<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; wyoming</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/wyoming</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'wyoming'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Top 10 Ways To Go Paperless</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/20/top-10-ways-to-go-paperless/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/20/top-10-ways-to-go-paperless/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sonya</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Home and Green Cleaning]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Environmental Topics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/20/top-10-ways-to-go-paperless/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/files/2009/04/image001tree1.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-3631" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2009/04/image001tree1-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>It can be challenging going <strong>paperless</strong> at <strong>home</strong> or <strong>work</strong>, right?</p>
<p>One Jackson Hole, Wyoming business, <a href="http://www.wordenpr.com"><strong>WordenGroup Strategic Public Relations</strong></a>, has announced a <strong>“Go Paperless”</strong> initiative for  <strong><a href="http://www.arborday.org/arborday" target="_blank">Arbor Day</a>, April 24, 2009</strong>.</p>
<p>The company wants to reduce office <strong>paper flow</strong> and save <strong>trees</strong> in honor of the  national tree planting holiday.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/20/top-10-ways-to-go-paperless/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/20/top-10-ways-to-go-paperless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Wyoming Gov. Calls Salazar&#8217;s Wind Power Remarks &#8216;Dumb&#8217;</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/11/wyoming-gov-calls-salazars-wind-power-remarks-dumb/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/11/wyoming-gov-calls-salazars-wind-power-remarks-dumb/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/11/wyoming-gov-calls-salazars-wind-power-remarks-dumb/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/04/windcoal_rpeschetz.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2929 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/04/windcoal_rpeschetz.jpg" alt="smokestack and wind turbine at power plant" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<h3>Freudenthal says replacing coal with wind &#8220;Ain&#8217;t going to happen&#8221;</h3>
<p>In response to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar&#8217;s recent comments that the offshore wind energy resource in the United States <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/07/dept-of-interior-offshore-wind-could-meet-100-of-us-demand/">could potentially provide 25% of our electricity</a> and replace the need for coal-fired power generation, Wyoming Governor Dave Freudenthal balked, telling reporters: &#8220;Ain&#8217;t going to happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>At an impromptu press conference in Cheyenne on Wednesday, <a href="http://www.trib.com/articles/2009/04/08/news/wyoming/5d385b70f7d0dc31872575930001e854.txt">Freudenthal said</a> Salazar&#8217;s comments were a &#8220;dumb thing to say,&#8221; and said he hoped Salazar would learn the wisdom of &#8220;not making gratuitous statements.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wyoming is the biggest coal-producing state in the U.S., producing more than 450 million tons of coal in 2007, or nearly 40 percent of the country&#8217;s coal.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/11/wyoming-gov-calls-salazars-wind-power-remarks-dumb/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/11/wyoming-gov-calls-salazars-wind-power-remarks-dumb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Duke Energy Plans Third Wyoming Wind Farm, Latest Step on Renewable Path</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/01/duke-energy-plans-third-wyoming-wind-farm-latest-step-on-renewable-path/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/01/duke-energy-plans-third-wyoming-wind-farm-latest-step-on-renewable-path/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Tyler</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/01/duke-energy-plans-third-wyoming-wind-farm-latest-step-on-renewable-path/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/04/wyomingwind.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2432" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/04/wyomingwind.jpg" alt="Duke Energy announced plans to add more wind turbines in Wyoming" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>Duke Energy said today it will build <a href="http://sev.prnewswire.com/null/20090401/CL9245001042009-1.html">a third wind farm</a> in Wyoming and the Charlotte, N.C., based company plans to have the facility online by the end of this year.</p>
<p> The <span class="content">Silver Sage Windpower Project will generate 42 megawatts of electricity with 20 2.1 MW </span><span class="content">Suzlon wind turbines. It will join Duke&#8217;s </span><span class="content">29-MW Happy Jack Windpower Project in Cheyenne and the 99-MW Campbell Hill Windpower Project near Casper which should also be online by year&#8217;s end.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/01/duke-energy-plans-third-wyoming-wind-farm-latest-step-on-renewable-path/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/01/duke-energy-plans-third-wyoming-wind-farm-latest-step-on-renewable-path/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Oil Shale: Saving Grace or Environmental Catastrophe?