<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; water rights</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/water-rights</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'water rights'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Rainwater Harvesting Legalized in Colorado</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/06/30/rainwater-harvesting-legalized-in-colorado/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/06/30/rainwater-harvesting-legalized-in-colorado/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Becky Striepe</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/06/30/rainwater-harvesting-legalized-in-colorado/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecolocalizer.com/files/2009/03/rain-barrel.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2009/03/rain-barrel.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1327" /></a></p>
<h3><b>Until this year, there were three Western states where it was illegal to have a <a href="">rain barrel</a> in your back yard: <a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/25/who-owns-the-rain/">Washington, Utah, and Colorado</a>.  A change to local laws means we can scratch the latter off the list!</b></h3>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/06/30/rainwater-harvesting-legalized-in-colorado/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/06/30/rainwater-harvesting-legalized-in-colorado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Nuclear Power Plant&#8217;s Water Rights Threaten Endangered Species</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/nuclear-power-plants-water-rights-threaten-endangered-species/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/nuclear-power-plants-water-rights-threaten-endangered-species/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/nuclear-power-plants-water-rights-threaten-endangered-species/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><a rel="attachment wp-att-4525" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/nuclear-power-plants-water-rights-threaten-endangered-species/green-river/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4525" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/06/green-river.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="280" /></a></strong></p>

<p><strong>In southeast Utah rests a peaceful town located on the banks of a peaceful river. Here the Green River flows between two canyons, Gray and Labyrinth, allowing for farming and ranching in an arid desert. Driving through Green River, Utah doesn&#8217;t take but a few moments, including a stop to purchase some mouth-watering melons, for which Green River is famous. But Green River now has a new claim to fame.</strong></p>
<p>Transition Power Development LLC (TPD) has proposed construction of a 2 unit nuclear power plant known as the Blue Castle Project situated just outside of the peaceful town. In order to maintain the 2 unit nuclear power plant, massive amounts of water would be required. The <a href="http://www.kcwcd.com/" target="_blank">Kane County Water Conservancy District</a> (KCWCD) has filed a <a href="http://uraniumwatch.org/transitionpower/kcwcd.89-74_changeapplication.090330.pdf" target="_blank">water-rights application</a> in order to facilitate the project. The application requests 29,600 acre-feet of water, which would be diverted from the Green River, a part of the Colorado River drainage.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/nuclear-power-plants-water-rights-threaten-endangered-species/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/05/nuclear-power-plants-water-rights-threaten-endangered-species/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Who Owns the Rain?</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/25/who-owns-the-rain/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/25/who-owns-the-rain/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Becky Striepe</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/25/who-owns-the-rain/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2009/03/rain-barrel.jpg" alt="" width="550" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1327" /></p>
<h3><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/19/conserving-water-rainbarrel-love/">A rain barrel or two</a> may seem like the perfect solution for watering the garden without waste and without adding to your water bill.  <b>Before you build your rainwater harvesting system, though, you might want to make sure that it&#8217;s legal to do so.</b>  There are three states that say the water that falls from the sky belongs to them, not to just anyone. </h3>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/25/who-owns-the-rain/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/25/who-owns-the-rain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Water Not the Only Weapon Used on Water Forum Protesters</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/24/water-not-the-only-weapon-used-on-water-forum-protesters/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/24/water-not-the-only-weapon-used-on-water-forum-protesters/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Environmentalism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/24/water-not-the-only-weapon-used-on-water-forum-protesters/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/03/peopleswaterforum.jpeg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4369" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/03/peopleswaterforum.jpeg" alt="" width="400" height="223" /></a></p>
<p><strong>While <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/19/police-spray-water-cannons-at-world-water-forum-protesters/" target="_blank">my post earlier this week about police spraying water cannons at World Water Forum protesters was intended to point out the irony</a>, the truth is that the situation in Turkey was out of control, with unprovoked police attacks on peaceful protesters.</strong></p>
