<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; thomas sowell</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/thomas-sowell</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'thomas sowell'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Campaign Contributions Versus Lobbying: Big Oil Spends Big Money in Washington</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/20/campaign-contributions-versus-lobbying-big-oil-spends-big-money-in-washington/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/20/campaign-contributions-versus-lobbying-big-oil-spends-big-money-in-washington/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/20/campaign-contributions-versus-lobbying-big-oil-spends-big-money-in-washington/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/exxon-profits-and-climate-chan.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-733" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/08/exxon-profits-and-climate-chan.jpg" alt="Exxon Mobil profits and global warming" width="446" height="430" /></a>Big oil has been spending big money in Washington, but it may surprise you that <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/19/news/economy/oil_money/index.htm" target="_blank">gas and oil companies spend more money on corporate lobbying than individual campaign contributions</a>.  Why chose lobbying over campaign contributions?  Lobbying is more effective at crushing energy bills, as we have seen this year.  As <a href="http://www.votenader.org/" target="_blank">Ralph Nader</a> explains, &#8220;The corporate lobby in Washington is basically designed to stifle all legislative activity on behalf of consumers.&#8221;  It&#8217;s no coincidence that recently <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/18/senate-blocks-renewable-energy-tax-credits-billagain-sf-to-go-it-alone/" target="_blank">the Senate blocked the extension renewable energy tax credits</a>.</p>
<p>Thus far in 2008, <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2008&#38;indexType=i" target="_blank">oil and gas companies have spent $55,339,015 million on lobbying</a> in an effort to convince lawmakers to vote in the industry&#8217;s favor and against renewables.  Not surprisingly, the top spender is Exxon-Mobil.  At the current rate of spending, the industry is set to break last year&#8217;s record of $83 million. Big Oil defends this increased spending in response to more energy bills being on the &#8220;menu&#8221; and denies it is responsible for the failure of these bills; however, lobbying dollars speak for themselves. According to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/19/news/economy/oil_money/index.htm" target="_blank">CNN</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The oil industry may have not gotten its drilling wish list just yet, but so far they have been able to avoid higher taxes.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the renewable energy folks haven&#8217;t seen a big increase in funding.</p>
<p>Looking at the dollars spent lobbying Congress, that may not be surprising. The renewable industry and their allies in the environmental movement have spent a combined $19 million lobbying Congress this year - half what the oil industry has spent.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/20/campaign-contributions-versus-lobbying-big-oil-spends-big-money-in-washington/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/20/campaign-contributions-versus-lobbying-big-oil-spends-big-money-in-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>You&#8217;re Either with Us, or You&#8217;re with the CFLs</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/04/cfl1.jpg" alt="cfl1.jpg" width="515" align="left" /><strong>So, what&#8217;s the bigger danger to the American public: Al-Qaeda, or compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs)?</strong></p>
<p>If you follow the conservative punditry, online or off, it&#8217;s a tough call.  <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/fun/mallard.asp">Today&#8217;s (April 24) &#8220;Mallard Fillmore&#8221; comic strip</a> is just the latest example of <a href="http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#38;pageId=45407">conservatives</a> <a href="http://www.junkscience.com/ByTheJunkman/20070426.html">taking</a> <a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2008/04/16/political_crusaders">aim</a> at these energy-saving bulbs, focusing primarily on the fact that CFLs contain mercury.</p>
<p>So, for Mallard Fillmore author Bruce Tinsley,  Thomas Sowell, Rush Limbaugh (whose content is not publicly available) and the crowd at WorldNetDaily, let&#8217;s review the facts:</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 123 queries in 0.329 seconds. -->