<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; study</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/study</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'study'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Study: 14 Million Plug-In Electric Cars on US Roads by 2020</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Viewpoint]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2009/11/electrification-roadmap-coalition-electric-car-cars-2020-2040-us.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4127" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/11/electrification-roadmap-coalition-electric-car-cars-2020-2040-us.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A remarkable new study predicts that at least <a title="EVs" href="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/11/a-roadmap-to-vehicle-electrification/?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wiredautopia+(Blog+-+Autopia)" target="_blank">14 million electric cars will be zooming around the US by 2020</a>, and reckons that <a title="electrification coalition" href="http://www.electrificationcoalition.org/news-launch.php" target="_blank">EVs could account for a startling 75 percent of all light-duty miles driven by 2040</a>.</strong></p>
<p>The ambitious claims form part of an in-depth study, called the <strong><a title="Electrification roadmap" href="http://www.electrificationcoalition.org/" target="_blank">Electrification Roadmap</a></strong>, backed by a coalition of business leaders including Nissan, FedEx, Coda Automotive and <strong><a title="Coulomb Technologies" href="http://gas2.org/2009/08/24/ev-and-fleets-electric-heat-hits-the-streets/" target="_blank">Coulomb Technologies</a></strong>.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/11/17/study-14-million-plug-in-electric-cars-on-us-roads-by-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Small, Immediate Gains More Tempting than Large, Long Term Gains Regarding Environment</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/small-immediate-gains-more-tempting-than-large-long-term-gains-regarding-environment/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/small-immediate-gains-more-tempting-than-large-long-term-gains-regarding-environment/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/small-immediate-gains-more-tempting-than-large-long-term-gains-regarding-environment/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/for-environment.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4866" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/for-environment.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="330" /></a></p>
<p><strong>We&#8217;ve all done the elementary school math story problem: Would you rather have $10,000 right now, or a penny doubled every day for a month? Well, in the end, those of us who were greedy enough to take the $10,000 right up front </strong><a href="http://asktom-naturally.com/what/penny.html" target="_blank"><strong>ended up poorer than those who took the penny</strong></a><strong>.</strong></p>
<p>This problem seems silly to us though. Now what about this one. Would you rather take $1,000 right now or $4,000 three years from now? Chances are, you chose the immediate cash. Psychologists use the term &#8221;delay discounting&#8221; to describe our inability to resist the temptation of a smaller immediate reward in lieu of receiving a larger reward later. Most people choose the smaller, more immediate reward over the larger &#8220;patience is a virtue&#8221; reward.</p>
<p>And no matter what the context, discounting stems from three factors: a bias for the present; uncertainty; and projected resources. We are a people who thrive on instant gratification; that&#8217;s one reason we love TV so much. It is also a contributing factor to the current economic crisis (and debt in general).</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/small-immediate-gains-more-tempting-than-large-long-term-gains-regarding-environment/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/small-immediate-gains-more-tempting-than-large-long-term-gains-regarding-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study: Airlines Should Aim to Use 80% Biofuels by 2050</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2009/07/biofuel.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3000" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/07/biofuel.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="454" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A far reaching report has called on the <a title="aviation" href="http://www.newenergyfocus.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=1&#38;listcatid=32&#38;listitemid=2848" target="_blank">aviation industry to drastically increase the use of biofuels</a>, to make a 60% reduction in its greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.</strong></p>
<p>The study, called &#8216;<a title="policy" href="http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/publications/publication.cgi?id=129" target="_blank">Green Skies Thinking</a>&#8216;, was published today by right wing think-tank <a title="policy exchange" href="http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/" target="_blank">Policy Exchange</a>, and advocates the phase-in of an EU Sustainable Bio-Jet Fuel Blending Mandate by 2020, which would force aviation companies to commit to a rising proportion of jet fuel from sustainable bio-jet fuels.</p>
