank">EDP Renewables;</a> the second largest wind company in the world, intends to almost triple  its US projects to $4 billion worth of new wind energy projects in the United States through 2012.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">This year alone Horizon Wind Energy  installed </span><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #000000">$1.5  billion worth </span></span><span style="color: #000000">of wind  power, adding</span><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #000000"> 800 megawatts </span></span>of clean energy to the grid to bring its US  total to <span style="color: #000000">more than 2,500 MW in 21 states.</span></p>
<p>The CEO attributes <span style="color: #000000">the expansion</span> to our new renewable energy incentives.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/22/portugal-incentivized-to-roll-out-4-billion-worth-of-new-us-wind-power-projects/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/22/portugal-incentivized-to-roll-out-4-billion-worth-of-new-us-wind-power-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>CARB Unveils DriveClean, a New Web Tool to Help Consumers Pick Green Cars</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/20/carb-unveils-driveclean-a-new-web-tool-to-help-consumers-pick-green-cars/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/11/20/carb-unveils-driveclean-a-new-web-tool-to-help-consumers-pick-green-cars/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fuel economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/11/20/carb-unveils-driveclean-a-new-web-tool-to-help-consumers-pick-green-cars/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4163" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/11/carb_site.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="424" /><br />
California has just updated its Air Resources Board website to give consumers a wide range of information about all the alternative power cars coming out next year, from <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/23/affordable-electric-cars-coming-to-us-in-2009/">electric cars</a> to diesel hybrids.</p>

<p>The new site—<a href="http://driveclean.ca.gov/">driveclean.ca.gov</a>—offers well-organized data that ranks vehicles according to various  emission and cost characteristics and provides tools to compare models on a variety of qualities, including the new <a href="http://driveclean.ca.gov/Calculate_Savings/Incentives.php" target="_blank">incentives</a> that low carbon emission vehicles qualify for: up to $5,000 for cars, and up to $15,000 for electric trucks or  vans.</p>
<p>One aspect of the site is revolutionary: <strong>For the first time Americans will be able to compare models based on how many grams of CO2 each spews per mile.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/20/carb-unveils-driveclean-a-new-web-tool-to-help-consumers-pick-green-cars/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/11/20/carb-unveils-driveclean-a-new-web-tool-to-help-consumers-pick-green-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Asia Light Years Ahead of the US in Clean Tech Investment &#8212; Financial and Economic Consequences</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/solar-panels-large-sun.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/solar-panels-large-sun.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3992" /></a><br />
<strong>Asia is investing hundreds of billions of dollars more than the US in clean technology, according to a new report by two research institutions. In the future, the US may be importing trillions of dollars of needed clean technology (and losing countless jobs to Asia) as a result.</strong></p>

<p>In total, the report showed that China, Japan, and South Korea will invest about $509 billion in clean tech over the next 5 years, whereas the US (with our greenest President in decades, maybe ever) is only expected to invest $172 billion (about 3 times less) &#8212; this is assuming the climate and energy legislation in Congress passes. </p>
<p>If the US were to invest the same percentage of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as South Korea, it would invest almost $140 billion per year ($700 billion over this five year period)! Compared to China, the anticipated per-GDP investment ratio is 1:4 (US to China).</p>
<p>In 2008, Japan almost matched US R&#38;D spending on energy and achieved almost the same number of international clean energy patents despite having dramatically lower GDP.</p>
<p>The financial investment is not the only thing giving these countries a major advantage in this field, though.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Top ARPA-E Funding Goes to Renewable Storage in Liquid &#8220;Battery&#8221;</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/19/arpa-e-37-top-funding-goes-to-renewable-storage-in-liquid-battery/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/19/arpa-e-37-top-funding-goes-to-renewable-storage-in-liquid-battery/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/19/arpa-e-37-top-funding-goes-to-renewable-storage-in-liquid-battery/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/doe_vc_chu.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3982" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/doe_vc_chu.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></a><br />
DOE&#8217;s new renewable energy Venture Capital unit ARPA-E has just funded an entirely new kind of liquid battery innovation from MIT professor Donald Sadoway, that works like an  aluminum plant running in reverse; producing power instead of consuming  it.</p>

