<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; report</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/report</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'report'</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions Trends &#8212; 1990, 2000, 2008</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/11/power-plant-pollution-fossil-fuels-carbon-project.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/11/power-plant-pollution-fossil-fuels-carbon-project.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="360" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4932" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>Overall, global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels increased 29% between 2000 and 2008 and 41% from 1990-2008, and the current concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is now at its highest in at least 2 million years, according to a new study in the journal <em><a href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ngeo689.html">Nature Geoscience</a></em>.</strong></h3>

<p>The new report published this week by an international team of researchers who are part of the &#8220;Global Carbon Project&#8221; shows emissions trends through 2008 (including changes in emissions causes and in the amount of emissions remaining in the atmosphere) and brings up some major questions for the future as well. </p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study: 14 Million Plug-In Electric Cars on US Roads by 2020</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Viewpoint]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2009/11/electrification-roadmap-coalition-electric-car-cars-2020-2040-us.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4127" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/11/electrification-roadmap-coalition-electric-car-cars-2020-2040-us.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A remarkable new study predicts that at least <a title="EVs" href="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/11/a-roadmap-to-vehicle-electrification/?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wiredautopia+(Blog+-+Autopia)" target="_blank">14 million electric cars will be zooming around the US by 2020</a>, and reckons that <a title="electrification coalition" href="http://www.electrificationcoalition.org/news-launch.php" target="_blank">EVs could account for a startling 75 percent of all light-duty miles driven by 2040</a>.</strong></p>
<p>The ambitious claims form part of an in-depth study, called the <strong><a title="Electrification roadmap" href="http://www.electrificationcoalition.org/" target="_blank">Electrification Roadmap</a></strong>, backed by a coalition of business leaders including Nissan, FedEx, Coda Automotive and <strong><a title="Coulomb Technologies" href="http://gas2.org/2009/08/24/ev-and-fleets-electric-heat-hits-the-streets/" target="_blank">Coulomb Technologies</a></strong>.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Nike Stops Use of Amazon Leather After Damning Greenpeace Report</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/nike-amazon-leather-greenpeace.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4757" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/nike-amazon-leather-greenpeace.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>

<p><strong><a title="nike" href="http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/press-releases/nike-agree-stop-buying-amazon-leather-following-greenpeace-report-20090722" target="_blank">Nike has stopped all imports of leather from the Amazon region of Brazil</a>, after a Greenpeace report claimed that its shoes and trainers could be speeding up the destruction of the world&#8217;s largest rainforest and contributing to global warming.</strong></p>
<p>The report, published last month, revealed how cattle hides from deforested areas were entering the supply chains of global brands including Nike, Clarks, Adidas and Reebok.</p>
<p>According to the NGO, deforestation for cattle ranching in Brazil alone is now the biggest driver of deforestation anywhere in the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study: Airlines Should Aim to Use 80% Biofuels by 2050</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2009/07/biofuel.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3000" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/07/biofuel.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="454" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A far reaching report has called on the <a title="aviation" href="http://www.newenergyfocus.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=1&#38;listcatid=32&#38;listitemid=2848" target="_blank">aviation industry to drastically increase the use of biofuels</a>, to make a 60% reduction in its greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.</strong></p>
<p>The study, called &#8216;<a title="policy" href="http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/publications/publication.cgi?id=129" target="_blank">Green Skies Thinking</a>&#8216;, was published today by right wing think-tank <a title="policy exchange" href="http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/" target="_blank">Policy Exchange</a>, and advocates the phase-in of an EU Sustainable Bio-Jet Fuel Blending Mandate by 2020, which would force aviation companies to commit to a rising proportion of jet fuel from sustainable bio-jet fuels.</p>
<p>Crucially, the report also reckons that growing the feedstock needed for advanced biofuels would require significantly less land and be more sustainable than first generation biofuels such as bioethanol and <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/">biodiesel</a>, generally used by road transport.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Report Shows that Climate Change &#8220;Literally Affects People in Their Backyards&#8221;</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental &amp; Climate Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/sprinkler.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4566" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/06/sprinkler.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>

<p><strong>It&#8217;s in the papers and on TV. It spreads across the Internet (including this very post), and it is finding its way into the classroom. Global climate change is nothing new. And it certainly isn&#8217;t going away. Not yet, anyway.</strong></p>
