A new report ranks ten leading world cities on their greenhouse gas emissions. It also examines how and why the emissions differ.

As the report says, over 50% of the world’s population lives in urban areas. Leading cities of the world, global cities, are the places where greenhouse gas emissions really need to be cut. The greenest city from the study is Barcelona and the worst is Denver.

Read more of this story »

Not Far From the Tree is a Toronto program that focuses on harvesting fruit from local trees in residential areas for the good of the community!

The mission of their fruit-picking program is to:

Read more of this story »

A man in Toronto with 13 prior wildlife crime convictions will serve time after being busted with “a plethora” of poached wildlife.

In a “precedent-setting” sentence, The Star has reported that Toronto-based Pak Sun Chung has been sentenced to 106 days plus an additional nine months in jail for two federal offenses under the Species at Risk Act. The judge also banned him from hunting or fishing in Ontario.

Repeat offender Chung was found this time with what is described as “a plethora of wildlife, alive, dead, and quartered.” He also reportedly has $27,000 in fines related to the 13 prior convictions. Chung was previously arrested twice for the same turtle poaching crime in less than six weeks during 2007.

Read more of this story »

Growing food in your own backyard is hardly a new concept, nor is utilizing any open space available if you live in the city, but turning your rooftop into a garden?  Well that idea has caught on in cities throughout the world, and now is starting to gain a foothold in the United States as well.

Rooftop gardens are by no means new.  Forward thinking, environmentally conscious, or penurious city dwellers have been doing it for as long as there have been city dwellers.  But recently the rooftop garden movement has started to gain some traction, inspired by the environmental benefit of more green space in a city (it reduces the “heat island” effect), and the appeal of home grown organic veggies just steps away have given the movement some serious traction.

Large metropolises across North America - including New York City, Washington DC, and Chicago have also sweetened the deal by offering tax incentives and subsidies to encourage green rooftops, and Toronto, Canada also has a new law requiring buildings of a certain size to have a green roof.  Though the Green Roof Bylaw in Toronto has garnered some criticism (mostly from developers) it has been well received by residents in the city as a means to increase the amount of green space, offset their carbon emissions, and generally to be a greener city.

Read more of this story »

Last year, 300 folks across North America turned in their car keys for a month as part of the 2008 Zipcar Low-Car Diet. And, in addition to cutting congestion, they also walked 85% more, biked 136% more and decreased their miles driven by 71%. Pretty impressive, eh? Starting July 15, a new crop of participants from all Zipcar cities worldwide* will begin the 2009 Low-Car Diet: one full month of living without a primary car.

Zipcar will be selecting 30 participants in each Zipcar metro to take part in the 2009 Low-Car Diet. Zipcar and its partners are committed to providing all participants with the necessary tools for creating transportation nirvana, including:

• Bike rentals
• Transit passes
• Complimentary meals at participating restaurants
• Discounts at local retailers
• And, of course, a 1-year Zipcar membership with some driving credit to get started

There will be a number of applicants for only 30 spaces, and Zipcar would like to make sure they’re the best. If you think you’d like to try an unconventional diet just fill out this short survey.

*Zipcar cities include Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, London, New York City, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, Toronto, Vancouver, and Washington, DC.

Photo Courtesy tvol via Flickr under Creative Commons license.

Disclaimer: Gas2.0 parent company Virgance is participating in the Low-Car Diet.

The City of Toronto’s Planning and Growth Committee met earlier this week to discuss the proposed and highly controversial ‘Green Roof’ by-law. A green roof is partially or completely covered with vegetation and soil that has been planted over a waterproof layer. The benefits of these roofs include reduced energy use, reduced storm water runoff, and increased longevity of the roof by protecting it from natural elements.

The original version of the by-law would have made green roofs mandatory in new construction of condos higher than 7 storeys and office or retail complexes greater than 54,000 square feet beginning in 2010. The law was to require 30-60% of subjected buildings’ roofs to be green (depending on the size of the building) and violators would be subject to fines up to $100,000.