<p>Under the ARPA-E program at the DOE, the Obama administration has  provided record-setting funding for  advanced breakthroughs in renewable energy technology - that could  propel America to the  front of the post-oil age economy.</p>
<p><strong>Just 37 technologies were selected for their potential transformational impact in the world, out of 3,600 applicants.</strong> Of the 37 winners; Sadaway&#8217;s has received the most funding; with $7 million.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/19/arpa-e-37-top-funding-goes-to-renewable-storage-in-liquid-battery/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/19/arpa-e-37-top-funding-goes-to-renewable-storage-in-liquid-battery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>CO2, Methane Ousted as Worst Global Climate Change Chemicals</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/19/co2-methane-ousted-as-worst-global-climate-change-chemicals/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/11/19/co2-methane-ousted-as-worst-global-climate-change-chemicals/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joanna Schroeder</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/11/19/co2-methane-ousted-as-worst-global-climate-change-chemicals/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4138" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/11/timothy-lee1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="323" /></p>

<p>Move over CO2—you&#8217;ve been ousted, along with methane, as the biggest offenders of <a href="http://gas2.org/2009/06/29/three-ways-the-climate-bill-will-change-your-life/">global climate change</a>. According to a new a study by Purdue University and NASA, the major chemicals most frequently cited as leading to climate change, namely carbon dioxide and<a href="http://gas2.org/2009/06/29/biomethane-for-energy-and-fuel/2/"> methane</a>, are actually outclassed in their warming potential by compounds receiving less attention. The majority of &#8220;greenhouse gases&#8221; are <a href="http://gas2.org/2009/02/01/global-warming-our-immediate-responsibility/">created by humans</a>.</p>
<p>The results were discovered when researchers studied more than a dozen chemicals, or greenhouse gases as classified by their warming properties defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. From there, the team developed a blueprint for the underlying molecular machinery of global warming. The results appeared in the November 12, 2009 issue of the American Chemical Society&#8217;s <em>Journal of Physical Chemistry</em>, just in time for the convergence of world leaders in Copenhagen.
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/19/co2-methane-ousted-as-worst-global-climate-change-chemicals/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/11/19/co2-methane-ousted-as-worst-global-climate-change-chemicals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. Army&#8217;s New Research Center Puts Fossil Fuels on Notice</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/16/us-armys-new-research-center-puts-fossil-fuels-on-notice/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/11/16/us-armys-new-research-center-puts-fossil-fuels-on-notice/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tina Casey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/11/16/us-armys-new-research-center-puts-fossil-fuels-on-notice/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-4093" href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/16/us-armys-new-research-center-puts-fossil-fuels-on-notice/us-army-commits-to-leaner-greener-fighting-machines/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4093" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/11/us-army-commits-to-leaner-greener-fighting-machines.jpg" alt="The U.S. Army\'s new GSPEL laboratory complex in Warren, Michigan will push the market for more sustainable vehicle technologies." width="500" height="327" /></a></p>

<p>If we need just one more reason to be convinced that the era of <strong>fossil fuels</strong> is quickly winding down, 30,000 square feet of evidence is going up right now in the suburban Detroit town of Warren, Michigan. That&#8217;s where the <strong>U.S. Army</strong> is building its new <a title="October 19, 2009 press release, U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center" href="http://tardec.army.mil/pressreleases.aspx">Ground System Power and Energy Laboratory</a> (GSPEL), and it&#8217;s no accident that the site is deep in the heart of the U.S. auto industry.</p>
<p>The high tech GSPEL complex features eight separate laboratories, all dedicated to the development of more <strong>sustainable military vehicles </strong>and related systems: increasing <strong>energy efficiency</strong>, using more <strong>renewable resources</strong>, focusing on ready access to energy and power, and reducing <strong>environmental impacts</strong>. It&#8217;s all part of the military&#8217;s overall drive to shed fossil fuels—both foreign domestic—and focus on <a title="article on military calling for more sustainable fuels" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/11/us-military-veterans-call-for-sustainable-fuels/" target="_blank">energy security</a> for the 21st century.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/16/us-armys-new-research-center-puts-fossil-fuels-on-notice/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/11/16/us-armys-new-research-center-puts-fossil-fuels-on-notice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Every Year of Delaying Legislation on Climate Change Adds $500 Billion a Year Says IEA</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/every-year-of-delaying-legislation-on-climate-change-adds-500-billion-a-year-says-iea/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/every-year-of-delaying-legislation-on-climate-change-adds-500-billion-a-year-says-iea/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/every-year-of-delaying-legislation-on-climate-change-adds-500-billion-a-year-says-iea/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/future_oil.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3949" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/future_oil.jpg" alt="" width="497" height="371" /></a><br />
The normally conservative International Energy Agency is now saying that we must act faster to prevent climate change. Not only to prevent catastrophe, but also because the longer we wait, the more difficult and expensive it becomes to achieve the greater and greater cuts that are necessary to keep worldwide temperature rise to 2 degrees Centigrade or a 3.8 degrees Fahrenheit global average.</p>
<p>2 C is the least we can realistically hope and aim for now. This would be less disastrous than the  4 C or the completely catastrophic 6 C (10.8 F) average worldwide temperature rise we would headed for under a business-as-usual continuation of current overall trends in carbon emissions.</p>

