<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; U.S. presidential race</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/us-presidential-race</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'U.S. presidential race'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Beyond Talking Points and Spin: Group Seeks Presidential Debate on Science</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/06/beyond-talking-points-and-spin-group-seeks-presidential-debate-on-science/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/06/beyond-talking-points-and-spin-group-seeks-presidential-debate-on-science/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/06/beyond-talking-points-and-spin-group-seeks-presidential-debate-on-science/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/06/beyond-talking-points-and-spin-group-seeks-presidential-debate-on-science/the-white-house/' rel='attachment wp-att-2141' title='The White House'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/02/white-house.jpg" alt='The White House' /></a>If a U.S. presidential debate on science and technology sounds too wonky for words, think again. That&#8217;s the message supporters of <a href="http://www.sciencedebate2008.com">Science Debate 2008</a> are trying to hammer home.</p>
<p>Science and technology not only contribute greatly to the nation&#8217;s bottom line (about half of U.S. gross domestic product over the past century, according to the group), but represent &#8220;what may be the most important social issue of our time,&#8221; the group&#8217;s organizers claim.</p>
<p>&#8220;When you think about it, nearly every major challenge the next president will face has a science or technological component,&#8221; said Lawrence M. Krauss, an astrophysicist at Case Western Reserve University and a member of the Science Debate 2008 steering committee.</p>
<p>Those challenges include <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/29/focus-the-nation-on-global-warming/">climate change</a>, the future of the <a href="http://ecoscraps.com/2008/02/06/todays-recipe-garbage-soup/">Earth&#8217;s oceans</a>, fresh water supplies, drought, renewable energy research, the threat of global pandemics, the rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria, bioethics, energy policy and ensuring scientific integrity in government.</p>
<p>So far, nearly 75 institutions and 12,000-plus individuals have signed on as supporters of a presidential science debate. They include the National Academy of Sciences; Friends of the Earth; Science Magazine; Marcia McNutt, president and CEO of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute; and Will Steger, a polar explorer and developer of the <a href="http://www.globalwarming101.com">Global Warming 101</a> initiative.</p>
<p>Science Debate 2008 organizers hope to soon start formally inviting the presidential candidates, and have tentatively scheduled a debate for sometime in mid-April.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/06/beyond-talking-points-and-spin-group-seeks-presidential-debate-on-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 92 queries in 0.318 seconds. -->