<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; uranium mining</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/uranium-mining</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'uranium mining'</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>French Elite Leads the World in Pushing Nuclear Technology: Having Technical Hiccups or Fatal Flaws?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/19/french-elite-leads-the-world-in-pushing-nuclear-technology-having-technical-hiccups-or-fatal-flaws/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/19/french-elite-leads-the-world-in-pushing-nuclear-technology-having-technical-hiccups-or-fatal-flaws/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Green Topics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/19/french-elite-leads-the-world-in-pushing-nuclear-technology-having-technical-hiccups-or-fatal-flaws/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/nuclearplants.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4704" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/nuclearplants.jpg" alt="huntz at Flickr under a Creative Commons license" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>There is a controversial decision to be made in Maryland soon regarding a nuclear reactor that might be built there. Similar to reactors being built in Finland that British and Finnish regulators are finding problems with, this reactor would be built largely by a French nuclear technocratic elite who are operating in a questionable and risky way.</p>
<p>The project in Maryland is a 4.5 billion dollar deal that is trying to skirt public service regulation. Thanks in part to a regional coalition, the <a href="http://www.safeenergymd.org/">Chesapeake Safe Energy Coalition (CSEC)</a>, and their ability to get 650 petition signatures sent to the Public Service Commission (PSC), the nuclear business elite are running into responsible and practical decision-making that will give more public accountability.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.safeenergymd.org/french/090502mschneidernukefrance.pdf">An in-depth report</a> of the history of nuclear technology in France that leads into the situation today was completed by international nuclear expert and consultant Mycle Schneider in May of this year. There are many issues put forth in this paper that are discussed in great detail and with appropriate connection to various global issues (i.e. issues regarding political conflict and the environment). Six key points from the report are introduced below:</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/19/french-elite-leads-the-world-in-pushing-nuclear-technology-having-technical-hiccups-or-fatal-flaws/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/19/french-elite-leads-the-world-in-pushing-nuclear-technology-having-technical-hiccups-or-fatal-flaws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Uranium Tailings Removed From Moab Site</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-4528" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/moab-tailings/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4528" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/06/moab-tailings.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="135" /></a><strong></strong></p>

<p><strong>Desert spreads endlessly beyond the horizon, where crystalline azure meets rusted bronze. This is red rock country. Moab, Utah is known for its breathtaking scenery. Red rock arches, labyrinth-like canyons, the clever Colorado River. This paradise permeates the soul and the soil.  But something else sleeps in the soil: uranium tailings.</strong></p>
<p>Uranium was discovered near Moab in the early 1900s, but it wasn&#8217;t significantly mined until 1952 when Charlie Steen, a geologist, discovered large quantities of uranium in Lisbon Valley, south east of Moab. Enough Uranium was mined that a sign in town declared that Moab was &#8220;The Uranium Capitol of the World!&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/uranium-tailings-removed-from-moab-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Challenge to the Nuclear Industry:  Honest Questions Require Honest Answers</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/challenge-to-the-nuclear-industry-honest-questions-require-honest-answers/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/challenge-to-the-nuclear-industry-honest-questions-require-honest-answers/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/challenge-to-the-nuclear-industry-honest-questions-require-honest-answers/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: center"><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/07/nuclear-reactor.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2730 alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/07/nuclear-reactor-300x187.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="187" /></a></h3>
<h3 style="text-align: center"><span style="text-decoration: underline">My Issues and Support of Nuclear Power</span></h3>
<p>In the past year or so I&#8217;ve been writing articles in opposition to the proliferation of nuclear power stations, not only in the United States, but in the world.  The responses have been enlightening, intelligent, pedestrian and downright rude.</p>
<p>In each case, the respondents seem to have either missed my general point, or ignored it altogether in order to make their point that nuclear power is clean and safe.  So I want to go on record, again, that in and of itself, a nuclear power generating station does not pollute the air with toxic smoke and chemicals.  In a limited sense it&#8217;s &#8220;clean&#8221;.  That, I support, but there&#8217;s more to consider.</p>