<p>A report, “<a href="http://www.globalchange.gov/publications/reports/scientific-assessments/us-impacts" target="_blank">Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States</a>,” was put out on June 16, 2009. The report compiles years of scientific research and takes into account new data not available during the preparation of previous assessments. It was produced by a consortium of experts from 13 U.S. government science agencies and from several major universities and research institutes.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/22/new-report-shows-that-climate-change-literally-affects-people-in-their-backyards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Kids and Nature - The Great Backyard Bird Count</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/08/kids-and-nature-the-great-backyard-bird-count/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/08/kids-and-nature-the-great-backyard-bird-count/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amy Bell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Outdoor Fun]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/08/kids-and-nature-the-great-backyard-bird-count/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/files/2009/02/chickadee1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2976" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2009/02/chickadee1.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="192" /></a>Once again it&#8217;s time for the <strong>National Audubon Society&#8217;s Annual Great Backyard Bird Count</strong>.</p>
<p>This event is in its 12th year, and for 2009 will be held February 13-16.</p>
<p><strong>Over the four day period, birdwatchers count birds to create a r</strong><strong>eal-time snapshot of where birds are across the continent. </strong></p>
<p>People of all ages and birdwatching levels are invited to participate in this popular event, and what <strong>a great way to <a href="http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/04/11/green-family-values-leave-no-child-inside/" target="_self">get children outside</a> and take notice of the wonders of the natural world around them.</strong>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/08/kids-and-nature-the-great-backyard-bird-count/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/08/kids-and-nature-the-great-backyard-bird-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Problems with Funding and Reporting in Canadian Government&#8217;s Environment Policies</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/05/problems-with-funding-and-reporting-in-canadian-governmens-environment-policies/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/05/problems-with-funding-and-reporting-in-canadian-governmens-environment-policies/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amanda Peterka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/05/problems-with-funding-and-reporting-in-canadian-governmens-environment-policies/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/02/canadianflag.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2454" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/02/canadianflag-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a>Money flowing into Canada&#8217;s government to protect the environment may actually never be going there&#8230; and nobody would know any better. An analysis done by the country&#8217;s Commissioner of the Environment shows the lack of a cohesive structure to Canada&#8217;s system of funding for environmental causes. Scott Vaughan, the commissioner, said that the government has no way of knowing if the right amount of money is going into even climate change policies, and that&#8217;s only supposed to be a $1.5 billion effort.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/05/problems-with-funding-and-reporting-in-canadian-governmens-environment-policies/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/05/problems-with-funding-and-reporting-in-canadian-governmens-environment-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Hong Kong Ecological Footprint is Twice as Large as China&#8217;s</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/hong-kong-china-footprint-laszlo-photo.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3720" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/hong-kong-china-footprint-laszlo-photo.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="222" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A startling new WWF study has revealed that <a title="China Hong Kong footprint" href="http://www.panda.org/news_facts/newsroom/news/?153841" target="_blank">people living in Hong Kong currently use twice as many resources as residents in China</a>, more than double the sustainable level.</strong></p>
<p>To feed the vibrant city&#8217;s massive demand for natural resources, and absorb the CO2 emitted, residents need an area of land and sea larger than 250 Hong Kong&#8217;s, an incredible seven-fold increase since 1965.</p>
<p>According to Mathis Wackernagel, Executive Director of the Global Footprint Network, &#8220;Although small geographically, Hong Kong not only has significant resource demands, but it also has an over-proportional influence on the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>UC Berkeley Report Says Global Warming Could Put $2.5 Trillion of California Real Estate at Risk</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/11/california-global-warming-cnynfreelancer.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1600" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/11/california-global-warming-cnynfreelancer.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A new report says that  <a title="global warming" href="http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2230552/climate-change-put-5tr-real" target="_blank">global warming could cost the Californian economy billions of dollars each year</a>, through a combination of rising sea levels, and the increased frequency of wild fires and extreme weather events.</strong></p>
