<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; RES</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/res</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'RES'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>National Renewable Energy Lab Looks at Proposed U.S. Electricity Standards</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff Kart</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/50/130685037_94fb63cd33.jpg?v=0"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2606" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/05/solar-farm.jpg" alt="Soalr Farm in California" width="500" height="375" /></a>The United States have already started down the path of Renewable Portfolio Standards.</p>
<p>There are now <a href="http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/states/maps/renewable_portfolio_states.cfm" target="_blank">almost 30 states with their own RPSes</a>, which require utilities to generate more of their power from renewable sources, like wind and solar and even landfill gas. Different states have set different standards, often with percentages based on years: 15 percent by 2015, for instance. It&#8217;s more catchy that way.</p>
<p>Now Congress is discussing a national RPS, which would set minimum standards for all states. RPSes, also known as Renewable Electricity Standards, can drive investment in renewable technologies. They can pave the way for new investment in turbines and panels, and associated jobs that come with the pay out. Sure, renewables may cost more for now, but you probably remember that <a href="http://www.economist.com/business/management/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12446567" target="_blank">economies of scale</a> thing from high school.</p>
<ul class="category-links">
<li>» <a href="http://solardenver.1bog.org/" target="blank">Consumer solar power aggregation project launched in Denver, CO</a></li>
<li>» <a href="/feed/">Get CleanTechnica by RSS</a> or <a href="http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=cleantechnica/com">sign up by email</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.nrel.gov/" target="_blank">The National Renewable Energy Laboratory</a> looks at three proposed standards <a href="http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/45877.pdf ." target="_blank">in a new 30-page report (.pdf)</a>. They&#8217;re the master plans &#8212; from Senator Jeff Bingaman and Representative Edward Markey, and jointly by representatives Henry Waxman and Markey &#8212; that have risen to the top for now, being discussed in U.S. House and Senate committees.</p>
<p>The bottom line: The report doesn&#8217;t really choose a &#8220;best plan.&#8221; But Markey seems to get the best marks for a 25% by 2025 RES target with no energy efficiency substitutions allowed.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Markey RES legislation requires significantly greater renewable power deployment and the construction of new transmission infrastructure in a timely manner,&#8221; it says on pdf page 22.</p>
<p>Browse the report, and tell me what you think. Which of these plans is best for America? Or is there a fourth plan that was left out?</p>
<p>Image Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/divwerf/130685037/" target="_blank">Divwerf</a> via flickr under Creative Commons License</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>House Moves Closer to 15% Renewable Energy Standard</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/14/house-moves-closer-to-15-renewable-energy-standard/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/14/house-moves-closer-to-15-renewable-energy-standard/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/14/house-moves-closer-to-15-renewable-energy-standard/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/05/res.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3126 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/05/res.jpg" alt="wind turbine, cfl, solar panels" width="500" height="230" /></a></p>
<h4><strong>Bill would require just 15% of electricity to come from renewable sources<br />
</strong></h4>
<p>House Democrats negotiating a climate and energy bill have reportedly <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/05/13/13greenwire-house-dems-settle-on-15-renewable-energy-targe-12208.html">reached a compromise</a> on a renewable energy standard (RES) as part of the American Clean Energy &#38; Security Act that would allow those states unable to meet the requirement to make up for it with gains in energy efficiency.</p>
<p>The agreement would break what has been a point of contention for House negotiators for weeks. Concerned that they would be unable to meet the target of 25 percent renewables by 2025 first proposed in the Waxman-Markey draft in March, Southern Democrats balked, arguing that they didn&#8217;t have access to strong solar or wind resources the other states do and that high cost would make such a target cost prohibitive.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/14/house-moves-closer-to-15-renewable-energy-standard/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/14/house-moves-closer-to-15-renewable-energy-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>25% Renewable Energy Standard Introduced into Senate</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/17/25-renewable-energy-standard-introduced-into-senate/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/17/25-renewable-energy-standard-introduced-into-senate/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/17/25-renewable-energy-standard-introduced-into-senate/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/02/wind-and-solar.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2560 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/02/wind-and-solar.jpg" alt="wind turbine and solar panel" width="500" height="250" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Two freshmen U.S. senators—who also happen to be cousins—have introduced a bill that would create a national renewable energy standard (RES) of twenty-five percent by 2020.</strong></p>