Read more of this story »

North of the border a controversy is starting to gain steam in the nation’s largest city, Toronto. The city has proposed a by-law that would make ‘green roofs’ mandatory in new construction of condos higher than 7 storeys and office or retail complexes greater than 54,000 square feet (about 1/4 of a Wal-Mart Supercenter). The proposed law would require 30-60% of the surface area of buildings’ roofs to be green (depending on the size of the building) and violators would be subject to fines up to $100,000.

Read more of this story »

I spent the first night of my summer vacation in a bed-and-breakfast in Toronto with my family.  (Yes, I blogged while on vacation.  That’s what happens when free wireless is available everywhere and you have obsessive-compulsive disorder.)  We drove from Chicago in our Toyota Camry.  It’s not exactly a Prius, but while averaging about 30 MPG, we had a smaller carbon footprint than we would if the three of us traveled by plane.  We brought most of our own meals and snacks in reusable containers, printed out travel and maps on previously used paper, and reused our water bottles.  So we thought we were being green.  But a morning walk around Toronto made us feel only light green, at best.

Read more of this story »

“We won’t meet our ambitious targets if we don’t have the support of every Torontonian and every Toronto-based business,” said David Miller, Toronto’s mayor, at the Green Living Show last Friday.

Read more of this story »

In spite of this, Lorraine Gauthier, co-founder of the socially-conscious Toronto design studio Work Worth Doing, has identified a housing type which offers a high degree of consistency across a large number of homes: post-war housing. Post-war homes, built to accommodate returning WWII veterans, are still a part of the landscape throughout Canada and the United States, and many of these aging homes have poor energy performance. By assembling a team of designers and other sustainable building experts to retrofit a single home in the Toronto area (as part of an undertaking known as the Now House™ project), it is hoped that a formula can be created and then applied to literally millions of homes.

Read more of this story »

Streets are for People sponsored this anti-car petition on an actual car in Ontario.

We the undersigned do hereby demand that not one more dollar go to promote, support, or perpetuate car culture. We want bike lanes, public transit and a train system. We want our public space back. We want local food, clean air, sustainable industry, a liveable future for our children, and an end to oil wars. We want to dance in the street. We want a government that values life over money.

Over 4,000 people have signed the car.

Via:  Spacing Toronto

Image: Peyton Chung

What do Singapore, Oslo, Toronto, and London have in common? They are among a number of cities to adopt traffic-reducing legislation. Popularly known as congestion charging, this legislation aims to improve the health of urban areas.

If your city suffers from congestion, stuffiness, poor air quality, slow public transportation, and irritating gridlock, you may be able to benefit your community by recommending congestion charging to your local officials.

What wouldn’t we give for clean air, less asthma and lung and heart disease, safer streets, and a healthy environment? But these are only a few of the perks of pushing for this legislation in your hometown or city.

Toronto commuters can now get home from work twice as fast (and surely with fewer bumper-to-bumper headaches). Londoners enjoy lower fairs on better-funded public transportation and a 20% drop in polluting carbon emissions, which will benefit health as well as the environment. In Melbourne, 86% of motorists said that the toll enabled them to get around the city more easily. Even in Norway’s Trondheim, where congestion charging met with initial resistance, public approval climbed from 26% to 64% in the first four years after the legislation was implemented. In other words, by all accounts this is exceedingly popular and effective legislation. (Commission for Integrated Transportation)

Here’s where we come in. We all know that the United States is the biggest per capita emitter of climate-altering CO2 and that much of this pollution comes from the vehicles we drive. As Environmental Defense puts it, “If U.S. cars and light trucks were a country, they would be the fifth most polluting nation in the world.” Now we can hang our heads, count our toes, and feel guilty, or we can do something much more interesting and exciting. And this is where the fun starts.

Contact your local mayor and city council to let them know how great it would be to see a congestion charge implemented in your city. This is a great chance to improve funding for city streets and public transportation, benefit the physical health of your city’s residents, reduce the number of auto deaths and injuries each year, clean your air, fight global warming, and do it all by getting involved in the governance of your city. It’s good, old-fashioned activism in a positive, inspiring way.