<p>Crucially, the report also reckons that growing the feedstock needed for advanced biofuels would require significantly less land and be more sustainable than first generation biofuels such as bioethanol and <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/">biodiesel</a>, generally used by road transport.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/07/22/study-airlines-should-aim-to-use-80-biofuels-by-2050/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study: Cars Have Grown Bigger and Faster But Not As Efficient</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/07/21/study-cars-have-grown-bigger-and-faster-but-not-as-efficient/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/07/21/study-cars-have-grown-bigger-and-faster-but-not-as-efficient/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Christopher DeMorro</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Engines]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/07/21/study-cars-have-grown-bigger-and-faster-but-not-as-efficient/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>The first car my best friend ever drove was a early 80&#8217;s Honda Accord hatchback. It was little more than an oversized rollarskate with a tiny, 80 horsepower engine, but it beat the hell out of walking. The car itself was cramped and lacked all the amenities one would find standard on today&#8217;s cars, even cupholders. Today, the car serves as an immobile flower bed for a maple tree and wildflowers, but the memories will remain.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2009/07/85accord_hatchbacks.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2980" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/07/85accord_hatchbacks-600x359.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="359" /></a></p>
<p>Flash forward to today, and a new study finds that since the early &#8217;80&#8217;s the Honda Accord has packed on over 1,000 lbs, doubled its standard horsepower, and fuel economy has steadily dipped. The study seems to suggest that if vehicle weight, horsepower, and torque were held at their 1980&#8217;s levels, then fuel efficiency could have increased by at least 50%, rather than the 15% increase that actually occured. But is it really that simple?</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/07/21/study-cars-have-grown-bigger-and-faster-but-not-as-efficient/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/07/21/study-cars-have-grown-bigger-and-faster-but-not-as-efficient/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Global Warming is Shrinking Sheep and Fish</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/21/global-warming-is-shrinking-sheep-and-fish/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/21/global-warming-is-shrinking-sheep-and-fish/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/21/global-warming-is-shrinking-sheep-and-fish/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/global-warming-sheep-fish-smaller.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4720" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/global-warming-sheep-fish-smaller.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>

<p><strong>Two seperate scientific studies have revealed that <a title="baaah" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601090&#38;sid=aJZZoBNdKIN8" target="_blank">global warming is leading to significant reductions in the size of sheep and fish species</a>, more evidence that climate change is forcing a huge range of species to adapt to a hotter world.</strong></p>
<p>The first study, published in the <a title="pnas" href="http://www.pnas.org/" target="_blank">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</a>, investigated fish populations in French rivers and the Baltic Sea and discovered that fish are shrinking as their habitats heat up.</p>
<p>Results show that average fish size in many French rivers have declined over the last thirty years, while the geographical range of tiddlers in the Baltic expanded as species such as herring and sprat also shrunk.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/21/global-warming-is-shrinking-sheep-and-fish/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/21/global-warming-is-shrinking-sheep-and-fish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Chimps Show &#8216;Sugar Daddy&#8217; Sex Roles</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/08/chimps-show-sugar-daddy-sex-roles/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/08/chimps-show-sugar-daddy-sex-roles/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gavin Hudson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Africa]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/08/chimps-show-sugar-daddy-sex-roles/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/04/wild-chimpanzees-exchange-meat-for-sex1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2765" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/04/wild-chimpanzees-exchange-meat-for-sex1.jpg" alt="Wild chimpanzees exchange meat for sex" width="500" height="341" /></a>Male chimpanzees are able to exchange meat for sex with females, a recent study of wild chimps in Côte d&#8217;Ivoire found.</h3>
<p>Notorious B.I.G.&#8217;s &#8220;more money more problems&#8221; way of thinking may not be true for male chimpanzees looking to mate. It turns out that male chimps who bring home the bacon&#8211;so to speak&#8211;have twice as much sex over the long term. This, despite meat making up only <a href="http://http://www.ecologos.org/chimphunt.htm" target="_blank">1.4%</a> of the diets of wild chimps.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/08/chimps-show-sugar-daddy-sex-roles/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/08/chimps-show-sugar-daddy-sex-roles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fast Food Outlets Linked to Increased Risk of Stroke</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/20/fast-food-outlets-linked-to-increased-risk-of-stroke/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/20/fast-food-outlets-linked-to-increased-risk-of-stroke/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhonda Winter</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Arbor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/20/fast-food-outlets-linked-to-increased-risk-of-stroke/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a rel="attachment wp-att-1308" href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/20/fast-food-outlets-linked-to-increased-risk-of-stroke/fishfilet/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1308" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2009/03/fishfilet.jpg" alt="fast \" width="500" height="375" /></a></h3>