<p>The bill would initiate a federal minimum standard mandating retail energy suppliers to diversify their portfolios with the first requirement of six percent for 2012, and consistently increase thereafter until meeting the 2025 goal. The proposal dovetails with that of <a href="http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/03/obama-calls-for-doubling-renewable-energy-production-for-green-jobs/">President Obama who has proposed a goal of doubling renewable energy</a> within the next three years.</p>
<p>Twenty-eight states already have renewable generation standards with various timelines and targets and this legislation would not preempt states that have stronger standards.</p>
<p>On paper, the proposed RES would appear to surpass the <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/10/eu-sets-landmark-renewables-target-of-20-by-2020/">EU enewables requirement of twenty percent by 2020</a>. But municipal and other publicly-owned power plants and rural electric co-ops would be exempted from the requirements.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/17/25-renewable-energy-standard-introduced-into-senate/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/17/25-renewable-energy-standard-introduced-into-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>California Ups Renewable Energy Mandate to 33% by 2020</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/17/california-ups-renewable-energy-mandate-to-33-by-2020/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/17/california-ups-renewable-energy-mandate-to-33-by-2020/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/17/california-ups-renewable-energy-mandate-to-33-by-2020/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4>Gov. Schwarzenegger Signs Executive Order to Raise California&#8217;s Renewable Energy Goals to 33% by 2020 and Clear Red Tape for Renewable Energy Projects</h4>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/02/schwarzenegger.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2623 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/02/schwarzenegger.jpg" alt="" width="499" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>In an executive order signed on Monday, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger committed to getting a third of California&#8217;s electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Schwarzenegger made the announcement while speaking at a solar panel factory in Sacramento. California <a href="http://www.gov.ca.gov/executive-order/11072/">Executive Order S-14-08</a> puts the state&#8217;s renewable energy requirement at 33% by 2020, securing its place as the most aggressive renewable energy mandate in the country.</p>
<p>The order comes Just three days after Schwarzenegger issued another unprecedented executive order to state agencies telling them to <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/15/schwarzenegger-orders-california-to-prepare-for-sea-level-rise/">make preparations for rising sea levels</a> caused by global warming.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/17/california-ups-renewable-energy-mandate-to-33-by-2020/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/17/california-ups-renewable-energy-mandate-to-33-by-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. House Wraps Up Energy Bill</title>
    <link>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/08/10/us-house-wraps-up-energy-bill/</link>
    <comments>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/08/10/us-house-wraps-up-energy-bill/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CAFE]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Home and Garden]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Landscaping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National and World News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[RES]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable+Energy+Standard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science and Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Udall+Platts+Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleantechnica]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy+bill]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fuel+efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar+power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind+power]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/08/10/us-house-wraps-up-energy-bill/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/wp-admin/imceFinitor%28%27/files/29/Capitol.jpg%27,%20240,%20159,%20%2717.65%20KB%27%29"><img src="/files/29/Capitol.jpg" align="right" height="159" width="240" /></a> The big news this week was that the U.S. House passed an energy bill that for the first time included a federal renewable energy standard (RES). This RES – an amendment to the energy bill sponsored by Representatives Tom Udall (D-NM) and Todd Platts (R-PA) – requires utilities to get 15 percent of their power from renewables by the year 2020. Other components of the House energy bill include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Moving $16 billion in tax incentives away from oil companies and putting it towards renewable energy.</li>