</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/28/oil-shale/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/28/oil-shale/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Wojnovich</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/28/oil-shale/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1269" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/02/rocky-mountains.jpg" alt="The Rocky Mountains" width="500" height="375" />Did you know that the Rocky Mountains contain more oil than Saudi Arabia? Most people don’t. The problem is that, unlike the easily accessed and processed oceans of liquid oil under Middle Eastern sands, the Rocky Mountains’ petroleum is found in rocks called oil shale. <a href="http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/oilshale/index.cfm" target="_blank">Oil shale</a>, which must be mined, is a type of sedimentary rock that releases oil when heated in specific types of chemical processes. The problem, according to environmental groups, is that producing energy from oil shale is even less environmentally friendly than using normal, liquid oil or even coal.</h4>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/28/oil-shale/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/28/oil-shale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Wyoming Ranchers Contest Proposed Prairie Dog Protection</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/wyoming-ranchers-contest-proposed-prairie-dog-protection/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/wyoming-ranchers-contest-proposed-prairie-dog-protection/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/wyoming-ranchers-contest-proposed-prairie-dog-protection/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/02/prairiedog.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3925" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/02/prairiedog.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="278" /></a></p>
<p><strong>While the federal government debates adding the black-tailed prairie dog to the endangered species list, ranchers in Wyoming are speaking out against the idea, claiming any protection for the animal would threaten their livelihood.</strong></p>
<p><span>The US Fish and Wildlife Service has concluded that the prairie dog&#8217;s population is only 20 percent of its original size. The agency is expected to decide whether the species warrants protection in March, but ranchers are looking to have their voices heard.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/wyoming-ranchers-contest-proposed-prairie-dog-protection/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/wyoming-ranchers-contest-proposed-prairie-dog-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>2,000 MW Wind Farm Will Send Power from Wyoming to Southern California</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/30/2000-mw-wind-farm-will-send-power-from-wyoming-to-southern-california/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/30/2000-mw-wind-farm-will-send-power-from-wyoming-to-southern-california/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/30/2000-mw-wind-farm-will-send-power-from-wyoming-to-southern-california/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3114/2478601521_f1d157989c.jpg?v=0" alt="vestas turbine stock photo" width="200" height="306" />Add the name of Denver billionaire Philip Anschutz to the growing list of investors throwing their hats into the ring of a booming wind energy and transmission industry in the American west.</p>
<p>The Anschutz Corp. said Tuesday it has acquired the rights to a proposed $3 billion, 3,000-megawatt transmission project that will bring electricity from Wyoming to Southern California, Las Vegas and Phoenix.</p>
<p>The 900-mile TransWest Express Project will carry power from a 2,000-megawatt wind farm Anschutz is developing in south-central Wyoming, a<span> large portion of which will be built on a ranch he has owned for about 15 years. </span></p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/30/2000-mw-wind-farm-will-send-power-from-wyoming-to-southern-california/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/30/2000-mw-wind-farm-will-send-power-from-wyoming-to-southern-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Drought Causing Old Faithful to be Less Faithful</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/06/10/drought-causing-old-faithful-to-be-less-faithful/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/06/10/drought-causing-old-faithful-to-be-less-faithful/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Other Green Topics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/06/10/drought-causing-old-faithful-to-be-less-faithful/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoscraps.com/files/2008/06/39390879_9195b36d2f.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-672" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/06/39390879_9195b36d2f.jpg" alt="" width="297" height="396" /></a>A new study suggests that geysers, like Old Faithful, are affected by climate conditions, such as droughts. Shaul Hurwitz, a researcher with the U.S. Geological Survey, Ashish Kumar, a Stanford University statistician, and two National Park Service scientists have discovered that changes in the supply of underground water to a geyser can influence the amount of time between eruptions.  &#8220;Coupled with this decrease in precipitation, we see an increase in eruption intervals with all the geysers we analyzed,&#8221; explained Hurwitz.</p>
<p>Image credit:  <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tiarescott/39390879/" target="_blank">tiarescott at Flickr</a> under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en" target="_blank">Creative Commons license</a></p>
