<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; tax</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/tax</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'tax'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>5 Reasons Why We Don&#8217;t Need a Windfall Tax on Energy Firms</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/04/5-reasons-why-we-dont-need-a-windfall-tax-on-energy-firms/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/04/5-reasons-why-we-dont-need-a-windfall-tax-on-energy-firms/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Seall</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/04/5-reasons-why-we-dont-need-a-windfall-tax-on-energy-firms/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/160/345829246_a7434a76dc.jpg?v=0" alt="Tax by Phillip." width="265" height="260" align="left" />Campaigners are pressing the British government to impose a “windfall tax” on energy companies following record profit announcements in the past week from Shell (£7.9 / $15.5 billion) and British Gas parent firm Centrica (£2.97 / $5.8 billion).</p>
<p>Energy companies have become flush with cash following high margins from record oil prices and a government sponsored carbon permit give-away used to justify a consumer price hike.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/category/topics/energy" target="_blank">&#62;&#62;More on Energy from Red Green and Blue</a></strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Despite campaigners and Labour politicians describing recent profits as “grotesque” and “indecent”, and calling for additional taxes on recent gains to subsidize increasing household energy costs, there are several reasons why energy windfall taxes are fundamentally wrong, with the potential to worsen, and not improve the current energy crisis:</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/04/5-reasons-why-we-dont-need-a-windfall-tax-on-energy-firms/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/04/5-reasons-why-we-dont-need-a-windfall-tax-on-energy-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Green Tax Man: Good or Bad?</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/28/the-green-tax-man-good-or-bad/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/28/the-green-tax-man-good-or-bad/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Seall</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/28/the-green-tax-man-good-or-bad/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/04/pound-coin.jpg"><img height="230" alt="pound coin" src="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/04/pound-coin-thumb.jpg" width="297"></a> By many standards the UK Government is among the eco leaders of the world, with a clear commitment to make significant cuts in greenhouse emissions, numerous tax incentives for green behaviour, and longer term ambitions to reduce CO2 output by up to 80%.</p>
<p>However, actions speak louder than words, particularly the words of politicians.</p>
<p>When the British Government announced their most recent budget earlier this year, there was much applause from green groups after chancellor Alistair Darling announced almost draconian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/mar/12/budget.4x4s.greencars.exciseduty">increases in taxation on gas guzzling cars</a>. </p>
<p>But how effective are these taxes? Do we have a clear set of policies that are making a real difference, or is there some truth in accusations that governments are using a green agenda to raise additional tax revenue?</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/28/the-green-tax-man-good-or-bad/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/28/the-green-tax-man-good-or-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>5 Ways to Green Your Taxes</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/09/5-ways-to-green-your-taxes/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/09/5-ways-to-green-your-taxes/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/09/5-ways-to-green-your-taxes/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="tax.jpg" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/04/tax.jpg"><img src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/04/tax.jpg" alt="tax.jpg" align="left" /></a>It&#8217;s income tax time again.  Just like other special occasions, one would expect the green blogosphere to erupt in lists of eco-advice (see<a title="Permanent Link to Five Super-Simple Steps to Green Trick-or-Treating" rel="bookmark" href="http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/10/09/five-super-simple-steps-to-green-trick-or-treating/"> Five Super-Simple Steps to Green Trick-or-Treating</a> or <a title="Permanent Link to The 12 Green Days of Christmas" rel="bookmark" href="http://gavinhudson.greenoptions.com/2007/12/04/the-12-green-days-of-christmas/">The 12 Green Days of Christmas)</a>.   Since I can only think of one method to green up tax time (e-file), I will share my thoughts on income taxes and how they could/should benefit the environment instead of creating a list of 5 ways to green your taxes.</p>
<p>Unlike many people I know, I actually don&#8217;t mind paying taxes. The problem I have with taxes is that I don&#8217;t agree with how the money is spent by the government.  In return for my payment of taxes, I expect peace and health for<strong> all world citizens</strong>, as I do feel this is our responsibility as a wealthy nation engaged in a global economy.  These expectations are clearly tied to the environment, of which I expect my tax dollars to consider in every expense.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/09/5-ways-to-green-your-taxes/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/09/5-ways-to-green-your-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Plane Speaking. Lorries Too.</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/03/plane-speaking-lorries-too/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/03/plane-speaking-lorries-too/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pem Charnley</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/03/plane-speaking-lorries-too/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/02/london.jpg" title="london.jpg"><img src="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/02/london.jpg" alt="london.jpg" align="left" /></a>As EcoWorldly continues its theme with transport news and views from across the globe, two items have come to my attention here in the UK.</p>
<p><strong>Air Pollution</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/consultations_and_legislation/aviation/consult_aviation_duty.cfm">Aviation tax proposals</a> have been outlined by the government. Under the new guidelines, due to come into effect in November this year, it will be the planes, not the passengers, that will be taxed.</p>
<p>New Government figures released showed that emissions from air travel are continuing to rise. Between 1990 and 2006, emissions from aviation fuel use more than doubled.</p>
<p>21 per cent of the UK’s carbon emissions will be attributable to air traffic by 2050, and the Treasury report insisted the proposed tax system would, &#8220;introduce fairer duty, more in line with the environmental impact of flights, including the distance travelled&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/03/plane-speaking-lorries-too/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/03/plane-speaking-lorries-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Save the Environment: Tax the Babies!</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2007/12/10/save-the-environment-tax-the-babies/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2007/12/10/save-the-environment-tax-the-babies/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Offbeat]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2007/12/10/save-the-environment-tax-the-babies/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/baby-carbon-tax-47121014"><img src="http://ecoscraps.com/files/2007/12/happybaby.jpg" alt="happybaby.jpg" align="left" /><strong>&#8220;A professor of obstetrics in Australia has proposed an instantly controversial idea to put a tax on children, according to the Australian Broadcasting Corp.&#8221;</strong></a> (More on this one at <a href="http://www.planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/10/tax-babies-save-the-planet/">Planetsave</a>).</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2007/12/10/save-the-environment-tax-the-babies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 151 queries in 0.356 seconds. -->