<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; rush limbaugh</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/rush-limbaugh</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'rush limbaugh'</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Three Ways Obama Wins Republicans on Climate Change</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/three-ways-obama-wins-republicans-on-climate-change/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/three-ways-obama-wins-republicans-on-climate-change/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joe Walsh</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/three-ways-obama-wins-republicans-on-climate-change/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/07/obamapitch.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-3422" style="float: left;margin-left: 4px;margin-right: 4px" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/07/obamapitch-300x199.jpg" alt="Obama\'s \" width="300" height="199" /></a>Energy <a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-22-obama-health-care-vs-climate-energy-bill" target="_blank">didn&#8217;t get a sniff</a> in last night&#8217;s Obama press conference. That wasn&#8217;t really a surprise given the way that health care has elbowed its way into the political spotlight. You can count climate change among the &#8220;priorities&#8221; now in the shadows. Health care is all touch-and-feel&#8230;it plays with everyone.</p>
<p>Climate change? <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/climate-policy-puts-jon-stewart-to-sleep-video/" target="_blank">Not so much.</a> If Jon Stewart is snoozing, we know that the rest of America - a goodly percentage of which is far across the spectrum from Stewart and outwardly hostile to climate change arguments - is tuned all the way out. That is partly because climate change, energy and the environment still are considered Birkenstock and granola issues. The Obama operatives that are still engaged on climate change have finally started to <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-security-issue/" target="_blank">tweak the message</a> in a way that might help sell a bill even to science skeptics and the generally apathetic.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/three-ways-obama-wins-republicans-on-climate-change/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/three-ways-obama-wins-republicans-on-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>CARB States to Dictate Tailpipe GHG Emissions for Nation&#8230;(It&#8217;s a Good Thing)</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/03/carb-states-to-dictate-tailpipe-ghg-emissions-for-nationits-a-good-thing/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/03/carb-states-to-dictate-tailpipe-ghg-emissions-for-nationits-a-good-thing/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Cooney</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/03/carb-states-to-dictate-tailpipe-ghg-emissions-for-nationits-a-good-thing/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>California has been able to set its own emission standards for years.  One might wonder why we are so special?  The rule harkens back to the days of LA smog being a daily headline across the nation, when air quality was so poor in some parts of California that drastic measures were needed here well before anywhere else in the nation.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/03/carb-states-to-dictate-tailpipe-ghg-emissions-for-nationits-a-good-thing/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/03/carb-states-to-dictate-tailpipe-ghg-emissions-for-nationits-a-good-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>RNC Chairman Steele: &#8220;We are cooling. We are not warming.&#8221;</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/22/rnc-chairman-steele-we-are-cooling-we-are-not-warming/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/22/rnc-chairman-steele-we-are-cooling-we-are-not-warming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/22/rnc-chairman-steele-we-are-cooling-we-are-not-warming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/03/globaltemps.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2811 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/03/globaltemps.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="339" /></a></p>

<p>When Republican National Committee Chairman <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/16/steeles-tour-de-force-com_n_175317.html">Michael Steele guest-hosted</a> William Bennett&#8217;s nationally syndicated conservative talk radio show a few weeks back—in part, to diffuse the mounting tension between the Republican Party chief Steele and the <em>de facto</em> Republican Party chief, Rush Limbaugh—he gave a skewed interpretation of natural history and aligned himself with <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/11/are-gop-leaders-with-rush-limbaugh-on-global-warming/">Limbaugh&#8217;s position on global warming</a> in one fell swoop:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We are cooling. We are not warming. The warming you see out there, the supposed warming, and I am using my finger quotation marks here, is part of the cooling process. Greenland, which is now covered in ice, it was once called Greenland for a reason, right? Iceland, which is now green. Oh I love this. Like we know what this planet is all about. How long have we been here? How long? No very long.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>But Steele didn&#8217;t stop there. He exhorted listeners to take sides in a debate that is &#8220;leading to the ultimate political Armageddon between conservatism and liberalism.&#8221; Telling one caller:
