<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; radioactive waste</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/radioactive-waste</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'radioactive waste'</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Uranium Tailings Removed From Moab Site</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-4528" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/moab-tailings/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4528" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/06/moab-tailings.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="135" /></a><strong></strong></p>

<p><strong>Desert spreads endlessly beyond the horizon, where crystalline azure meets rusted bronze. This is red rock country. Moab, Utah is known for its breathtaking scenery. Red rock arches, labyrinth-like canyons, the clever Colorado River. This paradise permeates the soul and the soil.  But something else sleeps in the soil: uranium tailings.</strong></p>
<p>Uranium was discovered near Moab in the early 1900s, but it wasn&#8217;t significantly mined until 1952 when Charlie Steen, a geologist, discovered large quantities of uranium in Lisbon Valley, south east of Moab. Enough Uranium was mined that a sign in town declared that Moab was &#8220;The Uranium Capitol of the World!&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>DOE Files Application To Build Nuclear Repository.</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/04/doe-files-application-to-build-nuclear-repository/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/04/doe-files-application-to-build-nuclear-repository/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/04/doe-files-application-to-build-nuclear-repository/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/06/yucca-map.jpg" title="yucca-map.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/06/yucca-map.jpg" alt="yucca-map.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><strong>As promised in a <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/11/why-has-it-taken-so-long/">podcast interview</a> on February 11th</strong>,<br />
Edward Sproat, manager of the Yucca Mountain project in Nevada, filed a <a href="http://www.doe.gov/news/6310.htm">license application</a> with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to construct a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/04/doe-files-application-to-build-nuclear-repository/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/04/doe-files-application-to-build-nuclear-repository/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Lots More Nuclear Power - Good Thing or Bad Thing?</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/28/lots-more-nuclear-power-good-thing-or-bad-thing/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/28/lots-more-nuclear-power-good-thing-or-bad-thing/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Seall</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Europe]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/28/lots-more-nuclear-power-good-thing-or-bad-thing/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/03/istock-000002834051xsmall.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/03/istock-000002834051xsmall-thumb.jpg" alt="iStock_000002834051XSmall" width="242" height="323" align="left" /></a> Nuclear power – an abundant source of carbon free energy, or a dangerous and expensive power source with huge risks to our health and environment?</p>
<p>Britain may not have much choice in this matter as its government seems determined to take the nuclear route in an effort to bring Co2 emissions in line with its reduction pledges and mitigate its dwindling North Sea oil and gas supplies.</p>
<p>Announcing plans to enter into a technology partnership with France, the UK government proposes replacing its 24 aging reactors - which currently provide 20% of the nation’s electricity - with a new set of nuclear power plants which will double Britain&#8217;s nuclear power generating capacity. In doing so, Britain hopes to become a “world leader in nuclear technology”, according to Energy Secretary John Hutton.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/28/lots-more-nuclear-power-good-thing-or-bad-thing/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/28/lots-more-nuclear-power-good-thing-or-bad-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Beginning of the End For Yucca Mountain or the Beginning of Interim Nuclear Waste Management?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/23/beginning-of-the-end-for-yucca-mountain-or-the-beginning-of-interim-nuclear-waste-management/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/23/beginning-of-the-end-for-yucca-mountain-or-the-beginning-of-interim-nuclear-waste-management/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/23/beginning-of-the-end-for-yucca-mountain-or-the-beginning-of-interim-nuclear-waste-management/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/02/yucca-mountain2.gif" title="yucca-mountain2.gif"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/02/yucca-mountain2.gif" alt="yucca-mountain2.gif" /></a>Nuclear energy officials appear to be taking the lead in the quest for storage of radioactive waste, as Nevada&#8217;s Yucca Mountain looks less and less like a reality, at least in the short term.</p>
<p>Marshall Cohen, an official of the <a href="http://www.nei.org/">Nuclear Energy Institute</a> told the <a href="http://www.lvrj.com/news/15901672.html">Las Vegas Review Journal</a>  that the industry is looking to several communities that might welcome interim storage of its used fuel.</p>
<p>Two or three communities, according to Cohen, are showing interest in the proposition, but he declined to name them pending further negotiations.  He did say, however, that some were among the 11 sites that once volunteered to host a government run nuclear waste reprocessing site.  Those states were Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, New Mexico, Ohio, South Carolina and Washington..</p>
<p>The move is seen as a major shift from reliance on completion of the Yucca Mountain project that would send spent waste to reprocessing facilities.  Presently waste is stored on above-ground pads and in steel and concrete casks.   The Department of Energy has voiced its disapproval of such action, citing political, legal and technical challenges.</p>
<p>This wouldn&#8217;t rule out the anticipated completion of Yucca Mountain, but could answer the question of what to do with radioactive waste that&#8217;s piling up at nuclear facilities around the country.   Should the new Congress decided to halt the Nevada project, as has been threatened, industry officials believe their proposal will offer some relief to local reactor sites until a permanent repository is completed.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/23/beginning-of-the-end-for-yucca-mountain-or-the-beginning-of-interim-nuclear-waste-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Lindberg Report Podcast:  Yucca Mountain Failure a Windfall for Nuclear Utilities</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/20/opinion-yucca-mountain-failure-a-windfall-for-nuclear-utilities/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/20/opinion-yucca-mountain-failure-a-windfall-for-nuclear-utilities/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Lindberg Report]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/20/opinion-yucca-mountain-failure-a-windfall-for-nuclear-utilities/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/02/yuccamountain.jpg" title="yuccamountain.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/02/yuccamountain.jpg" alt="yuccamountain.jpg" /></a>I was reading some recent headlines about Yucca Mountain, claiming the federal government will face heavy penalties and judgments if the project isn&#8217;t finished.  Read beyond the headlines my friends, &#8220;we&#8221; fund the government, the money comes from our pockets, and it isn&#8217;t chicken feed.</p>
<p>The latest estimates are, that if Yucca Mountain isn&#8217;t finished until 2017, &#8220;we&#8221; will owe the utilities an estimated $7 billion in penalties, provided by law, because the repository isn&#8217;t finished.  Bump completion time up another 3 years, and the bill goes up to about $11 billion.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/20/opinion-yucca-mountain-failure-a-windfall-for-nuclear-utilities/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/20/opinion-yucca-mountain-failure-a-windfall-for-nuclear-utilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 223 queries in 0.592 seconds. -->