<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; US Geological Survey</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/us-geological-survey</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'US Geological Survey'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Yosemite&#8217;s Large Trees See A Decline Of 24%</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/10/yosemites-large-trees-see-a-decline-of-24/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/10/yosemites-large-trees-see-a-decline-of-24/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/10/yosemites-large-trees-see-a-decline-of-24/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/08/wawona_tree_yosemite_ca.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3617" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/08/wawona_tree_yosemite_ca.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="380" /></a></p>

<p>The number of large-diameter trees in Yosemite National Park have declined 24-percent between the 1930s and 1990s.</p>
<p>The findings are based on a study done by the <a href="http://www.usgs.gov/">U.S. Geological Survey</a> and the University of Washington. Scientists compared tree densities from 1932-1936 to those from 1988-1999 where large-diameter trees are those with a diameter greater than three feet.</p>
<p>Along with large-diameter tree loss, they also found a shift to fire-intolerant trees. Amazingly, this shift was experienced in areas that hadn&#8217;t seen a wildfire in nearly a century. Trees changed from fire-tolerant ponderosa pines to fire-intolerant white fir and incense cedar. In burned areas, however, the pines remained dominant.
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/10/yosemites-large-trees-see-a-decline-of-24/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/10/yosemites-large-trees-see-a-decline-of-24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Geothermal Sources Could Add Significant Power Generation Capacity</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/08/geothermal-sources-could-add-significant-power-generation-capacity/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/08/geothermal-sources-could-add-significant-power-generation-capacity/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tom Schueneman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/08/geothermal-sources-could-add-significant-power-generation-capacity/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/10/geothermal_plant.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1265" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/10/geothermal_plant.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="282" /></a>A study released last week from the U.S. Geological Survey  reports that geothermal power production could  significantly add to electric power generating capacity within the United States.</h3>
<p>The first <a href="http://www.environmental-expert.com/resultEachPressRelease.aspx?cid=7699&#38;codi=37887&#38;idproducttype=8&#38;level=0" target="_blank">national geothermal assessment</a> done in 30 years by a governmental agency, the report indicates that the U.S. has &#8220;identified conventional&#8221; sources of geothermal systems that, if fully developed, are capable of generating 9,057 megawatts-electric (MWe). An additional 30,033 MWe of potential power generation is available from &#8220;conventional undiscovered&#8221; geothermal sources, and 517,800 MWe  from unconventional <a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/egs_technology.html" target="_blank">Enhanced Geothermal Systems</a> (EGS) or high temperature, low-permeability resources.</p>
<p>By developing the already known conventional sources, the reports says, geothermal electric power production could expand 260%, adding 6,500MWe to the total of slightly more than 2,500 MWe currently generated.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve heard a lot about drilling for oil offshore and in Alaska as a means to increase our domestic sources of energy, but the clamor for &#8220;drill now&#8221; has overshadowed the significant contribution geothermal can contribute to our domestic &#8220;energy portfolio&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/08/geothermal-sources-could-add-significant-power-generation-capacity/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/08/geothermal-sources-could-add-significant-power-generation-capacity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 126 queries in 0.346 seconds. -->