<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; usda</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/usda</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'usda'</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Healthier Fast Food?  Try In N&#8217; Out Burger</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/11/22/healthier-fast-food-try-in-n-out-burger/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/11/22/healthier-fast-food-try-in-n-out-burger/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Chappell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[local food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nutrition and health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/11/22/healthier-fast-food-try-in-n-out-burger/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2588" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/11/in-n-out-cheeseburgers.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>In N Out is a burger chain on the West Coast with locations in California, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona.  They&#8217;ve been around since 1948 and have long prided themselves on good, fresh food.  Their menu is delectably simple - hamburger, cheeseburger, fries, and shakes.  That&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a conscientious food consumer, eating fast food probably isn&#8217;t even on your radar, but at In N Out fast food isn&#8217;t synonymous with bad food or huge portions.  The USDA recommends consuming no more than 6 ounces of meat a day (see <a href="http://www.health.gov/DIETARYGUIDELINES/dga2000/document/build.htm">website</a>), and in an age when fast food joints are routinely putting half a pound or more of meat in their burgers, In N Out hamburger patties are a refreshingly small 2 ounces.</p>
<p>At In N Out, a meal of a cheeseburger and french fries is only 880 calories (800 total if you omit the Thousand Island-esque spread from the burger), significantly less than the 1000+ calorie combo meals pitched by other fast food franchises.  You can look at the <a href="http://www.in-n-out.com/nutritional_info.asp">Nutritional Information</a> for In N Outs&#8217; various products.  And not only is the above meal short on calories, but also on price.  A cheeseburger, fries, and beverage will run you just $5.</p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/11/22/healthier-fast-food-try-in-n-out-burger/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/11/22/healthier-fast-food-try-in-n-out-burger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>School Lunch Reform and a Food Critic&#8217;s Take on Chicken Nuggets</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/21/school-lunch-reform-and-a-food-critics-take-on-nuggets/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/21/school-lunch-reform-and-a-food-critics-take-on-nuggets/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kim Ukura</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Farmers Market Fare]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nutrition and health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/21/school-lunch-reform-and-a-food-critics-take-on-nuggets/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2009/10/nuggets.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2454" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/10/nuggets.jpg" alt="chicken nuggets" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<h4>Chicken nuggets. Taco salad. Pizza. Cartons of milk. Hot dogs. Mystery meat. These foods were all staples of my elementary and high school cafeterias, despite clear guidelines about the nutritional benefits for school meals. Efforts to reform school lunch got a boost Tuesday when Institute of Medicine of the National Academies released <a href="http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/School-Meals-Building-Blocks-for-Healthy-Children.aspx">&#8220;School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children,&#8221; a report of recommendations for how to reform school lunch</a>.</h4>
<p>The report was <a href="http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB?contentidonly=true&#38;contentid=2009/10/0516.xml" target="_blank">requested by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)</a> in order to help align the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs with the most recent set of dietary guidelines for Americans. Current school lunches must meet guidelines set in 1995, but nutritional knowledge has progressed since then, and <a href="http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/School-Meals-Building-Blocks-for-Healthy-Children/Fact-Sheet-School-Meals.aspx" target="_blank">the report tries to address those changes</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/21/school-lunch-reform-and-a-food-critics-take-on-nuggets/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/21/school-lunch-reform-and-a-food-critics-take-on-nuggets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Stimulus Money Used To Buy Pork - Literally</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/14/stimulus-money-used-to-buy-pork-literally/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/14/stimulus-money-used-to-buy-pork-literally/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Chappell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/14/stimulus-money-used-to-buy-pork-literally/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2428" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/10/pig-farmer.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="337" /></p>
