<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; sara palin</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/sara-palin</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'sara palin'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>What&#8217;s the Real Story Behind the Enbridge Pipeline?</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/whats-the-real-story-behind-the-enbridge-pipeline/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/whats-the-real-story-behind-the-enbridge-pipeline/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/whats-the-real-story-behind-the-enbridge-pipeline/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/06/tar-sand-in-hand.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3270" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/06/tar-sand-in-hand.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="384" /></a></p>
<p><strong>With the spotlight shining on clean energy, the stage has been set for the U.S. to rid itself of a harmful addiction to foreign oil. The stars are aligned and the cards have been dealt. Soon we&#8217;ll have kicked the dirty habit, right?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/29/maverick-reformer-sarah-palin-lies-about-free-market-competition-for-natural-gas-pipeline-in-energy-speech/" target="_blank">Sarah Palin seems to think so</a>. Perhaps you&#8217;ll remember her proposal to tap the natural gas supply found under the pristine Alaskan wilderness. As Governor of Alaska she &#8220;fought to bring about the largest private-sector infrastructure project in North American history . . . a nearly $40 billion natural gas pipeline to help lead America to energy independence.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/whats-the-real-story-behind-the-enbridge-pipeline/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/whats-the-real-story-behind-the-enbridge-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Nearing Election, McCain and Palin Shift Views on Ethanol</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/28/nearing-election-mccain-and-palin-shift-views-on-ethanol/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/28/nearing-election-mccain-and-palin-shift-views-on-ethanol/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Meg Hamill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/28/nearing-election-mccain-and-palin-shift-views-on-ethanol/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>While campaigning in <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/10/21/iowas-ethanol-plants-create-15-percent-of-its-emissions/">Iowa</a> this week, <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/12/mccains-plan-to-combat-climate-change/">John McCain</a> offered a glimmer of new support for the <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/04/ethanol-industry-jobs-are-better-than-food/">ethanol industry </a>that he has long been opposed to.</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/399px-teosinte.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1448" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/399px-teosinte.png" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a></p>
<p class="storytext">In general it is thought that rural America feels more closely aligned with the<a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/03/republicans-work-to-reconcile-mccains-climate-change-position-with-their-oil-platform/"> Republican Party&#8217;s</a> conservative social views.  However, right now it&#8217;s the<a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/29/convention-conservation-can-democrats-win-the-west-finally/"> Democrats</a> who support the ethanol and subsidy policies that help so many farmers in the middle of the country to stay afloat.</p>
<p class="storytext">Corn growers from across the nation are heading to the polls next week, and many are still feeling confused.</p>
<p class="storytext">John Wallbrown owns a 2,800-acre farm in Portage County, <a href="http://sustainablog.org/2007/08/26/ohio-next-to-implement-renewable-energy-standard/">Ohio</a>.  He said that he has heard from peers who are upset with the Republican Party, and though he still plans to cast his ballot for McCain, he told the Beacon Journal in Ohio that:  &#8221;McCain will probably lose some votes this year.&#8221;</p>
<p class="storytext">Historically McCain and Obama have not agreed on the issue of <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/10/24/are-corn-ethanol-farm-subsidies-too-complex-to-understand/">farm subsidies</a>.  Subsidies offer a financial safety net for farmers across the nation, whose livelihoods are very tied to the whims of nature.  McCain has been opposed to them, while Obama has offered support.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/28/nearing-election-mccain-and-palin-shift-views-on-ethanol/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/28/nearing-election-mccain-and-palin-shift-views-on-ethanol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Video Shows Sarah Palin&#8217;s Record on Aerial Wolf Hunting</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/18/video-shows-sarah-palins-reccord-on-aerial-wolf-hunting/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/18/video-shows-sarah-palins-reccord-on-aerial-wolf-hunting/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gavin Hudson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/18/video-shows-sarah-palins-reccord-on-aerial-wolf-hunting/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[This post contains additional media. <a href="http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/18/video-shows-sarah-palins-reccord-on-aerial-wolf-hunting/">Click here to view the full post</a>.