<p>Faith Birol, the IEA Chief Economist at the International Energy Agency said that the world must speed up the reduction in fossil energy use and make a transition faster to clean renewable energy, not only because because of climate change but because of growing problems within our energy system and possible implications for the global economy.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/every-year-of-delaying-legislation-on-climate-change-adds-500-billion-a-year-says-iea/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/every-year-of-delaying-legislation-on-climate-change-adds-500-billion-a-year-says-iea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Economic Value of Ecosystems and Biodiversity &#8212; New Report</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/11/rainforest-ii.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/11/rainforest-ii.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4801" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>A new report, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), attempts to bring to the world&#8217;s attention the truly great economic value of ecosystems and biodiversity, as well as the benefits of taking these into account when making policies.</strong></h3>

<p>The value of the world&#8217;s natural ecosystems and biodiversity is something lacking in most economic analyses. Lack of value for what is truly priceless doesn&#8217;t just hurt the environment, however. It is also a sort of economic suicide. This new report, hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme and supported by key EU, UK, German, Swedish, Dutch, and Norwegian bodies, attempts to bring all of this to our attention more and <strong>show some positive case studies</strong> of how taking the environment into consideration can actually save us money.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.teebweb.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=I4Y2nqqIiCg%3d&#38;tabid=924&#38;language=en-US">the report</a> says: &#8220;the failure of markets to adequately consider the value of ecosystem services is of concern not only to environment, development and climate change ministries but also to finance, economics and business ministries.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EU on Track to Meet or Exceed Original Kyoto Goals: Estimate 13.9% Below 1990</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/eu-on-track-to-meet-or-exceed-original-kyoto-goals-estimate-139-below-1990/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/eu-on-track-to-meet-or-exceed-original-kyoto-goals-estimate-139-below-1990/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/eu-on-track-to-meet-or-exceed-original-kyoto-goals-estimate-139-below-1990/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/eu-on-track-to-meet-or-exceed-original-kyoto-goals-estimate-139-below-1990/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3948" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/eu_reduces_13percent_below_kyoto.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="421" /></a><br />
Kyoto legislation worked. The EU is on track to meet - and actually <strong><em>exceed</em></strong> the carbon emissions target it set of 8% reductions below 1990 levels by 2012, the Commission&#8217;s annual progress report on emissions shows.  The EU-15 (the first fifteen signatories) will meet and exceed their initial target  to get 8% below 1990 levels and 10 of the remaining 12 member states will meet and exceed their  reduction goals of 6% below 1990 levels by 2012.</p>

<p>This contrasted with economic growth of around 44% over the same period, through 2007.<span> </span>Currently, as of 2009; EU-27 emissions are now estimated to be 13.6% lower than the base year  level 1990.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/eu-on-track-to-meet-or-exceed-original-kyoto-goals-estimate-139-below-1990/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/13/eu-on-track-to-meet-or-exceed-original-kyoto-goals-estimate-139-below-1990/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Whistleblower: World Running Out of Oil Faster Than IEA Says</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/13/whistleblower-world-running-out-of-oil-faster-than-iea-says/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/11/13/whistleblower-world-running-out-of-oil-faster-than-iea-says/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/11/13/whistleblower-world-running-out-of-oil-faster-than-iea-says/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4082 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/11/oilproduction.gif" alt="" width="459" height="331" /></p>