<li>New energy efficiency standards for appliances and building codes.</li>
<li>The creation of a Solar Energy Industries Research and Promotion Board to raise national awareness of solar energy options. The program would be funded completely by a portion of solar industry revenues, with no appropriations authorized.</li>
<li>A modified 4-year extension of the wind power Production Tax Credit (PTC) that limits the credit to 35 percent of wind project costs.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Not</em> in the bill is an increase in the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) standards (a.k.a. “fuel efficiency”) that was a <a href="/2007/08/01/saving_the_best_for_last_more_energy_legislation_this_week">hot topic</a> as the session came to a close. By avoiding a vote on CAFE standards, Democrats avoid public in-fighting with fellow Dems from auto industry states, notably Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell (D-MI).</p>
<p><!--break--> The Senate already approved an increase in fuel efficiency back in June, which will be just another piece of the Senate bill to be reconciled with the House version in conference committee this fall. In addition, the White House has threatened to veto any legislation containing a renewable energy standard.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=49580">Renewable Energy Access</a><br />
<a href="http://www.blog.thesietch.org/2007/07/12/renewable-energy-legislation-update/">The Sietch Blog</a><br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070805/pl_nm/usa_energy_house_dc;_ylt=ApFZzRgNqV6QIayoDgfY3CUPLBIF">Yahoo News</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/08/10/us-house-wraps-up-energy-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. House Vote on Renewable Energy Requirements “Likely”</title>
    <link>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/07/23/us-house-vote-on-renewable-energy-requirements-%e2%80%9clikely%e2%80%9d/</link>
    <comments>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/07/23/us-house-vote-on-renewable-energy-requirements-%e2%80%9clikely%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Geothermal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Landscaping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National and World News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[RES]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[renewable+energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind+energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind+power]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/07/23/us-house-vote-on-renewable-energy-requirements-%e2%80%9clikely%e2%80%9d/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/4/capitol3.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="160" align="right" />According to the American Wind Energy Association, U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) recently <a href="http://www.awea.org/windenergyweekly/WEW1249.html#Article1">told</a> wind power supporters that a House vote on a national renewable portfolio standard (RPS) was likely to happen the week of July 30.
</p>
<p>
A renewable portfolio standard – also called a renewable energy standard – is a measure requiring utilities to get a certain amount of their power from renewable sources by a particular time.
</p>
<p>
Last month in the Senate, Senator Jeff Bingaman’s (D-NM) RPS amendment to the energy bill was killed before a vote could be held. Although the current House version of the energy bill does not have an RPS provision, Representatives Tom Udall (D-NM) and Todd Platts (R-PA) are expected to offer an amendment requiring utilities to get 20 percent of their energy from renewables by 2020. This amendment is based on <a href="http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.00969:">H.R. 969</a>, which calls for an RPS and is also authored by Udall and Platts. (Make sure your Representative is one of the 120 co-sponsors <a href="http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d110:4:./temp/~bdDdi5:@@@P&#124;/bss/d110query.html">here</a>).<!--break-->
</p>
<p>
In her meeting with wind power supporters, Pelosi underscored the critical role an RPS would play in moving the nation towards global warming solutions.
</p>
<p>
According to the <a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/clean_energy/National-RPS-EIA.pdf">Union of Concerned Scientists</a>, a 20 percent by 2020 RPS would save consumers nearly $11 billion on energy bills by 2030 and save nearly 2 billion short tons of coal from being burned up into the atmosphere. Similarly, the American Solar Energy Society found that an RPS could help create nearly 40 million new jobs in the U.S. by 2030 in the renewable energy and energy efficiency sectors. <a href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/07/21/upcoming-house-renewable-energy-standard-vote-crucial/"></a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2007/07/21/upcoming-house-renewable-energy-standard-vote-crucial/">It’s Getting Hot in Here</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/clean_energy/National-RPS-EIA.pdf">Union of Concerned Scientists</a> <a href="http://www.awea.org/windenergyweekly/WEW1249.html#Article1"><br />
Wind Energy Weekly</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/07/23/us-house-vote-on-renewable-energy-requirements-%e2%80%9clikely%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 230 queries in 0.563 seconds. -->