<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; yampa river</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/yampa-river</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'yampa river'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Shell&#8217;s Plan for Oil Shale Water Faces Stiff Opposition</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/10/shells-plan-for-oil-shale-water-faces-stiff-opposition/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/10/shells-plan-for-oil-shale-water-faces-stiff-opposition/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken salazar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yampa river]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/10/shells-plan-for-oil-shale-water-faces-stiff-opposition/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/03/yampa_river.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2742 aligncenter" src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/03/yampa_river.jpg" alt="yampa river, colorado" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>Shell Oil&#8217;s plan to acquire a junior water right for an 8% stake of Colorado&#8217;s Yampa River average April-to-June flow for oil shale development has been opposed by some twenty-five parties, all submitting <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_11867924">letters of opposition to the District 6 Colorado Water Court</a> in Steamboat Springs.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><span>Among those opposing the plan were a bevy of federal, state, and local governmental agencies, a coal company, and several environmental organizations.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><span>&#8220;Colorado&#8217;s future is the issue here,&#8221; said Roger Singer, the Sierra Club&#8217;s western regional representative, in a statement. &#8220;Do we commit this dwindling resource to energy development?&#8221; </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left">The Yampa River is the only river left in Colorado with unappropriated water.</p>
<p>Shell&#8217;s plan would divert up to 375 feet per second in spring runoff months and pump the water into a new 1,000 acre, 15 billion gallon reservoir. But the <a href="http://ecopolitology.org/2008/08/19/the-infeasability-of-oil-shale-development-in-the-western-us/">viability of oil shale development in the west</a> depends on water <em>and</em> energy &#8211; energy that would most likely be provided by new coal-fired generation</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><span>Shell&#8217;s application and the opposition letters will be reviewed by the water court, a process that could take up to a year and a half, </span><span>considering the high number of dissenters. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>Image</strong>: CC Licensed by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/s_mestdagh/">s_medgah</a> at flickr</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/10/shells-plan-for-oil-shale-water-faces-stiff-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 41 queries in 0.443 seconds. -->