<h3><strong>Would you like a stroke with your cheeseburger? </strong>Scientists have found that your chances of having a stroke may actually be related to how many Burger Kings and KFCs are operating in your town. <a title="Researchers at the University of Michigan" href="http://www2.med.umich.edu/prmc/media/newsroom/details.cfm?ID=1054" target="_blank">Researchers at the University of Michigan</a> have discovered that the risk of stroke increases with the preponderance of fast-food restaurants in a neighborhood.</h3>
<h4><strong>In the recently published study, </strong><strong>Texas residents with the highest number of fast-food restaurants had a 13% higher relative risk of suffering strokes than those living in areas with the lowest number of restaurants. </strong>Each additional McDonalds, Jack in the Box or Taco Bell also increased the risk of stroke by 1%.</h4>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/20/fast-food-outlets-linked-to-increased-risk-of-stroke/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/20/fast-food-outlets-linked-to-increased-risk-of-stroke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study Proves Light Pollution Can Kill Animals</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/study-proves-light-pollution-can-kill-animals/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/study-proves-light-pollution-can-kill-animals/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/study-proves-light-pollution-can-kill-animals/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/light-pollution-animals-makelessnoise.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3724" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/light-pollution-animals-makelessnoise.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="313" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A groundbreaking study has proved that <a title="light pollution animals kill death" href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-01/esoa-plp010509.php" target="_blank">man-made light sources can change natural light cycles, triggering abnormal animal behavior that often leads to injury and even death</a>.</strong></p>
<p>The study, published in the journal <em>Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment</em>, confirms that polarized light pollution can cause confusion in creatures that rely on light &#8216;cues&#8217; to navigate through their environment, with many animals also thrown off course by light reflecting from buildings.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/study-proves-light-pollution-can-kill-animals/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/study-proves-light-pollution-can-kill-animals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Hong Kong Ecological Footprint is Twice as Large as China&#8217;s</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/hong-kong-china-footprint-laszlo-photo.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3720" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/hong-kong-china-footprint-laszlo-photo.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="222" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A startling new WWF study has revealed that <a title="China Hong Kong footprint" href="http://www.panda.org/news_facts/newsroom/news/?153841" target="_blank">people living in Hong Kong currently use twice as many resources as residents in China</a>, more than double the sustainable level.</strong></p>
<p>To feed the vibrant city&#8217;s massive demand for natural resources, and absorb the CO2 emitted, residents need an area of land and sea larger than 250 Hong Kong&#8217;s, an incredible seven-fold increase since 1965.</p>
<p>According to Mathis Wackernagel, Executive Director of the Global Footprint Network, &#8220;Although small geographically, Hong Kong not only has significant resource demands, but it also has an over-proportional influence on the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/08/hong-kong-ecological-footprint-is-twice-as-large-as-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>NASA Says Cut in Soot Emissions Would Slash Global Warming</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/06/nasa-says-cut-in-soot-emissions-would-slash-global-warming/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/06/nasa-says-cut-in-soot-emissions-would-slash-global-warming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental &amp; Climate Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/06/nasa-says-cut-in-soot-emissions-would-slash-global-warming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/pollution-a6u571n.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3686" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/pollution-a6u571n.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="257" /></a></p>

<p><strong>Nasa scientists have told government&#8217;s that a <a title="soot emissions global warming" href="http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/soot-tops-nasas-climate-blacklist/1399650.aspx" target="_blank">simple cut in worldwide emissions of soot could lead to a dramatic reduction in the effects of global warming</a>, as well as preventing hundreds of thousands of deaths from air pollution.</strong></p>
<p>Soot contains black carbon, thought to be the second largest cause of global warming after carbon dioxide. Whilst airborne, it it spread around the globe by wind, heating the atmosphere by absorbing and releasing warmth from the sun&#8217;s rays. When it falls to the surface it also darkens snow and ice in polar regions or high mountain ranges, further reducing the Earth&#8217;s ability to reflect solar radiation.</p>