<p>According to two unnamed sources as <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/09/peak-oil-international-energy-agency" target="_blank">reported in the Guardian</a>—one current International Energy Agency (IEA) employee and one former—the IEA has been purposely painting an overly rosy picture of the remaining available world oil supplies to avoid panicking the public. Apparently this obfuscation has been a result of heavy pressure from the United States.</p>
<p>As one whistleblower put it, &#8220;Many inside the [IEA] believe that maintaining oil supplies at even 90m to 95m barrels a day would be impossible but there are fears that panic could spread on the financial markets if the figures were brought down further. And the Americans fear the end of oil supremacy because it would threaten their power over access to oil resources.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/13/whistleblower-world-running-out-of-oil-faster-than-iea-says/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/11/13/whistleblower-world-running-out-of-oil-faster-than-iea-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>AMA Now Believes that Marijuana Has Medical Value</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/11/11/ama-now-believes-that-marijuana-has-medical-value/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/11/11/ama-now-believes-that-marijuana-has-medical-value/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhonda Winter</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[EcoLocalizer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/11/11/ama-now-believes-that-marijuana-has-medical-value/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4><strong>In a historic shift, the conservative <a title="AMA" href="http://www.ama-assn.org/" target="_self">American Medical Association</a> has just voted to <a title="AMA reverses it marijuana policy" href="http://www.safeaccessnow.org/article.php?id=5838" target="_self">reverse its long held position that marijuana has no medical value</a>; the group is also planning to entirely review it current cannabis policy.</strong> During a meeting in Houston this week, the AMA&#8217;s House of Delegates adopted a new position which demands that:</h4>
<blockquote>
<h4><strong>&#8220;<a title="AMA calls for marijuana policy review" href="http://rawstory.com/2009/11/ama-review-pot-prohibition/" target="_self">Marijuana&#8217;s status as a federal Schedule I controlled substance be reviewed with the goal of facilitating the conduct of clinical research and development of cannabinoid-based medicines, and alternate delivery methods</a>.&#8221;</strong></h4>
</blockquote>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1681" href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/11/11/ama-now-believes-that-marijuana-has-medical-value/medicinal/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1681" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2009/11/medicinal.gif" alt="medicinal marijuana" width="500" height="366" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/11/11/ama-now-believes-that-marijuana-has-medical-value/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/11/11/ama-now-believes-that-marijuana-has-medical-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Obama to Automakers: We&#8217;ll Count Electric Cars Double For Low Emissions Standards</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/09/obama-to-automakers-we-will-count-electric-cars-double-for-low-emissions-standards/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/11/09/obama-to-automakers-we-will-count-electric-cars-double-for-low-emissions-standards/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Auto industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/11/09/obama-to-automakers-we-will-count-electric-cars-double-for-low-emissions-standards/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-4036 alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/11/obama.jpg" alt="" width="240" />To spur the switch to <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/23/affordable-electric-cars-coming-to-us-in-2009/">electric cars</a> the Obama administration is  proposing a &#8220;build one, get one free&#8221; rule for makers of electric cars. For each full  electric vehicle they build, it could be used to count as two  zero emissions vehicles towards the new low carbon emissions rules they  have set.</p>
<p>In may, the Obama administration moved the deadline for low carbon cars closer to 2016. Under this proposed new rule each electric car would count two times when figuring the average  fuel efficiency of a new-vehicle fleet, making the average easier to  meet—if the automaker adds electric cars to its fleet.</p>
<p>But an environmental policy group in Washington would prefer to see  regular old-fashioned <a href="http://www.safeclimatecampaign.org/biggest-single-step" target="_blank">gasoline vehicles built to be more fuel efficient</a>.
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/09/obama-to-automakers-we-will-count-electric-cars-double-for-low-emissions-standards/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/11/09/obama-to-automakers-we-will-count-electric-cars-double-for-low-emissions-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What&#8217;s Florida Worth?</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/07/whats-florida-worth/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/07/whats-florida-worth/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/07/whats-florida-worth/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/going_over_a_cliff.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3902" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/going_over_a_cliff.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="330" /></a><br />
An inter-agency work group  headed by the White House Office of  Management and Budget is trying to find the real cost of a  ton of carbon emitted. It turns out to be a hard number to agree on.</p>

