Fly ash is the material left over from burning coal. A waste product with little other use, it is sometimes added to concrete or bricks. However, if the original coal contained radioactive isotopes, those isotopes will be greatly concentrated in the ash.

Read more of this story »

Some granite emits substantial amounts of radiation and radon gas. There is no way to tell which stones are radioactive just by looking. Testing is the only way to know for sure. However, the problem granites are more likely to be exotic and to have a lot of “movement”, such as swirls or banding. 

Dr. Daniel Steck, a leading radon scientist, is conducting a nationwide survey of homes with suspect granite. Participation in the study is free, and homeowners get their homes tested for radon by one of the country’s most respected radon researchers. If a radon problem is discovered, Dr. Steck will help to identify and resolve the issue.

Read more of this story »

Many of us think about green living and reducing our carbon footprints. But do we get enough fresh air into our homes? Energy efficient homes don’t get much ventilation, unless windows are opened regualrly. Airborne contaminants in homes can build up to many times the outdoor concentrations.

Read more of this story »

According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the air inside your home can be as much as five times more polluted than outdoor air!

Ever wonder why you sneeze so much in certain homes? The reason is the air. A lot of families suffer from respiratory problems, allergies, and other health problems due to the qualify of their indoor air at home. Organisms such as dust mites and mold are the main culprits. Other pollutants include natural gases such as radon, which is radioactive, colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas which is formed as natural deposits of uranium throughout the earth’s crust decay.

Read more of this story »

Not long after Green Options posted my article Granite Counters: Uranium Ore In Disguise?, the Managing Editor received a communication from the publicity firm representing the Marble Institute of America (MIA).  That letter stated:

In order to demonstrate why these articles/posts are not only inaccurate but also misleading, I wanted to supply some additional information including results from the most comprehensive scientific study of granite to-date that found not a single stone slab that poses a health risk to consumers.

Read more of this story »

The bill makes no provision for education about radon or testing of homes to detect elevated radon.  There is no assistance for homeowners needing mitigation.  There is no incentive for builders to use Radon Resistant New Construction.

Proposed by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA), the bill calls for $75 million in funding for drug research.  I met with Senator Feinstein’s Legislative Assistant, Kristen Wikelius, to ask that 10% of the funds go toward lung cancer prevention.  I reminded Ms. Wikelius that lung cancer treatment is rarely effective.  Lung cancer is nearly always fatal within five years.

Read more of this story »

Liz Hoffman learned she had lung cancer at 37.  She never smoked.  She had no family history of cancer.  She believes her lung cancer was caused radon gas in her home.  Dennie Edwards, an Ohio real estate agent, learned he had 10 picoCuries/liter of radon in his home, 2 ½ times the EPA action level.  Two days later, surgeons removed his entire left lung.  Dennie passed away last June.

Ms. Hoffman founded Cancer Survivors Against Radon (CanSAR) to “put a face on radon”.  She hopes that stories like hers will convince people to test their homes for radon and mitigate if needed. 

 ”HUD requires a termite letter to qualify for a mortgage, yet to my knowledge a termite never killed anybody”, comments Dr. Lane Mathis Price (Decatur General Oncology Center).  “Why are they not requiring a radon test?”  Dr. Michael Dick (Decatur Adult Medicine) adds, “you’d be kicking yourself if you knew something as simple as a radon detection device would have allowed you to prevent this from occurring.”

Read more of this story »

Disclosure reports use statistical sleight of hand to mislead consumers.

A Silicon Valley real estate agent told her clients, “There is no radon in California.  You don’t need to worry about it.”  The couple purchased a home in Sunnyvale, CA, which has some of the higher radon levels in Santa Clara County.  Based on their agent’s advice, they chose not to test for radon. 

Another home in Sunnyvale had 29 picoCuries/liter (pCi/L), more than 8 times the EPA action level (4 pCi/L).  A home in Los Gatos had 56 pCi/L, which is 14 times the action level.