<p>The US Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, announced last month plans to use an additional $30 million dollars to purchase pork in 2009 for federal food and nutrition assistance programs.</p>
<p>This announcement comes as the USDA has already spent some $151 million of Recovery Act (widely known as the &#8220;stimulus&#8221;) money to purchase pork products.  To me there&#8217;s always a bit of irony when pork barrel money is spent to purchase actual pork, as is the case here.  You can read the <a title="website" href="http://www.fns.usda.gov/cga/PressReleases/2009/PR-0420.htm" target="_blank">USDA Press Release here</a>.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s theoretically nothing wrong with using taxpayer money to support pork producers who are struggling with a glut of supply and lagging demand, as well as slower sales due to the economic conditions in the US.  But since a majority of pork producers in the US are huge CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations), essentially your tax money is being used to bail out pork producers who are having a slow year.</p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/14/stimulus-money-used-to-buy-pork-literally/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/10/14/stimulus-money-used-to-buy-pork-literally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>4 Wolves Gunned Down By Feds Near USDA Sheep Experiment Station</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/09/4-wolves-gunned-down-by-feds-near-usda-sheep-experiment-station/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/09/4-wolves-gunned-down-by-feds-near-usda-sheep-experiment-station/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhishja Larson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/09/4-wolves-gunned-down-by-feds-near-usda-sheep-experiment-station/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-4253" href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/09/4-wolves-gunned-down-by-feds-near-usda-sheep-experiment-station/wolf-snow/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4253" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/10/wolf-snow.jpg" alt="Wolf image for article about USDA killing wolves near Sheep Experiment Station" width="500" height="314" /></a></p>
<h3>Aerial sharpshooters with the U.S. Department of Agriculture have killed four wolves in Montana for preying on sheep in the secretive Sheep Experiment Station.</h3>
<p>The last four wolves of the Sage Creek Pack were gunned down this week by USDA aerial sharpshooters, after the wolves had been targeted for preying on sheep in the 100,000+ acre USDA Sheep Experiment Station (USSES) west of Yellowstone National Park.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/09/4-wolves-gunned-down-by-feds-near-usda-sheep-experiment-station/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/09/4-wolves-gunned-down-by-feds-near-usda-sheep-experiment-station/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Know Your Farmer, Know Your Food:  Significant Fresh Visions from the USDA</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/09/18/know-your-farmer-know-your-food-significant-fresh-visions-from-the-usda/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/09/18/know-your-farmer-know-your-food-significant-fresh-visions-from-the-usda/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Kivirist</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[local food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nutrition and health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/09/18/know-your-farmer-know-your-food-significant-fresh-visions-from-the-usda/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2009/09/johngarlic.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2301" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/09/johngarlic.jpg" alt="" width="288" height="216" /></a>A visionary, inspiring image:  “Know Your Farmer, Know Your Food.”</p>
<p>No, this isn’t some crunchy, organic non-profit’s local food campaign or a new Slow Food slogan.  This message comes to us fresh from our United States Department of Agriculture.  <a href="http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB?contentidonly=true&#38;contentid=2009/09/0440.xml">“Know Your Farmer, Know Your Food”</a> is a national effort collectively launching this week, designed to build vibrant local and regional food systems that provide healthful food and build the economic base of rural communities.  It showcases the importance of the connection between us and our food sources and includes $65 million in new funding initiatives.</p>
<p>The fact that this message comes from the USDA represents the fresh crop of vision under the Obama Administration.  Thanks to the efforts of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/usda">USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack</a> and Deputy Secretary Kathleen Merrigan, there’s a new ingredient at the USDA that has the potential to cook up something big:  leadership.  Harvesting inspiration from back in 1862 when Abraham Lincoln established the USDA as the “People’s Department,” this week’s collective efforts takes a transforming perspective on the relationship between our food and us:  personal responsibility.