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/22/rnc-chairman-steele-we-are-cooling-we-are-not-warming/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/22/rnc-chairman-steele-we-are-cooling-we-are-not-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>MJG #55: Limbaugh, O&#8217;Reilly, Hannity and Beck Environmental Superheroes</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/17/mjg-55-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/17/mjg-55-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joe Mohr</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/17/mjg-55-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>When we last checked in our heroes from the Trust Us League were <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/24/mean-joe-green-52-the-trust-us-league-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/">creating electricity from self-generated methane to power the red-states</a>.</p>
<p>Well, these &#8216;green machines&#8217; are at it again. This time doing what they can to help Mother Nature fight climate change&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/03/mjg055.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2780" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/03/mjg055.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="832" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/24/mean-joe-green-52-the-trust-us-league-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/">MJG #52: Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Hannity, and Beck: Environmental Superheroes</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/17/mjg-55-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Are GOP Leaders with Rush Limbaugh on Global Warming?</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/11/are-gop-leaders-with-rush-limbaugh-on-global-warming/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/11/are-gop-leaders-with-rush-limbaugh-on-global-warming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/11/are-gop-leaders-with-rush-limbaugh-on-global-warming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left">The Republican Party is in a bit of a rough patch.</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><a href="http://www.lcv.org/">The League of Conservation Voters</a> yesterday launched a <a href="http://www.withusorwithrush.com/">petition</a> to tell Republican congressional leaders Rep. John Boehner (KY) and Sen. Mitch McConnel (KY) that they have a choice: Either follow the leadership of Republican governors like <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/18/potential-mccain-running-mate-florida-governor-charlie-crist-has-green-cred-is-it-deserved/">Charlie Crist</a> of Florida and <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/15/schwarzenegger-orders-california-to-prepare-for-sea-level-rise/">Arnold Schwarzenegger</a> of California in building a clean energy economy, ending our attachment on foreign oil, and addressing climate change, or; &#8220;Follow the leadership of Rush Limbaugh by proposing no new ideas, providing tax breaks to oil companies, and ignoring global warming.&#8221; Watch the LCV&#8217;s 54-second snark attack:</p>
<p style="text-align: center">This post contains additional media. <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/11/are-gop-leaders-with-rush-limbaugh-on-global-warming/">Click here to view the full post</a>.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/11/are-gop-leaders-with-rush-limbaugh-on-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>President Obama: The Economy versus Climate Change</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/03/03/the-economy-versus-climate-change/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/03/03/the-economy-versus-climate-change/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/03/03/the-economy-versus-climate-change/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/files/2009/03/img-bs-top-blair-environment-174_071754369649.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1277 alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/03/img-bs-top-blair-environment-174_071754369649.jpg" alt="" width="174" height="174" /></a></h4>
<h4>While President Obama makes strides towards dealing with the issue of climate change, many prefer that he focus on fixing the recession first. Republicans like <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_030209/content/01125106.guest.html" target="_blank">Rush Limbaugh</a> have been quite vocal about it but other political figures like Tony Blair say that climate change must not fall victim to the recession.</h4>
<h4>Can President Obama realistically fix both the recession and climate change?
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/03/03/the-economy-versus-climate-change/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/03/03/the-economy-versus-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>MJG #52: Limbaugh, O&#8217;Reilly, Hannity, and Beck: Environmental Superheroes</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/24/mean-joe-green-52-the-trust-us-league-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/24/mean-joe-green-52-the-trust-us-league-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joe Mohr</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/24/mean-joe-green-52-the-trust-us-league-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Long thought of as loud-mouth talking-heads that serve only to divide our nation with their far-right wing positions, it turns out Rush Limbaugh, Bill O&#8217;Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck are secretly saving the world one small ecological-footprint at a time.</h3>
<p>Here is the first of a series of installments shining a light on what these environmental superheroes are doing to help heal Mother Earth. I only hope the actions of the &#8220;Trust-Us League&#8221; inspire the masses!</p>
<p><em>Under the angry, doughy, white exterior lie the &#8216;green&#8217; innards of men with an undying love for the earth and all of its creatures.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/02/mjg052.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2610" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/02/mjg052.jpg" alt="Limbaugh, Hannity, O\'Reilly, and Beck--environmental superheroes" width="500" height="474" /></a></p>