<p>My entire case revolves around the mining, processing and storage of spent uranium and radioactive materials, the effects they have on the environment and the people who populate it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no secret that many people around the world are afraid of nuclear energy, partially because of the Chernobyl disaster, but also the stories of miners and their families who have been affected by radiation during their lives, and still live in &#8220;dirty&#8221; areas.  The move to build a hundred or more nuclear power facilities in the coming years means more mining, milling and production of highly toxic, radioactive waste.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/challenge-to-the-nuclear-industry-honest-questions-require-honest-answers/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/challenge-to-the-nuclear-industry-honest-questions-require-honest-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Uranium Contaminated Soil at Grand Canyon School District Playgrounds?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/uranium-contaminated-soil-at-grand-canyon-school-district-playgrounds/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/uranium-contaminated-soil-at-grand-canyon-school-district-playgrounds/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/uranium-contaminated-soil-at-grand-canyon-school-district-playgrounds/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: center"><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/07/grand_canyon.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2723" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/07/grand_canyon.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="312" /></a></h3>
<h3 style="text-align: center"><span style="text-decoration: underline">Putting an Old Dog to Rest&#8230;Hopefully</span></h3>
<p>For years, there have been rumors, and concerns, about playground areas at the Grand Canyon School District, located inside the park, being contaminated with radioactive soil from old uranium mines in the area.</p>
<p>I talked with park Public Affairs Officer Maureen Oltrogge, and she said that an investigation is underway to determine if there is contaminated soil in the playground areas.  Oltrogge said the park has no records of any company dumping radioactive dirt there, so they&#8217;ve contracted with a geotechnical engineering company to test the area and make a final decision.  She said the test results should be in by the end of the year.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/uranium-contaminated-soil-at-grand-canyon-school-district-playgrounds/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/uranium-contaminated-soil-at-grand-canyon-school-district-playgrounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Is The Colorado River Becoming Radioactive from Upstream Uranium Mines?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/is-colorado-river-becoming-radioactive-from-upstream-uranium-mines/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/is-colorado-river-becoming-radioactive-from-upstream-uranium-mines/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/is-colorado-river-becoming-radioactive-from-upstream-uranium-mines/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center">
<h3 style="text-align: center"><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/06/colorado_river_grand_canyon.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2628" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/06/colorado_river_grand_canyon.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="332" /></a></h3>
<h3 style="text-align: center"><span style="text-decoration: underline">It All Depends On Who You Ask</span></h3>
<h4 style="text-align: center"><span style="text-decoration: underline"><strong>Las Vegas Water Offical Warns Radioactive Levels Rising</strong></span></h4>
<p>Sunday&#8217;s news was a bit disconcerting, when I read a small story at <a href="http://www.mohavedailynews.com/articles/2008/06/22/news/state/state6.txt">Tri-State Online</a>.  Pat Mulroy, head of the Southern Nevada Water Authority was quoted as saying measurable quantities of uranium are showing up in Colorado River water, something difficult and expensive to remove before passing it on to consumers in Las Vegas.</p>
<p>She blames upstream uranium mining, especially in the Moab, Utah area, so I decided to take a look and see what&#8217;s happening up there.</p>
<p>To the best of my knowledge, there are no operating uranium mines in or near Moab, UT, or anywhere in the state of Utah.  So, I felt Ms. Mulroy was referring to the uranium mill tailings just outside Moab, where they&#8217;ve been for decades after the failure of the Atlas Minerals Corporation mill.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/is-colorado-river-becoming-radioactive-from-upstream-uranium-mines/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/is-colorado-river-becoming-radioactive-from-upstream-uranium-mines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Uranium Mining Claims in Grand Canyon Area Ordered Withdrawn</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/uranium-mining-claims-in-grand-canyon-area-ordered-withdrawn/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/uranium-mining-claims-in-grand-canyon-area-ordered-withdrawn/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/uranium-mining-claims-in-grand-canyon-area-ordered-withdrawn/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/06/grand_canyon1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2625" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/06/grand_canyon1-300x187.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="187" /></a>For the 5th time in history, the House Natural Resources committee invoked its authority and ordered the Bush administration to stop mining claims in the Grand Canyon.  The measure was urged by Arizona Congressman Raul Grijalva of Tucson, chair of the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forest and Public Lands.</p>
