<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; synfuels</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/synfuels</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'synfuels'</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Canadian Enviro Minister: Carbon Capture &#8216;Feasible Presently&#8217;</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/21/canadian-enviro-minister-carbon-capture-presently-feasible/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/21/canadian-enviro-minister-carbon-capture-presently-feasible/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/21/canadian-enviro-minister-carbon-capture-presently-feasible/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/coal-plant-in-czech.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1290 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/coal-plant-in-czech.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<h4><strong> Did Canadian Environment Minister Jim Prentice speak too presumptively on Friday when he said the <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/31/dept-of-energy-to-provide-36-million-for-carbon-capture-projects/">capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide</a> is already proven and being applied on a commercial basis?</strong></h4>

<p>Speaking in the context of the recently agreed upon U.S.-Canada dialogue on clean energy and the upcoming Copenhagen round of climate talks, <em>The Canadian Press</em> <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gAPgmwTaO2FjlVltI-zspjQM0n6Q">reports</a> that Environment Minister JIm Prentice said that carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is a critical component of the energy equation that is currently being applied commercially &#8220;in enhanced oil recovery kinds of operations&#8221; and will be in the future.</p>
<p>Prentice was referring to the <a href="http://www.co2captureandstorage.info/project_specific.php?project_id=98">Weyburn oilfied project</a> owned and operated by EnCana which receives CO2 transported via pipeline from a lignite-fired coal-to-liquid fuel plant in North Dakota and injects it into underground reservoirs, thereby making the oil fields &#8220;more productive.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/21/canadian-enviro-minister-carbon-capture-presently-feasible/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/21/canadian-enviro-minister-carbon-capture-presently-feasible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Price of Oil Has Department of Defense Looking to Save Fuel</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>$1 per barrel increase in the price of oil costs U.S. $130 million</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/06/refueling.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-342" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/06/refueling.jpg" alt="Air Force jet refuels in mid-flight" width="500" height="300" /></a> Whenever I&#8217;m involved in a discussion about government waste and/or the politics of bureaucratic budgeting, I undoubtedly recount a story that usually leaves people nodding in agreement or shaking their head in disbelief. The story goes like this: A friend of mine we&#8217;ll call &#8220;Rob,&#8221; whom I used to work with during my summer breaks, was coming back to Massachusetts for an unexpected late-September visit. Rob had relocated to Pensacola, Florida where he was learning how to fly jets at the Naval Flight Training School. <strong>As Rob lifted the golf clubs out of the nose of the fighter jet he had just flown from Florida to Massachusetts for a one-day visit, he knew his trip was different</strong> - and he was a little uneasy about it.</p>
<p>You see, Rob&#8217;s day-long visit to play golf in Massachusetts was made possible by an officer (or officers) who rightly feared that ending up with a surplus of fuel at the end of that fiscal year would slash the budget for fuel in the next. Rob&#8217;s little visit was back in the early 1990s, but with today&#8217;s <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/14/opec-and-friends-want-oil-prices-to-behave-like-a-hot-air-balloon-not-a-bubble/">skyrocketing fuel prices</a>, and the added fuel demands of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the &#8220;largest single user of petroleum products in the world&#8221; is looking for ways to use less fuel - and more types of it.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/16/price-of-oil-has-department-of-defense-looking-to-save-fuel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 123 queries in 0.384 seconds. -->