<p>In addition to water cannons, police in riot gear <a href="http://www.anarkismo.net/article/12468" target="_blank">fired rubber bullets</a> and <a href="http://i4.democracynow.org/2009/3/23/water_rights_activists_blast_istanbul_world">tear gas</a> into a crowd, arresting 17 Turkish activists and forcing international activists to leave. The group peacefully gathered outside the official forum for the &#8220;People&#8217;s Forum&#8221; formed to oppose the &#8220;commercialization of water.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/24/water-not-the-only-weapon-used-on-water-forum-protesters/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/24/water-not-the-only-weapon-used-on-water-forum-protesters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Turkey Deports Two Activists for Protesting World Water Forum</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/17/turkey-deports-two-activists-for-protesting-world-water-forum/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/17/turkey-deports-two-activists-for-protesting-world-water-forum/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Environmentalism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/17/turkey-deports-two-activists-for-protesting-world-water-forum/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/03/noriskydams.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4312" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/03/noriskydams.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="305" /></a></h3>
<h3>Two peaceful protestors with the environmental nonprofit International Rivers were deported from Turkey today after revealing a banner reading &#8220;No Risky Dams&#8221; just before the conference was set to begin.</h3>

<p>The forum, held every three years, discusses global challenges and solutions to the water crisis. International Rivers advocates alternatives to large dams, which flood large areas, block the flow of rivers, and displace people and animals.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/17/turkey-deports-two-activists-for-protesting-world-water-forum/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/17/turkey-deports-two-activists-for-protesting-world-water-forum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Watching: The Water Front</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/17/watching-the-water-front/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/17/watching-the-water-front/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Becky Striepe</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/17/watching-the-water-front/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>When I was a kid, I remember helping my pops water the garden.  He told me that he&#8217;d seen on the news that water was going to be the most expensive resource on earth.  Eight-year-old me could not believe it!  Water? But it comes from the sky!  Well, I&#8217;m not sure what newscast pops was watching 22 years ago, but that report was pretty much spot on.  With <a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/01/19/conserving-water-rainbarrel-love/">huge areas of the U.S. crippled by drought</a> water is becoming more of a commodity than a right.<br />
<img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2009/03/outofservice.jpg" alt="" width="550" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1297" /></p>
<p>That distinction is the focus of <a href="http://www.waterfrontmovie.com/">The Water Front</a>, a documentary about the residents of Highland Park, Michigan and their struggle to keep a handle on their water rights.  Check out the trailer and more on the film after the jump!</p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/17/watching-the-water-front/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/17/watching-the-water-front/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Shell&#8217;s Plan for Oil Shale Water Faces Stiff Opposition</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/10/shells-plan-for-oil-shale-water-faces-stiff-opposition/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/10/shells-plan-for-oil-shale-water-faces-stiff-opposition/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/10/shells-plan-for-oil-shale-water-faces-stiff-opposition/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/03/yampa_river.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2742 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/03/yampa_river.jpg" alt="yampa river, colorado" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>Shell Oil&#8217;s plan to acquire a junior water right for an 8% stake of Colorado&#8217;s Yampa River average April-to-June flow for oil shale development has been opposed by some twenty-five parties, all submitting <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_11867924">letters of opposition to the District 6 Colorado Water Court</a> in Steamboat Springs.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><span>Among those opposing the plan were a bevy of federal, state, and local governmental agencies, a coal company, and several environmental organizations.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><span>&#8220;Colorado&#8217;s future is the issue here,&#8221; said Roger Singer, the Sierra Club&#8217;s western regional representative, in a statement. &#8220;Do we commit this dwindling resource to energy development?&#8221; </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left">The Yampa River is the only river left in Colorado with unappropriated water.</p>
<p>Shell&#8217;s plan would divert up to 375 feet per second in spring runoff months and pump the water into a new 1,000 acre, 15 billion gallon reservoir. But the <a href="http://ecopolitology.org/2008/08/19/the-infeasability-of-oil-shale-development-in-the-western-us/">viability of oil shale development in the west</a> depends on water <em>and</em> energy - energy that would most likely be provided by new coal-fired generation</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><span>Shell&#8217;s application and the opposition letters will be reviewed by the water court, a process that could take up to a year and a half, </span><span>considering the high number of dissenters. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>Image</strong>: CC Licensed by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/s_mestdagh/">s_medgah</a> at flickr</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/10/shells-plan-for-oil-shale-water-faces-stiff-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Los Angeles Residents March Against Water Privatization</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/04/los-angeles-residents-march-against-water-privatization/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/04/los-angeles-residents-march-against-water-privatization/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Becky Striepe</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/04/los-angeles-residents-march-against-water-privatization/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><b><br />
<h3>L.A. residents are speaking out for sustainable water management at the March for Water on March 22nd.</b></h3>
<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2009/03/water-bottles.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1264" /></p>