<p>The withdrawal halts thousands of mining claims in national forest areas surrounding the Grand Canyon amid fears that resumption of uranium mining presents a danger to drinking water for some 25 million people in the southwest.</p>
<p>Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano had requested that Interior Secretary Kempthorne withdraw the Grand Canyon area from mining.  The request was denied on the grounds that Congress must make the request.</p>
<p>The four previous emergency withdrawal authority requests were authored by Rep. Morris Udall, who was Chairman of the House Interior Committee.</p>
<p>Will the Bush administration abide by this authority, or is Bush still &#8220;the decider&#8221;?</p>
<p>Source:  Press Release from <a href="http://www.sierraclub.org/">The Sierra Club</a></p>
<p>Image Credit:  www.inetours.com/…/ Tours/Grand_Canyon_7739.jpg</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/uranium-mining-claims-in-grand-canyon-area-ordered-withdrawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Does Sen. John McCain Approve of Proposed Uranium Mines Near the Grand Canyon?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/21/how-does-sen-john-mccain-stand-on-proposed-uranium-mines-near-the-grand-canyon/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/21/how-does-sen-john-mccain-stand-on-proposed-uranium-mines-near-the-grand-canyon/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/21/how-does-sen-john-mccain-stand-on-proposed-uranium-mines-near-the-grand-canyon/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/06/grand_canyon.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2604" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/06/grand_canyon.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="312" /></a></h3>
<h3><span style="text-decoration: underline">An Open Letter to Senator John McCain, Presumptive Republican Presidential Candidate</span></h3>
<p>This hit me the other day; how does the Republican Presidential Candidate-in-Waiting view the possible mining of uranium just 3 miles from the Grand Canyon?</p>
<p>Senator John McCain (R-AZ) knows the canyon well, he&#8217;s reportedly hiked it a number of times, knows where the only <a href="http://grandcanyontreks.org/orphan.htm">uranium mine</a> that operated there is located, yet has said nothing about the 1000 or more permits being sought to explore for uranium near the park.  I&#8217;ve searched his Senate website, news reports on the issue and his name is nowhere to be seen.  Why is that?
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/21/how-does-sen-john-mccain-stand-on-proposed-uranium-mines-near-the-grand-canyon/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/21/how-does-sen-john-mccain-stand-on-proposed-uranium-mines-near-the-grand-canyon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Navajo Fight Against New Uranium Mines Explained, on The Lindberg Report</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/30/navajo-fight-against-new-uranium-mines-explained-on-the-lindberg-report/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/30/navajo-fight-against-new-uranium-mines-explained-on-the-lindberg-report/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Lindberg Report]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/30/navajo-fight-against-new-uranium-mines-explained-on-the-lindberg-report/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/insituleach.jpg" title="insituleach.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/04/insituleach.jpg" alt="insituleach.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>As I stated in an earlier <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/19/navajos-say-no-to-new-uranium-mines-on-tribal-lands/">article</a>, the Navajo Nation is challenging the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in a Federal appeals court, over proposed in <em>situ leach</em> uranium mining on tribal lands.  It&#8217;s the first time in history that the NRC will be challenged in court for its approval of a source materials license for an in <em>situ leach</em> uranium mine.</p>
<p>The Navajo communities of Crownpoint and Church Rock are represented by the New Mexico Environmental Law Center (NMELC), Eastern Navajo Dine against Uranium Mining (ENDAUM) and Southwest Research and Information Center (SRIC).   They are demanding that a New Mexico mining company, Hydro Resources, Inc., stay off tribal lands.</p>
<p>Eric Jantz, a lawyer with the NMELC, spent some time with me, explaining the lawsuit and that organization&#8217;s role in other uranium related issues.  I asked him for a briefing on the litigation.</p>
<p>This post contains additional media. <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/30/navajo-fight-against-new-uranium-mines-explained-on-the-lindberg-report/">Click here to view the full post</a>.</p>