Some more good news: you may find more support than you would think for congestion charging in your city or town. Across the U.S., municipal leaders are already showing willingness to look for ways to reduce carbon emissions. Over 500 city mayors have already signed the U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. Congestion charging is a great way to meet their climate goals (and yours).

Other Eco-Creativity Opportunities

If a congestion charge doesn’t feel quite right to you, consider what other solutions your city could find to its traffic troubles and pollution problems. In Trento, Italy, my Trentino friends tell me, cars take turns sharing the road: one day only cars with odd-numbered license plates are allowed on the road, followed by cars with even-numbered plates. Because Trento is in a valley, auto exhaust pollution poses an even more serious health risk, so this legislation helps keep people healthy and drivers happily traffic-free.

Another solution is to leave letter writing behind and join a local bicycle group and turn your commuting and errands into healthy and fun bike rides. This accomplishes traffic calming as well with one less car.

Taking Activism International

The London congestion charge has succeeded in improving public transportation, safeguarding health, cleaning the air and environment with reduced CO2 and particulate emissions, made commuting easier, and become more even popular today than it was when it was first signed into law.

However, the U.S. Embassy decided several years ago to stop paying this road charge, angering city officials and causing general international unrest. While this is nothing particularly new for U.S. foreign relations, wouldn’t it be nice if for once we could just get along with the rest of the world? (This story was the subject of an article by my fellow blogger, Heidi Strebel: “London Mayor Wants to Crush American Ambassador for Refusing to Pay.”)

So here’s another great activism opportunity. Feel free to contact Ambassador Robert Tuttle by phone at 442074999000 ext. 2211, or at the following address, to request politely that the U.S. Embassy repay its accrued debt to the London government and resume its payment of the London Congestion Charge. Always remember that when you call or write someone to take action, kindness and courtesy are important attributes. There’s an old adage that you catch more bees with honey than with vinegar. Personally, I would think that pollen or flowers would work best, but who am I to rewrite wisdom?

Before you contact the U.S. Embassy in London, you can also listen to both the argument of the London city Mayor, Ken Livingstone, who insists that the U.S. Embassy settle its tab with the city, as well as the defense of U.S. Minister David Johnson that the “charge” should be considered a “tax,” which would exempt foreign officials from obligation.

Ambassador Robert Tuttle
Embassy of the United States in London
24 Grosvenor Square
London, W1A 1AE
United Kingdom

Dear Ambassador Tuttle,

Sir, I just read a news article about your unwillingness to pay the London congestion charge on any of the vehicles used by the American Embassy in London. I understand your concern that the Embassy not be subject to foreign taxes in accordance with the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. However, it is in the best diplomatic interest of Americans at home and abroad that the American Embassy in London comply with the city of London and pay the congestion charge, which is, after all, a charge and not a tax.

It is of the utmost importance to Americans at home and abroad that ambassadors of this country build a positive political image. In order to maintain a positive image, the American Embassy and its employees must perform their duties with a sense of responsibility for the city and the country where they work. Flouting city laws and angering elected city officials is definitely not good press for America, especially when the law being broken concerns the health of local residents.

The London congestion charge is designed to benefit and protect the residents of London. Health officials, like the American Lung Association, are quick to remind us of the obvious connection between car exhaust and respiratory and cardiovascular health. By reducing the number of commuter vehicles used daily, the congestion charge helps to reduce harmful air pollution. Among the congestion charge’s other contributions to London are safer city streets with 38% fewer private cars, better public transit through much-increased ridership, 2 billion pounds a year to serve the city, and a 20% reduction of carbon emissions, according to Mayor Livingston’s office.

By ignoring the congestion charge, the American Embassy undermines this important legislation, which helps to protect the health and wellbeing of London residents. It is doubly surprising that the American Embassy should show such little respect for laws governing the capitol city of England, which has been a steadfast supporter of American interests.

I respectfully ask you, Sir, to consider the best interests of London residents and the good image of the United States of America, which you represent abroad, and to comply with the London congestion charge.

Sincerely,

Happy Activism!

Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fictiondreamer/523447351/