<p>Events kick off at 9am at the Los Angeles State Historic Park, and the march is at 10.  The event is bottled-water free, so participants should bring their own reusable containers.  There will be water to refill your bottle at the event.  They&#8217;re also <a href="http://action.foodandwaterwatch.org/t/5915/signUp.jsp?key=4069">looking for volunteers to help outt</a>.  The folks at Food &#38; Water Watch say:</p>
<blockquote><p>Our water is being mismanaged. Without your voice, lawmakers and profiteers will continue to exploit the headlines and win corporate profits and political advantage.</p>
<p>You have two opportunities to join us and show your power. Start the march at 9AM or meet us for the noon celebration.</p>
<p>Organized by a wide coalition promoting responsible and sustainable water use, this march has broad support, but it won&#8217;t work without YOU.</p></blockquote>
<p>They announced the march at a screening of <a href="http://www.flowthefilm.com/">FLOW - Irena Salina&#8217;s award-winning documentary about the world water crisis</a>.  Check out the trailer for FLOW:</p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/04/los-angeles-residents-march-against-water-privatization/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/04/los-angeles-residents-march-against-water-privatization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why James Bond Would Drink Motor Oil Before Drinking Coke</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/19/why-james-bond-would-drink-motor-oil-before-drinking-coke/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/19/why-james-bond-would-drink-motor-oil-before-drinking-coke/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Douglas</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Environmentalism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/19/why-james-bond-would-drink-motor-oil-before-drinking-coke/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/12/coke-quantum-ad.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3605" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/12/coke-quantum-ad.png" alt="" width="500" height="279" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The first time I saw the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuvW6f_IfBs">James Bond Coca-Cola ad</a>, I didn&#8217;t think much about it. But now it turns my spit to bile.</strong></p>

<p>It&#8217;s disgustingly ironic that the owners of the James Bond series would advertise Coke with a film about (spoiler alert) a greenwashing corporation stealing water from the third world. Because that perfectly describes Coca-Cola Inc.</p>
<p>For the past decade, Coke has invested heavily in bottled water. An increasingly health-conscious public, aware of the <a href="http://virtualnick.vox.com/library/post/what-happens-to-your-body-if-you-drink-a-coke-right-now.html">sickening effects of cola</a>, drove down carbonated soft drink sales. Coke responded by <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/news/the-real-thing-cokes-water-comes-straight-from-the-tap-with-a-cool-markup-of-3000-per-cent-571780.html">bottling purified tap water</a> and selling it under the name &#8220;Dasani.&#8221; Thanks to <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B00E3DB1630F933A25750C0A9649C8B63&#38;sec=&#38;spon=&#38;pagewanted=all">healthy sales of &#8220;healthy&#8221; drinks</a> (which according to the <em>New York Times</em> are &#8220;still just sugar water&#8221;), Coca-Cola has enjoyed <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/16/business/coke.php">rising international sales</a>.</p>
<p>Of course there have been setbacks. Coca-Cola recalled Dasani in the United Kingdom after they <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3550063.stm">accidentally poisoned the bottled water</a> with bromate, a possible carcinogen. At least it was only the Dasani that was tainted. In India, one of Coca-Cola&#8217;s fastest growing markets, problems ran deeper.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/19/why-james-bond-would-drink-motor-oil-before-drinking-coke/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/19/why-james-bond-would-drink-motor-oil-before-drinking-coke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>House Stops Water Diversion from the Great Lakes</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/house-stops-water-diversion-from-the-great-lakes/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/house-stops-water-diversion-from-the-great-lakes/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/house-stops-water-diversion-from-the-great-lakes/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>The House has blocked diverting any new water from the Great Lakes and forces bordering states to adhere to new conservation standards.</h3>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3098/2796522180_c0e4fcbd81.jpg" alt="" width="516" height="313" />In a 390-25 vote, the <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/7/23/145815/724">House </a>approved a measure on Tuesday that will increase protection of the <a href="http://www.grist.org/news/2008/09/18/GrLks/index.html">Great Lakes</a> region. It will prohibit any new diversions of the water to other places, and require states that border the lakes to adhere to new conservation standards.</p>
<p>Together, the five <strong>Great Lakes account for 20 percent of the world’s supply of fresh surface water</strong>.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/house-stops-water-diversion-from-the-great-lakes/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/house-stops-water-diversion-from-the-great-lakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>McCain&#8217;s Colorado River Gaffe Might Cost Him Key Western States</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/21/mccain-colorado-river-gaff-could-cost-him-in-key-western-states/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/21/mccain-colorado-river-gaff-could-cost-him-in-key-western-states/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/21/mccain-colorado-river-gaff-could-cost-him-in-key-western-states/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/picture-72.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-739" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/08/picture-72.png" alt="" width="278" height="376" /></a>John McCain <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/schwarzenegger-jumps-on-obamas-proper-tire-inflation-bandwagon/">has again</a> said something to cause his fellow western-state Republicans to wince at his political inexpedience and apparent naivete for the issue at hand. And even though the Senator has now recanted and begun damage control, Democrats are hoping that this one will cost him. Some even argue that the gaff was so severe, he may have just <a href="http://coloradopols.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=D98A03A4BBD860B061DE01FE78E0BBBF?diaryId=7052">lost Colorado</a>.</p>