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/09/18/know-your-farmer-know-your-food-significant-fresh-visions-from-the-usda/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/09/18/know-your-farmer-know-your-food-significant-fresh-visions-from-the-usda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Watermelon Juice &#8212; Next Source of Renewable Energy</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/27/watermelon-juice-next-source-of-renewable-energy/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/27/watermelon-juice-next-source-of-renewable-energy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/27/watermelon-juice-next-source-of-renewable-energy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/08/watermelon2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3223" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/08/watermelon2.jpg" alt="" width="451" height="500" /></a><br />
<strong>Hundreds of thousands of tons of watermelons are tossed every year because they aren&#8217;t good enough for market. A new study finds that the juice from these watermelons could easily be used to create the biofuel ethanol and other helpful products.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/27/watermelon-juice-next-source-of-renewable-energy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/27/watermelon-juice-next-source-of-renewable-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Nature of &#8220;Natural&#8221;</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/the-nature-of-natural/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/the-nature-of-natural/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steve Savage</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Food &amp; Drink]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/the-nature-of-natural/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/07/whole-foods.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4736" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/07/whole-foods.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p>If you go to the Organic Consumers Association <a title="OCA" href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/642/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27537" target="_blank">website</a> you will see that they are upset about the way that stores like <a title="Whole Foods" href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/01/28/whole-foods-market-bagging-profit-for-purpose/" target="_blank">Whole Foods</a> market products as &#8220;natural.&#8221;  They believe (and they are probably right) that consumers will confuse this with &#8220;Organic.&#8221;  In fact there are no real rules about what can be called &#8220;natural&#8221; and savvy marketers have realized that almost everyone likes the concept of &#8220;natural&#8221; and they have tapped into that for selling power.</p>
<p>The problem for the Organic community is that their own, highly regulated farming system is also built on the concept of &#8220;natural.&#8221;  I have a good friend who was on the board of CCOF (California&#8217;s organic certification leader) back in the days when the definition of &#8220;USDA Organic&#8221; was being hammered out (1990-2002).  He explained that one reason it took so long was that there was a philosophical struggle between the Organic stalwarts who wanted it to be driven by what was &#8220;natural&#8221; and by the <a title="USDA" href="http://gas2.org/2008/05/22/usda-says-ethanol-accounts-for-only-3-of-increased-cost-of-food/" target="_blank">USDA</a> that wanted to bring some science into what was safest and best for the environment.  The &#8220;natural&#8221; voices prevailed.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/the-nature-of-natural/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/the-nature-of-natural/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>An &#8220;Inconvenient Truth&#8221; about Composting</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/an-inconvenient-truth-about-composting/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/an-inconvenient-truth-about-composting/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steve Savage</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/an-inconvenient-truth-about-composting/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left"><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/07/compost.jpg"><span style="color: #551a8b"><br />
</span></a><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/07/compost.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4742" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/07/compost.jpg" alt="Commercial Scale Composting" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left"></p>
<p>Composting is a really <a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/06/06/want-to-curb-global-warming-start-recycling-and-composting" target="_blank">green</a> thing to do, right? I&#8217;ve always thought so since my Grandfather taught me to do it in the early sixties. Large-scale composting is getting to be quite the rage. The<a title="SF Food Policy" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/11/game-on-san-francisco-board-of-supervisors-oks-mandatory-recycling/" target="_blank"> City of San Francisco</a> attracted a great deal of attention with it&#8217;s mandatory food scrap recycling program and lots of local <a title="Red Tail Ridge" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/18/red-tail-ridge-poised-to-be-finger-lakes-greenest-winery/" target="_blank">wineries</a> are bragging about their use of that compost to fertilize their vineyards.</p>
