<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; public comment</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/public-comment</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'public comment'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>MMS Receives 40,000+ Comments On Cape Wind</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/05/06/mms-receives-40000-comments-on-cape-wind/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/05/06/mms-receives-40000-comments-on-cape-wind/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[administration and bureaucracy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/05/06/mms-receives-40000-comments-on-cape-wind/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3> <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/05/offshore_wind_dreamstime__520_200.JPG" title="offshore_wind_dreamstime__520_200.JPG, cape-wind, wind-turbine, mms"><img src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/05/offshore_wind_dreamstime__520_200.JPG" alt="offshore_wind_dreamstime__520_200.JPG" /></a>Agency permanently extends comment period for alt. energy leases</h3>
<p>In the fall of 2001, Jim Gordon of Energy Management Inc. (EMI) <a href="http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/13035/story.htm">announced his intentions to build a 420 megawatt wind farm</a> off the coast of Massachusetts - the nation&#8217;s first. Now, the long permitting process that was made even longer by powerful opposition  groups, is <em>nearing</em> resolution&#8230;finally.</p>
<p>More than 40,000 individuals and organizations have submitted comments on an environmental review of the wind farm proposed for Nantucket Sound, according to an article in the <a href="http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080423/NEWS/804230333"><em>Cape Cod Times</em></a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve never seen anything like this before,&#8221; said Rodney Cluck, Cape Wind project manager for the U.S. Minerals Management Service, the lead federal agency to review Cape Wind Associates&#8217; plan to build 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound, off the coast of Massachusetts. Originally, the comments were set to be released last Friday, but officials at the Minerals Management Service postponed the release to give agency staffers more time to organize the overwhelming public response to the proposed wind farm.</p>
<p>As a result of the scoping process&#8217; popularity, the MMS <a href="http://www.mms.gov/ooc/press/2008/press0430.htm">announced</a> that they would be preemptively extending the comment period for all of the remaining &#8220;Alternative Energy Leases&#8221; from 30 to 60 days.<!--more--></p>
<p>The final number of public comments submitted on the agency&#8217;s Cape Wind draft environmental report has yet to be tallied. But it is quite telling that <strong>an earlier 2005 report on the same project issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers produced one-tenth the number of comments than this one</strong> indicates that MMS did <em>something</em> right since taking over the review of Cape Wind from the Army Corps as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (As an aside, I think it also says something about the Corps of Engineers&#8217; ability to adequately conduct a thorough public scoping process).</p>
<h3>Opponents remain critical; supporters remain confident</h3>
<p>The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, the project&#8217;s most vocal opponent, enlisted 40 experts to review the report. The hired guns produced a 3,000-page critique of the Cape Wind proposal. One theme of critique coming from private scientists as well as public ones, was that the report&#8217;s information on migratory birds and fishery habitats where the project would be located is inadequate. <font color="#222222">&#8220;At the very least, the (report) should explain why recommended studies and analyses were not conducted and the ramifications of not having that information,&#8221; Michael Bartlett, supervisor for the New England Field Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. </font></p>
<p>Despite the criticisms of the MMS report, the vast majority of comments submitted will be in favor of the project, predicted Mark Rodgers, Communications Director for Cape Wind Associates.</p>
<p>A record of decision from the agency indicating approval or disapproval of the Cape Wind project is expected to be released sometime in the winter. And only then will this long, arduous journey be over&#8230;right?</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080423/NEWS/804230333"><em>Cape Cod Times</em></a></em></p>
<p><strong>Other Posts Related to the Cape Wind Project:</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;<a href="http://sustainablog.org/2005/08/21/the-politicos-chiming-in-on-cape-cod-wind/">The Politicos Chiming in On Cape Wind</a>&#8221; :: sustainablog (8/2005)</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;<a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/13/democracy-tell-the-feds-what-you-think-about-cape-wind/">(D)emocracy: Tell the Feds What You Think About Cape Wind</a>&#8221; :: Planetsave (2/2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;<a href="http://ecopolitology.blogspot.com/2007/08/85-percent-of-mass-residents-support.html">Survey Finds Overwhelming Support for Cape Wind</a>&#8221; :: ecopolitology (8/2007)</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;<a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/01/14/breaking-news-mms-releases-favorable-report-on-cape-wind/">Breaking: MMS Report Favorable on Cape Wind</a>&#8221; :: sustainablog (1/2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;<a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/01/11/longtime-cape-wind-foe-to-step-down/">Cape Wind Opponent to Step Down</a>&#8221; :: sustainablog (1/2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Photo: © <a href="http://www.dreamstime.com/Rodiks_info">Kamil Sobócki</a> | <a href="http://www.dreamstime.com/">Dreamstime.com</a></strong></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
  [1]Agency permanently extends comment period for alt. energy leases
In the fall of 2001, Jim Gordon of Energy Management Inc. (EMI) announced his intentions to build a 420 megawatt wind farm [2] off the coast of Massachusetts - the nation's first. Now, the long permitting process that was made even longer by powerful opposition  groups, is nearing resolution...finally.

More than 40,000 individuals and organizations have submitted comments on an environmental review of the wind farm proposed for Nantucket Sound, according to an article in the Cape Cod Times [3].

"I've never seen anything like this before," said Rodney Cluck, Cape Wind project manager for the U.S. Minerals Management Service, the lead federal agency to review Cape Wind Associates' plan to build 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound, off the coast of Massachusetts. Originally, the comments were set to be released last Friday, but officials at the Minerals Management Service postponed the release to give agency staffers more time to organize the overwhelming public response to the proposed wind farm.

As a result of the scoping process' popularity, the MMS announced [4] that they would be preemptively extending the comment period for all of the remaining "Alternative Energy Leases" from 30 to 60 days.

