<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Unobtanium</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/unobtanium</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Unobtanium'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>New Levels of LEED</title>
    <link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/</link>
    <comments>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip Proefrock</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Programs and Standards]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/greenbuildingelements/files/2008/04/bengal-kittens-print-c10084151.jpeg" alt="Modular kitten insulation" align="top" /></p>
<p>A new top-level LEED classification called Unobtanium is being proposed to replace the currently proposed Protactinium level, leading to a possible schism in the growing green building rating system.  Whether Protactinium or Unobtanium becomes the new top-level of the LEED rating system&#8230;?</p>
<p>Earlier this year, officials proposed a new level of LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) that is higher than the current top-end Platinum rating.  The new Protactinium level introduces more stringent requirements to ensure the purity of the design team and to verify their worthiness to obtain such a noble rating for their building.
<p><a href="http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 95 queries in 0.294 seconds. -->