<p>I just read today about how the <a title="Village Compost" href="http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/news/4509774.Council_plans_for_village_compost/" target="_blank">Langley Parish Council</a> in England is setting up a village compost and &#8220;set an example to small villages as the UK strives to battle climate change.&#8221;  Unfortunately, I recently learned that they and San Francisco and the Napa wineries might actually be doing is contributing to climate change.</p>
<p>Climate change science often ends up challenging things we think we know.</p>
<p><strong>Inconvenience<br />
</strong></p>
<p>The idea of composting is to provide plenty of moisture and oxygen so that microbes will digest the easily available organic matter and generate a great deal of metabolic heat in the process.  What is left at the end is a sterilized source of more resistant organic matter that can enrich a soil. <a class="aligncenter" title="FAO on Composting" href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5104e/y5104e07.htm" target="_blank"></a></p>
<p><a title="FAO on Composting" href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5104e/y5104e07.htm" target="_blank"><br />
Composting</a></p>
<p>of wastes is done with very good intentions, but there is the inconvenient truth that even a very well run large-scale compost operation emits some <a title="EPA Methane Site" href="http://www.epa.gov/methane/" target="_blank">methane</a>.</p>
<p>But if you stop to think about it, as much as you intend to have oxygen available to the whole pile (aerobic conditions), there are definitely going to be micro-sites that are going to lack oxygen (anaerobic conditions) particularly when there is huge oxygen demand during the peak of the process. That is where methane gets made.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/an-inconvenient-truth-about-composting/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/07/27/an-inconvenient-truth-about-composting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US Energy and Ag Departments Providing $6.3M for Specialized Biofuels Research</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/07/23/us-energy-and-ag-departments-providing-63m-for-specialized-biofuels-research/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/07/23/us-energy-and-ag-departments-providing-63m-for-specialized-biofuels-research/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cellulosic ethanol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/07/23/us-energy-and-ag-departments-providing-63m-for-specialized-biofuels-research/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3022 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/07/chu_nobel.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="339" /></p>

<p>US Department of Energy secretary <a href="http://www.facebook.com/stevenchu" target="_blank">Steven Chu</a> and US Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack have announced that the two agencies will be providing $6.3 million dollars for 7 projects at research institutions throughout the US to improve the use of plant feedstocks in biofuel production.</p>
<p>Although biofuels have fallen out of favor in the public eye recently, the federal government — led by Secretary Chu — is still forging ahead with providing money to research next generation biofuels.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Part of the solution to the energy problem will be home-grown energy crops,&#8221; said secretary Chu in a statement. &#8220;These projects will help us unlock the true potential of advanced biofuels, decrease our dependence on foreign oil, and create new jobs and a thriving biofuels industry in America.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/07/23/us-energy-and-ag-departments-providing-63m-for-specialized-biofuels-research/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/07/23/us-energy-and-ag-departments-providing-63m-for-specialized-biofuels-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Midst Senate Rebuttles, USDA Reports Benefits of Climate Change Legislation</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/midst-senate-rebuttles-usda-reports-benefits-of-climate-change-legislation/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/midst-senate-rebuttles-usda-reports-benefits-of-climate-change-legislation/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/midst-senate-rebuttles-usda-reports-benefits-of-climate-change-legislation/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/farm.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4741" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/farm.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="463" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Much has been said in opposition to the cap and trade climate legislation that is currently on the Senate&#8217;s plate. <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/public-advocacy-group-says-no-go-on-climate-bill/" target="_blank">Opponents have argued repeatedly</a></strong><strong> that the legislation will do nothing but increase the cost of energy, which will force companies send jobs over seas, where labor is cheaper, in order to keep up with production demands. Senator Kit Bond (R-Missouri) even went as far as to call </strong><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/15/cap-and-trade-climate-bill-is-a-pig-in-a-poke/" target="_blank"><strong>the Waxman-Markey Bill &#8220;a pig in a poke.&#8221;</strong></a></p>