<p>Michael M. Phillips recently blogged for the Wall Street Journal about some bad press that Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is receiving from environmental groups in the form of the above video:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Soon after she took office, Palin proposed that the state provide a $150 &#8216;incentive&#8217; for aerial wolf hunters; to collect it the hunters would have to turn in the animal’s severed left forepaw. Several environmental groups immediately attacked the proposal as an illegal &#8216;bounty&#8217; and sued the state. The court agreed, shutting the program down before it started.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a title="The Wall Street Journal" href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/09/12/enviro-group-launches-attack-ad-against-palin/" target="_blank">The Wall Street Journal</a></p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/06/pipelines.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3272" src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/06/pipelines-268x300.jpg" alt="" width="268" height="300" /></a>Now if the natural gas and land depletion aren&#8217;t enough to get you thinking; the water consumption is heinous. It takes two to four barrels of water to produce one barrel of bitumen (which is what they are really after). The used tailings are then stored, unusable, in tailings lakes, which have potential negative effects on the health of the environment and the population surrounding the contaminated area.</p>
<p><em>Oil Sands Facts</em></p>
<p><em> Climate Change<br />
· Alberta’s greenhouse gas regulation does not require real reductions in emissions from oil sands operations.<br />
· Oil sands production is much more greenhouse gas–intensive than conventional oil production.<br />
· Oil sands are the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions in Canada.<br />
· Continued increases in greenhouse gas emissions show that Canada’s commitment to address climate change falls far short of what&#8217;s needed.<br />
· Large-scale carbon capture and storage for oil sands emissions is currently a distant and uncertain prospect.<br />
· Companies are allowed to switch to burning dirtier fuels as a source of energy for oil sands extraction — further increasing greenhouse gas emissions from the oil sands.</em></p>
<p><em>Water Impacts<br />
· Oil sands mining uses two to four barrels of water for every barrel of bitumen produced.<br />
· Oil sands companies are not required to stop withdrawing water from the Athabasca River, even if flows are so low that fisheries and habitats are at serious risk.<br />
· Capping toxic tailings waste in end pit lakes with water is an unproven and risky concept.<br />
· For over 40 years, oil sands mining companies voluntarily managed tailings on their own, in the absence of concrete government regulations.<br />
· Tailings lakes seep toxic waste. It is uncertain exactly what is seeping, how much is seeping and what ecosystem components are affected.<br />
· Tailings lakes house compounds known to be acutely toxic to aquatic organisms.<br />
· Reclamation of tailings lakes has not yet been demonstrated.</em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/06/developing-oil-from-canadian-tar-sands-could-kill-160-million-migratory-birds-by-2038/" target="_blank">Boreal Forest Impacts</a><br />
· Alberta’s oil sands underlie one-fifth of the province, and development is already planned for more than 79,000 square kilometers.<br />
· The Athabasca Boreal Forest will not be restored to its native state following mine closure.<br />
· Oil sands mining reclamation standards are weak and lack transparency; only one square kilometer of land has been certified as reclaimed to date.<br />
· The security bonds that are supposed to protect Canadians from costly environmental liabilities may be inadequate.</em></p>
<p>Perhaps Alaska&#8217;s natural gas store will help America achieve oil independence. But it is going to take strong regulations to stop the spread of &#8220;the most destructive project on earth.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Photo Coutesy of </em><a href="http://www.suncor.com/" target="_blank"><em>Suncor Energy</em></a></p>
<p><em>Map Courtesy of </em><a href="http://www.enbridge.com/pipelines/" target="_blank"><em>Enbridge Pipelines</em></a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/18/video-shows-sarah-palins-reccord-on-aerial-wolf-hunting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Palin Disparages Environmentalist &#8216;Fear Mongering&#8217; Yet Warns of a &#8216;World of Hurt&#8217; if We Don&#8217;t Drill</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/picture-112.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-862" style="margin-left: 4px;margin-right: 4px;float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/08/picture-112.png" alt="" width="295" height="204" /></a>On Friday, presumptive GOP vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin did an <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/26462569/site/14081545/">interview on CNBC</a> that focused largely on American <span style="text-decoration: line-through">energy</span> oil policy. Most of the discussion was about drilling in ANWR and when Bartiromo asked about the specific steps Palin would take to mitigate environmental impacts, she answered by talking about how the naysayers and fear mongers didn&#8217;t get it, and that drilling was critical to Alaska&#8217;s economy, essentially dodging the crux of the question, and alienating herself from the other 49 states.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want you to get the idea that Bartiromo was tough, because she wasn&#8217;t. In fact, <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/31/123344/981/532/581194">Bartiromo repeated Palin&#8217;s assertion</a> that ANWR&#8217;s footprint would only be 2,000 acres on this past Sunday&#8217;s <em>Meet the Press</em> four times - a claim that has been <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/land/wilderness/artech/farc2000.asp">called out as a myth</a> - as if she was a surrogate for the governor. But what struck me most was not Palin&#8217;s support for increased oil development in Alaska, but that she <strong>simultaneously criticized fear mongering tactics and employed them herself</strong>.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 183 queries in 0.781 seconds. -->