<p>Via:  <a href="http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2008/06/04/news/wyoming/doc48469fcdaa2b6592064377.txt" target="_blank">Casper Star-Tribune</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/06/10/drought-causing-old-faithful-to-be-less-faithful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Wyoming Passes Carbon Capture &#38; Sequestration Legislation</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/18/wyoming-passes-carbon-capture-sequestration-legislation/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/18/wyoming-passes-carbon-capture-sequestration-legislation/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/18/wyoming-passes-carbon-capture-sequestration-legislation/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Law Helps Smooth Way For &#8220;Clean Coal&#8221;</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/freudenthal_wy_gov_compressed.jpg" title="freudenthal_wy_gov_compressed.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/03/freudenthal_wy_gov_compressed.jpg" alt="dave freudenthal, wyoming, global warming, greenhouse-gasses, coal, carbon-capture, split-estate, clean-coal, carbon-capture-and-sequestration" /></a></p>
<p>Last week, Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal  signed a bill that recognizes that <strong>surface owners control the underground pore spaces where carbon dioxide could be stored or sequestered</strong>.  A companion bill, gives the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality the authority to regulate the long-term storage of carbon dioxide.</p>
<p><em>“With the signing of these two bills today, Wyoming puts itself in the forefront of carbon sequestration legislation. This is a forward-thinking approach to protect both Wyoming’s economy and Wyoming’s environment.</em>”  Gov. Freudenthal called the legislation a &#8220;groundbreaking&#8221; framework for carbon capture and sequestration</p>
<p>Earlier this year, Freudenthal told the Joint Judiciary Interim Committee that the Wyoming Legislature had an opportunity to lead the nation in regulating long-term carbon capture and sequestration.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/18/wyoming-passes-carbon-capture-sequestration-legislation/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/18/wyoming-passes-carbon-capture-sequestration-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Coal Plants Cancelled in Wyoming</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2007/12/19/coal-plants-cancelled-in-wyoming/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2007/12/19/coal-plants-cancelled-in-wyoming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maria Surma Manka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2007/12/19/coal-plants-cancelled-in-wyoming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2007/12/no-to-coal.jpg" title="no to coal"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2007/12/no-to-coal.jpg" alt="no to coal" align="left" height="261" width="261" /></a> I may begin to sound like a broken record here, but yet another coal plant has been pulled because of global warming-related concerns.</p>
<p>Back in October, the Kansas Department of Health <a href="http://mariasurmamanka.greenoptions.com/2007/10/22/kansas-kills-coal-plants/">denied</a> a coal plant permit solely because of its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (CO2 is a major contributor to global warming). Not long after, Washington state <a href="http://sustainablog.org/2007/12/03/washington-rejects-coal-plants-plan-to-make-a-plan/">rejected</a> a coal plant because of its climate change pollution.</p>
<p>The most recent example hails from Wyoming, where two coal plants planned for the southwestern area of the state have been pulled because of concerns about global warming regulation.  Specifically, the uncertainty of what sort of CO2 regulation will ultimately be decided upon makes utilities and investors nervous about putting money into a technology that will likely be costlier in the near future.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2007/12/19/coal-plants-cancelled-in-wyoming/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2007/12/19/coal-plants-cancelled-in-wyoming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>85 Year Old &#8220;War&#8221; Over Colorado River Water Ends</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/14/85-year-old-war-over-colorado-river-water-ends/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/14/85-year-old-war-over-colorado-river-water-ends/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/14/85-year-old-war-over-colorado-river-water-ends/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/hoover_dam_pictures_t2700.jpg" title="hoover_dam_pictures_t2700.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2007/12/hoover_dam_pictures_t2700.jpg" alt="hoover_dam_pictures_t2700.jpg" align="left" /></a>It&#8217;s been going on since 1922, seven western states staking their claims on Colorado River Water.  For years, a sometimes divisive battle has raged as Colorado, Utah, California, Arizona, Wyoming, Nevada and New Mexico all said they weren&#8217;t getting their share of the precious liquid.</p>
<p>It came to an end in Las Vegas, when representatives of the seven states inked their signatures to a 20 year water-use agreement that now supersedes the 1922 pact.</p>
<p>The plan resolves several legal issues among water agencies and formalized rules fostering cooperation during drought conditions now ongoing in the region.  The states are promising consultation and negotiation before litigation on Colorado River water issues.  What a concept.</p>
<p>Three lower-basin states, Arizona, California and Nevada will use the Lake Mead reservoir behind Hoover Dam to store water they won&#8217;t use or need right now.  Thirty million people depend on water in that region, especially in Southern California, where 26 cities and water districts serve about 18 million customers.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/14/85-year-old-war-over-colorado-river-water-ends/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/14/85-year-old-war-over-colorado-river-water-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 390 queries in 1.073 seconds. -->