<p>A few days ago another Senator challenged the bill, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Senator Mike Johanns (R-Nebraska) said, &#8221;USDA knows what cap and trade will do to energy prices&#8230;Let me repeat that: USDA says energy prices will increase, but they think the opportunities from climate legislation will likely outweigh the costs.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/27/gops-boehner-calls-climate-bill-ridicilous-pile-of-sht/" target="_blank">So we&#8217;ve heard from opponents.</a> But what about proponents? What does the USDA have to say for itself?</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/midst-senate-rebuttles-usda-reports-benefits-of-climate-change-legislation/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/midst-senate-rebuttles-usda-reports-benefits-of-climate-change-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Raining Rose Set For The 4th</title>
    <link>http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/06/19/raining-rose-set-for-the-4th/</link>
    <comments>http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/06/19/raining-rose-set-for-the-4th/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Simonetta</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/06/19/raining-rose-set-for-the-4th/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest post by John Simonetta, owner of Proforma Simonetta Freelance, an eco-friendly promotional items consultancy (see <a href="http://www.proformagreen.com/">proformagreen.com</a>). John’s blogs are designed to keep us up to date on the “greening” of his industry.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2009/06/fourth-of-july-1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1709" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecopreneurist/files/2009/06/fourth-of-july-1-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Raining Rose - the first in the promotional items industry to offer a USDA certified organic promotional lip balm - is getting ready for the 4th of July celebrations in the US by releasing three new lip balm wraps ready for the addition of your company&#8217;s logo and contact information.</p>
<p>Many lip balms claim to be organic but the  USDA certified organic promotional lip balm from Raining Rose is the only promotional lip balm I know of that is certified to put the USDA seal on their high quality product.</p>
<p>Why? Let&#8217;s look at the ingredients: organic palm oil, organic beeswax, organic extra virgin olive oil, organic essential oil of peppermint, organic hemp seed oil, organic essential oil of spearmint, vitamin E.  That is it.</p>
<p>Raining Rose also offers a standard SPF 15 and SPF 30 lip balm which are 66% organic and come in a numbers of flavors such as Iced Pear, Cherry, Citrus, Coconut, Grape, and Lemonade. (FYI - Lemonade ingredients would be organic palm oil, beeswax, organic extra virgin olive oil, flavor or essential oil, organic hemp seed oil, vitamin E, rosemary extract.)</p>
<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2009/06/fourth-of-july-3.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1711" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecopreneurist/files/2009/06/fourth-of-july-3-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>All Raining Rose products are made in the USA and made on location in their FDA audited facility. All products have their ingredients listed on the <a href="http://www.lipbalmcompany.com">Raining Rose website</a> (try that, Kraft Foods). <a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/02/24/video-raining-rose-lip-balm-company/">All casings are made from 30% biodegradable plastic</a>. And if you are ASI, PPAI or SAGE and want to test out their products <a href="http://www.lipbalmcompany.com/information/">just ask</a>.</p>
<p>For <span>ecopreneurists wanting a lip smacking summer marketing tool these customizable lip balms are a great idea. Clients really seem to appreciate their quality and Raining Rose can print labels with any artwork that you can design. Plus they offer a number of <a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/04/26/spring-is-here-smell-the-raining-roses/">theme templates</a>, like these 4th of July labels. </span></p>
<p><span>Ecopreneurists </span><span>will find these products are great giveaways at trade shows, festivals, concert events, company picnics, beach events, you name it.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2009/06/fourth-of-july-2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1710" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecopreneurist/files/2009/06/fourth-of-july-2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>EQP on standard lip balms is $0.90 at 5,000 units. EQP on the USDA certified organic promotional lip balm is $1.90 also at 5,000. Minimum runs for each are as few as 250 units.</p>
<p>If you are in the promotions business contact <a href="mailto:lisa@rainingrose.com">Lisa Wagner</a> at Raining Rose for more information on their products and special wraps for the 4th of July. If you are interested in these items to promote your own business contact your local promotional items vendor or email <a href="mailto:info@proformagreen.com">info@proformagreen.com</a> for information and pricing.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2009/06/billboard.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1712" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecopreneurist/files/2009/06/billboard.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="142" /></a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/06/19/raining-rose-set-for-the-4th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What&#8217;s On My Food? Searchable Database Reveals Toxicology of Pesticide Residue</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/06/18/whats-on-my-food-searchable-database-reveals-toxicology-of-pesticide-residue/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/06/18/whats-on-my-food-searchable-database-reveals-toxicology-of-pesticide-residue/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gina Munsey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/06/18/whats-on-my-food-searchable-database-reveals-toxicology-of-pesticide-residue/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2017" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/06/jekrub.jpg" alt="Pesticides on Food" width="500" height="375" />You&#8217;ve likely heard of <a href="http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/index.php?nothanks=1" target="_blank">Skin Deep</a>, the cosmetic safety database which lists the toxicity of ingredients in personal care products.  