<p><a title="california" href="http://www.nextten.org/pdf/report_CCRR/California_Climate_Risk_and_Response.pdf" target="_blank">The comprehensive study</a> (PDF), published by researcher&#8217;s at UC Berkeley, also claims that $2.5 trillion of Californian real estate assets are at risk. The clear message, says co-author Prof. David Roland-Holst, is the strong economic case for timely action to slash carbon emissions and adapt to the already unavoidable effects of climate change.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our report makes clear the most expensive thing we can do about climate change is nothing,&#8221; he said. &#8220;As we learned in New Orleans, turning your back on the threat of natural disaster doesn’t make it go away.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>North Sea Grid Could Bring Wind Power to 70 Million Homes</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/north-sea-grid-could-bring-wind-power-to-70-million-homes/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/north-sea-grid-could-bring-wind-power-to-70-million-homes/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/north-sea-grid-could-bring-wind-power-to-70-million-homes/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/09/wind-turbine.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-903" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/09/wind-turbine.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a><strong>European Union officials are studying plans for an <a title="load of wind" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/sep/04/windpower.renewableenergy" target="_blank">international wind power grid in the North Sea</a> that could provide energy generated from renewable sources to 70 million European homes.</strong></p>
<p>The proposed offshore grid would be more than 3850 miles long, and connect more than 100 wind farms, containing a total of 10,000 turbines to seven countries, including Britain, Denmark, France, Norway, Germany, Belgium and <a title="nederlander" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/31/too-much-dutch-american-dependency-on-wind-power-spawns-mass-emigration-from-the-netherlands/" target="_self">the Netherlands</a>.</p>
<p>The plans, based on a report written by Greenpeace and environmental consultants 3E, assume that 68.4 gigawatts of capacity, across 118 identified wind farms, will be in place across the North Sea within 10-20 years, and could meet an impressive 13% of the annual energy needs of the countries involved.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/north-sea-grid-could-bring-wind-power-to-70-million-homes/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/north-sea-grid-could-bring-wind-power-to-70-million-homes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. Could Cut Fuel Use 50% by 2035</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/08/27/us-could-cut-fuel-use-50-by-2035/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/08/27/us-could-cut-fuel-use-50-by-2035/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fuel economy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/08/27/us-could-cut-fuel-use-50-by-2035/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2008/08/petrol2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-850" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/08/petrol2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<h4><strong> A new <a title="MIT report" href="http://web.mit.edu/sloan-auto-lab/research/beforeh2/otr2035/" target="_blank">report</a> by the <a title="energy initiative" href="http://web.mit.edu/mitei/index.html" target="_blank">Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Energy Initiative</a> predicts that a 30-50% reduction in fuel consumption is possible in the US over the next 25-30 years. Initially, this will be achieved through improved gasoline and diesel engines and transmissions, gasoline hybrids and reductions in vehicle weight and drag. In the longer term, the study concludes that <a title="pi hybrids" href="http://gas2.org/2008/08/18/report-claims-every-new-car-will-be-a-hybrid-by-2020/" target="_self">plug-in hybrids</a> and, later, hydrogen fuel cells may begin to have a significant impact on fuel use and emissions.</strong></h4>
<p>The report, &#8216;On the Road in 2035: Reducing Transportation&#8217;s Petroleum Consumption and GHG Emissions,&#8217; summarizes the results of an MIT research project that assessed the technology of vehicles and fuels that could be developed and commercialized during the next 25 years.</p>
<p>The research team assessed the effect of new vehicle and fuel technologies on the performance, cost and lifecycle emissions of individual vehicles. It then assessed the effects on the total on-the-road fleet of introducing these technologies using &#8220;plausible assumptions about how rapidly they could be developed, manufactured and sold to buyers to replace existing vehicles and fuels or to add to the existing fleet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Other key findings include:
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/08/27/us-could-cut-fuel-use-50-by-2035/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/08/27/us-could-cut-fuel-use-50-by-2035/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study Confirms the Need for More Sustainable Livestock Farming</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/30/study-confirms-the-need-for-more-sustainable-livestock-farming/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/30/study-confirms-the-need-for-more-sustainable-livestock-farming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Beth Bader</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/30/study-confirms-the-need-for-more-sustainable-livestock-farming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2008/03/cows.jpg" alt="cows.jpg" />The <a href="http://www.pcifap.org">Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production</a>, a two-and-a-half year long study by a non-profit organization, calls for urgent and major reform of confined animal operations.</p>
<p>&#8220;One of the most serious unintended consequences of industrial food animal production is the growing public health threat of these types of facilities,” the report said. “There is increasing urgency to chart a new course” in agriculture, which has been shifting over the last 50 years from family farms to large livestock meat producers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The studies primary focus assessed four areas of impact by industrial farms:</p>
<ul>