<p>Would our grandchildren really miss Florida if it was under water?  How about no more fruit <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/26/california-to-lose-crops-to-climate-change-by-2109/" target="_blank">or nuts from California</a>? What about the loss  of our breadbasket? Would <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/26/up-to-82-drop-in-corn-soy-and-cotton-crops-in-usa-without-action-to-reduce-emissions/" target="_blank">the end of corn and soy</a> from the Midwest really  bother the grandchildren of our children? How much?</p>
<p>Cost/benefit analysis.  Economists do it all the time. So, just what is the cost to society of a ton of carbon?   The Institute for Policy Integrity consulted 144 top economists and released the result: <a href="http://policyintegrity.org/publications/documents/EconomistsandClimateChange.pdf" target="_blank">(pdf) Economists and Climate Change: Consensus and Open Questions</a>. By sensibly <a href="http://www.env-econ.net/2009/11/survey-of-144-top-economists-finds-strong-consensus-for-climate-action.html" target="_blank">limiting</a> the sample to economists with the most expertise on climate change, the survey was able to avoid the ignorance of economists  who have not studied climate change.</p>
<p>84 percent agreed that the environmental effects of greenhouse gas emissions, as described by leading scientific experts, create significant risks to important sectors of the United States and global economies. A near unanimous 98 percent agreed that putting a price on carbon  through a tax or cap-and-trade will increase incentives for  efficiency and innovation. 55% preferred a tax, and 35% preferred cap-and‐trade.</p>
<p>But they came up with very widely divergent numbers for both the costs and the benefits. The cost estimates ranged from $10 a to $10 million a ton, with a median of $50 a ton. The benefits of prevention also ranged between <a href="http://www.eenews.net/public/climatewire/2009/11/04/1" target="_blank">$383  billion and  $5.5 trillion</a> over the next five decades.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/07/whats-florida-worth/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/07/whats-florida-worth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Cycle Capital, Draper Fisher Jurvetson Invest $12.2 Million in PACE Solar Renewable Funding</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/new-cycle-capital-draper-fisher-jurvetson-invest-122-million-in-pace-solar-renewable-funding/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/new-cycle-capital-draper-fisher-jurvetson-invest-122-million-in-pace-solar-renewable-funding/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/new-cycle-capital-draper-fisher-jurvetson-invest-122-million-in-pace-solar-renewable-funding/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/1347814813/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3898" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/steve_jurvetson_president_obama.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="353" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.renewfund.com/" target="_blank">Renewable Funding&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://solarfinancing.1bog.org/municipal-solar-financing/" target="_blank">PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy)</a> solar funding, begun by Cisco DeVries with <a href="http://solarfinancing.1bog.org/municipal-solar-financing/" target="_blank">Berkeley First</a> was a breakthrough in making solar affordable. Now VC high-flyers Draper Fisher Jurvetson, New Cycle Capital,  and RWE Ventures have just invested $12.2 million in a first round of financing to make this sober and sensible solar funding available to more homeowners.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.renewfund.com/" target="_blank">Renewable Funding</a> is a business in the Common Good. And it could be big too. There&#8217;s potentially a gigaton of greenhouse gas reductions to be made, at no cost to local, state, or federal governments from a $280 billion potential market in PACE solar funding in the US, acording to a UC Berkeley study published in <a href="http://www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/January-February%202009/FullerPortisKammen-full.html" target="_blank">Environment Magazine</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/new-cycle-capital-draper-fisher-jurvetson-invest-122-million-in-pace-solar-renewable-funding/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/new-cycle-capital-draper-fisher-jurvetson-invest-122-million-in-pace-solar-renewable-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>China Forgets &#8220;China-Only Wind Turbines&#8221; Policy, but Why?</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/03/china-forgets-china-only-wind-turbines-policy-but-why/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/03/china-forgets-china-only-wind-turbines-policy-but-why/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/03/china-forgets-china-only-wind-turbines-policy-but-why/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/wind2.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/wind2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3887" /></a><br />
<strong>A couple weeks ago, I wrote about China&#8217;s new policy to focus on buying (almost entirely) &#8220;<a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/china-wants-china-grown-wind-turbines-for-itself-and-europe/">China-grown</a>&#8221; wind turbines and wind turbine technologies with Chinese patents. That policy wasn&#8217;t a big hit internationally and China is back-tracking.</strong></p>