Based on radon test data, about half of California’s 58 counties are in EPA Radon Zone 2, averaging 2-4 piCi/L of indoor radon.  Santa Clara County, where I live, has an average radon concentration of 2.9 pCi/L, and about one in twelve radon tests finds radon above 4 pCi/L.  Ventura and Santa Barbara counties are in EPA Radon Zone 1, indicating countywide averages above 4 pCi/L. 

Read more of this story »

A homeowner in Menlo Park, CA recently discovered that his home had 14 picoCuries/liter of radon, three times the EPA action level of 4 picoCuries/liter (pCi/L).  He tested his home for radon because he was concerned about his new granite counters.  However, his granite was not the source of the radon.  He had “geologic” radon coming from the soil beneath his house.

Homeowners in Atherton, CA and Carmel, CA both learned last year that they had 8 pCi/L of radon, twice the EPA action level.  The homeowners in Atherton tested their home because they were concerned about their granite.  They discovered they had geologic radon instead.  The family in Carmel had some radon emitted by their granite, but the majority of their radon was coming from the soil.

Read more of this story »

Cathy Woods’ new granite counters were radioactive. They contained as much uranium as commercial uranium ore. The showroom that sold Cathy her Jupurana Bordeaux granite did not warn her that some granite is radioactive.

When I contacted the salesman, posing as a customer, he assured me their granite “is no more radioactive than soil or water”. However, Cathy’s granite emitted gamma radiation at many times background. The radon gas emitted by the stone tripled the radon concentration in her kitchen.

Jupurana Bordeaux is one of the granites that are likely to be radioactive. Just weeks after having her counters installed, Cathy learned of the possibility and enlisted the assistance of professionals to assess her exposure to radiation and radon gas.

Radon is a daughter product of uranium, so granites containing uranium will emit radon. According to the EPA, radon is the leading cause of lung cancer in non-smokers. Cathy and her husband both have family histories of cancer, so they were very concerned about elevated radiation and radon in their kitchen.

Read more of this story »

With the legion of both deniers and alarmists out there attempting to monopolize the discussion over the safety of granite countertops, it is difficult to find unbiased information.  Peruse the comments in the above post and you can see the discussion has devolved into name calling.  The deniers, many of whom work in the granite industry, blast any insinuation that granite could be dangerous as “fear-mongering” and put down the current research as “junk science.”  The alarmists, many of whom sell competing countertops, argue that consumers shouldn’t take the risk that comes with granite.  The truth, as with most heated arguments, can be found somewhere in the middle.

Read more of this story »

Please visit an updated post on radon in granite countertops here:  A Rational Discussion on Radon in Granite Countertops

The Marble Institute of America better get ready for another round of fighting because the issue of radon in granite countertops is back. For the past decade, the MIA has been trying, with much success, to squash the rumor that granite countertops have the potential to add dangerous amounts of radon in the home. A new study being conducted by Houston area not-for-profit BuildClean is raising old fears about the dangers of granite countertops, and its preliminary results show that while most granite countertops in the study contain very little to no radon at all, the countertops that do contain radon have levels that are frighteningly high. While consumers can be secure in the fact that the vast majority of granite is perfectly safe, a small percentage is still in question, and no independent scientific study exists to assuage consumer fears.

The first issue of Solid Surface in 1995 explored the possibility that granite countertops may pose a health risk. Soon, the MIA issued their response, which attacked the credibility of the science involved in the study as well as the fact that the advertisers in the journal included companies that competed with granite countertop manufacturers. But one phrase in the response, a highlighted phrase no less, is troubling: “…actual levels of radon gas emmissions are so low as to be insignificant and generally represent no threat.” As a father, I don’t want to be assured that there is “generally” no threat to my family. I want to know there is no threat. And after BuildClean* found that 3 of 95 granite countertops contained harmful amounts of radon, would the MIA consider such a small number to be “generally” no threat? I’m sure the owners of those three countertops are not reassured.

Read more of this story »