<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; University of California</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/university-of-california</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'University of California'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>DOE Funds $27.6 Mill. Study of CO2 Storage in Wake of Tar Sands Pipeline Approval</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/24/doe-funds-276-mill-study-of-co2-storage-in-wake-of-tar-sands-pipeline-approval/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/24/doe-funds-276-mill-study-of-co2-storage-in-wake-of-tar-sands-pipeline-approval/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/24/doe-funds-276-mill-study-of-co2-storage-in-wake-of-tar-sands-pipeline-approval/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/08/doe-logo.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3547" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/08/doe-logo.jpg" alt="DOE funds studies to use geologic methods of carbon storage after approving tar sands pipeline." width="265" height="264" /></a>The Department of Energy (DOE) announced today it will fund <a href="http://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/2009/08/24/3/" target="_blank">$27.6 million for next generation carbon capture</a> methods using geologic storage. The funding includes monitoring and evaluating CO2 storage, including risk assessment and verification of sequestration.  Suspiciously, this announcement follows on the heals of last week&#8217;s <a href="http://action.sierraclub.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=126201.0" target="_blank">State Department&#8217;s approval of a pipeline</a> from <a href="http://gas2.org/2009/02/01/football-field-sized-trucks-headed-to-canadian-tar-sands-with-superloads/" target="_blank">Canada&#8217;s tar sands</a> to the United States.  The <a href="http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/aug2009/2009-08-21-091.asp" target="_blank">1,000 mile crude oil pipeline</a> will run from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin.</p>
<p>19 projects will be funded by the DOE. <a href="http://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/2009/08/24/3/" target="_blank">John Litynski</a>, sequestration division director at DOE&#8217;s National Energy Technology Laboratory, explains:</p>
<blockquote><p>These projects represent specific areas in monitoring CO2, both in the subsurface and at the surface, that helps to meet our goals to account for 99 percent of CO2 once it&#8217;s injected.  We&#8217;ve actually been doing monitoring for quite a while &#8212; ever since the program started 10 years ago, but we&#8217;ve been doing some field activities with the regional partnerships and now we want to make an effort to start looking at verification and accounting protocols after the field work. We&#8217;ve selected the new projects to fill in the gaps.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/24/doe-funds-276-mill-study-of-co2-storage-in-wake-of-tar-sands-pipeline-approval/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/24/doe-funds-276-mill-study-of-co2-storage-in-wake-of-tar-sands-pipeline-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Growing Plastic: A New Use for Biomass</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Wojnovich</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interesting Ideas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Manufacturing]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1505" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/06/miscanthus.jpg" alt="A field of miscanthus, one of several crops grown to produce biomass" width="240" height="180" />In the constant push for ever newer and greener technology and energy, we sometimes forget that it is often both simpler and cheaper to revisit old techniques in new ways. And that’s exactly what <a href="http://newscenter.lbl.gov/feature-stories/2009/06/11/replacing-petros-with-biomass/" target="_blank">a group of researchers in California</a> has done.</h4>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>UC Berkeley Report Says Global Warming Could Put $2.5 Trillion of California Real Estate at Risk</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/11/california-global-warming-cnynfreelancer.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1600" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/11/california-global-warming-cnynfreelancer.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A new report says that  <a title="global warming" href="http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2230552/climate-change-put-5tr-real" target="_blank">global warming could cost the Californian economy billions of dollars each year</a>, through a combination of rising sea levels, and the increased frequency of wild fires and extreme weather events.</strong></p>
<p><a title="california" href="http://www.nextten.org/pdf/report_CCRR/California_Climate_Risk_and_Response.pdf" target="_blank">The comprehensive study</a> (PDF), published by researcher&#8217;s at UC Berkeley, also claims that $2.5 trillion of Californian real estate assets are at risk. The clear message, says co-author Prof. David Roland-Holst, is the strong economic case for timely action to slash carbon emissions and adapt to the already unavoidable effects of climate change.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our report makes clear the most expensive thing we can do about climate change is nothing,&#8221; he said. &#8220;As we learned in New Orleans, turning your back on the threat of natural disaster doesn’t make it go away.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/14/uc-berkeley-report-says-global-warming-could-put-25-trillion-of-california-real-estate-at-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What Does Economic Populism Mean For The Green Economy?</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/files/2008/10/warren.jpg"></a></p>
<h3><img class="reflect" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3030/2841297240_0cc4e2209d.jpg?v=0" alt="warren_buffet_when_the_tides_run_out by One Trick Pony in FlickR." width="212" height="382" />Economic Populism appears to be back in vogue. Given the<a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/15/economy-in-recession-the-cost-of-allowing-lehman-brothers-to-fail/" target="_blank"> fall of Lehman Brothers</a> and the Wall Street machine, the economic banter clearly seems to be &#8220;the people&#8221; versus &#8220;the <a title="Elite" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite">elites</a>.</h3>
<h3></h3>
<p>Economic populism involves an economic philosophy urging social and political system changes. In the current political and economic climate, the public concern over the inequity of wealth appears to be at a peak. There is a growing call by Senator <a title="Socialism vs. Capitalism" href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/22/election-coundown-socialism-vs-capitalism/" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a> and democrats to raise taxes on the wealthy to shrink the wealth gap. But is it true that the rich are getting richer? Or are the rich actually in danger of losing a significant portion of the nation&#8217;s wealth? Are the democrats worried about a problem that’s already being fixed by the markets?</p>
<p><strong>Emmanuel Saez</strong>, the income-share expert and economics professor at the <strong>University of California, Berkeley</strong> told <strong>Robert Frank of the Wall Street Journa</strong>l that during the Great Depression, the income and wealth of the top 1% of society fell drastically. (<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2008/10/22/why-the-rich-are-losing-their-share-of-wealth/?mod=loomia&#38;loomia_si=t0:a16:g4:r1:c0:b0" target="_blank">Read here for the full story)</a>. If history is to be believed then this will happen again especially if Obama becomes president.
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 178 queries in 0.485 seconds. -->