<p>However, is it changing its stance out of international moral pressure or a major financial incentive (recent deal) in the US? And who is to benefit the most from this shift?</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/03/china-forgets-china-only-wind-turbines-policy-but-why/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/03/china-forgets-china-only-wind-turbines-policy-but-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ontario to Introduce Green Licence Plates</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/03/ontario-to-introduce-green-licence-plates/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/11/03/ontario-to-introduce-green-licence-plates/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plug-in hybrid EVs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/11/03/ontario-to-introduce-green-licence-plates/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2009/11/ontario-green-licence-plate-plates.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3978" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/11/ontario-green-licence-plate-plates.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="250" /></a></p>

<p><strong>Canadian province <a title="Ontario green licence plates" href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/11/02/ontario-green-licence-plates642.html" target="_blank">Ontario is to introduce green-coloured licence plates</a>, available only to drivers of plug-in hybrids and battery-powered electric vehicles.</strong></p>
<p>Sounds like another gimmick? Well, here&#8217;s the deal - vehicles sporting the new green plates will be able to drive in the province&#8217;s dedicated carpool lanes until 2015, even if only one person is in the vehicle.</p>
<p>Speaking about the initiative, Transportation Minister Jim Bradley said, &#8220;The McGuinty government&#8217;s plan is to have one out of every 20 passenger vehicles on Ontario&#8217;s roads an electric vehicle by 2020.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/03/ontario-to-introduce-green-licence-plates/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/11/03/ontario-to-introduce-green-licence-plates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>$15 Billion Per Year Needed for Clean Energy R&#38;D Says Growing Consensus of Innovation Supporters</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/01/15-billion-per-year-need-for-clean-energy-rd-says-growing-consensus-of-innovation-supporters/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/01/15-billion-per-year-need-for-clean-energy-rd-says-growing-consensus-of-innovation-supporters/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yael Borofsky</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/01/15-billion-per-year-need-for-clean-energy-rd-says-growing-consensus-of-innovation-supporters/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/2293398178_d07622ae77_m.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3858" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/2293398178_d07622ae77_m.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="180" /></a>As the Senate version of pending climate legislations, Kerry-Boxer’s CEJAPA, heads for mark-up on Tuesday, voices calling for $15 billion annually for clean energy research and development are starting to gain traction. Earlier this week, Google’s Director of Climate Change and Energy, Dan Reicher joined the ranks of think tanks such as, Brookings Institution, Third Way, and the Breakthrough Institute, not to mention <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/energy-and-environment">President Barack Obama</a>, when he called on the Senate EPW committee to include this funding in the bill.</p>
<p>According to Reicher’s <a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&#38;FileStore_id=8d3195f8-9107-4fb0-86ca-51d9c5fbca46">testimony</a> (emphasis in original):</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Chairman Boxer, it is essential that Congress address this serious energy R&#38;D short-fall by incorporating President Obama&#8217;s goal of $15 billion per year in federal energy R&#38;D spending in final climate legislation.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This testimony followed on the heals of a <a href="http://thebreakthrough.org/blog/Letter_to_Reid-Energy.pdf">letter</a> and <a href="http://thebreakthrough.org/blog/ACES_R%26D_DiscussionPaper.pdf">discussion paper</a> from the nation’s leading universities to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, emphasizing the need for a bottom line investment of $5 billion dollars annually in R&#38;D, significantly more than would be <a href="http://thebreakthrough.org/blog/2009/10/kerryboxer_clean_energy_jobs_b.shtml">allocated</a> under both House and Senate version of climate and energy legislation.
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/01/15-billion-per-year-need-for-clean-energy-rd-says-growing-consensus-of-innovation-supporters/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/01/15-billion-per-year-need-for-clean-energy-rd-says-growing-consensus-of-innovation-supporters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Northeast Adds 17 Gigawatts of Renewable Power to Meet RPS</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/northeast-adds-17-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-to-meet-rps/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/northeast-adds-17-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-to-meet-rps/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/northeast-adds-17-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-to-meet-rps/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/water_power.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3845" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/water_power.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="353" /></a><br />
Renewable energy comprised <a href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/snapshot-northeast-clean-energy-projects/" target="_blank">more than half the energy added</a> this year to the Northeast grid, comprising part of Canada and 6 US states. 17 GW of renewable energy projects in the region will be completed in the next five years.</p>