<p>Cutting soot emissions has a virtually instantaneous effect since it disappears rapidly from the earth&#8217;s atmosphere, unlike CO2, which can linger for hundreds of years.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/06/nasa-says-cut-in-soot-emissions-would-slash-global-warming/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/06/nasa-says-cut-in-soot-emissions-would-slash-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cars Make Us Fat</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/01/cars-make-us-fat/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/01/cars-make-us-fat/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhonda Winter</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[EcoLocalizer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/01/cars-make-us-fat/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: justify"><a rel="attachment wp-att-1078" href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/01/cars-make-us-fat/fatcar/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1078" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2009/01/fatcar.jpg" alt="Cars Make Us Fat" width="500" height="349" /></a>A recent study published in the <strong><a title="Journal of Physical Activity and Health" href="http://www.humankinetics.com/JPAH/journalAbout.cfm" target="_self"><em>Journal of Physical Activity and Health</em></a> </strong>found a strong correlational link between &#8220;active transportation&#8221; <span style="color: #231f20"> (defined as the percentage of trips taken by walking, bicycling, and public transit) </span>and obesity rates in seventeen industrialized nations.  It appears that the more we sit on our butts and drive automobiles, the fatter we all become.</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify">David Bassett of the University of Texas and John Pucher of Rutgers University present their findings in <strong><a title="Walking, Cycling and Obesity Rates in Europe, North America and Australia" href="http://www.humankinetics.com/JPAH/viewarticle.cfm?jid=64hPLvP366eZLdR368aUY77v64rAM64X67hAE38&#38;aid=16305&#38;site=64hPLvP366eZLdR368aUY77v64rAM64X67hAE38" target="_self">&#8220;Walking, Cycling and Obesity Rates in Europe, North America and Australia&#8221;</a></strong>; they conclude that &#8220;Countries with the highest levels of active transportation generally had the lowest obesity rates. Walking and biking are far more common in European countries than in the United States, Australia and Canada. Active transportation is inversely related to obesity rates in these countries.&#8221; Nowhere is this more apparent than in the United States, where less than 12% of the population walks, rides a bike or takes mass transit, and one in three of us is <a title="obesity rates triple" href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/12/17/greener-neighborhoods-mean-healthier-kids/" target="_self">obese</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/01/cars-make-us-fat/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/01/cars-make-us-fat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ottawa&#8217;s Cool Plan to Use White Snow For Green Energy</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/14/ottawas-cool-plan-to-use-white-snow-for-green-energy/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/14/ottawas-cool-plan-to-use-white-snow-for-green-energy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/14/ottawas-cool-plan-to-use-white-snow-for-green-energy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/11/snow-micky.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1501" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/11/snow-micky.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="328" /></a></p>

<p><strong>Officials in Ottawa are considering a cool plan to <a title="ottawa snow" href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/11/12/ot-snow-081112.html" target="_blank">use the &#8216;cold energy&#8217; stored in snow as a source of renewable energy</a> in public buildings across the city.</strong></p>
<p>Under the plan, snow collected on the Ottawa streets during the cold winter months would be used to keep the city&#8217;s hospitals, universities and government buildings cool during the hot summer. Snow collected during the winter normally melts by early June, but, if the plan gets the green light, it will be insulated with wood chips, making it last until September. The icy melt-water could then be fed through pipes to keep buildings cool without the need for expensive, and energy hungry, air conditioners.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/14/ottawas-cool-plan-to-use-white-snow-for-green-energy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/14/ottawas-cool-plan-to-use-white-snow-for-green-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>UC Berkeley Report Says Global Warming Could Put $2.5 Trillion of California Real Estate at Risk</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/11/california-global-warming-cnynfreelancer.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1600" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/11/california-global-warming-cnynfreelancer.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A new report says that  <a title="global warming" href="http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2230552/climate-change-put-5tr-real" target="_blank">global warming could cost the Californian economy billions of dollars each year</a>, through a combination of rising sea levels, and the increased frequency of wild fires and extreme weather events.</strong></p>