<li>Impact on public healthy by overuse of antibiotics on food animals, primarily the development of antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria</li>
<li>Impact on the environment from animal waste</li>
<li>The need for humane treatment of animals</li>
<li>The impact on family farms from lack of competition and the consolidation of the agribusiness entities
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/30/study-confirms-the-need-for-more-sustainable-livestock-farming/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/30/study-confirms-the-need-for-more-sustainable-livestock-farming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Eco-Libris: How Green is the Book Publishing Industry?</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2008/03/18/eco-libris-how-green-is-the-book-publishing-industry/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2008/03/18/eco-libris-how-green-is-the-book-publishing-industry/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Books, Magazines &amp; Literature]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2008/03/18/eco-libris-how-green-is-the-book-publishing-industry/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2008/03/bookstack.jpg" alt="bookstack.jpg" align="left" /><em>Editor&#8217;s note: This week, Raz Godelnik at <a href="http://ecolibris.net/">Eco-Libris</a> takes a look at a new study of the book publishing industry&#8217;s environmental footprint. As gathering information is the first step towards making change, we hope this report provides the data necessary for this industry to continue moving in greener directions.  This post was <a href="http://ecolibris.blogspot.com/2008/03/how-green-is-book-publishing-industry.html">originally published</a> on Wednesday, March 12, 2008.</em></p>
<p>This is a very exciting week for the book industry and anyone involved in the efforts to green it up. The reason? <a href="http://www.greenpressinitiative.org/orderform.htm"><em>Environmental Trends and Climate Impacts:Findings from the U.S. Book Industry</em></a> has been published.</p>
<p>This 86-page report was prepared by <a href="http://www.bisg.org/">The Book Industry Study Group</a> (BISG) and <a href="http://www.greenpressinitiative.org/">The Green Press Initiative</a> (GPI) (with support from a number of industry sponsors). Seventy-six publishers, representing just under half of the market, participated in the study, along with 13 printers (about 25 percent) and 6 paper mills (about 17 percent).</p>
<p>Why is this report so important? Because this is an up to date analysis of the industry&#8217;s ecological footprint. This is the most detailed survey someone has done in years to create a clear picture of the book publishing industry&#8217;s environmental impacts.</p>
<p>These measurements will help not only to know better where the industry is standing now, but also to better plan how to move forward and green up the industry as well as to evaluate the progress later on. In one word: benchmark. Or as BISG describes the report on its website: &#8220;a benchmarking survey which will establish a baseline for tracking climate impacts and progress by the U.S. book industry in environmental improvements.&#8221;</p>
<p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/03/18/eco-libris-how-green-is-the-book-publishing-industry/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2008/03/18/eco-libris-how-green-is-the-book-publishing-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ecotality: Carbon Sequestration Could be $8B Business for Agriculture</title>
    <link>http://ecotalitylife.greenoptions.com/2007/05/25/ecotality-carbon-sequestration-could-be-8b-business-for-agriculture/</link>
    <comments>http://ecotalitylife.greenoptions.com/2007/05/25/ecotality-carbon-sequestration-could-be-8b-business-for-agriculture/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ecotality Life</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotalitylife.greenoptions.com/2007/05/25/ecotality-carbon-sequestration-could-be-8b-business-for-agriculture/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/images/farm_0.JPG" border="0" width="445" height="380" /> </p>
<p><em>By <a href="http://www.ecotality.com/blog/">Ecotality</a> writer Bill Hobbs.  <a href="http://www.ecotality.com/blog/2007/carbon-sequestration-could-be-8b-business-for-agriculture/">Originally published</a> May 22, 2007. </em></p>
<p>It’s not going to be the most scintillating beachside reading this summer, but a new guide coming out in June from Duke University Press could help prevent rising seas from obliterating your favorite beach.</p>
<p>It’s called <em>Harnessing Farms and Forests in the Low-Carbon Economy: How to Create and Verify Greenhouse Gas Offsets</em>, and is described as “the first how-to manual for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States through changes in land use and farming practices, and turning those reductions into verifiable credits for trading in carbon markets, is about to hit bookshelves.”</p>
<p>John Grisham it ain’t, but the book may help bring some rationality and credibility to the whole “carbon offsets” business. The book is a technical guide for farmers, foresters, traders and investors. You can see a preview of the guide <a href="http://www.env.duke.edu/institute/ghgoffsetsguide/index.html">here</a>. According to the Duke University <a href="http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2007/05/carbonguide.html">press release</a>, the book explains how farmers and foresters can convert their land’s carbon dioxide storage capacity, and reduce emissions of potent greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide, into revenue-generating “offsets” that can be bought and sold in future carbon markets.<!--break--></p>
<p>Duke’s <a href="http://www.nicholas.duke.edu/institute/">Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions</a> developed the guide in collaboration with the nonprofit advocacy group Environmental Defense, with input from scientists at Texas A&#38;M, Colorado State, Rice, Princeton, Kansas State and Brown universities.</p>
<p>More from the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Lawmakers at the federal and state levels are paying increased attention to the role of such offsets as legislation to reduce U.S.greenhouse gas emissions is being developed.</p>
