<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; solution</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/solution</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'solution'</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>CO2 Capture and Technology of the Future</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/26/co2-capture-and-technology-of-the-future/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/26/co2-capture-and-technology-of-the-future/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michelle Bennett</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[air quality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/26/co2-capture-and-technology-of-the-future/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/04/solartoday.gif" title="Solar Today magazine"><img src="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/04/solartoday.gif" alt="Solar Today magazine" align="left" /></a><br />
<font size="2">Today&#8217;s topic is inspired by <a href="http://solartoday.org">Solar Today</a> magazine. &#8220;Scrubbing Carbon from the Breeze&#8221; was written by Rona Fried, Ph.D., president of <a href="http://www.SustainableBusiness.com">SustainableBusiness.com</a> in the May/June 2008 issue. Unfortunately this particular article is not available online.</font></p>
<p>As climate change become a more central issue for people and governments around the globe, <a href="http://cdiac2.esd.ornl.gov/">a lot of people</a> are looking for solutions - fast solutions. If there were a quick and inexpensive way to dramatically <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_sequestration#Artificial_sequestration">reduce</a> the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, we should go for it right?  Well <a href="http://www.epa.gov/sequestration/faq.html">a number</a> of &#8220;quick fix&#8221; solutions, which have centered around hacking the <a href="http://www.epa.gov/sequestration/faq.html">environment</a> to fight climate change, have been floating around for years. One strategy is to <a href="http://www.loe.org/series/iron_fertilization/">capture the CO2 with plankton</a> and bury it in the ocean (which is much easier and cheaper than pumping it into the ground). Another is to change the <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/08/71613">composition of our atmosphere</a> to reflect sunlight. Others tend to be more <a href="http://ecotality.com/life/2007/11/06/top-5-wackiest-ideas-to-stop-global-warming/">sci-fi and outlandish</a> - but all of them <a href="http://www.talkgreen.ca/plan-to-reverse-global-warming-could-backfire/">might</a> just turn out to be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSN2435161220080425?feedType=RSS&#38;feedName=environmentNews">disastrous</a>.
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/26/co2-capture-and-technology-of-the-future/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/26/co2-capture-and-technology-of-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 49 queries in 0.431 seconds. -->