<p><a title="california" href="http://www.nextten.org/pdf/report_CCRR/California_Climate_Risk_and_Response.pdf" target="_blank">The comprehensive study</a> (PDF), published by researcher&#8217;s at UC Berkeley, also claims that $2.5 trillion of Californian real estate assets are at risk. The clear message, says co-author Prof. David Roland-Holst, is the strong economic case for timely action to slash carbon emissions and adapt to the already unavoidable effects of climate change.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our report makes clear the most expensive thing we can do about climate change is nothing,&#8221; he said. &#8220;As we learned in New Orleans, turning your back on the threat of natural disaster doesn’t make it go away.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>South Africans Have Poor Understanding of Climate Change, Survey Shows</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/05/south-africans-have-poor-understanding-of-climate-change/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/05/south-africans-have-poor-understanding-of-climate-change/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Harcourt</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Africa]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/05/south-africans-have-poor-understanding-of-climate-change/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/11/study-in-south-africa-reveals-low-knowledge-about-climate-change.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1940" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/11/study-in-south-africa-reveals-low-knowledge-about-climate-change.jpg" alt="Study in South Africa reveals low knowledge about climate change." width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<h4>Almost a third (28%) of South Africans have not heard about global warming or climate change while over a half considered their knowledge as &#8220;hardly anything&#8221; or less.</h4>
<p>The <a title="Human Sciences Research Council website" href="http://www.hsrc.ac.za" target="_blank">Human Sciences Research Council</a>, a South African parastatal, conducts human sciences research in support of the growth and development of the country. Their 2008 South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS) collected information from a representative sample of over three thousand people. One of the <a title="Report on findings of Climate Change opinions survey" href="http://www.hsrc.ac.za/HSRC_Review_Article-105.phtml" target="_blank">modules</a> of the survey explored issues such as knowledge and concern about climate change, perceived causes and impacts, where responsibility for action lies, and the level of support for interventions.</p>
<p>The results show that South Africans are poorly informed about climate change and its implications. They lack a full understanding of the impacts it is likely to have on their lives over the next few decades. This hints at difficulties that will be encountered as South Africa addresses climate change.</p>
<p>Respondents identified food security (15%), temperature (13%), disease (13%) and the standard of living (11%) as issues that would be effected by climate change. Issues with less direct impact on the individual, such as storms, floods, and loss of biodiversity, were not identified as frequently.
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/05/south-africans-have-poor-understanding-of-climate-change/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/05/south-africans-have-poor-understanding-of-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study Shows Shoppers Aren&#8217;t Buying Wal-Mart&#8217;s Green Marketing</title>
    <link>http://watchingwalmart.greenoptions.com/2008/05/19/study-shows-shoppers-arent-buying-wal-marts-green-marketing/</link>
    <comments>http://watchingwalmart.greenoptions.com/2008/05/19/study-shows-shoppers-arent-buying-wal-marts-green-marketing/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Goldschmidt</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Green Promises]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Greenwashing]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchingwalmart.greenoptions.com/2008/05/19/study-shows-shoppers-arent-buying-wal-marts-green-marketing/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/watchingwalmart/files/2008/05/sustainability_issues.jpg" align='left' alt='sustainability issues'/>It will take more than promises and glossy marketing campaigns to convince consumers that Wal-Mart is green, a recent study has found. </p>
<p>The largest retailer on earth finds itself the subject of <a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/05/10/green-marketing-campaigns-not-sticking/">Environmental Leader&#8217;s latest study</a> on green marketing. Despite Wal-Mart’s <a href="http://instoresnow.walmart.com/Sustainability.aspx">massive green marketing campaign</a> over the last year, consumers still don’t consider the retailer a sustainable company, explaining:</p>
<blockquote><p>Brands that have spent significant marketing dollars communicating green initiatives such as Wal-Mart and GE are not connecting.</p></blockquote>
<p>Environmental Leader&#8217;s report focuses specifically on the effectiveness of green marketing campaigns, but it implies a much larger truth: consumers aren’t buying Wal-Mart’s greenwashing. The chart above (<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/thumbs/green-marketing-campaigns-6080.jpg">click here</a> for a larger version) explains that in the minds of socially-conscious shoppers, social responsibility goes far beyond Wal-Mart&#8217;s current definition. Employee treatment, community connection and supply chain practices are equally important as environmental issues. But Wal-Mart has a track record of trouble in each of these categories, leading conscientious consumers to rightfully distrust the company&#8217;s green overtures. </p>