[1] http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/05/offshore_wind_dreamstime__520_200.JPG
[2] http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/13035/story.htm
[3] http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080423/NEWS/804230333
[4] http://www.mms.gov/ooc/press/2008/press0430.htm]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/05/06/mms-receives-40000-comments-on-cape-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Survey Says: Support for Cape Wind Surging</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/09/and-the-survey-says-support-for-cape-wind-surging/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/09/and-the-survey-says-support-for-cape-wind-surging/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[administration and bureaucracy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/09/and-the-survey-says-support-for-cape-wind-surging/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/offshore_wind_phault.jpg" title="offshore_wind_phault.jpg"><img src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/offshore_wind_phault.jpg" alt="offshore-wind, wine-energy, cape-wind, civil-society-institute, mms, public comment, eis" /></a>A recent <a href="http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/media/pdfs/030608%20CSI%20MA%20Cape%20Wind%20survey%20report.pdf">survey</a> (pdf) found that <strong>87 percent of Massachusetts residents say they</strong><strong> are now “more likely to support Cape Wind”</strong> in the wake of the recently issued draft environmental impact statement (EIS) that found no major environmental harms resulting from the project. It seems that the <strong>growing public consciousness of climate change is actually producing measurable shifts in the public mood</strong>.  Time is clearly running out for Cape Wind opponents. And despite the recent <a href="http://www.mms.gov/ooc/press/2008/press0305a.htm">30-day extension</a> of the <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/13/democracy-tell-the-feds-what-you-think-about-cape-wind/">public comment period</a> granted by the U.S. Minerals Management Service (at the behest of the <a href="http://www.saveoursound.org/site/PageServer?pagename=About_Us_Stakeholders">Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound</a>), it is my firm belief that this project will soon get the federal stamp of approval it has been seeking (to go along with the <a href="http://www.capewind.org/article72.htm#DEIS">federal approval it <em>already</em> got back in 2004</a>). In what should make for a pretty entertaining roadshow, the <strong>MMS is beginning a four-night run of public hearings starting on Monday March 10th</strong> in West Yarmouth, MA. The hearings will then rumble through Nantucket and Martha&#8217;s Vineyard before concluding in Boston on March 13. If you are not lucky enough to attend, what will certainly be &#8220;spirited&#8221; events,  you may submit an <a href="http://www.mms.gov/offshore/RenewableEnergy/CapeWind.htm">e-comment</a> no later than April 21.</p>
<p><!--more-->The proposed Cape Wind project would be comprised of 130 wind turbines that could generate a maximum of 468 megawatts output with an average output of approximately 180 megawatts. The project is proposed to be located on federal submerged lands in Nantucket Sound off the coast of Massachusetts.</p>
<p>When compared with the data from <a href="http://ecopolitology.blogspot.com/2007/08/85-percent-of-mass-residents-support.html">previous research</a>, it is clear that support is growing among Massachusetts residents. The research was conducted by the <a href="http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/#">Civil Society Institute</a>, a Massachusetts think tank focused on problem-solving interactions among people, and between communities, government and business. This most recent iteration of the survey research has a sample size of 1200 adults.</p>
<p>Highlights from the survey:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Support for Cape Wind in Massachusetts statewide has grown to 86 percent</strong> -– compared to 84 percent in August 2007 and 81 percent in June 2006 surveys posing the same question.</li>
<li>The <strong>growth in support for the Cape Wind project in Cape Cod/the Islands is even more striking</strong> -– rising to 74 percent in the new recent survey, compared to 61 percent in October 2007.</li>
<li><strong>95 percent of state residents think it is “important” that “Massachusetts take the steps needed now to ‘unplug’ itself from coal</strong>- and oil-based power and ‘plug in’ to solar, wind and other clean energy sources.”</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://capewind.whgrp.com/">Monitor Real-Time Weather Conditions at Proposed Site</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/media/pdfs/030608%20CSI%20MA%20Cape%20Wind%20survey%20report.pdf">Read the survey report here (pdf)</a>.</p>
<p>Photo Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pjh/page7/">phault via flickr</a></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]A recent survey [2] (pdf) found that 87 percent of Massachusetts residents say they are now “more likely to support Cape Wind” in the wake of the recently issued draft environmental impact statement (EIS) that found no major environmental harms resulting from the project. It seems that the growing public consciousness of climate change is actually producing measurable shifts in the public mood.  Time is clearly running out for Cape Wind opponents. And despite the recent 30-day extension [3] of the public comment period [4] granted by the U.S. Minerals Management Service (at the behest of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound [5]), it is my firm belief that this project will soon get the federal stamp of approval it has been seeking (to go along with the federal approval it already got back in 2004 [6]). In what should make for a pretty entertaining roadshow, the MMS is beginning a four-night run of public hearings starting on Monday March 10th in West Yarmouth, MA. The hearings will then rumble through Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard before concluding in Boston on March 13. If you are not lucky enough to attend, what will certainly be "spirited" events,  you may submit an e-comment [7] no later than April 21.



[1] http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/offshore_wind_phault.jpg
[2] http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/media/pdfs/030608%20CSI%20MA%20Cape%20Wind%20survey%20report.pdf
[3] http://www.mms.gov/ooc/press/2008/press0305a.htm
[4] http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/13/democracy-tell-the-feds-what-you-think-about-cape-wind/
[5] http://www.saveoursound.org/site/PageServer?pagename=About_Us_Stakeholders
[6] http://www.capewind.org/article72.htm#DEIS
[7] http://www.mms.gov/offshore/RenewableEnergy/CapeWind.htm]]></content:encoded>

    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/09/and-the-survey-says-support-for-cape-wind-surging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 242 queries in 0.566 seconds. -->