But did you know there is now a similar database for food?</p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/06/18/whats-on-my-food-searchable-database-reveals-toxicology-of-pesticide-residue/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/06/18/whats-on-my-food-searchable-database-reveals-toxicology-of-pesticide-residue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>USDA Announces $50 Million in Grants for Farmers to Switch to Organic Practices</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/05/13/usda-announces-50-million-in-grants-for-farmers-to-switch-to-organic-practices/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/05/13/usda-announces-50-million-in-grants-for-farmers-to-switch-to-organic-practices/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Chappell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[food policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/05/13/usda-announces-50-million-in-grants-for-farmers-to-switch-to-organic-practices/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2009/02/irrigation-reduced.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1647" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/02/irrigation-reduced.jpg" alt="Irrigation Over Crops" width="500" height="343" /></a></p>
<h4>The US Department of Agriculture recently announced that $50 million in grant money was being made available to farmers who wanted to switch from conventional to organic farming practices.  USDA Agriculture Deputy Secretary Kathleen Merrigan made the announcement last week of the grant money being made available.</h4>
<p>The funding for the program is through the Environmental Quality Incentives Program and fulfills an Obama administration promise to encourage organic farming practices.  It could also be a first step in organic agriculture gaining a more widespread acceptance in the federal government and within the farming community.</p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/05/13/usda-announces-50-million-in-grants-for-farmers-to-switch-to-organic-practices/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/05/13/usda-announces-50-million-in-grants-for-farmers-to-switch-to-organic-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>President Obama: $800 Million for Biofuels and Flex-Fuel Vehicles</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joanna Schroeder</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Cellulosic ethanol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Flex Fuel Vehicles (FFV)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" style="vertical-align: middle" src="http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2009/04/03/president_obama_and_ag_secretary_vilsack.jpg" alt="" width="525" height="294" /></p>
<p>Yesterday was a big day for the biofuels industry. President Obama issued a presidential directive to the USDA to expand access for biofuels that includes $800 million to fuel biofuels research. The purpose of the directive, in part, is to aggressively accelerate the investment and production of biofuels. What the directive does not do, is set dollars aside to help improve the infrastructure for higher ethanol blends including E85 although it encourages production of more <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/08/11/beyond-obama-a-biofuel-stimulus-for-president/">flex-fuel vehicles</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">This announcement appears to be serious, at least as serious as a government proclamation can really be&#8211; they created another committee to oversee that the presidential directive. The USDA, EPA and DOE will form a Biofuels Interagency Working Group with a mission to increase energy independence in part through the development of the nation&#8217;s first comprehensive biofuels market development program.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/05/06/president-obama-800-million-for-biofuels-and-more-flex-fuel-vehicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Victory at the USDA:  Three Reasons Why the People’s Garden Matters to Us All</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/23/victory-at-the-usda-three-reasons-why-the-people%e2%80%99s-garden-matters-to-us-all/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/23/victory-at-the-usda-three-reasons-why-the-people%e2%80%99s-garden-matters-to-us-all/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Kivirist</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Day]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[local food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/23/victory-at-the-usda-three-reasons-why-the-people%e2%80%99s-garden-matters-to-us-all/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2009/04/peoplegarden.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1843" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/04/peoplegarden.jpg" alt="" width="80" height="58" /></a><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2009/04/peoplesgardenlayoutsmall.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1844" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/04/peoplesgardenlayoutsmall.jpg" alt="" width="80" height="70" /></a>America received an Earth Day gift today wrapped in national significance and organic pea tendrils.  Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, <a href="http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB/.cmd/ad/.ar/sa.retrievecontent/.c/6_2_1UH/.ce/7_2_5JM/.p/5_2_4TQ/.d/1/_th/J_2_9D/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB?PC_7_2_5JM_contentid=2009%2F04%2F0121.xml&#38;PC_7_2_5JM_parentnav=LATEST_RELEASES&#38;PC_7_2_5JM_navid=NEWS_RELEASE#7_2_5JM">declared</a> the entire six-acres grounds of the Whitten Building, the mammoth marble USDA headquarters on the Mall in Washington D.C., as “The People’s Garden.”  Goodbye grass, hello edible greens.</p>