<p>Image:  <a href="http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf27.html">World Nuclear Association</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/30/navajo-fight-against-new-uranium-mines-explained-on-the-lindberg-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/eric-jantz-final.mp3" length="8910054" type="audio/mpeg" />
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Chernobyl Nuclear Meltdown Anniversary on The Lindberg Report</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/25/chernobyl-nuclear-meltdown-anniversary-on-the-lindberg-report/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/25/chernobyl-nuclear-meltdown-anniversary-on-the-lindberg-report/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Other Green Topics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Lindberg Report]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/25/chernobyl-nuclear-meltdown-anniversary-on-the-lindberg-report/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/chernobyl.jpg" title="chernobyl.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/04/chernobyl.jpg" alt="chernobyl.jpg" /></a>April 26 marks the 22nd anniversary of the 1986 nuclear accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Slavutych, Ukraine.  That one incident resulted in hundreds and possibly thousands of deaths, lingering health issues, radioactive contamination of a wide swath of land, property losses and on-going clean-up costs totaling billions of dollars.The <a href="http://www.ua-ea.org">Ukranian-American Environmental Association</a> sent out a release reminding everyon of the risks of nuclear power.</p>
<p>I spoke with Kenneth Bossong, co-director of UAEA, about the anniversary, and asked him to tell us more about his organization.</p>
<p>This post contains additional media. <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/25/chernobyl-nuclear-meltdown-anniversary-on-the-lindberg-report/">Click here to view the full post</a>.</p>
<h6>National Geographic Photo</h6>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/25/chernobyl-nuclear-meltdown-anniversary-on-the-lindberg-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/bossong-final.mp3" length="4575399" type="audio/mpeg" />
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>75% of Greens OK with Nuclear Power [redux]</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/18/75-of-greens-ok-with-nukes/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/18/75-of-greens-ok-with-nukes/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/18/75-of-greens-ok-with-nukes/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="nuke-poll.png" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/04/nuke-poll.png"><img class="alignleft" style="float: left;margin-left: 2px;margin-right: 2px" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/04/nuke-poll.png" alt="nuke-poll, nuclear power, public opinion" /></a>[<em>Update 11.9.2008: Over the last several days, thousands of <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/10/protests-turn-violent-in-germany-as-train-loaded-with-nuclear-waste-rolls-through-countryside/">environmental activists in Germany</a> have blocked and delayed a train carrying nuclear waste from France into the country to be stored in an old salt mine. The story reminded me that there is still substantial opposition to nuclear power, despite the fact that it has been touted by many as an essential component of our energy mix because nuclear power generates little in the way of greenhouse gas emissions. The story also reminded me of the following post. </em>]</p>
<p>This past spring we conducted a <a href="http://discuss.greenoptions.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&#38;t=462&#38;start=10&#38;st=0&#38;sk=t&#38;sd=a">reader poll</a> that concluded with some rather unexpected results. Nearly 75 percent of the respondents believe that nuclear power is good because it is a source of &#8220;abundant carbon free energy.&#8221; Granted, this simple reader&#8217;s poll with an admittedly minute <em>n</em> of 133 is not a statistical representation of  the public attitude of any particular group of people. But attitudes towards nuclear power have undergone a palpable shift amongst self-identified environmentalists in recent years. The change is especially striking considering that the anti-nuclear cause had been one of the core issues for the environmental movement for almost four decades.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/18/75-of-greens-ok-with-nukes/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/18/75-of-greens-ok-with-nukes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Legislation Introduced to Prohibit Uranium Mining Near Grand Canyon</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/03/17/legislation-introduced-to-prohibit-uranium-mining-near-grand-canyon/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/03/17/legislation-introduced-to-prohibit-uranium-mining-near-grand-canyon/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Green Topics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/03/17/legislation-introduced-to-prohibit-uranium-mining-near-grand-canyon/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/03/grijalva.jpeg" title="grijalva.jpeg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/03/grijalva.jpeg" alt="grijalva.jpeg" /></a>Arizona Congressman Raul Grijalva has introduced legislation to withdraw approximately one million acres near the Grand Canyon from mineral exploration under the 1872 Mining Act.</p>