<p>It is no coincidence that each of these states has a state renewable portfolio standard which requires utilities to add an increasing percent of renewable power to the grid each year. New York&#8217;s RPS requires <a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=NY03R&#38;state=NY&#38;CurrentPageID=1" target="_blank">24%</a> by 2013, Maine:<a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=ME01R&#38;state=ME&#38;CurrentPageID=1" target="_blank">40%</a> by 2017(met), Vermont:<a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=VT04R&#38;state=VT&#38;CurrentPageID=1" target="_blank">20%</a> by 2017, New Hampshire:<a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea//news/article/2007/04/rps-passes-new-hampshire-house-by-wide-margin-48042" target="_blank">16%</a> by 2025, Rhode Island:<a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=RI08R&#38;state=RI&#38;CurrentPageID=1" target="_blank">16%</a> by 2019, and Connecticut:<a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=CT04R&#38;state=CT&#38;CurrentPageID=1" target="_blank">27%</a> by 2020 )</p>
<p>The Renewable Portfolio Standard is a sure way to get more homegrown climate-friendly renewable power on the grid and is up for votes yet again this year (in the American Clean Jobs &#38; American Power Act) after multiple previous attempts to pass it.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/northeast-adds-17-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-to-meet-rps/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/northeast-adds-17-gigawatts-of-renewable-power-to-meet-rps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Hawaii Follows California with a Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariff</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/hawaii2.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/hawaii2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="331" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3838" /></a><br />
Earlier this month, <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/">Governor Schwarzenegger signed legislation</a> to buy solar power from relatively small private generators for rates above market value. Hawaii is next in line with this <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/22/is-a-feed-in-tariff-a-good-fit-for-the-us/">European-style tariff</a> &#8212; the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission and <a href="http://www.fit-hawaii.com/?FIT_proceedings_in_Hawaii">Governor Lingle</a> just recently <strong>set a similar initiative for Hawaii</strong>.</p>
<p>Hawaii&#8217;s initiative will make it possible for homeowners and businesses to sell power they generate from small to medium-scale renewable energy projects (i.e. <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/07/how-to-cheap-or-free-solar-panels/">solar panels</a>) to Hawaii&#8217;s main power producers at higher than market-value rates.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EPA&#8217;s New Parking Lot Explores Environmentally Friendly Pavements</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/epas-new-parking-lot-explores-environmentally-friendly-pavements/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/epas-new-parking-lot-explores-environmentally-friendly-pavements/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/epas-new-parking-lot-explores-environmentally-friendly-pavements/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3939 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/10/stormwater_runoff.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="367" /></p>

<p>Without pavement and <a href="http://gas2.org/2009/10/26/dell-builds-solar-trees-for-parking-lot/" target="_blank">parking lots</a> we would still be traveling cross-country in Conestoga wagons on 6-inch deep ruts and be breathing lungfulls of dust every time a vehicle drove by at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwik-E-Mart" target="_blank">Kwik-E-Mart</a>. Needless to say, pavement is one of the many things that makes modern life possible.</p>
<p>But, like everything else in our modern life, the more advanced we get in our ability to collect and analyze data, the more we realize that the good stuff always seems to have its awful consequences too. It&#8217;s the same story with pavement.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/epas-new-parking-lot-explores-environmentally-friendly-pavements/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/epas-new-parking-lot-explores-environmentally-friendly-pavements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 712 queries in 1.404 seconds. -->