<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; resource depletion</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/resource-depletion</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'resource depletion'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Lithium Counterpoint: No Shortage For Electric Cars</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/10/13/lithium-counterpoint-no-shortage-for-electric-cars/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/10/13/lithium-counterpoint-no-shortage-for-electric-cars/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karen Pease</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/10/13/lithium-counterpoint-no-shortage-for-electric-cars/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Editor&#8217;s Note: This post is a response to Anthony Cefali&#8217;s recent article &#8220;<a title="A Neurotic Look at Our Energy Future" rel="bookmark" href="../2008/10/12/where-were-going-we-wont-even-need-lithium-a-neurotic-look-at-our-energy-future/">Where We’re Going We Won’t Even Need Lithium: A Neurotic Look at Our Energy Future</a>.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2008/10/lithium_carbonate.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1105" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/10/lithium_carbonate-300x229.jpg" alt="Lithium carbonate powder" width="300" height="229" /></a></p>
<h4>Recently, fellow Gas 2.0 author Anthony Cefali <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/10/12/where-were-going-we-wont-even-need-lithium-a-neurotic-look-at-our-energy-future/" target="_blank">wrote an excellent post questioning the sustainability of lithium-ion batteries into the future due to concerns over the supply of lithium</a>.</h4>
<p>In this world, it&#8217;s easy to argue that one can never be too neurotic about our future, as our species has repeatedly shown a lack of foresight into the consequences of its actions.  However, in this case, I must argue against his views on lithium&#8217;s sustainability.  Lithium-ion batteries will only be superceded by superior technology, not by lithium shortage.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/10/13/lithium-counterpoint-no-shortage-for-electric-cars/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/10/13/lithium-counterpoint-no-shortage-for-electric-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Global Seafood Consumption Up: Is Aquaculture the Answer?</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/14/us-seafood-consumption-is-aquaculture-the-answer/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/14/us-seafood-consumption-is-aquaculture-the-answer/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/14/us-seafood-consumption-is-aquaculture-the-answer/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/07/fishingnet.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-510" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/07/fishingnet.jpg" alt="commercial fishing nets" width="529" height="364" /></a>Since 1910, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has calculated the nation’s seafood consumption rates to keep consumers and the industry informed about trends in seafood consumption and trade.</p>
<p>According to this year&#8217;s <a href="http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/index.html">report</a>, Americans consumed a total of 4.908 billion pounds of seafood in 2007, slightly less than the 4.944 billion pounds in 2006. The average American ate 16.3 pounds of fish and shellfish in 2007, a one percent decline from the 2006 consumption figures of 16.5 pounds. <strong>But even though U.S. seafood consumption is flat, global consumption continues to grow; a <a title="Global fisheries collapse" href="http://aquaculturedevelopments.com/tag/global-seafood/Worm_et_al_2006_Science.pdf" target="_blank">major study in the journal <em>Science</em></a> predicts the global collapse of the world’s major fisheries by the middle of this century</strong>. Already, over the past 50 years, there has been a 90 percent reduction of the ocean’s large predatory fish, including sharks, swordfish and tuna.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/14/us-seafood-consumption-is-aquaculture-the-answer/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/14/us-seafood-consumption-is-aquaculture-the-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 126 queries in 0.396 seconds. -->