<p>In a news release, the Congressman was quoted as saying:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>“I was pleased to introduce this legislation which will forever protect the  magnificence of the Grand Canyon and the people who live near and in the Canyon  from damaging uranium mining,” said Rep. Grijalva. “The federal government and  mining companies still have not adequately dealt with the clean up of old  uranium mine sites on the Navajo Nation and other areas that are causing ongoing  health problems. Until these issues are resolved, we should not move forward  with new mines, especially next to the crown jewel of our National Park  System.”</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The legislation came on the heels of a news story regarding exploratory drilling for uranium within a few miles of the Grand Canyon&#8217;s South Rim, a popular tourist destination.</p>
<p>Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano has requested the Bush administration to use it&#8217;s executive powers to withdraw areas in the vicinity of the Grand Canyon from mining.</p>
<p>The bill calls for protection of 628,000 acres in the Kanab Creek area, 112,655 in House Rock Valley and 327,886 acres in the Tusayan Ranger District of the Kaibab National forest south of the canyon.</p>
<p>A Congressional field hearing will be held on March 28th in the Flagstaff, AZ City Hall.  Local elected officials, Tribal representatives, Grand Canyon area business and environmental representatives and uranium experts are expected to attend the hearing.</p>
<p>The legislation, The Grand Canyon Watersheds Protection Act of 2008 (H.R. 5583) has been referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.  Congressman Grijalva serves on that committee.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/03/17/legislation-introduced-to-prohibit-uranium-mining-near-grand-canyon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Grand Canyon Area is Next for Uranium Exploration</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/07/the-grand-canyon-area-is-next-for-uranium-exploration/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/07/the-grand-canyon-area-is-next-for-uranium-exploration/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/07/the-grand-canyon-area-is-next-for-uranium-exploration/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/02/grand-canyon-mather1.jpg" title="grand-canyon-mather1.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/02/grand-canyon-mather1.jpg" alt="grand-canyon-mather1.jpg" /></a>I was going through the headlines, just waiting for something to drag me out of my lethargy, and it happened.  The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/washington/07canyon.html?ref=business">New York Times</a> posted a headline reading &#8220;Uranium Exploration Near Grand Canyon&#8221;, and that excited my first bit of exercise for the day;  the hair stood up on the back of my neck.</p>
<p>What an outrage!  But, before going on, I must say it isn&#8217;t the first time they&#8217;ve mined uranium in the Kaibab National Forest, near the Grand Canyon. That stopped when the price of uranium plummeted more than two decades ago.</p>
<p>Now, with the resurgence of interest in building new reactors across the country, the miners and prospectors are out again.  Which I find rather interesting since the United States and Russia just signed an agreement allowing Russia to sell uranium to the United States.  I gotta think about that one.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/07/the-grand-canyon-area-is-next-for-uranium-exploration/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/07/the-grand-canyon-area-is-next-for-uranium-exploration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Uranium Woes on Indian Nation Lands, an Interview with Marilyn Berlin Snell</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/24/uranium-woes-on-indian-nation-lands-an-interview-with-marilyn-berlin-snell/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/24/uranium-woes-on-indian-nation-lands-an-interview-with-marilyn-berlin-snell/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental &amp; Climate Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/24/uranium-woes-on-indian-nation-lands-an-interview-with-marilyn-berlin-snell/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/01/marilyn-snell.jpg" title="marilyn-snell.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/01/marilyn-snell.jpg" alt="marilyn-snell.jpg" /></a>How much do we really know about the damage done to lives and property by more than 50 years of uranium mining and milling in the Navajo and Hopi Indian Nations?   I didn&#8217;t know very much until I read three articles by Marilyn Berlin Snell in the Sierra Club Magazine.</p>
<p>Marilyn was chief editor when she wrote the stories, <a href="http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/200801/powerhungry/index.asp">Power Hungry</a>, <a href="http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/200801/powerhungry/clouds.asp">Gathering Clouds</a> and<a href="http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/200801/powerhungry/justice.asp"> Frontier Justice-in a Good Way</a>.  Wanting to know more, I picked up the phone and was honored with a few moments of her time.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/24/uranium-woes-on-indian-nation-lands-an-interview-with-marilyn-berlin-snell/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/24/uranium-woes-on-indian-nation-lands-an-interview-with-marilyn-berlin-snell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/01/snell.mp3" length="9164904" type="audio/mpeg" />
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 481 queries in 1.017 seconds. -->