<p>Today’s act builds on initial plans unveiled back on February 12, when Vilsack announced the People’s Garden concept on Abraham Lincoln’s birthday.  “Abraham Lincoln founded the Department of Agriculture in 1862, referring it to the ‘People’s Department,’” explains Rose Hayden-Smith, a <a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/05/15/planting-patriotism-recreating-the-victory-gardens-for-modern-times/">garden historian</a> and <a href="http://www.foodandsocietyfellows.org/fellows.cfm?id=101910">Kellogg Food and Society Policy Fellow</a>.  “The name of this new garden reflects the inspiring significant shift on the federal level in championing homegrown produce, rekindling the Victory Garden era for modern times.”</p>
<p>The new People’s Garden will be 1,300 square feet (slightly larger than the White House Garden, for those counting) and will include a rotation of crops, beginning with spring plantings such as peas, lettuce and kale.</p>
<p>This garden represents more than trendy edible landscaping.  Here are three reasons why these plantings cultivate inspiration and meaning for us all:
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/23/victory-at-the-usda-three-reasons-why-the-people%e2%80%99s-garden-matters-to-us-all/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/23/victory-at-the-usda-three-reasons-why-the-people%e2%80%99s-garden-matters-to-us-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>5 Myths About Food Safety Act HR 875 Debunked</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/07/5-myths-about-food-safety-act-hr-875-debunked/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/07/5-myths-about-food-safety-act-hr-875-debunked/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Derek Markham</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/07/5-myths-about-food-safety-act-hr-875-debunked/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1792" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/04/farm.jpg" alt="food safety" width="500" height="354" /></p>
<p>There has been a lot of <a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/03/10/could-the-food-safety-modernization-act-of-2009-be-the-end-to-farmers-markets-and-organic-farms/" target="_blank">fear and hysteria surrounding the Food Safety Modernization Act</a> (HR 875) coming from small growers, organic gardeners, and organic consumers alike. HR 875 was introduced by Congresswoman Rosa L. DeLauro, Connecticut, &#8220;to separate food safety regulation from drug and device approvals and to restore the balance that has long been missing at Health and Human Service.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/07/5-myths-about-food-safety-act-hr-875-debunked/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/07/5-myths-about-food-safety-act-hr-875-debunked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate Republicans Criticize USDA Nominee Merrigan for Organic Ties</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/07/senate-republicans-criticize-usda-nominee-merrigan-for-organic-ties/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/07/senate-republicans-criticize-usda-nominee-merrigan-for-organic-ties/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/07/senate-republicans-criticize-usda-nominee-merrigan-for-organic-ties/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/04/farm.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2905" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/04/farm.jpg" alt="Senate Republicans concerned with Merrigan\'s organic ties" width="500" height="368" /></a>President Obama has nominated <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/usPoliticsNews/idUKTRE51M7QM20090224" target="_blank">Kathleen Merrigan</a> for deputy secretary of agriculture, the number two post at the Department of Agriculture.  Merrigan, an assistant professor and the Director of the Agriculture, Food and Environment Program at Tufts University, helped develop the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE51M7QM20090223" target="_blank">USDA&#8217;s rules on organic food</a> during the Clinton administration.</p>
<h3>Merrigan has been hailed by sustainable agriculture advocates, like the <a href="http://hosted.vresp.com/353028/281ccb13e0/207/dd589eaa40/" target="_blank">National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition</a>; however, Senate Republicans are concerned with her organic ties.</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/07/senate-republicans-criticize-usda-nominee-merrigan-for-organic-ties/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/07/senate-republicans-criticize-usda-nominee-merrigan-for-organic-ties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Obama&#8217;s Administration Refuses to Halt Production of Monsanto&#8217;s Genetically-Modified Roundup-Ready Sugar Beets</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/06/obamas-administration-refuses-to-halt-production-of-monsantos-genetically-modified-roundup-ready-sugar-beets/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/06/obamas-administration-refuses-to-halt-production-of-monsantos-genetically-modified-roundup-ready-sugar-beets/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gina Munsey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[food policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/06/obamas-administration-refuses-to-halt-production-of-monsantos-genetically-modified-roundup-ready-sugar-beets/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2009/10/sugarbeet.