<p>“We know land-use practices can give us more options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions over the next 20 to 30 years and flexibility for companies adjusting to a U.S. carbon cap once it is enacted,” said Nicholas Institute Director Tim Profeta. “But farmers and foresters have needed specific guidance, and lawmakers need to know that the reductions can be verified. This book gives us that information and assurance.”</p>
<p>A number of agricultural groups are realizing the potential for new revenue streams through greenhouse gas-sequestering alterations to farming practices, such as “no till” farming where soils are not turned up after every season and manure-management practices that capture methane and use it as an energy source. “This is a comprehensive road map that paves the way for agriculture as a verifiable, measurable carbon sink,” said Dick Wittman, a member of the Agricultural Carbon Market Working Group and former president of the Pacific Northwest Direct Seed Association.</p>
<p>“Recent studies by Kansas State University and others have indicated that carbon could be an $8 billion market for agriculture,” Wittman said. “This document proves that specific agricultural conservation tillage practices are a legitimate method to store carbon. Should policy-makers embark on a cap-and-trade policy to curtail carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions, agriculture has the potential to be a cost-effective solution.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/tree.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4567" src="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/06/tree.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="351" /></a><strong><em>Some Key Findings of the report are:</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>1. Global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced. Global temperature has increased over the past 50 years. This observed increase is due primarily to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases. (p. 13)</strong></p>
<p><strong>2. Climate changes are underway in the United States and are projected to grow. Climate-related changes are already observed in the United States and its coastal waters. These include increases in heavy downpours, rising temperature and sea level, rapidly retreating glaciers, thawing permafrost, lengthening growing seasons, lengthening ice-free seasons in the ocean and on lakes and rivers, earlier snowmelt, and alterations in river flows. These changes are projected to grow. (p. 27)</strong></p>
<p><strong>3. Widespread climate-related impacts are occurring now and are expected to increase. Climate changes are already affecting water, energy, transportation, agriculture, ecosystems, and health. These impacts are different from region to region and will grow under projected climate change. (p. 41-106, 107-152)</strong></p>
<p><strong>4. Climate change will stress water resources. Water is an issue in every region, but the nature of the potential impacts varies. Drought, related to reduced precipitation, increased evaporation, and increased water loss from plants, is an important issue in many regions, especially in the West. Floods and water quality problems are likely to be amplified by climate change in most regions. Declines in mountain snowpack are important in the West and Alaska where snowpack provides vital natural water storage. (p. 41, 129, 135, 139)</strong></p>
<p><strong>5. Crop and livestock production will be increasingly challenged. Agriculture is considered one of the sectors most adaptable to changes in climate. However, increased heat, pests, water stress, diseases, and weather extremes will pose adaptation challenges for crop and livestock production. (p. 71)</strong></p>
<p><strong>6. Coastal areas are at increasing risk from sea-level rise and storm surge. Sea-level rise and storm surge place many U.S. coastal areas at increasing risk of erosion and flooding, especially along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, Pacific Islands, and parts of Alaska. Energy and transportation infrastructure and other property in coastal areas are very likely to be adversely affected. (p. 111, 139, 145, 149)</strong></p>
<p><strong>7. Threats to human health will increase. Health impacts of climate change are related to heat stress, waterborne diseases, poor air quality, extreme weather events, and diseases transmitted by insects and rodents. Robust public health infrastructure can reduce the potential for negative impacts. (p. 89)</strong></p>
<p><strong>8. Climate change will interact with many social and environmental stresses. Climate change will combine with pollution, population growth, overuse of resources, urbanization, and other social, economic, and environmental stresses to create larger impacts than from any of these factors alone. (p. 99)</strong></p>
<p><strong>9. Thresholds will be crossed, leading to large changes in climate and ecosystems. There are a variety of thresholds in the climate system and ecosystems. These thresholds determine, for example, the presence of sea ice and permafrost, and the survival of species, from fish to insect pests, with implications for society. With further climate change, the crossing of additional thresholds is expected. (p. 76, 82, 115, 137, 142)</strong></p>
<p><strong>10. Future climate change and its impacts depend on choices made today. The amount and rate of future climate change depend primarily on current and future human-caused emissions of heat-trapping gases and airborne particles. Responses involve reducing emissions to limit future warming, and adapting to the changes that are unavoidable. (p. 25, 29)</strong></p>
<p>Watch Video Coverage of the presentation of the report on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y88sgDM9HmA" target="_blank">youtube</a>.</p>
<p><em>Photo Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbum/175117349/">bbum</a></em><em> via flickr under Creative Commons License</em></p>
<p><em>Photo 2 Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/marzinians/3592548434/" target="_blank">Dimit®i</a> via flickr under Creative Commons License</em></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecotalitylife.greenoptions.com/2007/05/25/ecotality-carbon-sequestration-could-be-8b-business-for-agriculture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 507 queries in 1.434 seconds. -->