<p>Wal-Mart&#8217;s habit of making cosmetic changes instead of systematic improvements to its business practices aren&#8217;t fooling any shoppers. If Wal-Mart wants its green message to stick, it needs to address its sustainability problems from the ground up. Corporate transparency, employee friendliness, and fair, sustainable product sourcing aren&#8217;t just footnotes to an advertising campaign - they&#8217;re necessary parts of the modern responsible corporation. Wal-Mart would be better served to use the millions it currently spends on marketing to make holistic changes to its business model.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketingvox.com/green-marketing-campaigns-dont-always-stick-038641/">Green Marketing Campaigns Don’t Always Stick [Marketing Vox]</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://watchingwalmart.greenoptions.com/2008/05/19/study-shows-shoppers-arent-buying-wal-marts-green-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Switchgrass Could Displace 30% of US Petroleum Usage With 94% GHG Reduction</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/03/14/switchgrass-could-displace-30-of-us-petroleum-usage-with-94-ghg-reduction/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/03/14/switchgrass-could-displace-30-of-us-petroleum-usage-with-94-ghg-reduction/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Cellulosic ethanol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/03/14/switchgrass-could-displace-30-of-us-petroleum-usage-with-94-ghg-reduction/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/03/switchgrass.jpg" alt="switchgrass, biofuel, ethanol, cellulosic, science" align="left" />In January, USDA researchers <a href="http://ianrnews.unl.edu/static/0801070.shtml" title="UNL">completed </a>a five-year evaluation of another biofuel feedstock with the potential to make a serious dent in US petroleum usage. In the largest study to date,<em><strong> switchgrass has been shown to produce 540% more energy than was used to grow, harvest, and process it into <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/02/worlds-first-commercially-viable-cellulosic-ethanol-plant-online-2009/">cellulosic ethanol</a>, while reducing greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions by 94% when compared to gasoline.</strong></em></h4>
<p>USDA geneticist Ken Vogel commented that the study demonstrates switchgrass&#8217;s potential to be a major renewable biofuel that reduces GHGs and could &#8220;<strong>potentially displace 30 percent of current U.S. petroleum consumption</strong>.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/14/switchgrass-could-displace-30-of-us-petroleum-usage-with-94-ghg-reduction/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/03/14/switchgrass-could-displace-30-of-us-petroleum-usage-with-94-ghg-reduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study: Your Car Can Run On 20% Ethanol</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/03/biofuelpump.jpg" alt="biofuel pump" align="left" />A University of Minnesota study found that using higher blends of ethanol (20%) blended into gasoline did not cause damage or cause performance problems when used in standard gasoline engines.</h3>
<p>Over half the gasoline sold in the US is already blended with 10% ethanol (E10), but higher blends were thought to run the risk of causing engine damage. Higher blends of ethanol, up to 85% (E85), will only work properly in engines converted to accept the fuel.</p>
<blockquote><p>Using 40 pairs of vehicles commonly found on American roads, a year-long research effort found that increasing ethanol blends from 10 percent (E10) to 20 percent (E20) in a gallon of gasoline provided an effective fuel across a range of tests focusing on driveability and materials compatibility.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study: Buying Biodiesel May Be A Gamble</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/03/05/study-buying-biodiesel-may-be-a-gamble/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/03/05/study-buying-biodiesel-may-be-a-gamble/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/03/05/study-buying-biodiesel-may-be-a-gamble/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/03/b20pump.jpg" alt="b20 biodiesel pump" align="left" />If you ever buy <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/02/25/6-ways-to-find-and-use-biodiesel-anywhere-part-i/" title="6 Ways To Find And Use Biodiesel Anywhere">retail biodiesel</a> for your diesel vehicle, it turns out you might not be getting exactly what you paid for—or you may be getting quite a bit more.</p>
<p>In a new study, researchers from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution used highly accurate radiocarbon testing on samples from 20 different <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/">biodiesel</a> blenders to determine the biodiesel content of their fuel (so-called &#8220;splash blenders&#8221; mix pure biodiesel and diesel together before selling it at the pump).</p>
<h3><em><strong>The study found that blends sold as B20 <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/" title="Biodiesel Mythbuster">biodiesel </a>(20% biodiesel, 80% diesel) varied from 10% to 74% in actual biodiesel content.</strong></em></h3>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a huge problem for the industry,&#8221; says Teresa Alleman of the National  Renewable Energy Laboratory, who recently completed a <a href="http://nbb.grassroots.com/08Releases/NRELstudy/" title="http://nbb.grassroots.com/08Releases/NRELstudy/">study</a>  showing that biodiesel manufacturers have improved the overall quality of pure  biodiesel over the past year. If consumers pay a premium for biodiesel that they  aren&#8217;t getting, she says, public confidence could be shaken. Also, blenders  receive a tax credit based on the amount of biodiesel used, which could mean  some sellers have received larger credits than they merit.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/05/study-buying-biodiesel-may-be-a-gamble/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/03/05/study-buying-biodiesel-may-be-a-gamble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 640 queries in 1.249 seconds. -->