<p>McCain told <em>The Pueblo Chieftan</em> last week that he wants to renegotiate the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_River_Compact">1922 Colorado River compact</a> to re-appropriate water from the upper basin states, like Colorado, New Mexico and Wyoming, where the river originates and give it to lower basin states like California, and his home state of Arizona. McCain said:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any doubt the major, major issue is water and can be as important as oil. So the compact that is in effect, obviously, needs to be renegotiated over time amongst the interested parties. I think that there&#8217;s a movement amongst the governors to try, if not, quote, renegotiate, certainly adjust to <strong>the new realities of high growth</strong>, of greater demands on a scarcer resource.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><span class="template"><span class="body">“Over my cold, dead, political carcass,” <a href="http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/content/news/stories/2008/08/15/081608_1A_McCain_and_water.html">said</a> Bob Schaffer, a Republican candidate for U.S. Senate.</span></span></strong> “The <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/picture-111.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-746" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/08/picture-111.png" alt="" width="219" height="118" /></a>compact is the only protection Colorado has from several more politically powerful downstream states. Opening it for renegotiation would be the equivalent of a lamb discussing with a pack of wolves what should be on the dinner menu.”</p>
<p><span class="template"><span class="body">John Redifer, political science professor at Mesa State College, <a href="http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/content/news/stories/2008/08/15/081608_1A_McCain_and_water.html">said</a> McCain’s position makes sense in light of Arizona’s needs, but not as a national policy.</span></span> “I wonder if he is running for president of the United States or for something in Arizona when he makes those statements,” Redifer was quoted as saying in the <em>Grand Junction Sentinel</em>. “I’m really kind of surprised that someone running for president … that needs to carry the state of Colorado would make a statement like that.”</p>
<p>Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo. said McCain&#8217;s comment was &#8220;dangerously naive.&#8221; Salazar added, &#8220;It reflects, in my view, a fundamental misunderstanding&#8221; of the importance water politics has in the arid West.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal, also a Democrat, said McCain&#8217;s water comment could provide an opening for Democrats. &#8220;I was absolutely astonished that anybody running for president would suggest it, &#8220;Freudenthal <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/politicswestnews/ci_10254826">said</a>.</p>
<p>No matter which way you slice it, this has the potential to be a big political gaff. The sensitivity of the water issue is such that it can often overwhelm partisan allegiances. Across the American West there&#8217;s an old saying that goes, &#8220;Whiskey&#8217;s for drinkin&#8217; and water&#8217;s for fightin&#8217;&#8221; Sen. McCain should have known better. Water in the Colorado Basin is not something that one tosses around with such disregard for its importance to upper basin users. A point that will certainly be hammered home next week in Denver at the Democratic National Convention.</p>
<h3>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/20/canadian-groups-battle-large-scale-hydropower-bound-for-us-electricity-markets/">Canadian Groups Battle Large-Scale Hydro Bound for US Electricity Markets</a></strong></li>
<li><strong><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/23/bush-administration-proposes-fire-sale-of-rocky-mountains-for-oil-shale-development/">Bush Administration Proposes &#8216;Fire Sale&#8217; of Rocky Mtns. for Oil Shale Development</a><br />
</strong></li>
<li><strong><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/25/is-colorado-river-becoming-radioactive-from-upstream-uranium-mines/">Is the Colorado River Becoming Radioactive from Upstream Uranium Mines?</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/20/las-vegas-ripping-up-lawns-to-save-water-but-is-it-enough/"><strong>Las Vegas Ripping Up Lawns to Save Water, But is it Enough?</strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gonzo_fan2007/">Gonzo fan2007</a> via flickr under a Creative Commons License</strong></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/21/mccain-colorado-river-gaff-could-cost-him-in-key-western-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Southeast Water Squabbles Continue</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/14/southeast-water-squabbles-continue/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/14/southeast-water-squabbles-continue/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/14/southeast-water-squabbles-continue/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2008/02/lake_lanier_satellite_map.jpg" alt='Lake Lanier, the main water source for Atlanta, Georgia.' />Alabama, Georgia and Florida are expected to miss their Friday, Feb. 15, deadline for reaching a regional water-sharing agreement, the <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iYOMIAzXREFVjcYtNagkheasCXwAD8UQA9801">Associated Press reported today.</a></p>
<p>The states have been squabbling for years, and the situation only grew worse as last year&#8217;s drought drove levels at Lake Lanier &#8212; Atlanta&#8217;s main water supply &#8212; perilously low. When that happened, Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue did more than pray for rain (though he did that, too): he asked the feds to let his state hold back more water in its reservoirs rather than maintain federally mandated river flows into Alabama and Florida.</p>
<p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/14/southeast-water-squabbles-continue/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/14/southeast-water-squabbles-continue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 441 queries in 0.912 seconds. -->