<h3>Related Articles</h3>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/09/11/the-first-city-in-the-us-to-make-natural-gas-from-our-poop/">The First City in the U.S. to Make Natural Gas from Our Poop</a><br />
<a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/12/in-praise-of-poop-3-san-antonio-harnesses-power-from-sewage-methane/">In Praise of Poop 3: San Antonio Harnesses Power from Sewage Methane</a><br />
<a href="http://www.azocleantech.com/details.asp?ArticleID=31">Methane Gas - What is Methane Gas and Converting Landfill Gas into a Form of Renewable Energy</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/24/mean-joe-green-52-the-trust-us-league-limbaugh-oreilly-hannity-and-beck-environmental-superheroes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Going Green?  Rush Limbaugh Hopes You Fail</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/06/going-green-rush-limbaugh-hopes-you-fail/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/06/going-green-rush-limbaugh-hopes-you-fail/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tina Casey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Other Environmental Topics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/06/going-green-rush-limbaugh-hopes-you-fail/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-2955" href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/06/going-green-rush-limbaugh-hopes-you-fail/childrens-art/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2955" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2009/02/childrens-art.jpg" alt="" /></a>Why is <strong>Rush Limbaugh</strong> &#8212; who is neither a plumber nor an economist &#8212; front and center in the <a title="limbaugh opposes stimulus bill" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/25/rush-limbaugh-opposes-sti_n_160683.html" target="_blank">opposition to Obama&#8217;s stimulus package</a>?  I&#8217;m not knocking Limbaugh.  He&#8217;s a great entertainer and all that.  But if my toilet was clogged, Rush Limbaugh is not the first person I&#8217;d think of calling.  Ditto that for figuring out how to fix an economic crisis of epic proportions.</p>
<p>The answer to the mystery is simple.  The squeaky wheel gets the grease.  And brother, can <strong>Rush Limbaugh</strong> squeak!</p>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/06/going-green-rush-limbaugh-hopes-you-fail/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/06/going-green-rush-limbaugh-hopes-you-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bush Administration Proposes &#8216;Fire Sale&#8217; of Rocky Mountains for Oil Shale Development</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/23/bush-administration-proposes-fire-sale-of-rocky-mountains-for-oil-shale-development/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/23/bush-administration-proposes-fire-sale-of-rocky-mountains-for-oil-shale-development/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/23/bush-administration-proposes-fire-sale-of-rocky-mountains-for-oil-shale-development/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/07/shale.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-546" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/07/shale.jpg" alt="colorado oil shale" width="500" height="277" /></a>On Tuesday, the Bush administration moved to accelerate oil-shale development across the Rocky Mountain West. Along with calls to <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/14/bush-lifts-executive-ban-on-offshore-drilling-why-it-matters-and-why-it-doesnt/">lift the moratorium on offshore drilling</a>, and <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/05/09/anwr-drilling-promotedcan-you-make-a-difference/">open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge</a> to oil drilling, Tuesday&#8217;s release of <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-16275.pdf">proposed rules for shale exploration (pdf)</a> by the Bureau of Land Management was merely another shot across the bow in the political blame game over $4-per-gallon gas.</p>
<div>The draft rules recommend reduced royalty rates for the extraction of oil from shale on 2 million acres of public property in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming. <strong>While the government currently charges 12.5% to 18.8% for conventional oil drilling, oil shale development would be set at around 5%</strong>.</div>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/23/bush-administration-proposes-fire-sale-of-rocky-mountains-for-oil-shale-development/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/23/bush-administration-proposes-fire-sale-of-rocky-mountains-for-oil-shale-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>You&#8217;re Either with Us, or You&#8217;re with the CFLs</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/04/cfl1.jpg" alt="cfl1.jpg" width="515" align="left" /><strong>So, what&#8217;s the bigger danger to the American public: Al-Qaeda, or compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs)?</strong></p>
<p>If you follow the conservative punditry, online or off, it&#8217;s a tough call.  <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/fun/mallard.asp">Today&#8217;s (April 24) &#8220;Mallard Fillmore&#8221; comic strip</a> is just the latest example of <a href="http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#38;pageId=45407">conservatives</a> <a href="http://www.junkscience.com/ByTheJunkman/20070426.html">taking</a> <a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2008/04/16/political_crusaders">aim</a> at these energy-saving bulbs, focusing primarily on the fact that CFLs contain mercury.</p>
<p>So, for Mallard Fillmore author Bruce Tinsley,  Thomas Sowell, Rush Limbaugh (whose content is not publicly available) and the crowd at WorldNetDaily, let&#8217;s review the facts:</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 354 queries in 0.853 seconds. -->