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2500" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/10/sugarbeet.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a>Recent data showing <a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/01/sugar-popularity-grows-as-backlash-to-high-fructose-corn-syrup/" target="_self">sugar&#8217;s rising popularity</a> over high fructose corn syrup is good news, right?  Not if that sugar is genetically-modified.  In fact, if you&#8217;ve purchased beet sugar recently, there&#8217;s a very good chance that you&#8217;ve unintentionally consumed a genetically-modified product. Industry statistics show that more than half of the <a href="http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_16766.cfm" target="_blank">sugar beets grown in the US in 2008</a> were genetically-modified varieties.</p>
<p>If that isn&#8217;t enough to make you cringe, consider the following: most of those engineered beets were Roundup-resistant, courtesy of agri-tech giant <a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/03/03/eu-upholds-austria-hungarys-right-to-ban-genetically-modified-mon-810-maize/" target="_self">Monsanto</a>.  Last autumn under the Bush administration, the USDA approved the Monsanto seed <em>without </em>preparing a standard <a href="http://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/nepa/nepaeqia.htm" target="_blank">Environmental Impact Statement</a>.   But certainly President Obama, with an <a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/03/31/the-influence-of-obamas-organic-garden-grows/" target="_self">organic garden on the White House Lawn</a>, would have done things differently.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t he?</p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/06/obamas-administration-refuses-to-halt-production-of-monsantos-genetically-modified-roundup-ready-sugar-beets/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/04/06/obamas-administration-refuses-to-halt-production-of-monsantos-genetically-modified-roundup-ready-sugar-beets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>An End to Local Meat Sources?</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/12/an-end-to-local-meat-sources/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/12/an-end-to-local-meat-sources/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leslie Berliant</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food &amp; Drink]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/12/an-end-to-local-meat-sources/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/03/two-tagged-cow_irish-typepad-300x225.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4292" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/03/two-tagged-cow_irish-typepad-300x225.jpg" alt="two-tagged cow" width="300" height="225" /></a>I am obsessed with farms and farmers markets. People that read my work probably know that by now. Did I mention that I sometimes go to three different farmers markets in a single week? One of the things I love is that in addition to fruits and veggies, my local farmers markets have vendors selling milk and cheese, whole chickens, eggs of various types and sizes, pork and beef. I don’t eat most of that stuff, but I love that it is there and that it comes from local farms.</h3>
<p>Soon, however, there may not be meat at farmers markets, or meat raised by small farmers, at all. That’s because of the roll out of the National Animal ID System (NAIS), requiring farmers to attach radio frequency identification ear tags on cattle, dairy cows, pigs and chickens.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/12/an-end-to-local-meat-sources/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/12/an-end-to-local-meat-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Save My Chickens: Take Action Against NAIS</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Cate Nelson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Farmers Market Fare]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[local food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2009/02/junior.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1614" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2009/02/junior-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="282" height="211" /></a> I’m sitting in my backyard, surrounded by chickens and children.  A couple of dogs periodically pester both species of livestock. <em>(Yes, I did just call my child flock “livestock.”) </em>I’m waiting on the first egg of the day, a pink speckled one from my oldest Americana hen.</p>
<p>This backyard chicken experiment is new to my family, only a 6-month-old endeavor.  We wanted our children to know where food comes from.  We wanted to know that the eggs we ate were from happy chickens.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium">But as the number of small chicken “farmers” pop up in <a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/07/cluckin-about-urban-chickens/">cities</a>, <a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/26/urban-agriculturalist-backyard-chickens/comment-page-1/">suburbs</a>, and rural areas alike, <strong>our collective grand experiment may be in peril.</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2009/02/18/save-my-chickens-take-action-against-nais/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 711 queries in 2.149 seconds. -->